AzTrials
AzTrials

HIV/AIDSNCT04463784

Efficacy of Efavirenz 400mg vs. 600mg Combined With Lamivudine and Tenofovir in Treatment Naive HIV Infection

A study testing Efavirenz 400Mg Oral Tablet and Efavirenz 600Mg Oral Tablet in people with HIV/AIDS and Mental Impairment, run by Peking Union Medical College Hospital at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The present study will be a randomized controlled study in which 500 treatment-naive HIV patients will be randomized 1:1 to Efaviren 400mg v.s. 600mg combined with lamivudine and tenofovir. The whole cohort will be followed for two years. Efficacy and safety of each regimen will be evaluated throughout the study. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
HIV/AIDS, Mental Impairment
What is being tested?
Efavirenz 400Mg Oral Tablet and Efavirenz 600Mg Oral Tablet
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
500 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Apr 2018to Aug 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Provision of signed and dated informed consent form
  • Willingness and availability to engage in study activities for the duration of the study
  • Age between 18-65
  • Documented HIV-1 infection (confirmed by Western blot)
  • Received no prior antiretroviral therapy

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding or anticipated pregnancy in two years
  • History of AIDS-defining illness
  • Hemoglobin < 9g/dl;or peripheral white blood cell counts < 2000/μl;or neutrophil counts < 1000 /μl;or platelet count < 75,000/μl;
  • Liver disease (transaminase and alkaline phosphatase levels more than three times the upper limit of the normal range (ULN), bilirubin level more than 2.5 times the ULN)
  • Chronic kidney disease (serum creatinine level more than 1.5 times the ULN)
  • Patients with a history of injection drug usage
  • Patients with a history of mental disorders

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Peking Union Medical College Hospital

The present study will be a randomized controlled study in which 500 treatment-naive HIV patients will be randomized 1:1 to Efaviren 400mg v.s. 600mg combined with lamivudine and tenofovir. The whole cohort will be followed for two years. Efficacy and safety of each regimen will be evaluated throughout the study.

Read the detailed description

As efaviren has been commonly used as the first-line therapy in HIV infection worldwide, its major side effect i.e. the mental effects have been noticed and has a major influence on the adherence and efficacy of ART regimen. Mental effects of efaviren have been especially critical in Chinese patients, as the effective and toxic ranges of efaviren plasma concentration in Chinese patients are very close to each other.

In this study, 500 treatment-naive Chinese patients with a body weight < 60kg will be screened and recruited. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to efaviren 400mg v.s. 600mg combined with lamivudine and tenofovir. All patients will be followed regularly for 2 years, at 0, 2w, 4w, 3m and every 3 months. Virological and immunological measurements will be done at each visit. Meanwhile, various mental scales will be performed at each visit to evaluate the mental effects of each arm.

Being tested
Efavirenz 400Mg Oral Tablet, Efavirenz 600Mg Oral Tablet
Medical subject headings
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Efavirenz 400Mg Oral TabletDrug

    The experimental arm will receive 400mg efavirenz per randomization with other two antiretroviral medication (tenofovir and lamivudine).

  • Efavirenz 600Mg Oral TabletDrug

    The active comparator arm will receive 600mg efavirenz per randomization with other two antiretroviral medication (tenofovir and lamivudine).

Study groups in NCT04463784
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Efavirenz 400MG Oral TabletExperimentalRecruited treatment-naive HIV infected patients will be given Lamivudin 300mg per day, tenofovir 300mg per day and efavirenz 400mg per day as antiretroviral treatment.
Receives: Drug: Efavirenz 400Mg Oral Tablet
Efavirenz 600MG Oral TabletActive comparatorRecruited treatment-naive HIV infected patients will be given Lamivudin 300mg per day, tenofovir 300mg per day and efavirenz 600mg per day, per standard dose.
Receives: Drug: Efavirenz 600Mg Oral Tablet

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from Baseline Virological measurements at 12 weeks

