DiabetesNCT04834648
Improve Timely Referral Flow and Compliance of Diabetic Retinopathy Patients
A study testing Structured Counseling in people with Diabetes and Diabetic Retinopathy, run by Seva Foundation at 1 site in Nepal.
Trial summary
An effective referral system helps to ensure a close relationship between all levels of the health system and ensures clients receive optimum care at the appropriate level and at affordable cost, and hospital facilities are used optimally and cost-effectively. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes, Diabetic Retinopathy
- What is being tested?
- Structured Counseling
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNepal
- Study dates
- 15 Mar 2021to 30 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All Diabetic Retinopathy patients attending the peripheral eye centers linked with LEIRC.
Who cannot join
- All referred Diabetic patients who not is willing to be part of the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Operations Research to Improve Timely Referral Flow and Compliance of Diabetic Retinopathy Patients From Peripheral Eye Care Centers to Tertiary Center in Nepal: Cluster Randomised Control Trial
An effective referral system helps to ensure a close relationship between all levels of the health system and ensures clients receive optimum care at the appropriate level and at affordable cost, and hospital facilities are used optimally and cost-effectively. A referral system requires consideration of all its important components that can be then adjusted to the local situation. Being a system, the important components of a referral system are Health system issues (Service providers, Referral protocols, Communication \& transportation provide), Referring facility\& Referral practicalities (Client \& their condition, Protocols of care, Care provider \& documents, Referral decision, Outward referral form, Communicate with referral facility, Client information, Referral register), Referral facility\& Referral practicalities (Client with referral form, Treat the client with the document, Rehabilitation plan, Back referral form, Feedback to referring facility, Referral register) and Supervision and capacity building (Referral monitoring, Ensure back referral, Feedback and training to facility staff and Feedback to central level) ((USAID), 2012).
There are mainly two limitations on referring Diabetic Retinopathy patients. Patient-related reasons: lack of awareness, belief, cost, distance from screening/ treatment centers, discomfort from dilating drops, efforts to attend yet another center, fear of laser treatment, fear of its impact on quality of life and jobs, lack of family support and guilt surrounding the failure to control blood sugar. Provider-related reasons are poor counseling and advisory services about ocular complications for patients with diabetes, inefficient call and recall system, long waiting times for screening or treatment, and complicated referral mechanism.
Lumbini eye institute is a comprehensive tertiary eye care center in western Nepal. In spite of 19 peripheral referral centers under it, there is a poor inflow of Diabetic retinopathy patients as against the estimated disease burden in the catchment area. The objective of our study is to improve timely referral flow from referring centers and compliance with referral cases after the intervention. In order to meet our objective, the investigators tend to implement patient counseling at referral centers, a referral tracking system, and a fast-track mechanism for patients at base hospitals.
Read the detailed description
Background: Changes in lifestyle and a growing number of aging populations have increased the prevalence of diabetes worldwide. Diabetes imposes a heavy disease burden in both developed and developing countries (1). Diabetic retinopathy is the commonest microvascular complication of diabetes and the leading cause of blindness in adults. There are no symptoms initially; visual impairment is seen in the proliferative stage and in macular involvement. Vision once lost will never be regained (2). The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was 10%-50% for Type 1 and 25.2% for Type2. The worldwide prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was found to be 34.6%. WHO estimates Diabetic retinopathy is responsible for 4.8% of 37 million cases of blindness throughout the world. Several studies in Nepal showed the prevalence of 9% to 78%. A study at LEIRC showed PDR and ADED to 34%; this suggests a major blockage of cases at the tertiary and primary level (2013-2014).
Early diagnosis and treatment are the key components to reduce Diabetic blindness. A comprehensive set of guidelines (CARE 2019) recommends initial dilatation and comprehensive eye examination by an optometrist or ophthalmologist. Patient with Mild, Moderate and Severe Diabetic retinopathy requires a referral and they need reexamination or follow up within time limit of 3-6 months, less than 3 months and less than 1 month respectively. Incidence of visual loss secondary to proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy can be reduced by referral to an ophthalmologist. Multiple studies show laser photocoagulation of new vessels reduces the incidence of Diabetic Blindness by 60% to 80%.
