AzTrials
AzTrials

Kidney Transplant; ComplicationsELUCATRNCT04815954

Early vs Late Urinary Catheter Removal After Renal Transplantation

A study testing Urinary catheter removal in people with Kidney Transplant; Complications and Kidney Transplant Infection, run by Medical University of Warsaw at 1 site in Poland.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare frequency of UTI, urine leak and need for reoperation in patients after renal transplant with early or delayed Foley catheter removal. The hypothesis of the ELUCATR trial is that there is no need to keep Foley catheter longer than 24 hours after kidney transplant due to lack of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Urinary catheter removal
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 sitePoland
Study dates
26 Mar 2019to 26 Apr 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Kidney transplant recipient
  • Informed consent signed

Who cannot join

  • BMI under 18kg/m2
  • BMI over 40 kg/m2
  • Significant anatomical abnormalities of lower urinary tract
  • Previous surgery on bladder or urinary tract
  • Unusual urinary anastomosis (Leadbetter-Politano, Boari, conduit, psoas hitch, pyelo-ureteral or uretero-ureteral, double ureter)
  • Severe vascular complications during surgery with blood loss >1000 ml
  • Underwent haemodynamic shock or profund instability after surgery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Poland1 site
  • Department of General and Transplantation Surgery

    Warsaw, 02-014

Other trials in Poland

About this study

Official title: Early vs Late Urinary Catheter Removal After Renal Transplantation Randomised Clinical Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare frequency of UTI, urine leak and need for reoperation in patients after renal transplant with early or delayed Foley catheter removal. The hypothesis of the ELUCATR trial is that there is no need to keep Foley catheter longer than 24 hours after kidney transplant due to lack of significant effect on urological complications (urine leak, ureter strictures). Early removal can also reduce urinary tract infections.

Main advantage of urinary catheter placement is continual diuresis monitoring and lower bladder pressure. Some hypothesize that increased pressure can disrupt ureteroneocystostomy with resultant urinary fistula. Clinical practice is to remove the catheter between 1-10 post-transplant day. Only few studies described removal of Foley catheter in the first 48 hours. There is no level 1 evidence for timing of urinary catheter removal after kidney transplantation.

Read more

Urinary tract infection is a common complication after KTx occurring in about 7-80% patients. Studies suggest direct negative effect of UTI on long-term renal allograft function. There are several independent risk factors for developing UTI: female sex, diabetes and obesity. Duration of catheterization is a modifiable risk factor.

Urine leak and ureter stenosis are relatively frequent surgical complications of kidney transplantation. Urine leaks occur in 2-9% of all kidney transplants. Most of them happen within 3 months after surgery. Urinary fistula contributes to mortality and graft loss. Majority of them need intervention with nephrostomy, pigtail ureteral stent or surgery. Anastomotic or ureter stenosis occurs in 3.1% of all kidney transplants and is usually resolved with open ureteroneocystostomy. Diagnosed and treated early, it does not affect patient and graft survival. There are no solid data documenting influence of the urinary bladder catheterization on fistulas, urinomas, ureter strictures and need for reoperation in this set of patients.

European Best Renal Practice Guidelines recommend removal of the catheter as early as possible, however a randomized trial on timing and adverse event rates (urinary tract infection, urinary leakage) is needed.

Read the detailed description
  1. Objectives of the study
  2. Main aim of the study: Early urinary catheter removal is safe and does not increase urinary complications rate. Zero hypothesis is that early and delayed Foley catheter removal have similar urinary complications rate (urinary fistula, urinary tract infections). Alternative hypothesis is that early catheter removal decreases urinary tract infections.
  3. Primary endpoints:
  • Urinary fistula or stenosis requiring intervention,
  • 30 day graft function measured as serum creatinine,
  • 1 year graft survival and function.
  1. Secondary endpoints:
  • Urinary tract infections,
  • BK virus infection,
  • length of hospital stay.
  1. Patients and Methods

2.1 Study organisation

The study has been designed as a randomized, controlled, open label, multicenter trial to compare urinary complications rate between early and delayed Foley catheter removal groups in kidney transplant recipients. Computer list of random numbers will be generated, even numbers will be assigned to early and odd numbers to late catheter removal, 1:1 randomisation ratio is expected. At least 3 large-volume renal transplant centers will participate in the study. Randomisation will be supervised centrally by the leader center. Generated numbers will be closed in non-transparent envelopes numbered sequentially and shipped to each participating center. A center is supposed to use the envelopes for group assignment consecutively with increasing numbers. A record of computer-generated number and envelope number will be stored at the leader center. An institutional review board of the Medical University of Warsaw accepted the study design and patient information leaflet. MS Access-based electronic case report file will be used. CRFs will be checked for completeness and concordance with source documents and adherence to the study protocol by the study leader.

