DyslipidemiasNCT04861545
Meta-analyses of Soy Protein and Its Food Sources for Cholesterol Reduction
An observational study of Dyslipidemias and Cardiovascular Risk Factor, run by John Sievenpiper at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Although soy protein has approved health claims in Canada and the US, and is recognized by major cardiovascular clinical practice guidelines for the reduction of cholesterol and risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), these claims are based almost exclusively on evidence from foods containing isolated soy protein (ISP). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Dyslipidemias, Cardiovascular Risk Factor, Dysglycemia
- What is being tested?
- Soy
- How many people
- 1 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 1 May 2021to 15 May 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adults with and without dyslipidemia
Who may be able to join
- Randomized controlled trials
- Soy protein (Isolated soy protein and non-isolated soy protein) intervention
- Non-soy protein containing comparator
- Intervention duration ≥ 3 weeks
- Data for at least 1 outcome
Who cannot join
- Non-human studies
- Observational studies
- Acute single-bolus feeding studies
- Participants <18 years of age
- Interventions of soy derivatives or extracts (i.e. soy oil, sterols, etc)
- No quantification of soy protein in intervention
Show all 10Show fewer
- Multimodal interventions
- Lack of a suitable comparator (i.e. a comparator arm that contains soy protein)
- Intervention duration < 3 weeks
- No viable outcome data
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
The Toronto 3D (Diet, Digestive tract and Disease) Knowledge Synthesis and Clinical Trials Unit, Clinical Nutrition and Risk Factor Modification Centre, St. Micheal's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5C 2T2
About this study
Official title: Effect of Soy Protein and Its Food Sources on Established Therapeutic Blood Lipid Targets: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Although soy protein has approved health claims in Canada and the US, and is recognized by major cardiovascular clinical practice guidelines for the reduction of cholesterol and risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), these claims are based almost exclusively on evidence from foods containing isolated soy protein (ISP). The role of other non-ISP food sources of soy protein (e.g Tofu, tempeh, edamame) in these effects is unclear. The role of food form and matrix (e.g soy beverage versus meat analogue) on the effects of ISP is also unclear. As national dietary guidelines and clinical practice guidelines for nutrition therapy shift from a focus on single nutrients to a focus on foods and dietary patterns, it is important to understand whether non-ISP food sources of soy protein and ISP food sources with different food matrices produce the same reductions in LDL-cholesterol and CHD risk. To strengthen the evidence-base for health claims and guidelines development, the investigators will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the effect of ISP and non-ISP food sources of soy protein on stablished lipid targets in individuals with and without dyslipidemia.
Read the detailed description
RATIONALE. Although soy protein has approved health claims in Canada and the US and is recognized by major cardiovascular clinical practice guidelines for the reduction of cholesterol and risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), these claims are based almost exclusively on evidence from foods containing isolated soy protein (ISP). The role of other non-ISP food sources of soy protein (e.g Tofu, tempeh, edamame) in these effects is unclear. The role of food form and matrix (e.g soy beverage versus meat analogue) on the effects of ISP is also unclear. As national dietary guidelines and clinical practice guidelines for nutrition therapy shift from a focus on single nutrients to a focus on foods and dietary patterns, it is important to understand whether non-ISP food sources of soy protein and ISP food sources with different food matrices produce the same reductions in LDL-cholesterol and CHD risk. The investigators are not aware of any systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials that have addressed this important question.
OBJECTIVES. To conduct a systematic review of the effect of soy protein with prespecified analyses by food source on established lipid targets in individuals with and without dyslipidemia and assess the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. A sub-objective is to conduct a targeted systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of exclusively ISP on established lipid targets in individuals with and without dyslipidemia for use in the development of Health Claims submissions in Australia and New Zealand by co-investigator, Dr. Alan Barclay.
DESIGN. The systematic review and meta-analyses will be conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and reported according to the Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).
DATA SOURCES. Medline, Embase, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Clinical Trials; CENTRAL) will be searched using appropriate search terms supplemented by manual searches of references of included studies.
STUDY SELECTION. Randomized controlled trials of ≥3-weeks (based on the FDA minimum follow-up requirement) assessing the effect of soy protein food sources compared with a suitable non-soy-containing control on lipids will be included.
DATA EXTRACTION. Two or more investigators will independently extract relevant data. Authors will be contacted for additional information and any missing data will be computed/imputed using standard formulae.