Lumbini eye institute is a comprehensive tertiary eye care center in western Nepal. In spite of 19 peripheral referral centers under it, there is a poor inflow of Diabetic retinopathy patients as against the estimated disease burden in the catchment area. There are mainly two limitations on referring Diabetic Retinopathy patients. Patient-related reasons: lack of awareness, belief, cost, distance from screening/ treatment centers, discomfort from dilating drops, efforts to attend yet another center, fear of laser treatment, fear of its impact on quality of life and jobs, lack of family support and guilt surrounding the failure to control blood sugar. Provider-related reasons are poor counseling and advisory services about ocular complications for patients of diabetes, inefficient call and recall system, long waiting times for screening or treatment, and complicated referral mechanism (2). Considering these reasons and problem tree analysis effective interventions designed. Counseling and telephonic follow-up at referring facility; fast track system at the base hospital. The objective of our study is to improve timely referral flow from referring centers and compliance with referral cases after the intervention.
Methods:
Study Design: Two arm parallel, cluster Randomised control trial with allocation ratio 1:1 will be used.
Study Setting :
All diabetic retinopathy patients attending peripheral eye care centers will be the study population.
Lumbini Eye Institute and Research Center (LEIRC) - a comprehensive tertiary referral eye care center located in the Western part of Nepal has nineteen referring centers: five secondary eye hospitals (SEC), three district eye care centers (DECC), and eleven primary eye care centers (PECC). The referral center (LEIRC) has several sub-specialty services; the Retina department is well equipped with two consultants, one retina fellow, and one separate counselor. A secondary eye hospital has a general ophthalmologist, ophthalmic paramedical personnel (optometrist/ophthalmic assistant), and a counselor with limited diagnostic tools for diabetic retinopathy (DR). A primary/district eye care center has ophthalmic paramedical personnel (optometrist/ophthalmic assistant) and an optician with a direct ophthalmoscope for retina examination.
Masking: At LEI the staff will be blinded about the intervention/ control referring centers.
Data collection plan: An experienced team member will be responsible for data collection and telephonic follow-up. the project coordinator will be trained thoroughly trained on the completion of the data collection form Data Management Plan: The demographic information and other variables of the patient who are referred from peripheral eye care centers will be collected and entered in an excel sheet. One of the team members will be responsible for data management.
Data Analytic plan: Data will be analyzed using IBM SPSS. Differences indifference in compliance and referral rates will be computed.
Study period: Approximately 19 months (March 2020 to December 2021) Ethical consideration: Ethical approval is taken from the Institutional review committee, LEIRC. Data confidentiality will be maintained.
Ethical considerations:
Written Consent form including the title of the study and their support during the study period was sent to all 10 centers included in the study. These consent forms were signed by the head of centers on 12th June 2020 and sent to LEIRC. Ethical Approval from the Institutional Review Committee (IRC) of LEIRC was taken on 8th August 2020. Data confidentiality will be maintained. No personal information will be used in analysis, reports, and publications.
Discussion:
Diabetic Retinopathy is a global epidemic in both developed and developing countries with significant morbidity and mortality. In a study done by Mishra SK et al, they found people were less aware of the microvascular complications of diabetes. They didn't meet the physician regularly for diabetes control and didn't know about regular eye examinations with ophthalmologists. Even though the incidence of blindness secondary to diabetes mellitus can be significantly reduced; there is still a large number of diabetes patient with vision loss due to retinal complications of the disease In a study done by Tien Y. Wang et al, they came with a broad-based system-level approach to prevent vision loss resulting from Diabetic Retinopathy: 1: Targeted health care education to improve public knowledge. 2: well-implemented community or national level screening programs for all patients with diabetes. 3: Timely referral for severe level of Diabetic Retinopathy. 4: Appropriate treatment for advanced Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR and DME).
In our study the investigators wanted to make the patient aware of the changes diabetes can bring to the eye, the investigators implemented Structured Counseling where the patient is explained in detail about the changes diabetes makes in the eye. It also includes the impact on vision and different treatment options available and the rate. They are also explained to go to a base hospital where they will be evaluated by a retina specialist thus decreasing a load of visual impairment due to diabetes.
