Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Phase 2NCT04542148
Glycemic Control After Antenatal Corticosteroids in Women With Pregestational and Gestational Diabetes
A Phase 2 study testing Sliding Scale Insulin, Up-Titration of Home Insulin and Continuous Insulin Infusion in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 and Preterm Birth, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 4 sites in United States.
Trial summary
There is a fundamental gap in understanding the maternal and neonatal effects of antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) administration in women with threatened preterm birth (PTB) who have diabetes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 50 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Preterm Birth, Pregnancy, High Risk
- What is being tested?
- Sliding Scale Insulin, Up-Titration of Home Insulin and Continuous Insulin Infusion
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 10 Feb 2022to 31 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 50 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Gestational or pregestational type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with daily insulin injection(s) or oral hypoglycemic agents such as metformin
- Hospitalized for antenatal corticosteroid administration in anticipation of preterm birth
- Gestational age 23 0/7 weeks - 36 5/7 weeks
- Maternal age 18-50
Who cannot join
- Planned delivery < 72 hours after 1st dose of antenatal corticosteroids
- More than 16 hours after 1st dose of antenatal corticosteroids
- Major fetal anomaly
- Triplet or higher order multiple gestation
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
United States4 sites
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35223
University of South Carolina Greenville / Prisma Health-Upstate
Greenville, South Carolina, 29605
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, Texas, 77024
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239
About this study
Official title: Glycemic Control After Antenatal Corticosteroids in Women With Pregestational and Gestational Diabetes (Close the GAP)
There is a fundamental gap in understanding the maternal and neonatal effects of antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) administration in women with threatened preterm birth (PTB) who have diabetes. Since the initial discovery of ACS for neonatal benefit in 1972, more than 40 randomized controlled trials have been performed evaluating its efficacy. However, none of these trials have included women with T2DM, and there is limited data among women with gestational diabetes. While ACS have been shown to reduce neonatal morbidity associated with PTB in non-diabetic women, the side effects of ACS (maternal hyperglycemia and fetal hyperinsulinemia) may mitigate the neonatal benefit of ACS in women with diabetes. Before neonatal benefit of ACS can be evaluated in this population, the first step is to optimize maternal glycemic control after ACS. Previous studies evaluating maternal hyperglycemia after ACS have been limited by small sample size, retrospective study design, or insufficient glucose data. Use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in a randomized clinical trial provides a unique opportunity to overcome these challenges. Our long-term goal is to improve maternal and child health among women with diabetes as an independently funded clinical researcher. The research objectives of this proposal are to test the efficacy of three treatment strategies at achieving maternal glycemic control after ACS and evaluate the association between maternal glycemic control and neonatal outcomes. Our central hypothesis is that treatment with a continuous insulin infusion will improve maternal glycemic control, which is key to improving neonatal outcomes, but at the cost of less patient satisfaction and more health resource utilization. This hypothesis will be tested by pursuing the following specific aims: 1) Test the efficacy of three treatment strategies (addition of sliding scale insulin, up-titration of home insulin, and continuous insulin infusion) at achieving maternal glycemic control after ACS and 2) Quantify the association between maternal glycemic control after ACS and neonatal morbidity. Completion of these aims will determine the optimal strategy to achieve maternal glycemic control after ACS and inform a larger, multicenter trial to improve neonatal outcomes among women with diabetes and threatened PTB.
Read the detailed description
Eligible, consenting women with medication-treated gestational or pregestational type 2 diabetes receiving ACS at 23 0/7 - 36 5/7 weeks' gestation for threatened PTB will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive 1) addition of sliding scale insulin to their home insulin regimen, 2) up-titration of their home insulin regimen, or 3) discontinuation of their home insulin regimen and initiation of a continuous insulin infusion. The randomization sequence will be created by the study statistician in a permuted block design, and assignments will be centrally allocated using the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) application. Study investigators will be masked to the randomization sequence and varying block sizes.