RISK OF BIAS. Two or more investigators will independently assess risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.
OUTCOMES. The primary outcome will be LDL-C and secondary outcomes will be other established therapeutic lipid targets: HDL-C, TG, TC, non-HDL-C and apo B.
DATA SYNTHESIS. Data will be pooled using the Generic Inverse Variance method with prespecified analyses by food source. Separate pooled analyses will be conducted for ISP to meet the subobjective of assessing the effect of ISP. Random effects models will be used with paired analyses applied to crossover designs. Heterogeneity will be assessed (Cochran Q statistic) and quantified (I2 statistic). Sources of heterogeneity will be explored by sensitivity analyses and a priori subgroup analyses (dose, comparator, follow-up, baseline levels, design, body weight change, saturated fat intake, and risk of bias). Meta-regression will assess the significance of subgroup analyses. Linear and nonlinear dose-response analyses will be assessed by generalized least squares trend (GLST) estimation models and spline curve modelling (MKSPLINE procedure), respectively. Publication bias will be assessed by inspection of funnel plots and the Egger and Begg tests. Adjustment for evidence of funnel plot asymmetry or small study effects will be conducted by the Duval and Tweedie trim-and-fill method.
GRADE ASSESSMENT. To assess the certainty of the evidence, the investigators will use the GRADE system, an evidence-based grading system adopted by >100 organizations (http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/). It grades the evidence as high, moderate, low or very low quality based on the study design and a series of downgrades (risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, publication bias) and upgrades (large magnitude of the effect, dose-response gradient, and attenuation by confounding). The investigators will follow the GRADE handbook (https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html) and use the GRADEpro GDT (gradepro.org) software.
KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION PLAN. The investigators will follow the Ottawa model of Research for knowledge translation. The results will be disseminated through interactive presentations at local, national, and international scientific meetings and publication in high impact journals. Target audiences will include public health and clinical communities with an interest in nutrition and cardiovascular disease. Feedback will be incorporated and used to improve public health messages and key areas for future research will be defined. The PIs will network among opinion leaders to increase awareness and participate directly in the development of future guidelines.
SIGNIFICANCE. The proposed project will reinforce the role of the all soy protein food sources (not just ISP-containing food sources) for cholesterol and CHD risk reduction, strengthening the evidence-base for health claims and guidelines development in the U.S., Canada, Europe, and beyond and improving health outcomes, by educating healthcare providers and patients, stimulating industry innovation, and guiding future research design.
- Conditions
- Dyslipidemias, Cardiovascular Risk Factor, Dysglycemia
- Being tested
- Soy
- Keywords
- Cardiovascular disease, Coronary heart disease, LDL-Cholesterol, HDL-Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Apolipoprotein B, Soy protein, Isolated soy protein, Meta-analysis, Randomized controlled trial, Total Cholesterol
- Medical subject headings
- Dyslipidemias, Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SoyOther
Also called Isolated soy protein food sources, Non-Isolated soy protein food sources of soy protein
Isolated soy protein food sources are foods that include isolated soy protein in different forms and matrix (e.g. soy beverage and meat analogue).
Non-isolated soy protein food sources of soy protein are foods made with soy (e.g. Tofu, tempeh, edamame).
