AzTrials
AzTrials

Piriformis SyndromeNCT04588779

Graston vs Manual Myofascial Release Technique in Piriformis Syndrome.

A study testing Graston and Manual myofascial release in people with Piriformis Syndrome, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of our study is to compare the effects of Graston and manual myofascial release technique on pain, muscle length and functional status in patients with Piriformis syndrome. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 25 to 60 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Piriformis Syndrome
What is being tested?
Graston and Manual myofascial release
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
11 Jan 2020to 24 Sep 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 25 to 60 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Pain more than 1 month.
  • Piriformis syndrome diagnosed through screening test (FAIR test, Beatty test, Freiberg test, Sign of Pace)

Who cannot join

  • Leg pain due to causes other than piriformis syndrome.
  • Congenital spinal deformity.
  • History of fracture.
  • History of back or hip surgery.
  • Any systemic illness like metastatic or infective disorders.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Federal government polyclinic hospital

    Islamabad, Fedral, 46000

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Graston and Manual Myofacial Release Technique in Patients With Piriformis Syndrome.

The objective of our study is to compare the effects of Graston and manual myofascial release technique on pain, muscle length and functional status in patients with Piriformis syndrome.

Read the detailed description

In 2019, a study was conducted to conclude the effectiveness of Passive stretching v/s Myofascial release in improving Piriformis flexibility in females. They reported that myofascial release was more valuable than passive stretching exercises in enhancing piriformis flexibility in patients with piriformis tightness.

According to another study in 2018, after a single treatment, compressive myofascial release showed more improvement in ankle dorsiflexion than Graston technique, in participants with decrease dorsiflexion range.

In 2016, a study reported the effects of the Graston technique and general exercise in patients with chronic low back pain. Graston group showed greater improvement in pain and range of motion in patients with chronic low back pain.

According to a study conducted in 2014, self-myofascial release was more effective than Graston technique in improving knee joint flexibility, hamstring, and quadriceps strength.

In 2011, a study evaluated the effectiveness of deep soft tissue mobilization techniques and stretching exercises in piriformis syndrome and found that the deep soft tissue mobilization techniques along with stretching exercises significantly improved the piriformis syndrome.

Being tested
Graston, Manual myofascial release
Keywords
Graston technique, Myofascial release, Lower extremity functional scale, Piriformis syndrome
Medical subject headings
Piriformis Muscle Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • GrastonOther

    Ultrasound for 10 mins/1 set/ (3 sessions/week), Graston for 5 mins/1 set/ (3 sessions/week), Piriformis stretching exercises/ 10 reps with 30 sec hold/ 1 set/(3 sessions/week), Hip abductor strengthening/10 reps/1 set/(3 weeks), Hip extensor strengthening/10 reps/1 set/(3 weeks),

    A total of 9 sessions for 3 weeks (3 sessions/week) were given each consisting of 20 mins.

  • Manual myofascial releaseOther

    Ultrasound for 10 mins/1 set/ (3 sessions/week), Manual myofascial release for 5 mins/1 set/ (3 sessions/week), Piriformis stretching exercises/ 10 reps with 30 sec hold/ 1 set/(3 sessions/week), Hip abductor strengthening/10 reps/1 set/(3 weeks), Hip extensor strengthening/10 reps/1 set/(3 weeks),

    A total of 9 sessions for 3 weeks (3 sessions/week) were given each consisting of 20 mins.

Study groups in NCT04588779
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
GrastonExperimentalUltrasound, Graston technique, piriformis stretching, home plan (hip abductor and extensor strengthening)
Receives: Other: Graston
Manual myofascial releaseActive comparatorUltrasound, Manual myofascial release, piriformis stretching, home plan (hip abductor and extensor strengthening)
Receives: Other: Manual myofascial release

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Numeric Pain Rating Scale

    Changes from baseline and after 1st session, Numeric pain rating scale is a scale from 0 to 10. 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating worse pain.

    Measured: 9th day

  2. Piriformis muscle length

    Changes from baseline and after 1st session, in prone lying range of internal rotation is measured for piriformis muscle length

    Measured: 9th day

  3. Lower extremity functional scale

    Changes from baseline and after 1st session, lower extremity functional scale is used to measure the functional status of patients with piriformis syndrome.

    Measured: 9th day

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Straight leg raise

    Changes from baseline and after 1st session, goniometer is used to measure the straight leg raise range.

    Measured: 9th day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Oct 2020
  2. Study start11 Jan 2020
  3. Primary completion17 Sep 2020
  4. Study completion24 Sep 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Both groups were treated simultaneously with their specified treatment techniques within given duration.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04588779
Sponsor's protocol ID
REC/00689 Sonia Wali
Status last verified
Oct 2020
First submitted
9 Oct 2020
Last updated
19 Oct 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Kukadia HA, Malshikare A, Palekar TJ. Effect of Passive Stretching v/s Myofascial Release in Improving Piriformis Flexibility in Females-A Comparative Study. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy-An International Journal. 2019;13(4):57-61.

  • Stanek J, Sullivan T, Davis S. Comparison of Compressive Myofascial Release and the Graston Technique for Improving Ankle-Dorsiflexion Range of Motion. J Athl Train. 2018 Feb;53(2):160-167. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-386-16. Epub 2018 Jan 26.

    PubMed 29373060
  • Lee JH, Lee DK, Oh JS. The effect of Graston technique on the pain and range of motion in patients with chronic low back pain. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Jun;28(6):1852-5. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.1852. Epub 2016 Jun 28.

    PubMed 27390432
  • Kim D-H, Ms T-HK, Jung D-Y, Weon J-H. Effects of the graston technique and self-myofascial release on the range of motion of a knee joint. Journal of Korean Society of Physical Medicine. 2014;9(4):455-63.

  • Awan WA, Babur MN. EFFECTIVENESS OF DEEP FRICTION MASSAGE & STRETCHING EXERCISES IN PIRIFORMIS SYNDROME. IJCRB. 2011:378.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Graston and Manual myofascial release in people with Piriformis Syndrome, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Numeric Pain Rating Scale (time frame: 9th day). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04588779, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Oct 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in