EstheticsNCT04741607
Immediate Versus Late Placement
A study testing Implant placement (BLX implant system, Straumann, Basel, Switzerland), Ridge preservation (Bio-Oss Collagen 250 mg, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland) and Socket seal (Mucograft Seal, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland) in people with Esthetics, run by University Ghent at 2 sites in Belgium.
Trial summary
Patients in need of a single implant in the premaxilla will be invited to participate in this multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT). Prior to surgery, a small-field low-dose cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is taken to verify the integrity of the facial bone wall and an adequate amount of apical and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Esthetics
- What is being tested?
- Implant placement (BLX implant system, Straumann, Basel, Switzerland), Ridge preservation (Bio-Oss Collagen 250 mg, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland) and Socket seal (Mucograft Seal, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesBelgium
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2021to 1 Jan 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- at least 18 years old
- good oral hygiene defined as full-mouth plaque score ≤ 25% (O'Leary et al. 1972)
- presence of a single-rooted tooth in the anterior maxilla (15-25) that needs to be extracted for any reason with at least one neighboring tooth present
- at least 3 mm bone available at the apical or palatal aspect of the alveolus to ensure primary implant stability
- intact or nearly intact buccal bone wall at the time of extraction (max 3 mm bone missing = max 6 mm distance from free gingival margin to buccal bone crest)
Who cannot join
- systemic diseases
- smoking
- untreated periodontal disease
- untreated caries lesions
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Lorenz Seyssens, Phd candidate contact
Belgium2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Ghent University
Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, 9000
Jan Cosyn, Professor, jan.cosyn@ugent.be
Lorenz Seyssens, Phd candidate, lorenz.seyssens@ugent.be
- Recruiting
UCL St Luc
Liège
Selena Toma
Selena Toma
About this study
Official title: Alveolar Ridge Preservation With Immediate or Late Implant Placement: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Patients in need of a single implant in the premaxilla will be invited to participate in this multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT). Prior to surgery, a small-field low-dose cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is taken to verify the integrity of the facial bone wall and an adequate amount of apical and palatal bone dimensions. Sixty patients will be randomly allocated to the test group or control group in 6 centers. Each center receives 10 sealed envelopes (5 are internally labelled with 'delayed implant placement' and 5 with 'immediate implant placement').
For each patient a digital planning is performed in implant planning software and a tooth-supported surgical guide is fabricated prior to tooth extraction.
Read more
In the control group, alveolar ridge preservation is performed following tooth extraction. After a healing period of 4 months, a single implant is installed.
In the test group, a single implant is installed immediately after tooth extraction and ridge preservation is performed by filling the gap between the facial bone wall and the implant surface.
A provisional crown is placed at the day of implant surgery, which is replaced by a permanent one 3m later.
Six months after tooth extraction and subsequent ridge preservation, the need for soft tissue grafting is assessed on the base of predetermined criteria (primary outcome measure). Soft tissue augmentation is performed by inserting a palatal connective tissue graft (CTG) into the buccal mucosa at the implant site.
Secondary outcome measures include 3D hard and soft tissue changes as well as clinical, aesthetic, patient-reported and clinician-reported outcomes.
Read the detailed description
Patient selection Patients in need of a single implant in the premaxilla (15-25) will be included in this multicenter RCT following screening and after having received written consent.
Sample size calculation A sample size calculation using the Pearson Chi-square test was performed in SAS Power and Sample Size based on a comparison of the proportion on the need for soft tissue augmentation at 5 months following alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) between the control group (ARP + delayed implant placement 'DIP') and test group (ARP + immediate implant placement 'IIP'). The calculation was based on finding a 30% difference between these groups. With alpha set at 0.05 and a power of 0.80, the sample size calculation indicated 28 patients to be included per group. To compensate for drop-outs, 30 patients would be treated with ARP+DIP and 30 would be treated with ARP+IIP.
Clinicians and centers, randomization, allocation concealment and blinding Six experienced clinicians will treat at least 10 patients each. Five clinicians are staff members of the Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology at UGent - UZ Gent, who also work part-time in different private practices. The final clinician is a professor at the Saint-Luc University Hospital (UCL). The digital workflow, the implant placement protocol, the application of a connective tissue graft (CTG) at 6 months following ARP and the restorative protocol will be thoroughly discussed among the 6 clinicians in a training session before the start of the trial.