2.2 Study design

Donor and pre-transplant recipient data will be noted in a database. Donor blood, urine and preservation solution will be cultured, 10^5 colonies in the former is considered significant. Important transplant anatomical features, like multiple renal arteries will be noted. After screening and informed consent of the patient for participation in the study, kidney transplantation will be performed. Single dose of cefazolin adjusted for patient weight will be administered 30 minutes prior to skin incision. Other options of antibiotic prophylaxis or preemptive treatment are acceptable, however agent and duration must be noted in an electronic Case Report File (CRF). At the beginning of surgical procedure in the operating room, sterile catheterization of the urinary bladder and microbiology sampling will be performed. After uneventful vascular anastomosis, neoureterocystostomy will be done with Lich-Gregoire or a variation of U-stitch technique (McKinnon, other typical). Ureteral stent will be placed at surgeon's discretion. Suction drainage will be positioned in graft proximity. After wound closure and completion of the surgery, inclusion and exclusion criteria will be evaluated. Intraoperative data (blood loss, surgery duration, cold ischemia time, details of the anastomosis, utilization of magnifying loupes, pigtail placement) will be noted.

2.3 Eligibility and exclusion criteria.

2.3.1 Inclusion criteria

  • Age>18
  • Kidney transplant recipient
  • Informed consent signed

2.3.2 Exclusion criteria BMI<18 or >40 kg/m2 Significant anatomical abnormalities of lower urinary tract Previous surgery on bladder or urinary tract Unusual urinary anastomosis (Leadbetter-Politano, Boari, conduit, psoas hitch, pyelo-ureteral or uretero-ureteral, double ureter) Severe vascular complications during surgery with blood loss >1000 ml Haemodynamic shock or profund instability after surgery

Participants will be randomised to a group early urinary catheter removal (EG) or delayed removal group (DG). Early catheter removal will be done 24±6 hours after surgery. In a delayed group catheter will be removed 72±6 hours after completion of surgery. Shorter or longer catheterization will be considered protocol violation and reasons for ought to be explained in source documents and CRF.

Suction drain will be removed when discharge volume falls below 50 ml/day. If clear discharge (>100 ml/day) continues for 2 consecutive days, discharge fluid and serum creatinine ought to be measured. If fluid creatinine exceeds its serum concentration by at least 30%, urine leakage will be diagnosed and appropriate intervention applied according to surgeon's clinical judgement. Only fistulas requiring medical intervention: reintroduction of the catheter, endoscopic stenting, nephrostomy or surgery will be considered significant and fulfill criteria for primary endpoint of the study.

The course of study will consist of screen visit, hospitalization (with the transplantation procedure, catheter removal, follow up after 48h after catheter removal), follow up visit at 15 days after procedure and follow up visit at 30 days after procedure (see table 2). Patients with urinary complications (fistula, stenosis, infection) will have additional visits every 30 days until complete resolution of complication. Patients with stented anastomosis who will not have a pigtail removed until day 30 will be followed till 7 days after stent removal or resolution of complications would any occur. A final visit 1 year after transplantation will assess patient and graft survival, kidney function, late urinary complications beyond one month from transplantation.

2.4 Sample size and statistics

The investigators assumed early catheter removal reduces the risk of UTI by 10% (RR=0.9) and risk of urinary anastomosis complications is comparable. To achieve a power of 80% at p=0,05 an expected sample size is 450 patients divided fairly into 2 groups. An intent-to-treat analysis will be performed. Graft survival analysis and length of hospital stay will be calculated with log-rank test. Renal function will be analysed with Student t test, provided normal distribution of serum creatinine is observed. Chi2 will be used for analysis of urinary complications. Post hoc analysis of donor and recipient entry data will confirm groups being comparable fo UTI and urinary fistula risk factors.

