AzTrials
AzTrials

FrailtyPOSITIVENCT04592146

Maintaining and imPrOving the intrinSIc capaciTy Involving Primary Care and caregiVErs

A study testing Frailty multicomponent intervention supported by POSITIVE and Frailty multicomponent intervention in people with Frailty and Frailty Syndrome, run by Hospital Universitario Getafe at 3 sites in 3 countries.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The POSITIVE platform offers the possibility of unsupervised monitoring of pre-frailty and frailty status in a community setting, to detect the onset of frailty and to assess its evolution. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 70 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Frailty, Frailty Syndrome, Frail Elderly Syndrome
What is being tested?
Frailty multicomponent intervention supported by POSITIVE and Frailty multicomponent intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
150 participants
Where
3 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
1 Nov 2020to 30 Jun 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 70 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 70.
  • Living at home.
  • Having a caregiver/relative and/or supervision at home.
  • Barthel ≥ 90.
  • Meet at least 1 criterion from Fried's Criteria.

Who cannot join

  • Inadequate home infrastructure to host the required technology.
  • Inability to understand on how to use the POSITIVE system by the participant.
  • Diseases that may affect prescription therapy:
  • History of alcohol/drugs abuse.
  • Living with another participant.
  • Participating in other clinical studies.
  • Three or more hospitalizations in the last year.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 3 countries.

Rodrigo Pérez-Rodríguez, PhD contact

+34657994364

rprodrigo@salud.madrid.org

Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas, MD, PhD contact

leocadio.rodriguez@salud.madrid.org

3 sites in 3 countries

Poland1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Medical University of Lodz

    Lodz, 90-419

    Tomasz Kostka, PhD, +48 426793144 ext. 251, tomasz.kostka@umed.lodz.pl

    Tomasz Kostka, PhD

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in Poland

Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de Getafe

    Getafe, Madrid, 28905

    Rodrigo Pérez-Rodríguez, PhD, +34657994364, rprodrigo@salu.madrid.org

    Leocadio Rodríguez-Mañas, PdD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Spain

Sweden1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Karolinska Institutet

    Stockholm, 14183

    Susanne GE Guidetti, PhD, +46 (0)739 661636, susanne.guidetti@ki.se

    Susanne GE Guidetti, MsC

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Official title: POSITIVE: Maintaining and imPrOving the intrinSIc capaciTy Involving Primary Care and caregiVErs

The POSITIVE platform offers the possibility of unsupervised monitoring of pre-frailty and frailty status in a community setting, to detect the onset of frailty and to assess its evolution.

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate whether the POSITIVE system improves frailty in at least 1 point in the Fried's Criteria and 5 points in the FTS-5.

This is a multi-centre, non-inferiority, randomized, simple blind and prospective pilot study with a 12-month follow up duration. The study will be carried out in Spain, Sweden and Poland. 150 participants will be randomized into two groups. The control group will receive usual medical care. The intervention group will receive, in addition, the POSITIVE frailty home monitoring and intervention system.

Read the detailed description

The primary endpoints is to evaluate whether a multimodal intervention supported by the POSITIVE technological ecosystem improves frailty in at least 1 point in Fried's Criteria and 5 points in FTS-5 during a 6-month follow-up period.

This objective will be investigated through a multi-centre, non-inferiority, randomized, simple blind and prospective pilot study with an intervention lasting for 6 months. The study will be carried out in Spain, Sweden and Poland. 150 participants (50 per site) will be randomized into two groups. The control group will receive usual medical care. The intervention group will receive, in addition, the POSITIVE frailty home monitoring and intervention system.

Both groups will be assessed with the same instruments. This assessment will be conducted at baseline (in the beginning of the trial period), at the middle (month 3) and at the end of the intervention (month 6).

A stratified randomization technique will be applied in each of the study groups based on: age group (70-85,> 85), history of cognitive impairment, history of stroke to guarantee the existence of comparable groups. These factors have been significantly associated with frailty and pre-frailty status (stroke OR =3.11 (1.05-9.18), age, per 1-year OR = 1.14 (1.08-1.21); cognitive impairment OR = 8.37 (4.43-15.83)).

Being tested
Frailty multicomponent intervention supported by POSITIVE, Frailty multicomponent intervention
Keywords
Frailty, Technology, Home monitoring, Older persons
Medical subject headings
Frailty

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Frailty multicomponent intervention supported by POSITIVEDevice

    This technology mainly consists in a home monitoring kit periodically measuring gait speed, involuntary weight loss and power in the lower limb. Furthermore, through a tablet device, other relevant information (e.g. state of mind, activities of daily living-ADLs, etc.) is collected. The same device is used to enhance communication with the clinical team and follow the tailored intervention

  • Frailty multicomponent interventionOther

    This intervention is based on 3 main pillars: medication review (to avoid polypharmacy), tailored nutritional recommendations and a tailored physical activity plan based on the VIVIFRAIL program.