During the training session each clinician will receive 5 sealed envelopes internally coded as 'Delayed implant placement' and another 5 as 'immediate implant placement'. Just prior to surgery, a sealed envelope will be randomly selected and opened to reveal the treatment to be conducted. The measuring investigator will not be involved in the treatment of any of the patients and will be blinded to allow unbiased registrations.
Pre-operative digital planning for fabrication of surgical guide A digital workflow will be adopted for every patient for fabrication of a surgical guide prior to tooth extraction. This requires 3D digital implant planning in designated software on the basis of a pre-op low-dose small-field Cone-Beam CT and intra-oral scan. Note that surgical guides for patients in the ARP+DIP group will also be fabricated following patient selection, even though they are only to be used 4 months later.
Control group: ARP+DIP Patients start to take systemic antibiotics (Amoxicilline 1g) and anti-inflammatory medication (Ibuprofen 600 mg) 1h pre-operatively. Following local anesthesia (Septanest special, Septodont, Saint Maur des Fossés, France) and oral disinfection (Corsodyl mouth rinse, GSK, Wavre, Belgium), the failing tooth is extracted without raising a flap. Following socket debridement and rinsing, collagen-enriched DBBM (Bio-Oss Collagen 250 mg, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland) is applied up to the level of the palatal bone crest and slightly condensed. The occlusal aspect is closed with a collagen matrix (Mucograft Seal, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland), which is fixed with single sutures (Seralon 6/0, Serag Weissner, Naila, Germany) to the soft tissues. Post-op instructions include the intake of systemic antibiotics during 4 days (Amoxicilline 1g, two times a day), anti-inflammatory medication as deemed necessary by the patient and oral disinfection twice a day during 1 week. Then, sutures are removed. A removable partial denture as used as provisional tooth replacement when considered needed.
At 4 months, a mucoperiosteal flap is raised, the surgical guide is applied, and the implant is installed according to manufacturer's prescriptions. Then, an implant impression is taken for fabrication of a provisional crown. Prior to wound closure with vertical mattrass sutures (Seralon 6/0, Serag Weissner, Naila, Germany), an appropriate healing abutment is installed. This healing abutment is replaced by the provisional crown two days later.
At 6 months, the need for soft tissue augmentation is assessed by the 5 clinicians who have not been clinically involved. The treating clinician is excluded since he/she cannot be blinded for the treatment group. The need for soft tissue augmentation is assessed on the basis of screenshots from the pre-op CBCT with lip retractors enabling to evaluate buccal bone and soft tissue thickness. Pre-op clinical pictures, clinical pictures at 6 months with the provisional crown in situ and the STL file at 6 months are also offered to the panel in order to assess the loss of buccal convexity.
Soft tissue augmentation is required necessary when at least one of the following criteria are met: thin gingival biotype as defined as < 1mm midfacial soft tissue thickness as assessed on pre-op CBCT with lip retractors, thin buccal bone wall as defined as < 0.5mm as assessed on pre-op CBCT, loss of ideal buccal convexity at 6 months following ARP as assessed on the basis of clinical pictures and STL. Each clinician makes a decision on the need for soft tissue augmentation for 50 out of 60 cases independent from the other clinicians. Soft tissue augmentation is offered to the patient when the majority of the panel is in favor of it.
Soft tissue augmentation is performed using a CTG harvested from the lateral palate using the single incision technique. At the recipient site, a pouch is made in the buccal mucosa and an appropriately sized CTG is pulled in. The CTG is secured into the buccal mucosa with multiple single sutures (Seralon 6/0, Serag Weissner, Naila, Germany) and the provisional crown is re-installed. Sutures are removed after 1 week. The provisional crown is replaced by a permanent crown 3 months later.