Subgroup analysis in groups with and without urinary stent will be performed.

Being tested
Urinary catheter removal
Keywords
kidney transplant, urinary tract infections, foley catheter, urinary catheter, urinary fistula, urethral stricture
Medical subject headings
Urinary Fistula, Urinary Tract Infections, Urethral Stricture

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Urinary catheter removalProcedure or surgery

    Removal of urinary catheter which was placed during kidney transplantation.

Study groups in NCT04815954
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Early groupExperimentalEarly urinary catheter removal: 24±6 hours after completion of surgery.
Receives: Procedure: Urinary catheter removal
Delayed groupActive comparatorDelayed urinary catheter removal: 72±6 hours after completion of surgery.
Receives: Procedure: Urinary catheter removal

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Urinary fistula

    Presence of urine in the drains or peri-transplant fluid collection demonstrated with biochemical analysis (creatinine in mg/dl in the drains or aspirate exceeding that of serum in mg/dl by at least 30%); symptoms may be present in the first week after transplantation as increased drainage discharge, impaired graft function and decreased diuresis, fluid collection seen in ultrasound, CT or scintigraphy, discharge onto the skin, abdominal pain, cutaneous oedema often towards the scrotum, pain and inflammatory appearance of the scar; volume of the discharge has no influence on diagnosis. Only fistulas requiring medical intervention as reintroduction of the catheter, endoscopic stenting, nephrostomy or surgery will be considered in the study.

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Urinary stenosis

    Obstruction of the urine outflow from the transplanted kidney causing pelvicalyceal dilatation and impaired graft function; dilatation may be minimal due to fibrosis of the renal tissue and ex juvantibus diagnosis in these cases is acceptable. Only strictures requiring medical intervention as reintroduction of the catheter, endoscopic stenting, nephrostomy or surgery will be considered in the study.

    Measured: 1 year

  3. 30 day graft function measured as serum creatinine

    Serum creatinine in mg/dl

    Measured: 30 days

  4. 1 year graft survival in days and function measured as serum creatinine

    Graft survival in days; serum creatinine in mg/dl

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Urinary tract infections

    1. asymptomatic bacteriuria defined by the presence of >10^5 bacterial colony forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) of urine on urine culture with no local or systemic symptoms of UTI,
    2. simple cystitis with the presence of >10^5 CFU/mL on urine culture with local urinary symptoms, such as dysuria, frequency, or urgency, but no systemic symptoms, such as fever or allograft pain,
    3. complicated UTI with the presence of >10^5 CFU/mL on urine culture with fever and allograft pain, chills, malaise or bacteremia with the same organism in urine, or biopsy with findings consistent with pyelonephritis,
    4. recurrent UTI with three or more episodes of UTI in one year

    Measured: 1 year

  2. BK virus infection

    Diagnosed with histopathology and positive immunohistochemistry staining for BK SV40 T antigen; in highly suspicious clinical cases prolonged (>2 weeks) urinary viral shedding with significant BK load (>10 000 copies/ mL) as presumptive diagnosis is also acceptable.

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Length of hospital stay

    Length of hispital stay in days.

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Mar 2021
  2. Study start26 Mar 2019
  3. Primary completion26 Mar 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion26 Apr 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
120 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04815954
Sponsor's protocol ID
Not assigned
Acronym
ELUCATR
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
10 Feb 2020
Last updated
18 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Brar S, Wang Y, Cannitelli A, Lambadaris M, Li Y, Famure O, Husain S, Kim SJ. Bacteremia in kidney transplant recipients: Burden, causes, and consequences. Clin Transplant. 2019 Mar;33(3):e13479. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13479. Epub 2019 Feb 8.

    PubMed 30650217
  • Goldman JD, Julian K. Urinary tract infections in solid organ transplant recipients: Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Clin Transplant. 2019 Sep;33(9):e13507. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13507. Epub 2019 Mar 28.