World Health Organization (WHO) has identified adherence to follow-up services as a key component in effective management of Diabetic Retinopathy9. In this study, they found improving the clarity of the referral process by explaining the treatment costs, the reason for referral, and likely health benefits to the patient helped by increasing follow-up rates9. Keeping this in the investigators explained the treatment cost and about the base hospital in detain as our structured counseling. A study done by Mishra SK et al found major facilitator was the existence of referral slips to expedite treatment upon reaching the health facility and the major barrier was a failure to receive preferential treatment at the facility, despite the presence of the slip. In addition to this, they found lack of feedback as a barrier to functional referral system 3.
Similarly, during our problem tree analysis, the investigators found a longer waiting time and no preferential treatment as a factor in the referral system. The investigators tried implementing a referral slip and planned to decrease the waiting time by allowing them to visit the ophthalmologist directly at our center. This point will also be explained by the counselor during counseling.
- Conditions
- Diabetes, Diabetic Retinopathy
- Being tested
- Structured Counseling
- Keywords
- referral rate, diabetic retinopathy, counselling
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetic Retinopathy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Structured CounselingBehavioural
Structured Counseling, which includes A. Counseling is done by a trained counselor
- Telephonic Follow up:
- Development of Fast Track system at the Base Hospital. D. Provide Health Education Material to all Diabetic Patients. E. Referral communication and feedback between referring and referral facility.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Structured Counseling | Experimental | Structured Counseling, which includes A. Counseling is done by a trained counselor
B. Telephonic Follow up:
C. Development of Fast Track system at the Base Hospital. D. Provide Health Education Material to all Diabetic Patients. E. Referral communication and feedback between referring and referral facility. Receives: Behavioral: Structured Counseling |
| Control Arm | No intervention | General Counseling, which included saying you need to visit the hospital and you have involvement in the eyes due to diabetes, providing a health education leaflet. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary Outcome
Percentage of referral compliance before and after intervention
Measured: 8 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Apr 2021
- Study start15 Mar 2021
- Primary completion30 Aug 2021
- Study completion30 Dec 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Seva Foundation
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Lumbini Eye Institute and Research Centre, Indian Institute of Public Health, India, Seva Canada Society, Queen's University, Belfast
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04834648
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LEI/IRC/09/019/20
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 4 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 10 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Bhattarai B, Thapa HB, Bashyal S, Thapa SK, Chaudhuri S, Agiwal V, Pant H, Singh S, Mahajan H. Structured Counselling and Regular Telephonic follow up to improve Referral flow and compliance in Nepal for Diabetic Retinopathy(SCREEN-D Study): a randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 10;24(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10647-3.
PubMed 38336691
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Operations Research to Improve Timely Referral Flow and Compliance of Diabetic Retinopathy Patients From Peripheral Eye Care Centers to Tertiary Center in Nepal: Cluster Randomised Control Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04834648
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LEI/IRC/09/019/20
- Conditions
- Diabetes, Diabetic Retinopathy
- Keywords
- referral rate, diabetic retinopathy, counselling
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Seva FoundationUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Lumbini Eye Institute and Research Centre, Indian Institute of Public Health, India, Seva Canada Society, Queen's University, Belfast
- Study start
- 15 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
An effective referral system helps to ensure a close relationship between all levels of the health system and ensures clients receive optimum care at the appropriate level and at affordable cost, and hospital facilities are used optimally and cost-effectively. A referral system requires consideration of all its important components that can be then adjusted to the local situation. Being a system, the important components of a referral system are Health system issues (Service providers, Referral protocols, Communication \& transportation provide), Referring facility\& Referral practicalities (Client \& their condition, Protocols of care, Care provider \& documents, Referral decision, Outward referral form, Communicate with referral facility, Client information, Referral register), Referral facility\& Referral practicalities (Client with referral form, Treat the client with the document, Rehabilitation plan, Back referral form, Feedback to referring facility, Referral register) and Supervision and capacity building (Referral monitoring, Ensure back referral, Feedback and training to facility staff and Feedback to central level) ((USAID), 2012).
There are mainly two limitations on referring Diabetic Retinopathy patients. Patient-related reasons: lack of awareness, belief, cost, distance from screening/ treatment centers, discomfort from dilating drops, efforts to attend yet another center, fear of laser treatment, fear of its impact on quality of life and jobs, lack of family support and guilt surrounding the failure to control blood sugar. Provider-related reasons are poor counseling and advisory services about ocular complications for patients with diabetes, inefficient call and recall system, long waiting times for screening or treatment, and complicated referral mechanism.