Test group: ARP+IIP Patients start to take systemic antibiotics (Amoxicilline 1g) and anti-inflammatory medication (Ibuprofen 600 mg) 1h pre-operatively. Following local anesthesia (Septanest special, Septodont, Saint Maur des Fossés, France) and oral disinfection (Corsodyl mouth rinse, GSK, Wavre, Belgium), the failing tooth is extracted without raising a flap. Following socket debridement and rinsing, the surgical guide is applied, and the implant is installed according to manufacturer's prescriptions. Then, an implant impression is taken for fabrication of a provisional crown. Finally, the gap is filled with collagen-enriched DBBM (Bio-Oss Collagen 250 mg, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland), which is applied up to the level of the free mucosal margin, and an appropriate healing abutment is installed. This healing abutment is replaced by the provisional crown two days later.
At 6 months, the need for soft tissue augmentation is assessed by the 5 clinicians who have not been clinically involved. The treating clinician is excluded since he/she cannot be blinded for the treatment group. The need for soft tissue augmentation is assessed on the basis of screenshots from the pre-op CBCT with lip retractors enabling to evaluate buccal bone and soft tissue thickness. Pre-op clinical pictures, clinical pictures at 6 months with the provisional crown in situ and the STL file at 6 months are also offered to the panel in order to assess the loss of buccal convexity. Each clinician makes a decision on the need for soft tissue augmentation for 50 out of 60 cases independent from the other clinicians. Soft tissue augmentation is offered to the patient when the majority of the panel is in favor of it.
Soft tissue augmentation is performed using a CTG harvested from the lateral palate using the single incision technique. At the recipient site, a pouch is made in the buccal mucosa and an appropriately sized CTG is pulled in. The CTG is secured into the buccal mucosa with multiple single sutures (Seralon 6/0, Serag Weissner, Naila, Germany) and the provisional crown is re-installed. Sutures are removed after 1 week. The provisional crown is replaced by a permanent crown 3 months later.
- Conditions
- Esthetics
- Being tested
- Implant placement (BLX implant system, Straumann, Basel, Switzerland), Ridge preservation (Bio-Oss Collagen 250 mg, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland), Socket seal (Mucograft Seal, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland)
- Keywords
- connective tissue graft, dental implant, single tooth, immediate, ridge preservation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Implant placement (BLX implant system, Straumann, Basel, Switzerland)Device
Implants are placed after a healing period of 4 months (delayed implant placement, control group) or immediately after tooth extraction and ridge preservation (immediate implant placement, test group).
Ridge preservation (Bio-Oss Collagen 250 mg, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland)Procedure or surgery
Ridge preservation is performed by inserting a collagen-enriched DBBM (Bio-Oss Collagen 250 mg, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland) in the empty extraction socket (delayed implant placement, control group) or by filling the gap between the implant and buccal bone wall (immediate implant placement, test group).
Socket seal (Mucograft Seal, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland)Procedure or surgery
The occlusal aspect of the grafted socket in the delayed implant placement/control group is closed with a collagen matrix.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control group | Active comparator | Delayed implant placement Receives: Device: Implant placement (BLX implant system, Straumann, Basel, Switzerland); Procedure: Ridge preservation (Bio-Oss Collagen 250 mg, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland); Procedure: Socket seal (Mucograft Seal, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland) |
| Test group | Experimental | Immediate implant placement Receives: Device: Implant placement (BLX implant system, Straumann, Basel, Switzerland); Procedure: Ridge preservation (Bio-Oss Collagen 250 mg, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Need for soft tissue augmentation (true or false) as judged by a panel of clinicians
The need for soft tissue augmentation is assessed by the 5 clinicians who have not been clinically involved. The treating clinician is excluded since he/she cannot be blinded for the treatment group. The need for soft tissue augmentation is assessed on the basis of clinical pictures, a CBCT image and STL file.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (15)
Clinician-reported outcome measures
Ease of implant placement (Visual Analogue Scale). Minimum value = 0 (Very easy) Maximum value = 10 (Very difficult)
Measured: per-op
Changes in buccal soft tissue profile
Volumetric analysis with designated software on the basis of IOS (mm). Change in buccal soft tissue profile and the initial buccal soft tissue profile will be aggregated to calculate relative change in buccal soft tissue profile (=absolute change / initial buccal soft tissue profile, percent)
