TracheostomyDESCATRONNCT04841889
Determinants of Successful Decannulation in Difficult-to-wean Patients
A study testing Associated factors with decannulation in people with Tracheostomy and ICU, run by Hopital Forcilles at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The factors of success of decannulation are not well known in the literature and the decision to decannulate is mainly based on clinical judgment. The failure rate of decannulation is between 2 and 25% with a poor prognosis in case of failure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Tracheostomy, ICU, Weaning Failure
- What is being tested?
- Associated factors with decannulation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 15 Apr 2021to 15 Apr 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Hospitalized in weaning unit
- Presence of a tracheostomy at admission;
- Expected duration of mechanical ventilation >48h at admission;
Who cannot join
- Known pregnancy;
- Patient with protective measure of justice;
- Patient under guardianship or curators;
- Data access denial
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Determinants of Successful Tracheostomy Removal in Difficult-to-wean Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study
The factors of success of decannulation are not well known in the literature and the decision to decannulate is mainly based on clinical judgment. The failure rate of decannulation is between 2 and 25% with a poor prognosis in case of failure.
The objective of this study is to determine the factors associated with successful tracheostomy removal in patients hospitalized in a respiratory weaning unit.
Read more
The secondary objectives are to evaluate in tracheostomized and hospitalized patients in weaning unit:
- The prevalence of successful tracheostomy removal;
- The prevalence of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation;
- Factors associated with successful weaning from mechanical ventilation;
- Demographic characteristics of these patients at admission;
- Ventilatory characteristics of these patients at admission;
- Biological characteristics of these patients at admission;
This is a prospective, single-centre, interventional cohort study with an expected duration of 2 years. All patients admitted to the respiratory weaning unit in the Forcilles' hospital, with a tracheostomy and an expected duration of mechanical ventilation > 48 hours will be consecutively included.
All factors potentially associated with successful tracheostomy removal will be prospectively collected: severity factors related to the ICU stay, ventilatory factors, respiratory and extra-respiratory factors.
Read the detailed description
- Rational Mechanical ventilation following tracheal intubation is a common life-support procedure to treat patients with acute respiratory failure. However, even if the acute event is resolved, the ICU length of stay may be prolonged by prolonged mechanical ventilation. Many factors contribute to prolonging mechanical ventilation and prevent progression in weaning from the ventilator: neuromuscular blocking agents, pulmonary infections, pre-existing respiratory disease, etc. In case of prolonged invasive ventilation, following several failures of weaning and re-intubation, these patients are therefore most often tracheostomy by percutaneous or surgical way in order to optimise the mechanical ventilation weaning strategy. The weaning units, initially created in the United States and then in France in the early 2000s, have improved the success rate of mechanical ventilation weaning in these difficult-to-wean patients. The factors associated with the success of decannulation are not well known in the literature and the decision to remove the tracheostomy is primarily based on the clinical impression. The rate of tracheostomy removal failure ranges from 2 to 25%, with a poor prognosis in case of failure.
- Hypothesis The severity of the critical care patient, the factors related to mechanical ventilation, the respiratory and extra-respiratory status are independent factors for successful decannulation.
- Main objective Determine the factors associated with successful tracheostomy removal in difficult-to-wean patients hospitalised in respiratory weaning unit.
- Secondary objectives The secondary objectives are to evaluate in tracheostomy and hospitalised patients in weaning unit:
- The prevalence of successful tracheostomy removal;
- The prevalence of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation;
- The factors associated with successful weaning from mechanical ventilation;
- Demographic characteristics of these patients at admission;
- Respiratory characteristics of these patients at admission;
- Biological characteristics of these patients at admission;
- Method This is a prospective, single-centre, interventional cohort study with an expected duration of 2 years. This study will be performed per the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and will be reported according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement. All patients admitted to the respiratory weaning unit in the Forcilles' hospital, with a tracheostomy and an expected duration of mechanical ventilation > 48 hours will be consecutively included. Data will be recorded using a local case report form by the investigator. Demographic data, comorbidities and medical and surgical history, biological findings, the ventilatory parameters and the nutritional state will be recorded at inclusion. All factors potentially associated with successful tracheostomy removal will be prospectively collected: severity factors related to the ICU stay, ventilatory factors, respiratory and extra-respiratory factors. On-site monitoring is planned every month.
- Statistical plan:
Continuous variables will be expressed as the mean (± standard deviation) and compared using the Student's t test if the null hypothesis is not rejected by the Shapiro-Wilk test. Continuous variables will be expressed as the median (interquartile range) and compared with the Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis test if the null hypothesis is rejected by the Shapiro-Wilk test. For categorical variables, the proportions of patients in each category will be calculated. Then the groups will be compared using Chi squared test.