Regardless of treatment group, all women will receive Dexcom G6 Professional CGM for 10 days. The device will be applied by research staff or if desired, by the patient herself, under direct supervision by research staff. The CGM sensor will be applied to the patient's abdomen away from skin folds, where there is hair, near the waistband or areas of scarring, tatoos, irritation or open wounds. An additional waterproof adhesive will be applied to help prevent the sensor from being dislodged and finally the transmitter will be attached. The patient will be provided a handout with instructions for care. The Professional CGM device will ensure both patients and providers are masked to CGM data, which will be used for research purposes only as CGM is not readily available to guide insulin titration in most clinical settings. Capillary blood glucose testing, the method routinely used in clinical practice, will be used to guide insulin titration for each treatment group. Women assigned to the sliding scale insulin group will continue their home insulin regimen and receive supplemental insulin as needed for post-prandial hyperglycemia based on capillary blood glucose testing 4 times daily (fasting and 1-hour post-prandial) for 5 days after ACS. Women assigned to the up-titration of home insulin group will have their home insulin dosages increased based on an algorithm with capillary blood glucose testing 4 times daily and additional sliding scale insulin as needed for post-prandial hyperglycemia. For example, if a woman's baseline insulin regimen includes a total of 70 units of daily insulin (NPH 30 units in the morning (qAM), NPH 10 units at bedtime (qPM), and Aspart 10 units with each meal), then on day 2 after ACS she will receive 50% more or 105 units total (NPH 45 units qAM, NPH 15 units qPM, and Aspart 15 units with each meal). Women assigned to the continuous insulin infusion group will have their home insulin discontinued and receive a continuous insulin infusion based on hourly capillary blood glucose testing for 5 days after ACS. Given the high acuity of insulin infusion management these women will be monitored on L\&D, but women in the other two treatment groups may be managed on L\&D or on the Antepartum unit at the discretion of the primary provider. Regardless of treatment group, all women will be allowed to eat as long as it is deemed safe by the primary provider. If women assigned to receive the sliding scale insulin group or the up-titration of home insulin group are made nil per os (NPO) at any time after enrollment, they will be placed on the continuous insulin infusion per protocol with hourly capillary blood glucose testing. Once a diet is resumed, they will be switched back to the insulin algorithm.
Upon completion of the study intervention, all women will complete the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) to assess satisfaction with their insulin treatment strategy. The DTSQ is one of the most widely used treatment questionnaires as it is internationally validated and approved by the World Health Organization and International Diabetes Federation and available in over 100 different languages. The questionnaire is composed of 8 questions, each of which are scored on a scale ranging from 0 ("very dissatisfied or inconvenient") to 6 ("very satisfied or convenient"). The first section assesses treatment satisfaction and includes 6 questions that ask about 1) satisfaction with treatment, 2) flexibility, 3) convenience, 4) understanding of diabetes, 5) recommend treatment to others, and 6) willingness to continue. The second section consists of 2 questions that assess the burden of hyper- and hypoglycemia. Overall treatment satisfaction is measured by the sum of the scores on the first 6 questions, and a higher score indicates higher satisfaction (maximum score of 36). The DTSQ is particularly well-suited for use in this study because it is able assess treatment satisfaction regardless of the specific treatment method, and it is easy to answer without placing a large burden on patients.
Other than glycemic management during the 5 days after ACS, antenatal care (fetal testing, maternal laboratory evaluation, timing and mode of delivery) will be at the discretion of the primary obstetric provider. Umbilical cord blood will be collected at delivery and stored at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) for analysis at the conclusion of the trial. After birth, all neonates born to women with diabetes have a heelstick performed to measure capillary blood glucose as part of standard of care. Additional neonatal care after birth will be at the discretion of the primary neonatal provider.