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Blood lipids - LDL-Cholesterol (LDL-C)
LDL-C mean difference and 95%CIs in mmol/L
Measured: ≥ 3 weeks
Secondary outcomes (5)
Blood lipids - HDL-Cholesterol (HDL-C)
HDL-C mean difference and 95% CI in mmol/L
Measured: ≥ 3 weeks
Blood lipids - Triglycerides (TG)
TG mean difference and 95% CI in mmol/L
Measured: ≥ 3 weeks
Blood lipids - Total Cholesterol (TC)
TC mean difference and 95% CI in mmol/L
Measured: ≥ 3 weeks
Blood lipids - Non-HDL-Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)
Non-HDL-C mean difference and 95% CI in mmol/L
Measured: ≥ 3 weeks
Blood lipids - Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)
Apo B mean difference and 95% CI in g/L
Measured: ≥ 3 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Apr 2021
- Study start1 May 2021
- Primary completion15 May 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion15 May 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for DyslipidemiasStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- John Sievenpiper
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, John Sievenpiper, University of Toronto
- Investigators
- John L Sievenpiper, MD,PhD,FRCPC, Principal investigator, University of TorontoDavid JA Jenkins, MD,DSc,FRSC, Principal investigator, University of TorontoCyril WC Kendall, PhD, Study chair, University of TorontoAlan Barclay, PhD, Study chair, University of Sydney
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04861545
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Dupont - Soy protein/ISP
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 22 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 13 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: There is no individual data collected. However, data from all included studies will be published in the manuscript and supplementary material
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Soy Protein and Its Food Sources on Established Therapeutic Blood Lipid Targets: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04861545
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Dupont - Soy protein/ISP
- Conditions
- Dyslipidemias, Cardiovascular Risk Factor, Dysglycemia
- Keywords
- Cardiovascular disease, Coronary heart disease, LDL-Cholesterol, HDL-Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Apolipoprotein B, Soy protein, Isolated soy protein
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- John SievenpiperUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 May 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 May 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Although soy protein has approved health claims in Canada and the US, and is recognized by major cardiovascular clinical practice guidelines for the reduction of cholesterol and risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), these claims are based almost exclusively on evidence from foods containing isolated soy protein (ISP). The role of other non-ISP food sources of soy protein (e.g Tofu, tempeh, edamame) in these effects is unclear. The role of food form and matrix (e.g soy beverage versus meat analogue) on the effects of ISP is also unclear. As national dietary guidelines and clinical practice guidelines for nutrition therapy shift from a focus on single nutrients to a focus on foods and dietary patterns, it is important to understand whether non-ISP food sources of soy protein and ISP food sources with different food matrices produce the same reductions in LDL-cholesterol and CHD risk. To strengthen the evidence-base for health claims and guidelines development, the investigators will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the effect of ISP and non-ISP food sources of soy protein on stablished lipid targets in individuals with and without dyslipidemia.
Detailed description
RATIONALE. Although soy protein has approved health claims in Canada and the US and is recognized by major cardiovascular clinical practice guidelines for the reduction of cholesterol and risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), these claims are based almost exclusively on evidence from foods containing isolated soy protein (ISP). The role of other non-ISP food sources of soy protein (e.g Tofu, tempeh, edamame) in these effects is unclear. The role of food form and matrix (e.g soy beverage versus meat analogue) on the effects of ISP is also unclear. As national dietary guidelines and clinical practice guidelines for nutrition therapy shift from a focus on single nutrients to a focus on foods and dietary patterns, it is important to understand whether non-ISP food sources of soy protein and ISP food sources with different food matrices produce the same reductions in LDL-cholesterol and CHD risk. The investigators are not aware of any systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials that have addressed this important question.
OBJECTIVES. To conduct a systematic review of the effect of soy protein with prespecified analyses by food source on established lipid targets in individuals with and without dyslipidemia and assess the certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. A sub-objective is to conduct a targeted systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of exclusively ISP on established lipid targets in individuals with and without dyslipidemia for use in the development of Health Claims submissions in Australia and New Zealand by co-investigator, Dr. Alan Barclay.
DESIGN. The systematic review and meta-analyses will be conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and reported according to the Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).
DATA SOURCES. Medline, Embase, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Clinical Trials; CENTRAL) will be searched using appropriate search terms supplemented by manual searches of references of included studies.
STUDY SELECTION. Randomized controlled trials of ≥3-weeks (based on the FDA minimum follow-up requirement) assessing the effect of soy protein food sources compared with a suitable non-soy-containing control on lipids will be included.
DATA EXTRACTION. Two or more investigators will independently extract relevant data. Authors will be contacted for additional information and any missing data will be computed/imputed using standard formulae.
RISK OF BIAS. Two or more investigators will independently assess risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.
OUTCOMES. The primary outcome will be LDL-C and secondary outcomes will be other established therapeutic lipid targets: HDL-C, TG, TC, non-HDL-C and apo B.
DATA SYNTHESIS. Data will be pooled using the Generic Inverse Variance method with prespecified analyses by food source. Separate pooled analyses will be conducted for ISP to meet the subobjective of assessing the effect of ISP. Random effects models will be used with paired analyses applied to crossover designs. Heterogeneity will be assessed (Cochran Q statistic) and quantified (I2 statistic). Sources of heterogeneity will be explored by sensitivity analyses and a priori subgroup analyses (dose, comparator, follow-up, baseline levels, design, body weight change, saturated fat intake, and risk of bias). Meta-regression will assess the significance of subgroup analyses. Linear and nonlinear dose-response analyses will be assessed by generalized least squares trend (GLST) estimation models and spline curve modelling (MKSPLINE procedure), respectively. Publication bias will be assessed by inspection of funnel plots and the Egger and Begg tests. Adjustment for evidence of funnel plot asymmetry or small study effects will be conducted by the Duval and Tweedie trim-and-fill method.