A multivariate logistic regression model will be carried out to assess the relation between decannulation success and variables associated in univariate analyses. All statistically significant variables will be included in the model. Variable selection will be stepwise, based on Akaike Information Criterion. To check multicollinearity between independent variables, the variance inflation factor will be calculated before performing multivariate logistic regression. Multicollinearity will be regarded as present when the variance inflation factor is > 5. Goodness of fit will be assessed by Hosmer-Lemeshow method.
For all tests, a p-value ≤ 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. All statistical analysis will be made using R software (version 3.6.1, www.R-project.org).
Sample size calculation:
The investigators based the sample size calculation on the number of independent variables which will be included in the logistic multivariable regression model. The investigators use the criterion of one variable per 10 events for binary logistic regression analysis. The investigators plan to include the 5 most relevant ultrasound measures in the model. As prevalence of tracheostomy success in our unit is estimated at 0.5, the investigators plan a sample size of 100 patients.
- Conditions
- Tracheostomy, ICU, Weaning Failure
- Being tested
- Associated factors with decannulation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Associated factors with decannulationDiagnostic test
All factors potentially associated with successful tracheostomy removal will be prospectively collected: severity factors related to the ICU stay, ventilatory factors, respiratory and extra-respiratory factors. Lung and diaphragm ultrasound, swallowing, muscles and functional assessment will be performed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Associated factors with decannulation | Other | Collection of demographic, biological, ventilatory, respiratory and extra-respiratory parameters at the admission and the end of stay in the respiratory weaning center. Lung and diaphragm ultrasound, swallowing and muscles assessment will be performed. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Associated factors with decannulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of patients successfully liberated from the tracheostomy
Successful removal of the tracheostomy will be defined after 48 hours of spontaneous breathing without canulae. Acute use of mechanical or noninvasive ventilation, or death will be defined as failed tracheostomy removal.
Measured: After 48 hours of spontaneous breathing
Secondary outcomes (1)
Proportion of patients successfully liberated from the ventilator
Liberation from the ventilator will be defined after 48 hours of spontaneous
Measured: After 48 hours of spontaneous breathing
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Apr 2021
- Study start15 Apr 2021
- Primary completion15 Apr 2023
- Study completion15 Apr 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for TracheostomyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hopital Forcilles
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- PERETOUT Jean-Baptiste, MD, Principal investigator, Hôpital Forcilles-Fondation Cognacq-Jay
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04841889
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2020-A03070-39
- Acronym
- DESCATRON
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 30 Mar 2021
- Last updated
- 29 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All data that underlie results in a publication will be uploaded in a repository platform.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Determinants of Successful Tracheostomy Removal in Difficult-to-wean Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04841889
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DESCATRON / 2020-A03070-39
- Conditions
- Tracheostomy, ICU, Weaning Failure
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hopital ForcillesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Apr 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The factors of success of decannulation are not well known in the literature and the decision to decannulate is mainly based on clinical judgment. The failure rate of decannulation is between 2 and 25% with a poor prognosis in case of failure.
The objective of this study is to determine the factors associated with successful tracheostomy removal in patients hospitalized in a respiratory weaning unit.
The secondary objectives are to evaluate in tracheostomized and hospitalized patients in weaning unit:
- The prevalence of successful tracheostomy removal;
- The prevalence of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation;
- Factors associated with successful weaning from mechanical ventilation;
- Demographic characteristics of these patients at admission;
- Ventilatory characteristics of these patients at admission;
- Biological characteristics of these patients at admission;
This is a prospective, single-centre, interventional cohort study with an expected duration of 2 years. All patients admitted to the respiratory weaning unit in the Forcilles' hospital, with a tracheostomy and an expected duration of mechanical ventilation > 48 hours will be consecutively included.
All factors potentially associated with successful tracheostomy removal will be prospectively collected: severity factors related to the ICU stay, ventilatory factors, respiratory and extra-respiratory factors.
Detailed description
- Rational Mechanical ventilation following tracheal intubation is a common life-support procedure to treat patients with acute respiratory failure. However, even if the acute event is resolved, the ICU length of stay may be prolonged by prolonged mechanical ventilation. Many factors contribute to prolonging mechanical ventilation and prevent progression in weaning from the ventilator: neuromuscular blocking agents, pulmonary infections, pre-existing respiratory disease, etc. In case of prolonged invasive ventilation, following several failures of weaning and re-intubation, these patients are therefore most often tracheostomy by percutaneous or surgical way in order to optimise the mechanical ventilation weaning strategy. The weaning units, initially created in the United States and then in France in the early 2000s, have improved the success rate of mechanical ventilation weaning in these difficult-to-wean patients. The factors associated with the success of decannulation are not well known in the literature and the decision to remove the tracheostomy is primarily based on the clinical impression. The rate of tracheostomy removal failure ranges from 2 to 25%, with a poor prognosis in case of failure.
- Hypothesis The severity of the critical care patient, the factors related to mechanical ventilation, the respiratory and extra-respiratory status are independent factors for successful decannulation.
- Main objective Determine the factors associated with successful tracheostomy removal in difficult-to-wean patients hospitalised in respiratory weaning unit.
