AzTrials
AzTrials

GonarthrosisESPACENCT04460989

Assessment of Patient Satisfaction After Arthroplasty: A Comparative Study by Implant Type

An observational study of Gonarthrosis, run by GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main objective of this study is to evaluate the benefit of personalized prostheses compared to conventional prostheses on patient satisfaction 24 months after total knee arthroplasty. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Gonarthrosis
What is being tested?
arthroplasty
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
480 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
27 Oct 2021to 31 Oct 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patient with uni or bilateral primary gonarthrosis

Who may be able to join

  • Adult man or woman who has signed consent to participate in the study
  • Patient with uni- or bilateral primary gonarthrosis
  • For which an indication for total knee arthroplasty has been established

Who cannot join

  • History of knee arthroplasty or osteotomy
  • History of knee fracture
  • Inflammatory rheumatic disease or any other progressive concomitant disease that may affect the patient's functional prognosis.
  • Joint or extra-articular deformities of the lower limb of traumatic origin
  • Neurological diseases, stroke sequelae
  • Mental disability or any other reason that may hinder the understanding or strict application of the protocol
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Patient not affiliated to the French social security scheme
  • Patient under legal protection, guardianship or trusteeship
  • Patient already included in another therapeutic study protocol or having participated in another trial within the previous three months
  • Arthroplasty actually performed
  • Absence of per operative complications in bone (femoral or tibial bone), ligament (rupture or disinsertion of the patellar or quadricipital tendon) or nerve (lesion of the external popliteal sciatica).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Centre Orthopédique Santy

    Lyon, 69008

    Michel BONNIN, MD, bonnin.michel@gmail.com

    TARIK AIT SI SELMI, MD, tarik.aitsiselmi@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of the Impact of Customization of Total Knee Prostheses on Patient Satisfaction and Functional Outcome of Arthroplasty.

The main objective of this study is to evaluate the benefit of personalized prostheses compared to conventional prostheses on patient satisfaction 24 months after total knee arthroplasty.

Read the detailed description

Prospective randomized monocentric prospective comparative study carried out as a single blind study on two parallel groups (standard implant or customized implant).

Secondary Objectives: Compare between groups :

  • the functional outcome of the arthroplasty
  • pain progression
  • the evolution of the quality of life
  • the conditions of the surgery (duration of surgery, length of hospitalization, blood loss)
  • the frequency of adverse events related to arthroplasty
Conditions
Gonarthrosis
Being tested
arthroplasty
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis, Knee

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • arthroplastyProcedure or surgery

    total knee replacement

Study groups in NCT04460989
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
standard implantarthroplasty with a standard implant
Receives: Procedure: arthroplasty
personalized implantarthroplasty with a customized implant
Receives: Procedure: arthroplasty

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. IKS self-questionnaire Score at M24

    The score obtained on the IKS self-questionnaire at 24 months will be compared between the two treatment groups by an analysis of covariance, with the basal IKS score as a covariate and the type of prosthesis as a factor.

    Measured: 24 MONTHS

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. SF12 score at M24

    The comparison between groups will be made on the evolution of scores, in relation to the baseline value, by an analysis of covariance with treatment and time as fixed factors, the subject as a random factor and the baseline value as a covariate. The interaction Time x Treatment will be added to the model. The effects of time and treatment will be tested at each evaluation point.

    Measured: 24 months

  2. KOOS Score at M24

    The comparison between groups will be made on the evolution of scores, in relation to the baseline value, by an analysis of covariance with treatment and time as fixed factors, the subject as a random factor and the baseline value as a covariate. The interaction Time x Treatment will be added to the model. The effects of time and treatment will be tested at each evaluation point.

    Measured: 24 months

  3. Forgotten Joint Score at M24

    The comparison between groups will be made on the evolution of scores, in relation to the baseline value, by an analysis of covariance with treatment and time as fixed factors, the subject as a random factor and the baseline value as a covariate. The interaction Time x Treatment will be added to the model. The effects of time and treatment will be tested at each evaluation point.

    Measured: 24 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jul 2020
  2. Study start27 Oct 2021
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Oct 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
480 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04460989
Sponsor's protocol ID
2020-A00075-34
Other IDs
2020-A00075-34
Acronym
ESPACE
Status last verified
Jun 2024
First submitted
2 Jul 2020
Last updated
1 Jul 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Beel W, Sappey-Marinier E, Latifi R; ReSurg; Ait-Si-Selmi T, Bonnin MP. Individualised compared to off-the-shelf total knee arthroplasty results in lower and less variable patellar tilt. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024 Dec;32(12):3163-3173. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12234. Epub 2024 Jun 12.

    PubMed 38864165
  • Sappey-Marinier E, Beel W; ReSurg; Bonnin MP, Ait-Si-Selmi T. Better operating room efficiency and reduced staff demand: Individualised versus off-the-shelf total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024 Dec;32(12):3174-3184. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12233. Epub 2024 Jun 12.

    PubMed 38864156

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Gonarthrosis, run by GCS Ramsay Santé pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Michel BONNIN, MD (04 37 53 00 26 ext. 33, bonnin.michel@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

IKS self-questionnaire Score at M24 (time frame: 24 MONTHS). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04460989, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jul 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in