AzTrials
AzTrials

AnxietyPANICNCT04875572

Associations Between Analgesia Nociception Index and Preoperative Anxiety

A study testing Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) Monitor in people with Anxiety and Opioid Consumption, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The management and prediction of pain is one of the most crucial jobs for anesthetists. It has been shown that a patient's ability to remain calm during stressful situations is related to their post-surgical pain scores. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Anxiety, Opioid Consumption, Cesarean Section
What is being tested?
Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) Monitor
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
17 Feb 2021to 27 Sep 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 19 years of age or older.
  • Patient receiving an uncomplicated, scheduled caesarean section
  • Patient with a normal sinus rhythm

Who cannot join

  • Presentation with cardiac arrhythmia
  • Contraindications to neuraxial analgesia (ex. patient refusal, infection at the site of injection, uncorrected hypovolemia, allergy, increased intracranial pressure, coagulopathy, sepsis, fixed cardiac output states, or indeterminate neurological status), or risk factors likely to affect placement or function of the spinal needle (ex. previous back surgery, significant uncorrected scoliosis, or morbid obesity (BMI >40))
  • History of hypersensitivity or idiosyncratic reaction to local anesthetics or opioids
  • Current or historical evidence of any significant medical conditions, including diseases of pregnancy
  • Clinical settings in which general anesthesia may be preferable (ex. patient with failed regional anesthetic, patient with history of bleeding, fetal shoulder dystocia etc.)
  • Anticipated fetal abnormalities

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • BC Women's Hospital

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3N1

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Association of Analgesia Nociceptive Index With Preoperative Anxiety: A Prospective Observational Study

The management and prediction of pain is one of the most crucial jobs for anesthetists. It has been shown that a patient's ability to remain calm during stressful situations is related to their post-surgical pain scores. The MetroDoloris Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) monitor is a heart-rate monitor that provides us with a number which reflects a patient's state of relaxation (or parasympathetic tone). For this reason, the investigators are testing whether ANI can be used as a metric for perioperative anxiety, and a predictive tool for pain after c-sections.

Read the detailed description

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the MDoloris ANI monitor as an effective tool for objectively measuring perioperative stress, and as a prediction of post-operative pain.

Hypothesis: High perioperative anxiety scores, high post-operative pain scores, high post-operative anesthetic dosing, and high incidence of provider intervention will be positively correlated with frequency and magnitude of changes in the ANI score.

Justification: Anesthetists are constantly monitoring a patient's heart rate during caesarean sections. This is standard care, and this monitoring provides useful information about a patient's level of sedation, analgesia, and comfort. The ANI monitor takes more heart rate information through two electrodes placed on a patient's chest, and non-invasively provides more information by which anesthetists can improve the patient's standard of care.

Primary Objective: To determine whether the ANI monitor is a viable means of measuring perioperative anxiety during C-sections.

Secondary Objectives:

To determine if the ANI monitor is capable of providing anesthetists with an objective prediction variable for post-operative pain.

Research Methods and Design: Once eligibility is determined , the patient will be approached in the pre-operative waiting area at a time determined by the charge nurse. If they consent to the study, they will be given an validated questionnaire which assesses the patient's level of operative stress. After the survey, they will have the ANI electrodes placed on their chest by a member of the study team. The collection of this pre-surgical data provides the research team with a baseline to which they will compare the operative and post-operative results. Five to ten minutes prior to their surgery, the electrodes will be removed, and the monitor will be brought to the OR. The monitor will be plugged in to an electrical socket far away from areas of high traffic, and will not disturb the flow of OR staff.

During the operation, a member of the study team will constantly watch the ANI monitor to check for optimal connectivity, and will record the events of surgery. A record of the events is critical to interpreting the meaning of the ANI score, as it allows the team to match distinct stimuli with the number produced by the monitor.

The spinal block typically wears off after 24 hours, so at 24- and 48 hours following the c-section, a study team member will approach the patient on the wards, and ask for their resting, and evoked pain scores on a VAS 0-100 mm scale. Evoked pain is pain caused by movement. The investigators have chosen the previously used metric of a change in position: from lying to sitting. If the patient has received drugs for pain already, the investigator will ask them to score the pain they experienced before receiving medication. The study investigator will finally record the provider-administered dose of pain medication from the patient's chart.

Being tested
Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) Monitor
Keywords
Analgesia Nociception Index, Prospective Observational Study
Medical subject headings
Anxiety Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) MonitorDevice

    The ANI monitor produces an objective measure of parasympathetic tone through non-invasive electrodes placed on the patient's chest. The patient's standard of care is not affected, and the anesthetist is blinded to the monitor, so as not to affect their anesthetic practice.

Study groups in NCT04875572
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Study groupExperimentalSince this is a single group study, all patients enrolled will receive the same care, as described in the study description above.
Receives: Device: Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) Monitor

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Validation of Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) score for objective measurement of anxiety

    Association between frequency and magnitude of changes in ANI during the perioperative time period with patient's reported perioperative anxiety scores

    Measured: 25 minutes perioperatively

  2. Validation of ANI score for prediction of post-operative pain 24 hours

    Association between frequency and magnitude of changes in the ANI with patient's reported VAS evoked and resting pain scores at 24h and 48h. Evoked pain is defined as pain experienced from moving from a supine position (where resting pain VAS is measured) to seated position.

    Measured: Pain scores at 24 hours

  3. Validation of ANI score for prediction of post-operative pain 48 hours

    Association between frequency and magnitude of changes in the ANI with patient's reported VAS evoked and resting pain scores at 24h and 48h. Evoked pain is defined as pain experienced from moving from a supine position (where resting pain VAS is measured) to seated position.

    Measured: Pain scores at 48 hours

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Validation of ANI score for prediction of post-operative opioid requirements at 24 hours

    Association between frequency and magnitude of changes in the ANI with patient's total opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents at 24h and 48h

    Measured: Opioid use collected during followup at 24 hours

  2. Validation of ANI score for prediction of post-operative opioid requirements at 48 hours

    Association between frequency and magnitude of changes in the ANI with patient's total opioid consumption in oral morphine equivalents at 24h and 48h

    Measured: Opioid use collected during followup at 48 hours

  3. Absolute ANI score validation at 24 hours

    Determining whether post-partum pain, and operative anxiety are correlated with frequency of absolute ANI score less than 50

    Measured: Pain score recorded 24 hours post partum

  4. Absolute ANI score validation at 48 hours

    Determining whether post-partum pain, and operative anxiety are correlated with frequency of absolute ANI score less than 50

    Measured: Pain score recorded at 48 hours post partum

  5. Percent variability in ANI

    Use of Percent Variability (PV) statistic as a measure of top-down regulation of parasympathetic tone

    Measured: ANI score recorded for 25 minutes perioperatively

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 May 2021
  2. Study start17 Feb 2021
  3. Primary completion27 Sep 2021
  4. Study completion27 Sep 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04875572
Sponsor's protocol ID
H19-03148
Acronym
PANIC
Status last verified
Sep 2021
First submitted
23 Feb 2021
Last updated
1 Oct 2021
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) Monitor in people with Anxiety and Opioid Consumption, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Validation of Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) score for objective measurement of anxiety (time frame: 25 minutes perioperatively). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Oct 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in