Comprehensive baseline maternal data and maternal and neonatal outcomes will be abstracted from the UAB electronic medical record and Professional CGM devices. Additionally, measures of health resource utilization will be collected such as duration of time on labor and delivery, number of capillary blood glucose tests, treatments administered such as insulin, intravenous fluids, and dextrose for hypoglycemia.
- Being tested
- Sliding Scale Insulin, Up-Titration of Home Insulin, Continuous Insulin Infusion, Dexcom G6 Professional Continuous Glucose Monitor
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Premature Birth, Diabetes, Gestational
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sliding Scale InsulinDrug
Also called Aspart, Lispro
After antenatal corticosteroid administration, women will continue to receive long- and short-acting subcutaneous insulin injections as prescribed at home. In addition, they will receive supplemental short-acting insulin using a sliding scale based on postprandial glucose values. Capillary blood glucose values will be measured with fingersticks 4 times daily (fasting and 1-hour postprandial).
Up-Titration of Home InsulinDrug
Also called Glargine, NPH, Aspart, Lispro
After antenatal corticosteroid administration, women will receive long- and short-acting subcutaneous insulin injections at increased dosages compared to that prescribed at home. Insulin will be increased by 30% on the day that they receive their 1st dose of antenatal corticosteroids (day 1), 50% on day 2, 50% on day 3, 30% on day 4, and 15% increase on day 5. On day 6 they will return to their home insulin regimen. Capillary blood glucose values will be measured with fingersticks 4 times daily (fasting and 1-hour postprandial).
Continuous Insulin InfusionDrug
Also called Regular insulin
After antenatal corticosteroid administration, women will discontinue their home insulin regimen and be placed on a continuous insulin infusion with insulin boluses and titration of infusion rate per institutional L\&D protocol. Capillary blood glucose values will be measured with fingersticks every hour.
Dexcom G6 Professional Continuous Glucose MonitorDevice
Also called G6 Pro
Masked Dexcom G6 Pro devices will be worn for 10 days.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sliding Scale Insulin | Experimental | Addition of supplemental sliding scale insulin to home insulin regimen for maximum of 5 days after antenatal corticosteroids Receives: Drug: Sliding Scale Insulin; Device: Dexcom G6 Professional Continuous Glucose Monitor |
| Up-Titration of Home Insulin | Experimental | Increase in home insulin regimen based on standardized algorithm for maximum of 5 days after antenatal corticosteroids Receives: Drug: Up-Titration of Home Insulin; Device: Dexcom G6 Professional Continuous Glucose Monitor |
| Continuous Insulin Infusion | Experimental | Discontinuation of home insulin regimen and receipt of continuous insulin infusion for maximum of 5 days after antenatal corticosteroids Receives: Drug: Continuous Insulin Infusion; Device: Dexcom G6 Professional Continuous Glucose Monitor |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time In Range
Percent time glucose in range (65-140mg/dL) on CGM
Measured: During study intervention assessed for maximum of 5 days after ACS
Secondary outcomes (14)
Time Above Range
Percent time glucose above range (>140mg/dL) on CGM
Measured: During study intervention assessed for maximum of 5 days after ACS
Time Below Range
Percent time glucose below range (<65mg/dL) on CGM
Measured: During study intervention assessed for maximum of 5 days after ACS
Additional insulin requirement
Percent increase in daily insulin requirements compared to home regimen
Measured: During study intervention assessed for maximum of 5 days after ACS
Glucose variability
Coefficient of variation (glucose standard deviation / mean glucose) on CGM
Measured: During study intervention assessed for maximum of 5 days after ACS
Patient satisfaction
Score on modified Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (questions 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) with score range from 0-36 with 0 being not satisfied and 36 being very satisfied
Measured: Upon completion of study intervention, on average 5 days after enrollment
Neonatal composite respiratory morbidity
Composite including need for continuous positive airway pressure or high-flow nasal cannula of >=0.30 for >=12 continuous hours, respiratory distress syndrome, or mechanical ventilation
Measured: Birth to hospital discharge, assessed up to 28 days
