AzTrials
AzTrials

Pain, PostoperativePhase 2NCT04864210

Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery - Exparel Study

A Phase 2 study testing Liposomal bupivacaine and Bupivacaine in people with Pain, Postoperative, run by Nada Sadek at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) greatly decreased the number and types of surgery that required open thoracotomy. Initially it was thought that VATS would lead to a reduction of respiratory problems and less acute pain in patients when compared to patients receiving an open thoracic surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Pain, Postoperative
What is being tested?
Liposomal bupivacaine and Bupivacaine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
176 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
2 Feb 2021to 30 Jan 2025
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age over 18 years and less than 80 years
  • Undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) procedure
  • BMI less than 40

Who cannot join

  • Unable to provide informed consent
  • Non-English speaking
  • Pregnant
  • BMI greater than 40
  • Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery pleurodesis subjects
  • Patients with pre-existing chronic pain
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Opioid tolerance
  • Pain syndromes including fibromyalgia, regional pain syndrome or post therapeutic neuralgia in a thoracic distribution
  • Allergy to the study medication
  • Patients with infectious disease
  • Patients with impaired coagulation
  • Severe hepatic disease
  • Incarcerated

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Iowa

    Iowa City, Iowa, 52242

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Analgesia for Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgeries: A Comparison Between Intercostal Blocks With Liposomal Bupivacaine and Paravertebral Blocks With Plain Bupivacaine

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) greatly decreased the number and types of surgery that required open thoracotomy. Initially it was thought that VATS would lead to a reduction of respiratory problems and less acute pain in patients when compared to patients receiving an open thoracic surgery. However, for reasons not clearly understood, a large number of patients who undergo VATS still experience moderate to severe post-surgical pain. Physicians are still faced with the challenge of providing care that will manage both the respiratory issues as well as manage acute pain. The goal of this study is to find the most suitable regimen to effectively manage post-VATS-related pain.

Read the detailed description

The "promise" was that video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) would be associated with less severe pulmonary impairment and less acute post-operative pain compared to open thoracotomy. However, VATS can cause moderate to severe post-operative pain in a significant number of patients and the reason for this is not well understood. In addition it has been found that post-surgical pain can be a strong predictor for the development of chronic pain. Inadequate control of acute pain not only causes serious discomfort and significant respiratory problems, but it may place this population of patients at greater risk of chronic pain and prescription opioid dependence.

Current protocols to manage and/or reduce VATS associated pain include combining the use of regional anesthesia techniques with opioid and non-opioid analgesics. Recent studies have investigated the efficacy of intercostal blocks using liposomal bupivacaine after thoracic surgery. However, these studies lacked an active comparator population of patients.

The study is designed as a prospective randomized study evaluating intercostal blocks using liposomal bupivacaine. The control population of patients will be treated with a paravertebral block using plain bupivacaine.

Being tested
Liposomal bupivacaine, Bupivacaine
Keywords
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), Paravertebral blocks, Liposomal Bupivacaine (Exparel)
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Liposomal bupivacaineDrug

    Surgeons will perform an intercostal nerve block in the operating room under thoracoscopic guidance while the patient is asleep under anesthesia. This intervention (block) is one of the standards of care but the medication (liposomal bupivacaine) currently is not FDA approved for this type of block.

  • BupivacaineDrug

    An anesthesiologist trained in regional anesthesia will perform a paravertebral block in the hospital's pain service unit. This intervention is standard of care and will use plain bupivacaine with epinephrine as the medication

Study groups in NCT04864210
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Liposomal bupivacaineExperimentalThe patient will receive an intercostal nerve block by the surgeon in the operating room after anesthetic has been administered. The surgeon will use thoracoscopic guidance to administer the intercostal nerve block. The medication used in this block will liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel).
Receives: Drug: Liposomal bupivacaine
BupivacaineActive comparatorThe patient will receive a paravertebral block by the anesthesiologist staffing the pain service area within the hospital prior to surgery. This regional anesthesia will be done using ultrasound guidance. The medication used in this block will be plain bupivacaine with epinephrine.
Receives: Drug: Bupivacaine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Subjects With Post-operative Opioid Usage

    The number of subjects who utilized opioid medications in the first 48 hours after surgery

    Measured: Up to 48 hours post procedure

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Measure Lung Function

    Using an incentive spirometer device, the amount of air volume inhaled and exhaled by the lungs post VATS procedure. The subject will be asked to do 3 attempts in succession and the number recorded will be the average of the 3 attempts. The air volume inhaled is measured on a scale from near 0 to 2500 milliliters with the low number indicating little air movement whereas 2500 milliliters indicates good air flow. These results will be compared to the volume determined at baseline prior to surgery.