- Secondary objectives The secondary objectives are to evaluate in tracheostomy and hospitalised patients in weaning unit:
- The prevalence of successful tracheostomy removal;
- The prevalence of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation;
- The factors associated with successful weaning from mechanical ventilation;
- Demographic characteristics of these patients at admission;
- Respiratory characteristics of these patients at admission;
- Biological characteristics of these patients at admission;
- Method This is a prospective, single-centre, interventional cohort study with an expected duration of 2 years. This study will be performed per the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and will be reported according to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement. All patients admitted to the respiratory weaning unit in the Forcilles' hospital, with a tracheostomy and an expected duration of mechanical ventilation > 48 hours will be consecutively included. Data will be recorded using a local case report form by the investigator. Demographic data, comorbidities and medical and surgical history, biological findings, the ventilatory parameters and the nutritional state will be recorded at inclusion. All factors potentially associated with successful tracheostomy removal will be prospectively collected: severity factors related to the ICU stay, ventilatory factors, respiratory and extra-respiratory factors. On-site monitoring is planned every month.
- Statistical plan:
Continuous variables will be expressed as the mean (± standard deviation) and compared using the Student's t test if the null hypothesis is not rejected by the Shapiro-Wilk test. Continuous variables will be expressed as the median (interquartile range) and compared with the Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis test if the null hypothesis is rejected by the Shapiro-Wilk test. For categorical variables, the proportions of patients in each category will be calculated. Then the groups will be compared using Chi squared test.
A multivariate logistic regression model will be carried out to assess the relation between decannulation success and variables associated in univariate analyses. All statistically significant variables will be included in the model. Variable selection will be stepwise, based on Akaike Information Criterion. To check multicollinearity between independent variables, the variance inflation factor will be calculated before performing multivariate logistic regression. Multicollinearity will be regarded as present when the variance inflation factor is > 5. Goodness of fit will be assessed by Hosmer-Lemeshow method.
For all tests, a p-value ≤ 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. All statistical analysis will be made using R software (version 3.6.1, www.R-project.org).
Sample size calculation:
The investigators based the sample size calculation on the number of independent variables which will be included in the logistic multivariable regression model. The investigators use the criterion of one variable per 10 events for binary logistic regression analysis. The investigators plan to include the 5 most relevant ultrasound measures in the model. As prevalence of tracheostomy success in our unit is estimated at 0.5, the investigators plan a sample size of 100 patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Associated factors with decannulation | Other | Diagnostic Test: Associated factors with decannulationCollection of demographic, biological, ventilatory, respiratory and extra-respiratory parameters at the admission and the end of stay in the respiratory weaning center. Lung and diaphragm ultrasound, swallowing and muscles assessment will be performed. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Hospitalized in weaning unit
- Presence of a tracheostomy at admission;
- Expected duration of mechanical ventilation >48h at admission;
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Known pregnancy;
- Patient with protective measure of justice;
- Patient under guardianship or curators;
- Data access denial
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Associated factors with decannulationAll factors potentially associated with successful tracheostomy removal will be prospectively collected: severity factors related to the ICU stay, ventilatory factors, respiratory and extra-respiratory factors. Lung and diaphragm ultrasound, swallowing, muscles and functional assessment will be performed. | Diagnostic test | Associated factors with decannulation |
Primary outcome
Proportion of patients successfully liberated from the tracheostomy
Time frame: After 48 hours of spontaneous breathing
Successful removal of the tracheostomy will be defined after 48 hours of spontaneous breathing without canulae. Acute use of mechanical or noninvasive ventilation, or death will be defined as failed tracheostomy removal.
1 secondary outcome
Proportion of patients successfully liberated from the ventilator
Time frame: After 48 hours of spontaneous breathing
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Feb 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All data that underlie results in a publication will be uploaded in a repository platform.
Related trials for Tracheostomy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
A Speaking-Valve-Based Decannulation Protocol for Tracheostomized Stroke Patients
Stroke Patients, Tracheostomy
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
A Speaking-Valve-Based Decannulation Protoco for Patients With a Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness
Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness, Tracheostomy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Laryngotracheal Lesions in Adults With Long-Term Tracheostomy
Laryngotracheal Lesions, Tracheostomy Complications
Enrolling by invitation
No DIET Trial: Dogmatic Interruption of Enteral nuTrition
Gastrostomy, Tracheostomy
Recruiting
Classical Music, Pain, and Physiological Parameters in Children Undergoing Two Aspiration Procedures
Endotracheal Aspiration, Tracheostomy Patients
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
PERETOUT Jean-Baptiste, MD principal investigator
Hôpital Forcilles-Fondation Cognacq-Jay
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Associated factors with decannulation in people with Tracheostomy and ICU, run by Hopital Forcilles at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of patients successfully liberated from the tracheostomy (time frame: After 48 hours of spontaneous breathing). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Feb 2024.