Initial neonatal glucose
Initial capillary neonatal glucose in mg/dL measured by heelstick
Measured: Birth to 2 hours of life
Umbilical cord blood C-peptide
C-peptide concentration (mcg/L) in the umbilical cord blood as measure of fetal insulin status
Measured: Delivery
Umbilical cord blood insulin
Insulin concentration (mcg/L) in the umbilical cord blood as measure of fetal insulin status
Measured: Delivery
Umbilical cord blood cortisol
Cortisol concentration (mcg/L) in the umbilical cord blood as measure of fetal HPA axis
Measured: Delivery
Umbilical cord blood surfactant protein A (SP-A)
Fetal surfactant protein A
Measured: Delivery
Umbilical cord blood surfactant protein B (SP-B)
Fetal surfactant protein B
Measured: Delivery
Umbilical cord blood surfactant protein C (SP-C)
Fetal surfactant protein C
Measured: Delivery
Umbilical cord blood surfactant protein D (SP-D)
Fetal surfactant protein D
Measured: Delivery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Sep 2020
- Study start10 Feb 2022
- Primary completion30 Nov 2025
- Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (21)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Alabama at BirminghamThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ashley N. Battarbee, University of Alabama at Birmingham
- Investigators
- Ashley N Battarbee, MD, Principal investigator, University of Alabama at Birmingham
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04542148
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 300005848
- Other IDs
- K23HD103875
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 18 Aug 2020
- Last updated
- 14 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N, Colagiuri S, Guariguata L, Motala AA, Ogurtsova K, Shaw JE, Bright D, Williams R; IDF Diabetes Atlas Committee. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Nov;157:107843. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
PubMed 31518657Rowley WR, Bezold C, Arikan Y, Byrne E, Krohe S. Diabetes 2030: Insights from Yesterday, Today, and Future Trends. Popul Health Manag. 2017 Feb;20(1):6-12. doi: 10.1089/pop.2015.0181. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
PubMed 27124621Boyle JP, Thompson TJ, Gregg EW, Barker LE, Williamson DF. Projection of the year 2050 burden of diabetes in the US adult population: dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality, and prediabetes prevalence. Popul Health Metr. 2010 Oct 22;8:29. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-8-29.
PubMed 20969750Crowley PA. Antenatal corticosteroid therapy: a meta-analysis of the randomized trials, 1972 to 1994. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jul;173(1):322-35. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90222-8. No abstract available.
PubMed 7631713Roberts D, Brown J, Medley N, Dalziel SR. Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 21;3(3):CD004454. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004454.pub3.
PubMed 28321847Amiya RM, Mlunde LB, Ota E, Swa T, Oladapo OT, Mori R. Antenatal Corticosteroids for Reducing Adverse Maternal and Child Outcomes in Special Populations of Women at Risk of Imminent Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 3;11(2):e0147604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147604. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 26841022American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 171: Management of Preterm Labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;128(4):e155-64. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001711.
PubMed 27661654Battarbee AN, Aliaga S, Boggess KA. Management of diabetic women with threatened preterm birth: a survey of Maternal-Fetal Medicine providers. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Sep;33(17):2941-2949. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1566307. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
PubMed 30678514Ramirez-Torres MA, Perez-Monter SE, Espino y Sosa S, Ibarguengoitia-Ochoa F. [Effect of betamethasone in blood glucose levels in pregnant diabetic women at risk of preterm birth]. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2011 Sep;79(9):565-71. Spanish.
PubMed 21966858Mathiesen ER, Christensen AB, Hellmuth E, Hornnes P, Stage E, Damm P. Insulin dose during glucocorticoid treatment for fetal lung maturation in diabetic pregnancy: test of an algorithm [correction of analgoritm]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002 Sep;81(9):835-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2002.810906.x.