    Plasma viral load

    Measured: 12 weeks

  2. Change from Baseline Virological measurements at 24 weeks

    Plasma viral load

    Measured: 24 weeks

  3. Change from Baseline Virological measurements at 48 weeks

    Plasma viral load

    Measured: 48 weeks

  4. Change from Baseline Virological measurements at 72 weeks

    Plasma viral load

    Measured: 72 weeks

  5. Change from Baseline Virological measurements at 96 weeks

    Plasma viral load

    Measured: 96 weeks

  6. Change from Baseline Immunological measurements at 12 weeks

    CD4 T cell count

    Measured: 12 weeks

  7. Change from Baseline Immunological measurements at 24 weeks

    CD4 T cell count

    Measured: 24 weeks

  8. Change from Baseline Immunological measurements at 48 weeks

    CD4 T cell count

    Measured: 48 weeks

  9. Change from Baseline Immunological measurements at 72 weeks

    CD4 T cell count

    Measured: 72 weeks

  10. Change from Baseline Immunological measurements at 96 weeks

    CD4 T cell count

    Measured: 96 weeks

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Adverse effects measured by Dizziness Handicap Inventory

    Measure statistically significant difference in perception of dizziness by administering the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) between two groups at different time point. The 25-item tool comprises three sub-scales: physical (DHI-P; 7 items), emotional (DHI-E; 9 items), and functional (DHI-F; 9 items) and each item is scored from 0 to 4. Grading standard: 0-30 points is defiend as minor obstacles, 31-60 points as moderate obstacle, and 61-100 points as serious obstacle with high risk of falling.

    Measured: 0, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 weeks

  2. Adverse effects measured by Hamilton Depression Scale-24

    Measure statistically significant difference in perception of depression by administering the Hamilton Depression Scale-24 (HAMD-24) between two groups at different time point. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) has a total of 24 items. 14 items were scored from 0 to 4, and 10 items were scored from 0 to 2. The total score that less than 8 points is defined as no depression, 8 to 20 points as may be depression, scores that more than 20 is defined as mild or moderate depression, and more than 35 points as severe depression.

    Measured: 0, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 weeks

  3. Adverse effects measured by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

    Measure statistically significant difference in perception of sleep quality by administering the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) between two groups at different time point. PSQI was used to assess the sleep quality of subjects in the last month. It consists of 19 self-evaluation items and 5 other evaluation items, of which only 18 self-evaluation items participate in scoring. 18 items constitute 7 components, and each component is scored according to 0 ~ 3 grades. The PSQI total score ranges from 0 to 21. The higher the score indicates the worser sleep quality.

    Measured: 0, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jul 2020
  2. Study start1 Apr 2018
  3. Primary completionDec 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completionAug 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
500 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04463784
Sponsor's protocol ID
CACT 1809
Status last verified
Jul 2020
First submitted
15 Jul 2018
Last updated
9 Jul 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Hang Q, Ziyan W, Xiaojing S, Min W, Haibo D, Hanhui Y, Zhihao M, Shenghua H, Yun H, Linghua L, Yinzhong S, Yong X, Ping M, Taisheng L. Efavirenz 400 vs 600 mg combined with lamivudine and tenofovir in treatment-naive HIV-infected patients in China: A randomized, multi-centered, controlled trial. Int J Infect Dis. 2026 Sep;170:108859. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2026.108859. Epub 2026 Jun 2.

    PubMed 42235914
  • Tongtong Y, Shenghua H, Yin W, Lin C, Huanxia L, Chunrong L, Ruifeng Z, Xiaojing Y, Yuan Y, Yuanhong H, Ke Y. Effectiveness and Safety of Dolutegravir Versus Efavirenz-Based Antiviral Regimen in People Living With HIV-1 in Sichuan Province of China: A Real-World Study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2022 Oct 1;91(S1):S1-S7. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003041.

    PubMed 36094508

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Efavirenz 400Mg Oral Tablet and Efavirenz 600Mg Oral Tablet in people with HIV/AIDS and Mental Impairment, run by Peking Union Medical College Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from Baseline Virological measurements at 12 weeks (time frame: 12 weeks). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04463784, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jul 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in