Study groups in NCT04592146
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control groupActive comparatorParticipants randomized into the intervention group will receive care according to the current organizational model in each pilot site (managed by community care). Frailty care will consist in a multicomponent intervention.
Receives: Other: Frailty multicomponent intervention
Intervention groupExperimentalParticipants randomized into the intervention group will receive the same intervention as those allocated into the control group, but this intervention will be supported by the POSITIVE technology.Informal caregivers will also receive an app to follow the evolution of the cared person. As in the control group, participants allocated into the intervention group will be managed by community care; these professionals will have access to the evolution of the older persons so they can take promote actions in case early deterioration is detected.
Receives: Device: Frailty multicomponent intervention supported by POSITIVE; Other: Frailty multicomponent intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Frailty status 1

    Evaluation of the impact of the technology supported intervention in terms of frailty measured with the Linda Fried's criteria. This test ranges from 0 to 5 (0: robust; 1-2: pre-frailty; +2: frailty).

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Frailty status 2

    To evaluate whether a multimodal intervention supported by the POSITIVE technological ecosystem improves frailty in at least 5 points in Frail trait scale (FTS-5) during a 6-month follow-up period. FTS scores between 0-50. 0 is the best value and 50 the worst value.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Frailty trajectories 1

    Trajectories of frailty according to changes in Fried´s phenotype. Fried´s Phenotype scores between 0 and 5. 0 means robust; 1-2 mean pre-frail and 3 or more mean frail

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Frailty trajectories 2

    To evaluate whether the POSITIVE system improves frailty transitions in pre-frail and frail participants according to FTS-5.

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Physical function 1

    To evaluate whether the POSITIVE system improves participants' physical performance according to the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB).SPPB scores between 0-12. 0 is the worst and 12 the best value.

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Physical function 2

    To evaluate whether the POSITIVE system improves participants' physical performance according to the Gait Speed test (meters/second)

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Basic activities daily living (BADL)

    To evaluate the influence of the POSITIVE system in patients' autonomy every day life (basic activities) according to the Barthel Index. Barthel scores between 0-100; 0 is the worst value and 100 the best.

    Measured: 6 months

  6. Disability

    To evaluate the influence of the POSITIVE system in patients' autonomy every day life (instrumental activities) according to WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0). Score between 0 to 100 (where 0 = no disability; 100 = full disability)

    Measured: 6 months

  7. Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL)

    To evaluate the influence of the POSITIVE system in patients' autonomy every day life (instrumental activities) according to the Lawton and Brody scale. Lawton and Brody scale scores between 0-10; 0 is the worst and 10 the best value.

    Measured: 6 months

  8. Health-related quality of life

    To evaluate the influence of the POSITIVE system in the quality of life according to the European Quality of life 5 dimensions-5 levels (EuroQoL 5D-5L). EuroQoL scores between 0-10 and 10 is the worst quality of life.

    Measured: 6 months

  9. Cognitive impairment 1

    To evaluate the influence of the POSITIVE system in the cognitive sphere according to the MONTREAL COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT (MoCA test). Scores between 0-30 being 30 the best value.

    Measured: 6 months

  10. Cognitive impairment 2

    To evaluate the influence of the POSITIVE system in the cognitive sphere according to the clock drawing test. Score ranges between 0-10. <8 suggests that cognitive impairment (CI)

    Measured: 6 months

  11. Affective sphere

    To evaluate the influence of the POSITIVE system in the affective sphere according Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Each answer indicating depression (bold 'yes' or 'no) counts one point. Scores greater than 5 are indicative of probable depression.

    In the experimental site located in Sweden, the version of this scale will be used.

    Measured: 6 months

  12. Caregiver quality of life

    To evaluate the influence of the POSITIVE system on the caregiver quality of life according EuroQoL-5D-5L.

    Measured: 6 months

  13. To evaluate the usability of the POSITIVE system according to the System Usability Scale (SUS).

    SUS ranges from 0 to 100. A SUS score above a 68 would be considered above average and anything below 68 is below average..

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Oct 2020
  2. Study start1 Nov 2020
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Multi-centre, non-inferiority, randomized, simple blind and prospective pilot study.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
150 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04592146
Sponsor's protocol ID
POSITIVE
Acronym
POSITIVE
Status last verified
Oct 2020
First submitted
30 Sep 2020
Last updated
12 Feb 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Terio M, Perez-Rodriguez R, Guevara Guevara T, Valdes-Aragones M, Kornevs M, Bjalevik-Chronan S, Taloyan M, Meijer S, Guidetti S. Preventing frailty with the support of a home-monitoring and communication platform among older adults-a study protocol for a randomised-controlled pilot study in Sweden. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2022 Aug 23;8(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01147-4.

    PubMed 35999616

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Frailty multicomponent intervention supported by POSITIVE and Frailty multicomponent intervention in people with Frailty and Frailty Syndrome, run by Hospital Universitario Getafe at 3 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Poland, Spain, Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Rodrigo Pérez-Rodríguez, PhD (+34657994364, rprodrigo@salud.madrid.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Frailty status 1 (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04592146, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Feb 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in