PubMed 12225298Kaushal K, Gibson JM, Railton A, Hounsome B, New JP, Young RJ. A protocol for improved glycaemic control following corticosteroid therapy in diabetic pregnancies. Diabet Med. 2003 Jan;20(1):73-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.00853.x.
PubMed 12519324Refuerzo JS, Garg A, Rech B, Ramin SM, Vidaeff A, Blackwell SC. Continuous glucose monitoring in diabetic women following antenatal corticosteroid therapy: a pilot study. Am J Perinatol. 2012 May;29(5):335-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1295642. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
PubMed 22094918Battarbee AN, Anderson SB, Tita ATN, Harper LM. Methods of Glycemic Control and Neonatal Outcomes after Antenatal Corticosteroid Administration among Women with Pregestational Diabetes. Am J Perinatol. 2020 Nov;37(13):1351-1356. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693717. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
PubMed 31365928American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 201: Pregestational Diabetes Mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;132(6):e228-e248. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002960.
PubMed 30461693International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel; Metzger BE, Gabbe SG, Persson B, Buchanan TA, Catalano PA, Damm P, Dyer AR, Leiva Ad, Hod M, Kitzmiler JL, Lowe LP, McIntyre HD, Oats JJ, Omori Y, Schmidt MI. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar;33(3):676-82. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1848. No abstract available.
PubMed 20190296
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Glycemic Control After Antenatal Corticosteroids in Women With Pregestational and Gestational Diabetes (Close the GAP)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04542148
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 300005848
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Alabama at BirminghamUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Study start
- 10 Feb 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There is a fundamental gap in understanding the maternal and neonatal effects of antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) administration in women with threatened preterm birth (PTB) who have diabetes. Since the initial discovery of ACS for neonatal benefit in 1972, more than 40 randomized controlled trials have been performed evaluating its efficacy. However, none of these trials have included women with T2DM, and there is limited data among women with gestational diabetes. While ACS have been shown to reduce neonatal morbidity associated with PTB in non-diabetic women, the side effects of ACS (maternal hyperglycemia and fetal hyperinsulinemia) may mitigate the neonatal benefit of ACS in women with diabetes. Before neonatal benefit of ACS can be evaluated in this population, the first step is to optimize maternal glycemic control after ACS. Previous studies evaluating maternal hyperglycemia after ACS have been limited by small sample size, retrospective study design, or insufficient glucose data. Use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in a randomized clinical trial provides a unique opportunity to overcome these challenges. Our long-term goal is to improve maternal and child health among women with diabetes as an independently funded clinical researcher. The research objectives of this proposal are to test the efficacy of three treatment strategies at achieving maternal glycemic control after ACS and evaluate the association between maternal glycemic control and neonatal outcomes. Our central hypothesis is that treatment with a continuous insulin infusion will improve maternal glycemic control, which is key to improving neonatal outcomes, but at the cost of less patient satisfaction and more health resource utilization. This hypothesis will be tested by pursuing the following specific aims: 1) Test the efficacy of three treatment strategies (addition of sliding scale insulin, up-titration of home insulin, and continuous insulin infusion) at achieving maternal glycemic control after ACS and 2) Quantify the association between maternal glycemic control after ACS and neonatal morbidity. Completion of these aims will determine the optimal strategy to achieve maternal glycemic control after ACS and inform a larger, multicenter trial to improve neonatal outcomes among women with diabetes and threatened PTB.
Detailed description
Eligible, consenting women with medication-treated gestational or pregestational type 2 diabetes receiving ACS at 23 0/7 - 36 5/7 weeks' gestation for threatened PTB will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive 1) addition of sliding scale insulin to their home insulin regimen, 2) up-titration of their home insulin regimen, or 3) discontinuation of their home insulin regimen and initiation of a continuous insulin infusion. The randomization sequence will be created by the study statistician in a permuted block design, and assignments will be centrally allocated using the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) application. Study investigators will be masked to the randomization sequence and varying block sizes.