    PubMed 30793386
  • Akbari R, Rahmani Firouzi S, Akbarzadeh-Pasha A. Old habits die hard; does early urinary catheter removal affect kidney size, bacteriuria and UTI after renal transplantation? J Renal Inj Prev. 2016 Nov 20;6(1):43-48. doi: 10.15171/jrip.2017.08. eCollection 2017.

    PubMed 28487871
  • Cole T, Hakim J, Shapiro R, Kayler LK. Early urethral (Foley) catheter removal positively affects length of stay after renal transplantation. Transplantation. 2007 Apr 15;83(7):995-6. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000259723.92943.8f. No abstract available.

    PubMed 17460573
  • Chuang P, Parikh CR, Langone A. Urinary tract infections after renal transplantation: a retrospective review at two US transplant centers. Clin Transplant. 2005 Apr;19(2):230-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00327.x.

    PubMed 15740560
  • Lempinen M, Stenman J, Kyllonen L, Salmela K. Surgical complications following 1670 consecutive adult renal transplantations: A single center study. Scand J Surg. 2015 Dec;104(4):254-9. doi: 10.1177/1457496914565419. Epub 2015 Jan 7.

    PubMed 25567856
  • Siskind E, Sameyah E, Goncharuk E, Olsen EM, Feldman J, Giovinazzo K, Blum M, Tyrell R, Evans C, Kuncewitch M, Alexander M, Israel E, Bhaskaran M, Calderon K, Jhaveri KD, Sachdeva M, Bellucci A, Mattana J, Fishbane S, D'Agostino C, Coppa G, Molmenti E. Removal of foley catheters in live donor kidney transplant recipients on postoperative day 1 does not increase the incidence of urine leaks. Int J Angiol. 2013 Mar;22(1):45-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1333870.

    PubMed 24436583
  • Abramowicz D, Cochat P, Claas FH, Heemann U, Pascual J, Dudley C, Harden P, Hourmant M, Maggiore U, Salvadori M, Spasovski G, Squifflet JP, Steiger J, Torres A, Viklicky O, Zeier M, Vanholder R, Van Biesen W, Nagler E. European Renal Best Practice Guideline on kidney donor and recipient evaluation and perioperative care. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015 Nov;30(11):1790-7. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu216. Epub 2014 Jul 9.

    PubMed 25007790
  • Menegueti MG, Pereira MF, Bellissimo-Rodrigues F, Garcia TM, Saber LT, Nardim ME, Muglia VA, Neto MM, Romao EA. Study of the risk factors related to acquisition of urinary tract infections in patients submitted to renal transplant. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2015 May-Jun;48(3):285-90. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0098-2015.

    PubMed 26108006
  • Rubin RH. Infectious disease complications of renal transplantation. Kidney Int. 1993 Jul;44(1):221-36. doi: 10.1038/ki.1993.234. No abstract available.

    PubMed 8394951
  • Wilson CH, Rix DA, Manas DM. Routine intraoperative ureteric stenting for kidney transplant recipients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 17;(6):CD004925. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004925.pub3.

    PubMed 23771708
  • de Souza RM, Olsburgh J. Urinary tract infection in the renal transplant patient. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol. 2008 May;4(5):252-64. doi: 10.1038/ncpneph0781. Epub 2008 Mar 11.

    PubMed 18334970
  • Ariza-Heredia EJ, Beam EN, Lesnick TG, Cosio FG, Kremers WK, Razonable RR. Impact of urinary tract infection on allograft function after kidney transplantation. Clin Transplant. 2014 Jun;28(6):683-90. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12366. Epub 2014 Apr 27.

    PubMed 24654771
  • Adamska Z, Karczewski M, Cichanska L, Wieckowska B, Malkiewicz T, Mahadea D, Stronka M. Bacterial Infections in Renal Transplant Recipients. Transplant Proc. 2015 Jul-Aug;47(6):1808-12. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.03.046.

    PubMed 26293055
  • Ak O, Yildirim M, Kucuk HF, Gencer S, Demir T. Infections in renal transplant patients: risk factors and infectious agents. Transplant Proc. 2013 Apr;45(3):944-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.02.080.

    PubMed 23622594

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Urinary catheter removal in people with Kidney Transplant; Complications and Kidney Transplant Infection, run by Medical University of Warsaw at 1 site in Poland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Urinary fistula (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04815954, which also lists 40 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in