Measured: pre-op, 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Vertical change in midfacial soft tissue level
Analysed with designated software on the basis of IOS (mm)
Measured: pre-op, 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Change in width of the alveolar process
Horizontal measurements with designated software on the basis of CBCT scans (mm)
Measured: pre-op, 1 year, 5 year
Change in height of the alveolar process
vertical measurements with designated software on the basis of CBCT scans (mm)
Measured: pre-op, 1 year, 5 year
Change in buccal bone thickness
Horizontal measurements with designated software on the basis of CBCT scans (mm)
Measured: pre-op, 1 year, 5 year
Implant survival
presence of the implant
Measured: 6 months, 9 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Complication
Any complication
Measured: Up to 5 years
Changes in radiographic outcomes
marginal peri-implant bone level change as assessed by intra-oral radiography (mm)
Measured: implant placement, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Aesthetic outcome as assessed by care providers
Pink Aesthetic Score (0-14) = assessment of 7 different parameters (Mesial papilla, distal papilla, tissue contour, gingival level, alveolar process, coloring, texture) which are all rated 0 (worst) - 2 (best)
Measured: pre-op, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Aesthetic outcome as assessed by patients
Patients aesthetic satisfaction (Visual Analogue Scale) Minimum value = 0 (Very unsatisfied) Maximum value = 10 (Very satisfied)
Measured: pre-op, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Keratinized mucosa width
Vertical measurement performed with a periodontal probe (mm)
Measured: pre-op, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Probing pocket depth
Probing depth measured with a periodontal probe (mm)
Measured: pre-op, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Bleeding on probing
Bleeding on probing was registered 15 seconds following pocket probing at four sites per implant (mesial, distal, buccal, palatal) using a dichotomous score (0: no bleeding; 1: bleeding). These values were averaged and expressed as a percentage on implant level
Measured: pre-op, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Plaque
Plaque was recorded at four sites per implant (mesial, distal, buccal, palatal) using a dichotomous score (0: no visible plaque at the soft tissue margin; 1: visible plaque at the soft tissue margin). These values were averaged and expressed as a percentage on implant level.
Measured: pre-op, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Feb 2021
- Study start1 Jan 2021
- Primary completion1 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jan 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for EstheticsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Multicenter randomized controlled study with 2 treatment arms (control: delayed implant placement; test: immediate implant placement) and 6 centers
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Ghent
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04741607
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BC-08574
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 17 Oct 2020
- Last updated
- 2 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Avila-Ortiz G, Elangovan S, Kramer KW, Blanchette D, Dawson DV. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2014 Oct;93(10):950-8. doi: 10.1177/0022034514541127. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
PubMed 24966231Bittner N, Schulze-Spate U, Silva C, Da Silva JD, Kim DM, Tarnow D, Gil MS, Ishikawa-Nagai S. Changes of the alveolar ridge dimension and gingival recession associated with implant position and tissue phenotype with immediate implant placement: A randomised controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2019;12(4):469-480.
PubMed 31781700Cosyn J, De Bruyn H, Cleymaet R. Soft tissue preservation and pink aesthetics around single immediate implant restorations: a 1-year prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Dec;15(6):847-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00448.x. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
PubMed 22376232Cosyn J, Eghbali A, Hermans A, Vervaeke S, De Bruyn H, Cleymaet R. A 5-year prospective study on single immediate implants in the aesthetic zone. J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Aug;43(8):702-9. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12571. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
PubMed 27120578Cosyn J, Pollaris L, Van der Linden F, De Bruyn H. Minimally Invasive Single Implant Treatment (M.I.S.I.T.) based on ridge preservation and contour augmentation in patients with a high aesthetic risk profile: one-year results. J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Apr;42(4):398-405. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12384. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
PubMed 25728590Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada JL, Zimmerman G. Facial gingival tissue stability following immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: a 2- to 8-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jan-Feb;26(1):179-87.