Regardless of treatment group, all women will receive Dexcom G6 Professional CGM for 10 days. The device will be applied by research staff or if desired, by the patient herself, under direct supervision by research staff. The CGM sensor will be applied to the patient's abdomen away from skin folds, where there is hair, near the waistband or areas of scarring, tatoos, irritation or open wounds. An additional waterproof adhesive will be applied to help prevent the sensor from being dislodged and finally the transmitter will be attached. The patient will be provided a handout with instructions for care. The Professional CGM device will ensure both patients and providers are masked to CGM data, which will be used for research purposes only as CGM is not readily available to guide insulin titration in most clinical settings. Capillary blood glucose testing, the method routinely used in clinical practice, will be used to guide insulin titration for each treatment group. Women assigned to the sliding scale insulin group will continue their home insulin regimen and receive supplemental insulin as needed for post-prandial hyperglycemia based on capillary blood glucose testing 4 times daily (fasting and 1-hour post-prandial) for 5 days after ACS. Women assigned to the up-titration of home insulin group will have their home insulin dosages increased based on an algorithm with capillary blood glucose testing 4 times daily and additional sliding scale insulin as needed for post-prandial hyperglycemia. For example, if a woman's baseline insulin regimen includes a total of 70 units of daily insulin (NPH 30 units in the morning (qAM), NPH 10 units at bedtime (qPM), and Aspart 10 units with each meal), then on day 2 after ACS she will receive 50% more or 105 units total (NPH 45 units qAM, NPH 15 units qPM, and Aspart 15 units with each meal). Women assigned to the continuous insulin infusion group will have their home insulin discontinued and receive a continuous insulin infusion based on hourly capillary blood glucose testing for 5 days after ACS. Given the high acuity of insulin infusion management these women will be monitored on L\&D, but women in the other two treatment groups may be managed on L\&D or on the Antepartum unit at the discretion of the primary provider. Regardless of treatment group, all women will be allowed to eat as long as it is deemed safe by the primary provider. If women assigned to receive the sliding scale insulin group or the up-titration of home insulin group are made nil per os (NPO) at any time after enrollment, they will be placed on the continuous insulin infusion per protocol with hourly capillary blood glucose testing. Once a diet is resumed, they will be switched back to the insulin algorithm.
Upon completion of the study intervention, all women will complete the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) to assess satisfaction with their insulin treatment strategy. The DTSQ is one of the most widely used treatment questionnaires as it is internationally validated and approved by the World Health Organization and International Diabetes Federation and available in over 100 different languages. The questionnaire is composed of 8 questions, each of which are scored on a scale ranging from 0 ("very dissatisfied or inconvenient") to 6 ("very satisfied or convenient"). The first section assesses treatment satisfaction and includes 6 questions that ask about 1) satisfaction with treatment, 2) flexibility, 3) convenience, 4) understanding of diabetes, 5) recommend treatment to others, and 6) willingness to continue. The second section consists of 2 questions that assess the burden of hyper- and hypoglycemia. Overall treatment satisfaction is measured by the sum of the scores on the first 6 questions, and a higher score indicates higher satisfaction (maximum score of 36). The DTSQ is particularly well-suited for use in this study because it is able assess treatment satisfaction regardless of the specific treatment method, and it is easy to answer without placing a large burden on patients.
Other than glycemic management during the 5 days after ACS, antenatal care (fetal testing, maternal laboratory evaluation, timing and mode of delivery) will be at the discretion of the primary obstetric provider. Umbilical cord blood will be collected at delivery and stored at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) for analysis at the conclusion of the trial. After birth, all neonates born to women with diabetes have a heelstick performed to measure capillary blood glucose as part of standard of care. Additional neonatal care after birth will be at the discretion of the primary neonatal provider.