    Measured: Up to 24 hours post procedure

  2. Measure Post-operative Opioid Consumption Following Discharge From the Hospital

    Patients will be asked to keep a pain medication diary to record their use of opioid and non-opioid medications for pain control.

    Measured: Up to 6 months post procedure.

  3. Post-operative Numerical Rating Scores After Discharge From the Hospital

    Using a numerical rating scale, patients will be asked to report their pain level. The scale is from 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain and 10 representing the most intense pain. The goal for measuring after acute hospitalization is to determine if the patient is experiencing the onset of chronic pain.

    Measured: Up to 6 months post procedure.

  4. Post-operative Acute Pain Numerical Rating Scores

    Using a numerical rating scale (0-10), patients will be asked to report their pain level. The scale is from 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain and 10 representing the most intense pain.

    Measured: Up to 24 hours post procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Apr 2021
  2. Study start2 Feb 2021
  3. Primary completion1 Aug 2024
  4. Study completion30 Jan 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
176 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04864210
Sponsor's protocol ID
201901777
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
22 Feb 2021
Last updated
6 May 2026
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All of the individual participant data (IPD) collected during the trial, after deidentification will be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal, to achieve aims in the approved proposal. IPD will be available for sharing immediately after publication and ending 5 years following article publication.

Publications

  • Bayman EO, Parekh KR, Keech J, Larson N, Vander Weg M, Brennan TJ. Preoperative Patient Expectations of Postoperative Pain Are Associated with Moderate to Severe Acute Pain After VATS. Pain Med. 2019 Mar 1;20(3):543-554. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny096.

    PubMed 29878248
  • Bayman EO, Parekh KR, Keech J, Selte A, Brennan TJ. A Prospective Study of Chronic Pain after Thoracic Surgery. Anesthesiology. 2017 May;126(5):938-951. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001576.

    PubMed 28248713
  • Furrer M, Rechsteiner R, Eigenmann V, Signer C, Althaus U, Ris HB. Thoracotomy and thoracoscopy: postoperative pulmonary function, pain and chest wall complaints. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997 Jul;12(1):82-7. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(97)00105-x.

    PubMed 9262085
  • Steegers MA, Snik DM, Verhagen AF, van der Drift MA, Wilder-Smith OH. Only half of the chronic pain after thoracic surgery shows a neuropathic component. J Pain. 2008 Oct;9(10):955-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.05.009. Epub 2008 Jul 16.

    PubMed 18632308
  • Steinthorsdottir KJ, Wildgaard L, Hansen HJ, Petersen RH, Wildgaard K. Regional analgesia for video-assisted thoracic surgery: a systematic review. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Jun;45(6):959-66. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt525. Epub 2013 Nov 27.

    PubMed 24288340
  • Adhikary SD, Pruett A, Forero M, Thiruvenkatarajan V. Erector spinae plane block as an alternative to epidural analgesia for post-operative analgesia following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A case study and a literature review on the spread of local anaesthetic in the erector spinae plane. Indian J Anaesth. 2018 Jan;62(1):75-78. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_693_17.

    PubMed 29416155
  • Shariat A, Bhatt H. Successful Use of Serratus Plane Block as Primary Anesthetic for Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS)-Assisted Pleural Effusion Drainage. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018 Feb;32(1):e31-e32. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.10.038. Epub 2017 Oct 31. No abstract available.

    PubMed 29199049
  • Khalil KG, Boutrous ML, Irani AD, Miller CC 3rd, Pawelek TR, Estrera AL, Safi HJ. Operative Intercostal Nerve Blocks With Long-Acting Bupivacaine Liposome for Pain Control After Thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Dec;100(6):2013-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.08.017. Epub 2015 Oct 24.

    PubMed 26507422
  • Parascandola SA, Ibanez J, Keir G, Anderson J, Plankey M, Flynn D, Cody C, De Marchi L, Margolis M, Blair Marshall M. Liposomal bupivacaine versus bupivacaine/epinephrine after video-assisted thoracoscopic wedge resectiondagger. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Jun 1;24(6):925-930. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx044.

    PubMed 28329326
  • Rice DC, Cata JP, Mena GE, Rodriguez-Restrepo A, Correa AM, Mehran RJ. Posterior Intercostal Nerve Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine: An Alternative to Thoracic Epidural Analgesia. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;99(6):1953-60. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.02.074. Epub 2015 Apr 23.

    PubMed 25912739

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Liposomal bupivacaine and Bupivacaine in people with Pain, Postoperative, run by Nada Sadek at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 May 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Subjects With Post-operative Opioid Usage (time frame: Up to 48 hours post procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04864210, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery - Exparel Study | AzTrials