PubMed 21365054Migliorati M, Amorfini L, Signori A, Biavati AS, Benedicenti S. Clinical and Aesthetic Outcome with Post-Extractive Implants with or without Soft Tissue Augmentation: A 2-Year Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Oct;17(5):983-95. doi: 10.1111/cid.12194. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
PubMed 24373419Sanz M, Lindhe J, Alcaraz J, Sanz-Sanchez I, Cecchinato D. The effect of placing a bone replacement graft in the gap at immediately placed implants: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Aug;28(8):902-910. doi: 10.1111/clr.12896. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
PubMed 27273298Seyssens L, Eghbali A, Cosyn J. A 10-year prospective study on single immediate implants. J Clin Periodontol. 2020 Oct;47(10):1248-1258. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13352. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
PubMed 32748983Yoshino S, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Roe P, Lozada JL. Effects of connective tissue grafting on the facial gingival level following single immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the esthetic zone: a 1-year randomized controlled prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Mar-Apr;29(2):432-40. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3379.
PubMed 24683571Zuiderveld EG, Meijer HJA, den Hartog L, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM. Effect of connective tissue grafting on peri-implant tissue in single immediate implant sites: A RCT. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Feb;45(2):253-264. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12820. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
PubMed 28941303
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Alveolar Ridge Preservation With Immediate or Late Implant Placement: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04741607
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BC-08574
- Conditions
- Esthetics
- Keywords
- connective tissue graft, dental implant, single tooth, immediate, ridge preservation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University GhentUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients in need of a single implant in the premaxilla will be invited to participate in this multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT). Prior to surgery, a small-field low-dose cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is taken to verify the integrity of the facial bone wall and an adequate amount of apical and palatal bone dimensions. Sixty patients will be randomly allocated to the test group or control group in 6 centers. Each center receives 10 sealed envelopes (5 are internally labelled with 'delayed implant placement' and 5 with 'immediate implant placement').
For each patient a digital planning is performed in implant planning software and a tooth-supported surgical guide is fabricated prior to tooth extraction.
In the control group, alveolar ridge preservation is performed following tooth extraction. After a healing period of 4 months, a single implant is installed.
In the test group, a single implant is installed immediately after tooth extraction and ridge preservation is performed by filling the gap between the facial bone wall and the implant surface.
A provisional crown is placed at the day of implant surgery, which is replaced by a permanent one 3m later.
Six months after tooth extraction and subsequent ridge preservation, the need for soft tissue grafting is assessed on the base of predetermined criteria (primary outcome measure). Soft tissue augmentation is performed by inserting a palatal connective tissue graft (CTG) into the buccal mucosa at the implant site.
Secondary outcome measures include 3D hard and soft tissue changes as well as clinical, aesthetic, patient-reported and clinician-reported outcomes.
Detailed description
Patient selection Patients in need of a single implant in the premaxilla (15-25) will be included in this multicenter RCT following screening and after having received written consent.
Sample size calculation A sample size calculation using the Pearson Chi-square test was performed in SAS Power and Sample Size based on a comparison of the proportion on the need for soft tissue augmentation at 5 months following alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) between the control group (ARP + delayed implant placement 'DIP') and test group (ARP + immediate implant placement 'IIP'). The calculation was based on finding a 30% difference between these groups. With alpha set at 0.05 and a power of 0.80, the sample size calculation indicated 28 patients to be included per group. To compensate for drop-outs, 30 patients would be treated with ARP+DIP and 30 would be treated with ARP+IIP.
Clinicians and centers, randomization, allocation concealment and blinding Six experienced clinicians will treat at least 10 patients each. Five clinicians are staff members of the Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology at UGent - UZ Gent, who also work part-time in different private practices. The final clinician is a professor at the Saint-Luc University Hospital (UCL). The digital workflow, the implant placement protocol, the application of a connective tissue graft (CTG) at 6 months following ARP and the restorative protocol will be thoroughly discussed among the 6 clinicians in a training session before the start of the trial.
During the training session each clinician will receive 5 sealed envelopes internally coded as 'Delayed implant placement' and another 5 as 'immediate implant placement'. Just prior to surgery, a sealed envelope will be randomly selected and opened to reveal the treatment to be conducted. The measuring investigator will not be involved in the treatment of any of the patients and will be blinded to allow unbiased registrations.
Pre-operative digital planning for fabrication of surgical guide A digital workflow will be adopted for every patient for fabrication of a surgical guide prior to tooth extraction. This requires 3D digital implant planning in designated software on the basis of a pre-op low-dose small-field Cone-Beam CT and intra-oral scan. Note that surgical guides for patients in the ARP+DIP group will also be fabricated following patient selection, even though they are only to be used 4 months later.