Lumbini eye institute is a comprehensive tertiary eye care center in western Nepal. In spite of 19 peripheral referral centers under it, there is a poor inflow of Diabetic retinopathy patients as against the estimated disease burden in the catchment area. The objective of our study is to improve timely referral flow from referring centers and compliance with referral cases after the intervention. In order to meet our objective, the investigators tend to implement patient counseling at referral centers, a referral tracking system, and a fast-track mechanism for patients at base hospitals.
Detailed description
Background: Changes in lifestyle and a growing number of aging populations have increased the prevalence of diabetes worldwide. Diabetes imposes a heavy disease burden in both developed and developing countries (1). Diabetic retinopathy is the commonest microvascular complication of diabetes and the leading cause of blindness in adults. There are no symptoms initially; visual impairment is seen in the proliferative stage and in macular involvement. Vision once lost will never be regained (2). The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was 10%-50% for Type 1 and 25.2% for Type2. The worldwide prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was found to be 34.6%. WHO estimates Diabetic retinopathy is responsible for 4.8% of 37 million cases of blindness throughout the world. Several studies in Nepal showed the prevalence of 9% to 78%. A study at LEIRC showed PDR and ADED to 34%; this suggests a major blockage of cases at the tertiary and primary level (2013-2014).
Early diagnosis and treatment are the key components to reduce Diabetic blindness. A comprehensive set of guidelines (CARE 2019) recommends initial dilatation and comprehensive eye examination by an optometrist or ophthalmologist. Patient with Mild, Moderate and Severe Diabetic retinopathy requires a referral and they need reexamination or follow up within time limit of 3-6 months, less than 3 months and less than 1 month respectively. Incidence of visual loss secondary to proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy can be reduced by referral to an ophthalmologist. Multiple studies show laser photocoagulation of new vessels reduces the incidence of Diabetic Blindness by 60% to 80%.
Lumbini eye institute is a comprehensive tertiary eye care center in western Nepal. In spite of 19 peripheral referral centers under it, there is a poor inflow of Diabetic retinopathy patients as against the estimated disease burden in the catchment area. There are mainly two limitations on referring Diabetic Retinopathy patients. Patient-related reasons: lack of awareness, belief, cost, distance from screening/ treatment centers, discomfort from dilating drops, efforts to attend yet another center, fear of laser treatment, fear of its impact on quality of life and jobs, lack of family support and guilt surrounding the failure to control blood sugar. Provider-related reasons are poor counseling and advisory services about ocular complications for patients of diabetes, inefficient call and recall system, long waiting times for screening or treatment, and complicated referral mechanism (2). Considering these reasons and problem tree analysis effective interventions designed. Counseling and telephonic follow-up at referring facility; fast track system at the base hospital. The objective of our study is to improve timely referral flow from referring centers and compliance with referral cases after the intervention.
Methods:
Study Design: Two arm parallel, cluster Randomised control trial with allocation ratio 1:1 will be used.
Study Setting :
All diabetic retinopathy patients attending peripheral eye care centers will be the study population.
Lumbini Eye Institute and Research Center (LEIRC) - a comprehensive tertiary referral eye care center located in the Western part of Nepal has nineteen referring centers: five secondary eye hospitals (SEC), three district eye care centers (DECC), and eleven primary eye care centers (PECC). The referral center (LEIRC) has several sub-specialty services; the Retina department is well equipped with two consultants, one retina fellow, and one separate counselor. A secondary eye hospital has a general ophthalmologist, ophthalmic paramedical personnel (optometrist/ophthalmic assistant), and a counselor with limited diagnostic tools for diabetic retinopathy (DR). A primary/district eye care center has ophthalmic paramedical personnel (optometrist/ophthalmic assistant) and an optician with a direct ophthalmoscope for retina examination.
Masking: At LEI the staff will be blinded about the intervention/ control referring centers.
Data collection plan: An experienced team member will be responsible for data collection and telephonic follow-up. the project coordinator will be trained thoroughly trained on the completion of the data collection form Data Management Plan: The demographic information and other variables of the patient who are referred from peripheral eye care centers will be collected and entered in an excel sheet. One of the team members will be responsible for data management.
Data Analytic plan: Data will be analyzed using IBM SPSS. Differences indifference in compliance and referral rates will be computed.