Comprehensive baseline maternal data and maternal and neonatal outcomes will be abstracted from the UAB electronic medical record and Professional CGM devices. Additionally, measures of health resource utilization will be collected such as duration of time on labor and delivery, number of capillary blood glucose tests, treatments administered such as insulin, intravenous fluids, and dextrose for hypoglycemia.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sliding Scale Insulin | Experimental | Drug: Sliding Scale Insulin, Device: Dexcom G6 Professional Continuous Glucose MonitorAddition of supplemental sliding scale insulin to home insulin regimen for maximum of 5 days after antenatal corticosteroids |
| Up-Titration of Home Insulin | Experimental | Drug: Up-Titration of Home Insulin, Device: Dexcom G6 Professional Continuous Glucose MonitorIncrease in home insulin regimen based on standardized algorithm for maximum of 5 days after antenatal corticosteroids |
| Continuous Insulin Infusion | Experimental | Drug: Continuous Insulin Infusion, Device: Dexcom G6 Professional Continuous Glucose MonitorDiscontinuation of home insulin regimen and receipt of continuous insulin infusion for maximum of 5 days after antenatal corticosteroids |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Gestational or pregestational type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with daily insulin injection(s) or oral hypoglycemic agents such as metformin
- Hospitalized for antenatal corticosteroid administration in anticipation of preterm birth
- Gestational age 23 0/7 weeks - 36 5/7 weeks
- Maternal age 18-50
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Planned delivery < 72 hours after 1st dose of antenatal corticosteroids
- More than 16 hours after 1st dose of antenatal corticosteroids
- Major fetal anomaly
- Triplet or higher order multiple gestation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sliding Scale InsulinAlso: Aspart, LisproAfter antenatal corticosteroid administration, women will continue to receive long- and short-acting subcutaneous insulin injections as prescribed at home. In addition, they will receive supplemental short-acting insulin using a sliding scale based on postprandial glucose values. Capillary blood glucose values will be measured with fingersticks 4 times daily (fasting and 1-hour postprandial). | Drug | Sliding Scale Insulin |
| Up-Titration of Home InsulinAlso: Glargine, NPH, Aspart, LisproAfter antenatal corticosteroid administration, women will receive long- and short-acting subcutaneous insulin injections at increased dosages compared to that prescribed at home. Insulin will be increased by 30% on the day that they receive their 1st dose of antenatal corticosteroids (day 1), 50% on day 2, 50% on day 3, 30% on day 4, and 15% increase on day 5. On day 6 they will return to their home insulin regimen. Capillary blood glucose values will be measured with fingersticks 4 times daily (fasting and 1-hour postprandial). | Drug | Up-Titration of Home Insulin |
| Continuous Insulin InfusionAlso: Regular insulinAfter antenatal corticosteroid administration, women will discontinue their home insulin regimen and be placed on a continuous insulin infusion with insulin boluses and titration of infusion rate per institutional L\&D protocol. Capillary blood glucose values will be measured with fingersticks every hour. | Drug | Continuous Insulin Infusion |
| Dexcom G6 Professional Continuous Glucose MonitorAlso: G6 ProMasked Dexcom G6 Pro devices will be worn for 10 days. | Device | Continuous Insulin Infusion, Sliding Scale Insulin, Up-Titration of Home Insulin |
Primary outcome
Time In Range
Time frame: During study intervention assessed for maximum of 5 days after ACS
Percent time glucose in range (65-140mg/dL) on CGM
14 secondary outcomes
Time Above Range
Time frame: During study intervention assessed for maximum of 5 days after ACS
Time Below Range
Time frame: During study intervention assessed for maximum of 5 days after ACS
Additional insulin requirement
Time frame: During study intervention assessed for maximum of 5 days after ACS
Glucose variability
Time frame: During study intervention assessed for maximum of 5 days after ACS
Patient satisfaction
Time frame: Upon completion of study intervention, on average 5 days after enrollment
Neonatal composite respiratory morbidity
Time frame: Birth to hospital discharge, assessed up to 28 days
Initial neonatal glucose
Time frame: Birth to 2 hours of life
Umbilical cord blood C-peptide
Time frame: Delivery
Umbilical cord blood insulin
Time frame: Delivery
Umbilical cord blood cortisol
Time frame: Delivery
Umbilical cord blood surfactant protein A (SP-A)
Time frame: Delivery
Umbilical cord blood surfactant protein B (SP-B)
Time frame: Delivery
Umbilical cord blood surfactant protein C (SP-C)
Time frame: Delivery
Umbilical cord blood surfactant protein D (SP-D)
Time frame: Delivery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jul 2026.