Control group: ARP+DIP Patients start to take systemic antibiotics (Amoxicilline 1g) and anti-inflammatory medication (Ibuprofen 600 mg) 1h pre-operatively. Following local anesthesia (Septanest special, Septodont, Saint Maur des Fossés, France) and oral disinfection (Corsodyl mouth rinse, GSK, Wavre, Belgium), the failing tooth is extracted without raising a flap. Following socket debridement and rinsing, collagen-enriched DBBM (Bio-Oss Collagen 250 mg, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland) is applied up to the level of the palatal bone crest and slightly condensed. The occlusal aspect is closed with a collagen matrix (Mucograft Seal, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland), which is fixed with single sutures (Seralon 6/0, Serag Weissner, Naila, Germany) to the soft tissues. Post-op instructions include the intake of systemic antibiotics during 4 days (Amoxicilline 1g, two times a day), anti-inflammatory medication as deemed necessary by the patient and oral disinfection twice a day during 1 week. Then, sutures are removed. A removable partial denture as used as provisional tooth replacement when considered needed.
At 4 months, a mucoperiosteal flap is raised, the surgical guide is applied, and the implant is installed according to manufacturer's prescriptions. Then, an implant impression is taken for fabrication of a provisional crown. Prior to wound closure with vertical mattrass sutures (Seralon 6/0, Serag Weissner, Naila, Germany), an appropriate healing abutment is installed. This healing abutment is replaced by the provisional crown two days later.
At 6 months, the need for soft tissue augmentation is assessed by the 5 clinicians who have not been clinically involved. The treating clinician is excluded since he/she cannot be blinded for the treatment group. The need for soft tissue augmentation is assessed on the basis of screenshots from the pre-op CBCT with lip retractors enabling to evaluate buccal bone and soft tissue thickness. Pre-op clinical pictures, clinical pictures at 6 months with the provisional crown in situ and the STL file at 6 months are also offered to the panel in order to assess the loss of buccal convexity.
Soft tissue augmentation is required necessary when at least one of the following criteria are met: thin gingival biotype as defined as < 1mm midfacial soft tissue thickness as assessed on pre-op CBCT with lip retractors, thin buccal bone wall as defined as < 0.5mm as assessed on pre-op CBCT, loss of ideal buccal convexity at 6 months following ARP as assessed on the basis of clinical pictures and STL. Each clinician makes a decision on the need for soft tissue augmentation for 50 out of 60 cases independent from the other clinicians. Soft tissue augmentation is offered to the patient when the majority of the panel is in favor of it.
Soft tissue augmentation is performed using a CTG harvested from the lateral palate using the single incision technique. At the recipient site, a pouch is made in the buccal mucosa and an appropriately sized CTG is pulled in. The CTG is secured into the buccal mucosa with multiple single sutures (Seralon 6/0, Serag Weissner, Naila, Germany) and the provisional crown is re-installed. Sutures are removed after 1 week. The provisional crown is replaced by a permanent crown 3 months later.
Test group: ARP+IIP Patients start to take systemic antibiotics (Amoxicilline 1g) and anti-inflammatory medication (Ibuprofen 600 mg) 1h pre-operatively. Following local anesthesia (Septanest special, Septodont, Saint Maur des Fossés, France) and oral disinfection (Corsodyl mouth rinse, GSK, Wavre, Belgium), the failing tooth is extracted without raising a flap. Following socket debridement and rinsing, the surgical guide is applied, and the implant is installed according to manufacturer's prescriptions. Then, an implant impression is taken for fabrication of a provisional crown. Finally, the gap is filled with collagen-enriched DBBM (Bio-Oss Collagen 250 mg, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland), which is applied up to the level of the free mucosal margin, and an appropriate healing abutment is installed. This healing abutment is replaced by the provisional crown two days later.
