AzTrials
AzTrials

DistressNCT04574466

Scaling-up Psychological Interventions With Syrian Refugees in Switzerland (STRENGTHS_CH): RCT

A study testing Problem Management Plus in people with Distress and PTSD, run by University of Zurich at 1 site in Switzerland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The current refugee crisis across the Middle East and Europe has large effects on individual refugees' psychological well-being, as well as on the healthcare systems of countries hosting refugees. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Distress, PTSD, Anxiety
What is being tested?
Problem Management Plus
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
54 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
25 Aug 2020to 31 Dec 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male and female Arabic-speaking refugees or asylum seekers who entered Switzerland after March 2011
  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • Arabic-speaking (Levantine Arabic)
  • Signed Informed Consent after being informed
  • Increased psychological distress (K10 > 15)
  • Reduced psychological functioning (WHODAS 2.0 > 16)

Who cannot join

  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study
  • Previous enrolment into the current study phase
  • Participants under tutelage
  • Acute or severe psychiatric (e.g. schizophrenia) or neurological illness (e.g. dementia)
  • Imminent suicide risk

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • Klinik für Konsiliarpsychiatrie und Psychosomatik

    Zurich, 8091

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Scaling-up Psychological Interventions With Syrian Refugees in Switzerland: RCT

The current refugee crisis across the Middle East and Europe has large effects on individual refugees' psychological well-being, as well as on the healthcare systems of countries hosting refugees. For example, in Switzerland patients sometimes have to wait up to 12 months for the specific psychological treatment due to a lack of specialists. To address this problem the WHO has developed Problem Management Plus (PM+), a brief (five sessions), low-intensity psychological intervention, delivered by paraprofessionals, that addresses common mental disorders in people in communities affected by adversity. The effectiveness and implementation of PM+ has never been examined in Switzerland before, this is the aim of the current randomized controlled trial.

Read the detailed description

Recent crises in the Middle East have resulted in an unprecedented increase in the worldwide number of refugees and asylum seekers. Switzerland (CH) is strongly affected by this crisis too.There are currently about 19'000 Syrian refugees and asylum seekers in Switzerland. A similar number of other Arabic-speaking individuals have applied for asylum in Switzerland since 2011. Due to the ongoing war in the MENA region, it is unlikely that this kind of migration and flight will resolve within the next years.

Refugees have typically been exposed to multiple stressors related to war and displacement including loss of family members, destruction of homes and livelihoods and human rights violations such as sexual violence or torture. They have often undertaken a risky and stressful flight leaving their homes for an unknown future. Accordingly, various studies have shown that refugees are at considerable risk of developing common mental disorders, including depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and related somatic health symptoms.

According to the UNHCR, 85% of all displaced persons are hosted in third-world countries where appropriate mental health care is often not available. However, Western health systems are also often unable to appropriately cover the needs of this particularly vulnerable population regarding prevention and treatment of mental health problems. As a response to this situation, the WHO developed the low-intensity Problem Management Plus (PM+) programs, a new generation of short, resource-sparing, trans-diagnostic (i.e., not specifically aimed at treating a certain mental disorder) programs to reduce common mental health symptoms and improve psychosocial functioning. PM+ is based on the WHO treatment guidelines for conditions related to stress. PM+ is a 5-sessions intervention aimed at reducing symptoms of depression, anxiety, PTSD, and related conditions, is delivered by trained non-specialized workers or lay people, and is available in individual and group delivery formats for both children and adults. It comprises evidence-based techniques of (a) problem solving, (b) stress management, (c) behavioral activation, and (d) accessing social support. PM+ has been successfully tested for effectiveness in Kenya and Pakistan.

The STRENGTHS (Syrian REfuGees MeNTal HealTH Care Systems) study aims at evaluating the effectiveness and implementation of PM+ with Syrian refugees in different settings in low- and high-resource countries. The study consortium includes international experts in the domains of trauma and public mental health as well as representatives of WHO and UNHCR. The Zürich study site has been consigned to examine PM+ with adult refugees in an individual treatment setting in Switzerland. At the same time, similar studies in other countries will be undertaken. Despite the objective of these studies to implement and evaluate the effectiveness of PM+ in refugees, each research institution acts independently. Moreover, the other studies will be completed in different treatment settings - i.e., in children and adolescents (Lebanon), in groups (Turkey and Netherlands), and internet-delivered PM+ (Germany and Egypt).

To date, the effectiveness and implementation of PM+ has not been investigated in a highly industrialized country, such as Switzerland.

In the present study, the investigators will evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of PM+ in Arabic speaking refugees in Switzerland.

Being tested
Problem Management Plus
Keywords
Problem Management Plus, Distress, Mental Health Care, Low-intensity, Refugees
Medical subject headings
Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Wounds and Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Problem Management PlusBehavioural

    Problem Management Plus (PM+) is a new, brief, psychological intervention program based on CBT techniques that are empirically supported and formally recommended by the WHO. The full protocol was developed by the WHO and the University of New South Wales, Australia. The manual involves the following empirically supported elements: problem solving plus stress management, behavioural activation, facing fears, and accessing social support. These elements have been recommended in recent WHO guidelines.