- Background: PubMed 31518657Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N, Colagiuri S, Guariguata L, Motala AA, Ogurtsova K, Shaw JE, Bright D, Williams R; IDF Diabetes Atlas Committee. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: Results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Nov;157:107843. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107843. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
- Background: PubMed 27124621Rowley WR, Bezold C, Arikan Y, Byrne E, Krohe S. Diabetes 2030: Insights from Yesterday, Today, and Future Trends. Popul Health Manag. 2017 Feb;20(1):6-12. doi: 10.1089/pop.2015.0181. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
- Background: PubMed 20969750Boyle JP, Thompson TJ, Gregg EW, Barker LE, Williamson DF. Projection of the year 2050 burden of diabetes in the US adult population: dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality, and prediabetes prevalence. Popul Health Metr. 2010 Oct 22;8:29. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-8-29.
- Background: PubMed 7631713Crowley PA. Antenatal corticosteroid therapy: a meta-analysis of the randomized trials, 1972 to 1994. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jul;173(1):322-35. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90222-8. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 28321847Roberts D, Brown J, Medley N, Dalziel SR. Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 21;3(3):CD004454. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004454.pub3.
- Background: PubMed 26841022Amiya RM, Mlunde LB, Ota E, Swa T, Oladapo OT, Mori R. Antenatal Corticosteroids for Reducing Adverse Maternal and Child Outcomes in Special Populations of Women at Risk of Imminent Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 3;11(2):e0147604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147604. eCollection 2016.
- Background: PubMed 27661654American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 171: Management of Preterm Labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;128(4):e155-64. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001711.
- Background: PubMed 30678514Battarbee AN, Aliaga S, Boggess KA. Management of diabetic women with threatened preterm birth: a survey of Maternal-Fetal Medicine providers. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Sep;33(17):2941-2949. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1566307. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
- Background: PubMed 21966858Ramirez-Torres MA, Perez-Monter SE, Espino y Sosa S, Ibarguengoitia-Ochoa F. [Effect of betamethasone in blood glucose levels in pregnant diabetic women at risk of preterm birth]. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2011 Sep;79(9):565-71. Spanish.
- Background: PubMed 12225298Mathiesen ER, Christensen AB, Hellmuth E, Hornnes P, Stage E, Damm P. Insulin dose during glucocorticoid treatment for fetal lung maturation in diabetic pregnancy: test of an algorithm [correction of analgoritm]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002 Sep;81(9):835-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2002.810906.x.
- Background: PubMed 12519324Kaushal K, Gibson JM, Railton A, Hounsome B, New JP, Young RJ. A protocol for improved glycaemic control following corticosteroid therapy in diabetic pregnancies. Diabet Med. 2003 Jan;20(1):73-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.00853.x.
- Background: PubMed 22094918Refuerzo JS, Garg A, Rech B, Ramin SM, Vidaeff A, Blackwell SC. Continuous glucose monitoring in diabetic women following antenatal corticosteroid therapy: a pilot study. Am J Perinatol. 2012 May;29(5):335-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1295642. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ashley N Battarbee, MD principal investigator
University of Alabama at Birmingham
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Sliding Scale Insulin, Up-Titration of Home Insulin and Continuous Insulin Infusion in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 and Preterm Birth, run by University of Alabama at Birmingham at 4 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time In Range (time frame: During study intervention assessed for maximum of 5 days after ACS). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04542148, which also lists 21 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2026.