At 6 months, the need for soft tissue augmentation is assessed by the 5 clinicians who have not been clinically involved. The treating clinician is excluded since he/she cannot be blinded for the treatment group. The need for soft tissue augmentation is assessed on the basis of screenshots from the pre-op CBCT with lip retractors enabling to evaluate buccal bone and soft tissue thickness. Pre-op clinical pictures, clinical pictures at 6 months with the provisional crown in situ and the STL file at 6 months are also offered to the panel in order to assess the loss of buccal convexity. Each clinician makes a decision on the need for soft tissue augmentation for 50 out of 60 cases independent from the other clinicians. Soft tissue augmentation is offered to the patient when the majority of the panel is in favor of it.
Soft tissue augmentation is performed using a CTG harvested from the lateral palate using the single incision technique. At the recipient site, a pouch is made in the buccal mucosa and an appropriately sized CTG is pulled in. The CTG is secured into the buccal mucosa with multiple single sutures (Seralon 6/0, Serag Weissner, Naila, Germany) and the provisional crown is re-installed. Sutures are removed after 1 week. The provisional crown is replaced by a permanent crown 3 months later.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Multicenter randomized controlled study with 2 treatment arms (control: delayed implant placement; test: immediate implant placement) and 6 centers
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control group | Active comparator | Device: Implant placement (BLX implant system, Straumann, Basel, Switzerland), Procedure: Ridge preservation (Bio-Oss Collagen 250 mg, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland), Procedure: Socket seal (Mucograft Seal, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland)Delayed implant placement |
| Test group | Experimental | Device: Implant placement (BLX implant system, Straumann, Basel, Switzerland), Procedure: Ridge preservation (Bio-Oss Collagen 250 mg, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland)Immediate implant placement |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- at least 18 years old
- good oral hygiene defined as full-mouth plaque score ≤ 25% (O'Leary et al. 1972)
- presence of a single-rooted tooth in the anterior maxilla (15-25) that needs to be extracted for any reason with at least one neighboring tooth present
- at least 3 mm bone available at the apical or palatal aspect of the alveolus to ensure primary implant stability
- intact or nearly intact buccal bone wall at the time of extraction (max 3 mm bone missing = max 6 mm distance from free gingival margin to buccal bone crest)
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- systemic diseases
- smoking
- untreated periodontal disease
- untreated caries lesions
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Implant placement (BLX implant system, Straumann, Basel, Switzerland)Implants are placed after a healing period of 4 months (delayed implant placement, control group) or immediately after tooth extraction and ridge preservation (immediate implant placement, test group). | Device | Control group, Test group |
| Ridge preservation (Bio-Oss Collagen 250 mg, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland)Ridge preservation is performed by inserting a collagen-enriched DBBM (Bio-Oss Collagen 250 mg, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland) in the empty extraction socket (delayed implant placement, control group) or by filling the gap between the implant and buccal bone wall (immediate implant placement, test group). | Procedure or surgery | Control group, Test group |
| Socket seal (Mucograft Seal, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland)The occlusal aspect of the grafted socket in the delayed implant placement/control group is closed with a collagen matrix. | Procedure or surgery | Control group |
Primary outcome
Need for soft tissue augmentation (true or false) as judged by a panel of clinicians
Time frame: 6 months
The need for soft tissue augmentation is assessed by the 5 clinicians who have not been clinically involved. The treating clinician is excluded since he/she cannot be blinded for the treatment group. The need for soft tissue augmentation is assessed on the basis of clinical pictures, a CBCT image and STL file.
15 secondary outcomes
Clinician-reported outcome measures
Time frame: per-op
Changes in buccal soft tissue profile
Time frame: pre-op, 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Vertical change in midfacial soft tissue level
Time frame: pre-op, 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Change in width of the alveolar process
Time frame: pre-op, 1 year, 5 year
Change in height of the alveolar process
Time frame: pre-op, 1 year, 5 year
Change in buccal bone thickness
Time frame: pre-op, 1 year, 5 year
Implant survival
Time frame: 6 months, 9 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Complication
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Changes in radiographic outcomes
Time frame: implant placement, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Aesthetic outcome as assessed by care providers
Time frame: pre-op, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Aesthetic outcome as assessed by patients
Time frame: pre-op, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Keratinized mucosa width
Time frame: pre-op, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Probing pocket depth
Time frame: pre-op, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Bleeding on probing
Time frame: pre-op, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Plaque
Time frame: pre-op, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Feb 2024.