Study groups in NCT04574466
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Enhanced Treatment As Usual (ETAU)No interventionThe control group will receive enhanced treatment as usual (ETAU). ETAU means that the research team will advise the participants to contact their doctor in case of physical or mental health problems. Moreover, the research team will hand over written information (official booklet) about the operating of the Swiss health care system. Adequate treatment will be provided by a physician, usually, a general practitioner who acts as a gate-keeper (an asylum seeker or refugee has to go first to his/her assigned GP in order to get access to the health care system).
Problem Management PlusExperimentalThe participants who are assigned to the intervention group will receive five sessions of PM+, a psychological intervention which has been developed by the WHO. PM+ is a new short, transdiagnostic (i.e., not specifically aimed at treating a certain mental disorder) program aiming to reduce common mental health symptoms and improve psychosocial functioning. PM+ is a new, brief, psychological intervention program based on Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) techniques that are empirically supported and formally recommended by the WHO. The full protocol was developed by the WHO and the University of New South Wales, Australia. The manual involves the following empirically supported elements: problem solving plus stress management, behavioural activation, and accessing social support. These elements have been recommended in recent WHO guidelines. PM+ has proven to be effective by two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in Kenya and Pakistan.
Receives: Behavioral: Problem Management Plus

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in psychological distress

    Change of psychological distress measured with the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25) serves as primary beneficiary-related health outcome. The 25 items are rated on a scale from 1 to 4. Higher scores indicate more pronounced symptom severity.

    Measured: Baseline assessment, 1 week post-intervention assessment (6 weeks after baseline), 3 month post-intervention assessment (4-4.5 months after baseline), 12 month post intervention assessment

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Change in posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms

    Change in posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms measured with the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Responses are scored on a scale from 0 to 4 with higher scores indicating more pronounced symptom severity.

    Measured: Baseline assessment, 1 week post-intervention assessment (6 weeks after baseline), 3 month post-intervention assessment (4-4.5 months after baseline), 12 month post intervention assessment

  2. Change in functional disability

    Change in functional disability measured with the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0). The items are rated on a scale from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate more pronounced functional disability.

    Measured: Screening, 1 week post-intervention assessment (6 weeks after baseline), 3 month post-intervention assessment (4-4.5 months after baseline), 12 month post intervention assessment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Oct 2020
  2. Study start25 Aug 2020
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2022
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The definitive RCT will inform us about the effectiveness and implementation of the intervention. After the baseline assessment, three hundred eighty participants (N = 380) will be involved in the exploratory RCT (assigned to either the PM+ intervention (n=190) or the ETAU control condition (n=190)).
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
54 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04574466
Sponsor's protocol ID
BASEC-2017-01175-rct
Status last verified
May 2023
First submitted
16 Sep 2020
Last updated
9 May 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Sijbrandij M, Acarturk C, Bird M, Bryant RA, Burchert S, Carswell K, de Jong J, Dinesen C, Dawson KS, El Chammay R, van Ittersum L, Jordans M, Knaevelsrud C, McDaid D, Miller K, Morina N, Park AL, Roberts B, van Son Y, Sondorp E, Pfaltz MC, Ruttenberg L, Schick M, Schnyder U, van Ommeren M, Ventevogel P, Weissbecker I, Weitz E, Wiedemann N, Whitney C, Cuijpers P. Strengthening mental health care systems for Syrian refugees in Europe and the Middle East: integrating scalable psychological interventions in eight countries. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017 Nov 7;8(sup2):1388102. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1388102. eCollection 2017.

    PubMed 29163867
  • Dawson KS, Bryant RA, Harper M, Kuowei Tay A, Rahman A, Schafer A, van Ommeren M. Problem Management Plus (PM+): a WHO transdiagnostic psychological intervention for common mental health problems. World Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;14(3):354-7. doi: 10.1002/wps.20255. No abstract available.

    PubMed 26407793
  • Steel Z, Chey T, Silove D, Marnane C, Bryant RA, van Ommeren M. Association of torture and other potentially traumatic events with mental health outcomes among populations exposed to mass conflict and displacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2009 Aug 5;302(5):537-49. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1132.

    PubMed 19654388
  • Rahman A, Khan MN, Hamdani SU, Chiumento A, Akhtar P, Nazir H, Nisar A, Masood A, Din IU, Khan NA, Bryant RA, Dawson KS, Sijbrandij M, Wang D, van Ommeren M. Effectiveness of a brief group psychological intervention for women in a post-conflict setting in Pakistan: a single-blind, cluster, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019 Apr 27;393(10182):1733-1744. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32343-2. Epub 2019 Apr 1.

    PubMed 30948286
  • Bryant RA, Schafer A, Dawson KS, Anjuri D, Mulili C, Ndogoni L, Koyiet P, Sijbrandij M, Ulate J, Harper Shehadeh M, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, van Ommeren M. Effectiveness of a brief behavioural intervention on psychological distress among women with a history of gender-based violence in urban Kenya: A randomised clinical trial. PLoS Med. 2017 Aug 15;14(8):e1002371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002371. eCollection 2017 Aug.

    PubMed 28809935
  • Fazel M, Wheeler J, Danesh J. Prevalence of serious mental disorder in 7000 refugees resettled in western countries: a systematic review. Lancet. 2005 Apr 9-15;365(9467):1309-14. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61027-6.

    PubMed 15823380
  • Bogic M, Njoku A, Priebe S. Long-term mental health of war-refugees: a systematic literature review. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2015 Oct 28;15:29. doi: 10.1186/s12914-015-0064-9.

    PubMed 26510473

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Problem Management Plus in people with Distress and PTSD, run by University of Zurich at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in psychological distress (time frame: Baseline assessment, 1 week post-intervention assessment (6 weeks after baseline), 3 month post-intervention assessment (4-4.5 months after baseline), 12 month post intervention assessment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04574466, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 May 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in