GRADE ASSESSMENT. To assess the certainty of the evidence, the investigators will use the GRADE system, an evidence-based grading system adopted by >100 organizations (http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/). It grades the evidence as high, moderate, low or very low quality based on the study design and a series of downgrades (risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, publication bias) and upgrades (large magnitude of the effect, dose-response gradient, and attenuation by confounding). The investigators will follow the GRADE handbook (https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html) and use the GRADEpro GDT (gradepro.org) software.
KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION PLAN. The investigators will follow the Ottawa model of Research for knowledge translation. The results will be disseminated through interactive presentations at local, national, and international scientific meetings and publication in high impact journals. Target audiences will include public health and clinical communities with an interest in nutrition and cardiovascular disease. Feedback will be incorporated and used to improve public health messages and key areas for future research will be defined. The PIs will network among opinion leaders to increase awareness and participate directly in the development of future guidelines.
SIGNIFICANCE. The proposed project will reinforce the role of the all soy protein food sources (not just ISP-containing food sources) for cholesterol and CHD risk reduction, strengthening the evidence-base for health claims and guidelines development in the U.S., Canada, Europe, and beyond and improving health outcomes, by educating healthcare providers and patients, stimulating industry innovation, and guiding future research design.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Other
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adults with and without dyslipidemia
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Randomized controlled trials
- Soy protein (Isolated soy protein and non-isolated soy protein) intervention
- Non-soy protein containing comparator
- Intervention duration ≥ 3 weeks
- Data for at least 1 outcome
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Non-human studies
- Observational studies
- Acute single-bolus feeding studies
- Participants <18 years of age
- Interventions of soy derivatives or extracts (i.e. soy oil, sterols, etc)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SoyAlso: Isolated soy protein food sources, Non-Isolated soy protein food sources of soy proteinIsolated soy protein food sources are foods that include isolated soy protein in different forms and matrix (e.g. soy beverage and meat analogue). Non-isolated soy protein food sources of soy protein are foods made with soy (e.g. Tofu, tempeh, edamame). | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Blood lipids - LDL-Cholesterol (LDL-C)
Time frame: ≥ 3 weeks
LDL-C mean difference and 95%CIs in mmol/L
5 secondary outcomes
Blood lipids - HDL-Cholesterol (HDL-C)
Time frame: ≥ 3 weeks
Blood lipids - Triglycerides (TG)
Time frame: ≥ 3 weeks
Blood lipids - Total Cholesterol (TC)
Time frame: ≥ 3 weeks
Blood lipids - Non-HDL-Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)
Time frame: ≥ 3 weeks
Blood lipids - Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)
Time frame: ≥ 3 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Feb 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. There is no individual data collected. However, data from all included studies will be published in the manuscript and supplementary material
Related trials for Dyslipidemias
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Study Evaluating LDL-C Change and Adherence to Inclisiran Lipid-lowering Therapy in ASCVD
Primary Hypercholesterolemia, Mixed Dyslipidemia
Not yet recruiting
Plasma Lipids-Dependent Vitamin E Metabolism During Dynamic Hyperlipidemia
Lipid Metabolism Disorders
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Longitudinal Cohort Study to Evaluate Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Disease in Haiti
Hypertension, Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Developing a Learning COmmunity to Increase eNgagemeNt and Enrollment in Cardiovascular Clinical Trials (CONNECT)
Cardiovascular Diseases, Hypertension
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Inclisiran to Prevent Cardiovascular Events in High-risk Primary Prevention Patients.
Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
John L Sievenpiper, MD,PhD,FRCPC principal investigator
University of Toronto
David JA Jenkins, MD,DSc,FRSC principal investigator
University of Toronto
Cyril WC Kendall, PhD study chair
University of Toronto
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Dyslipidemias and Cardiovascular Risk Factor, run by John Sievenpiper at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Blood lipids - LDL-Cholesterol (LDL-C) (time frame: ≥ 3 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Feb 2026.