- Background: PubMed 24966231Avila-Ortiz G, Elangovan S, Kramer KW, Blanchette D, Dawson DV. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2014 Oct;93(10):950-8. doi: 10.1177/0022034514541127. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
- Background: PubMed 31781700Bittner N, Schulze-Spate U, Silva C, Da Silva JD, Kim DM, Tarnow D, Gil MS, Ishikawa-Nagai S. Changes of the alveolar ridge dimension and gingival recession associated with implant position and tissue phenotype with immediate implant placement: A randomised controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2019;12(4):469-480.
- Background: PubMed 22376232Cosyn J, De Bruyn H, Cleymaet R. Soft tissue preservation and pink aesthetics around single immediate implant restorations: a 1-year prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013 Dec;15(6):847-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00448.x. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
- Background: PubMed 27120578Cosyn J, Eghbali A, Hermans A, Vervaeke S, De Bruyn H, Cleymaet R. A 5-year prospective study on single immediate implants in the aesthetic zone. J Clin Periodontol. 2016 Aug;43(8):702-9. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12571. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
- Background: PubMed 25728590Cosyn J, Pollaris L, Van der Linden F, De Bruyn H. Minimally Invasive Single Implant Treatment (M.I.S.I.T.) based on ridge preservation and contour augmentation in patients with a high aesthetic risk profile: one-year results. J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Apr;42(4):398-405. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12384. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
- Background: PubMed 21365054Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada JL, Zimmerman G. Facial gingival tissue stability following immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: a 2- to 8-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Jan-Feb;26(1):179-87.
- Background: PubMed 24373419Migliorati M, Amorfini L, Signori A, Biavati AS, Benedicenti S. Clinical and Aesthetic Outcome with Post-Extractive Implants with or without Soft Tissue Augmentation: A 2-Year Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Oct;17(5):983-95. doi: 10.1111/cid.12194. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
- Background: PubMed 27273298Sanz M, Lindhe J, Alcaraz J, Sanz-Sanchez I, Cecchinato D. The effect of placing a bone replacement graft in the gap at immediately placed implants: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Aug;28(8):902-910. doi: 10.1111/clr.12896. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
- Background: PubMed 32748983Seyssens L, Eghbali A, Cosyn J. A 10-year prospective study on single immediate implants. J Clin Periodontol. 2020 Oct;47(10):1248-1258. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13352. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
- Background: PubMed 24683571Yoshino S, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Roe P, Lozada JL. Effects of connective tissue grafting on the facial gingival level following single immediate implant placement and provisionalization in the esthetic zone: a 1-year randomized controlled prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 Mar-Apr;29(2):432-40. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3379.
- Background: PubMed 28941303Zuiderveld EG, Meijer HJA, den Hartog L, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM. Effect of connective tissue grafting on peri-implant tissue in single immediate implant sites: A RCT. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Feb;45(2):253-264. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12820. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Esthetics
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Association Between Peri-implant Soft Tissue Thickness and Midfacial Marginal Mucosal Recession
Midfacial Mucosal Recession
RecruitingObservational study
Autologous Hair Follicle Derived Secretome as Adjunct to Aesthetic Procedures
Post Procedural Erythema
RecruitingPhase 4
PLLA and CaHA-R for Aesthetic Rejuvenation
Aesthetic
Not yet recruiting
Accuracy of Stackable Double Periodontal Guide in Esthetic Crown Lengthening
Gummy Smile of Altered Passive Eruption Type 1B
Not yet recruiting
MEBO Bio-Dressing on Patient-Reported Outcomes and Tissue Healing Following Rotary Gingival Depigmentation
Gingival Hyperpigmentation, Oral Health-Related Quality of Life
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Lorenz Seyssens, Phd candidate contact
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Implant placement (BLX implant system, Straumann, Basel, Switzerland), Ridge preservation (Bio-Oss Collagen 250 mg, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland) and Socket seal (Mucograft Seal, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switserland) in people with Esthetics, run by University Ghent at 2 sites in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jan Cosyn, Professor (+3293324000, jan.cosyn@ugent.be), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Need for soft tissue augmentation (true or false) as judged by a panel of clinicians (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04741607, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Feb 2024.