Study period: Approximately 19 months (March 2020 to December 2021) Ethical consideration: Ethical approval is taken from the Institutional review committee, LEIRC. Data confidentiality will be maintained.
Ethical considerations:
Written Consent form including the title of the study and their support during the study period was sent to all 10 centers included in the study. These consent forms were signed by the head of centers on 12th June 2020 and sent to LEIRC. Ethical Approval from the Institutional Review Committee (IRC) of LEIRC was taken on 8th August 2020. Data confidentiality will be maintained. No personal information will be used in analysis, reports, and publications.
Discussion:
Diabetic Retinopathy is a global epidemic in both developed and developing countries with significant morbidity and mortality. In a study done by Mishra SK et al, they found people were less aware of the microvascular complications of diabetes. They didn't meet the physician regularly for diabetes control and didn't know about regular eye examinations with ophthalmologists. Even though the incidence of blindness secondary to diabetes mellitus can be significantly reduced; there is still a large number of diabetes patient with vision loss due to retinal complications of the disease In a study done by Tien Y. Wang et al, they came with a broad-based system-level approach to prevent vision loss resulting from Diabetic Retinopathy: 1: Targeted health care education to improve public knowledge. 2: well-implemented community or national level screening programs for all patients with diabetes. 3: Timely referral for severe level of Diabetic Retinopathy. 4: Appropriate treatment for advanced Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR and DME).
In our study the investigators wanted to make the patient aware of the changes diabetes can bring to the eye, the investigators implemented Structured Counseling where the patient is explained in detail about the changes diabetes makes in the eye. It also includes the impact on vision and different treatment options available and the rate. They are also explained to go to a base hospital where they will be evaluated by a retina specialist thus decreasing a load of visual impairment due to diabetes.
World Health Organization (WHO) has identified adherence to follow-up services as a key component in effective management of Diabetic Retinopathy9. In this study, they found improving the clarity of the referral process by explaining the treatment costs, the reason for referral, and likely health benefits to the patient helped by increasing follow-up rates9. Keeping this in the investigators explained the treatment cost and about the base hospital in detain as our structured counseling. A study done by Mishra SK et al found major facilitator was the existence of referral slips to expedite treatment upon reaching the health facility and the major barrier was a failure to receive preferential treatment at the facility, despite the presence of the slip. In addition to this, they found lack of feedback as a barrier to functional referral system 3.
Similarly, during our problem tree analysis, the investigators found a longer waiting time and no preferential treatment as a factor in the referral system. The investigators tried implementing a referral slip and planned to decrease the waiting time by allowing them to visit the ophthalmologist directly at our center. This point will also be explained by the counselor during counseling.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Structured Counseling | Experimental | Behavioral: Structured CounselingStructured Counseling, which includes A. Counseling is done by a trained counselor B. Telephonic Follow up: C. Development of Fast Track system at the Base Hospital. D. Provide Health Education Material to all Diabetic Patients. E. Referral communication and feedback between referring and referral facility. |
| Control Arm | No intervention | –General Counseling, which included saying you need to visit the hospital and you have involvement in the eyes due to diabetes, providing a health education leaflet. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All Diabetic Retinopathy patients attending the peripheral eye centers linked with LEIRC.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All referred Diabetic patients who not is willing to be part of the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Structured CounselingStructured Counseling, which includes A. Counseling is done by a trained counselor B. Telephonic Follow up: C. Development of Fast Track system at the Base Hospital. D. Provide Health Education Material to all Diabetic Patients. E. Referral communication and feedback between referring and referral facility. | Behavioural | Structured Counseling |
Primary outcome
Primary Outcome
Time frame: 8 months
Percentage of referral compliance before and after intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Mar 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38336691Bhattarai B, Thapa HB, Bashyal S, Thapa SK, Chaudhuri S, Agiwal V, Pant H, Singh S, Mahajan H. Structured Counselling and Regular Telephonic follow up to improve Referral flow and compliance in Nepal for Diabetic Retinopathy(SCREEN-D Study): a randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 10;24(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10647-3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetes
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Structured Counseling in people with Diabetes and Diabetic Retinopathy, run by Seva Foundation at 1 site in Nepal.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Nepal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary Outcome (time frame: 8 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04834648, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2022.