AzTrials
AzTrials

End Stage Renal Disease on DialysisPhase 2/3NCT04477811

Comparative Study Evaluating the Effect of Vitamin K1 Versus Vitamin K2 on Vascular Calcification in Dialysis Patients

A Phase 2/3 study testing Vitamin K1 and Vitamin k2 in people with End Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate the effect of supplementation of vitamin K2 (menaquinone, MK-7)vs vitamin k1 on circulating levels of calcification regulators and to assess their safety in patients on regular dialysis patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
End Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis
What is being tested?
Vitamin K1 and Vitamin k2
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
25 Jul 2020to 1 Jan 2021
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Both sexes aged between 18-75 years
  • Patients on HD greater than 3 months at least.
  • Stable clinical condition (no hospitalization in the previous 3 months)

Who cannot join

  • Hypersensitivity to vitamin k
  • Participant in an another clinical trial within the past 4 weeks.
  • Judged to be unsuitable as a subject by the attending physician.
  • Patients taking warfarin
  • Patients with known intestinal malabsorption
  • Patients with hypercoagulable state

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Ainshams University

    Cairo, 02

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Comparative Study Evaluating the Effect of the Administration of Vitamin K1 Versus Vitamin K2 on Vascular Calcification in Dialysis Patients

To evaluate the effect of supplementation of vitamin K2 (menaquinone, MK-7)vs vitamin k1 on circulating levels of calcification regulators and to assess their safety in patients on regular dialysis patients.

Read the detailed description

Vascular calcification has emerged as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, especially in chronic kidney disease .

It has a predictive value of poor prognoses and clinical outcomes in CKD patients such as overall mortality and even poor arteriovenous graft maturation .

Vitamin K is essential for the activation of matrix Gla protein (MGP), a powerful inhibitor of tissue calcification, functional vitamin K deficiency may contribute to high vascular calcification (VC) burden in haemodialysis patients; this is process in which mineral is pathologically deposited in blood vessels, mainly in large elastic and muscular arteries such as the aorta and the coronary, carotid, and peripheral arteries.

it is Prospective, Randomized,Placebo Controlled Study

Being tested
Vitamin K1, Vitamin k2, placebo

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Vitamin K1Drug

    Also called Phylloquinone

    vitamin k1 tablets

  • Vitamin k2Drug

    Also called menaquinone

    vitamin k2 45 ug tablets twice daily

  • placeboOther

    placebo tablets

Study groups in NCT04477811
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
vitamin k1Active comparatorvitamin k1 will be given 10 mg thrice a week for 3 months
Receives: Drug: Vitamin K1
vitamin k2Active comparatorvitamin k2 (menaquinone) will be given 90 ug per day orally
Receives: Drug: Vitamin k2
placeboPlacebo comparatorplacebo will be given daily per oral for 3 months
Receives: Other: placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. change in serum level of Uncarboxylated MGP

    Measuring the change in serum level of Uncarboxylated MGP as a marker for calcification

    Measured: change between baseline and after 3 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. parathyroid hormone

    measuring change in serum PTH

    Measured: change between baseline and after 3 months

  2. serum calcium level

    measuring the change in serum calcium level

    Measured: change between baseline and after 3 months

  3. serum phosphate level

    measuring the change in phosphate level

    Measured: change between baseline and after 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jul 2020
  2. Study start25 Jul 2020
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2020
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04477811
Sponsor's protocol ID
vitamin k in dialysis patients
Status last verified
Jul 2021
First submitted
13 Jul 2020
Last updated
21 Jul 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Palit S, Kendrick J. Vascular calcification in chronic kidney disease: role of disordered mineral metabolism. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20(37):5829-33. doi: 10.2174/1381612820666140212194926.

    PubMed 24533939
  • McCabe KM, Adams MA, Holden RM. Vitamin K status in chronic kidney disease. Nutrients. 2013 Nov 7;5(11):4390-8. doi: 10.3390/nu5114390.

    PubMed 24212088

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing Vitamin K1 and Vitamin k2 in people with End Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis, run by Ain Shams University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

change in serum level of Uncarboxylated MGP (time frame: change between baseline and after 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04477811, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in