Chronic PainCaRISMANCT04419168
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Real-Time Pain Management Intervention for Sickle Cell Via Mobile Applications
A study testing cCBT and m-Education in people with Chronic Pain and Depression, Anxiety, run by University of Pittsburgh at 7 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The investigators are conducting a comparative effectiveness trial among adult patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) who report chronic pain (N = 350), randomized to receive either mobile phone-delivered computerized cognitive behavioral therapy (cCBT; n = 175) or digital education (m-Education; n = 175). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Pain, Depression, Anxiety, Opioid Use
- What is being tested?
- cCBT and m-Education
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 359 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 12 Aug 2020to 11 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- People with any type of sickle cell disease
- Male or female, age 18 years or older
- Reports chronic pain: i.e pain more days that not for the past 3 months or longer and/or is prescribed daily or long-acting opioids for pain.
- English speaking
Who cannot join
- Any potential participants who fail consent comprehension questions
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 1 country.
7 sites in 1 country
United States7 sites
Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
University of Illinous-Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60607
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, 27708
East Carolina University
Greenville, North Carolina, 27858
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee, 37240
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
About this study
The investigators are conducting a comparative effectiveness trial among adult patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) who report chronic pain (N = 350), randomized to receive either mobile phone-delivered computerized cognitive behavioral therapy (cCBT; n = 175) or digital education (m-Education; n = 175). Both intervention groups will receive weekly (more frequent if requested or needed) follow-up with a health coach for at least 3 months to reinforce learned materials. Both groups will also use their mobile device to track daily pain, mood, and medication used for two-week periods at baseline and each of the follow-up points (3, 6 and 12 months). Participants will also be given access to a study-associated online support group page where members can discuss with other patients, issues participants faced and what skills were or could be used to address them. Participants will continue all routine care including opioid pain management and novel therapies.
Read the detailed description
CaRISMA is a randomized comparative effectiveness trial among adult patients with SCD who report chronic pain (N = 350) randomized to receive either cCBT (n = 175) or m-Education (n = 175). A third group of adult patients with SCD who do not meet the criteria for having chronic pain or who are not interested in participating in the intervention will be a convenience non-chronic pain comparison group and will not receive any intervention or scheduled follow-up. The non-chronic pain comparison group will only complete the battery of questionnaires at baseline and each time they return to the clinic for a medical visit. The study will access patients' stored information or verbally obtained information to assess a person's eligibility and suitability for potential participation in the study.
All adult patients, age 18 or above, with a self-report SCD diagnosis, are willing to complete a brief stress and pain functioning screener (stress/pain screener). The stress/pain screener includes measures of depression, anxiety, disability, pain (intensity, quality, and location), and quality of life. The PHQ-9 and GAD-7 measures are administered as part of routine clinical care at the UPMC comprehensive sickle cell clinic and will both be utilized as part of the stress and pain functioning screener for research purposes in the study. Each patient completes electronic versions of all or some of these scales before the sickle cell clinic social worker or psychologist sees them. The total screener typically takes patients about 15-20 minutes to complete.
Patients who do meet the criteria for having chronic pain will be randomized to one of the two intervention groups. For at least 12 weeks, one group will be asked to engage in a mobile cCBT program tailored for adults with SCD. The second group will receive pain and SCD education on mobile phones (m-Education). Both programs use identical mobile technology platforms; only the content differs. The cCBT program focuses on teaching behavioral coping skills through participants' "seeing and doing" while the pain education arm focuses on improving self-management through participants' "learning and knowing" more about pain and SCD. All participants in the intervention group will have weekly follow-ups with a health coach and will track pain symptoms daily during the intervention. A smartphone is required to participate in the intervention. If an interested and eligible participant does not have a smartphone, one may be provided to them. Upon completion of the study, the participant may keep the phone after completing all study elements, including having the study team remove all study-related data from the phone.
Both arms of the intervention will be delivered through pre-programmed chatbot interactions administered in a mobile messaging app. The intervention arm is automatically assigned via the chatbot. When the CaRISMA intervention is opened for the first time, it will automatically randomize each participant to either study arm: cCBT or m-Education. The participants will not know which arm they have been assigned to, and they will only have access to the materials included in the respective study arm
Participants will receive a link to our online survey tool where they will be asked to respond to a set of questionnaires and Painimation, a novel pain assessment tool.
The questionnaires are as follows: Sickle Cell Self-Efficacy Scale (SCSS), Patient- Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference, Adult Sickle Cell Quality of Life Measurement Information System (ASCQ-ME), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorders Scale (GAD- 7), and the Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM). For participants who are eligible to be randomized, in addition to baseline questionnaires, items from the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) will be asked through the messaging app as participants progress through their respective programs.
The Painimation tool is an electronic pain assessment tool developed by our team at the University of Pittsburgh that allows users to better communicate their pain symptoms. Patients are provided with a selection of animations that they use to describe the quality of their pain. The animations can be increased or decreased in speed, color saturation, focus, and size, to reflect the intensity of their pain.
For intervention participants, in addition to the quantitative assessments, our partners at the Qualitative, Evaluation, And Stakeholder Engagement (Qual EASE) Research Services will conduct a set of qualitative interviews to further understand which intervention works best for whom and when, the lived experience of patients in the trial, and differences in perceptions between depression subgroups. Qual- EASE will randomly select 48 participants (of the 350) to be interviewed. Attending the qualitative interviews is completely voluntary and participants may opt out at any time. However, if one of the 48 selected participants does opt out, Qual-EASE will invite another participant, of those not previously selected, as a replacement.
In the first three months of the study, intervention participants will complete all modules of their assigned study arm (cCBT or m-Education) at their own pace. The recommended progression is one module per week; this will give participants time to practice the techniques taught in each module. Participants will be asked to complete a daily electronic diary to track their pain symptoms. Only intervention arm participants will receive follow-up assessment. The convenience comparison group will not be followed with scheduled assessments.
At the 3-month assessment (T1) (i.e., three months after enrollment, on the same date the participant began the study) participants will again receive a link to our online survey tool to complete the second iteration of Painimation, the SCSS, PROMIS, ASCQ-ME, PHQ-9 and GAD-7. If participants have questions while completing these questionnaires, they may contact their health coach for guidance.
Participants will also be asked to complete daily pain intensity entries in the electronic diary. If participants do not complete the questionnaires or the pain intensity entries, health coaches will contact them and remind them to do so. The 48 patients selected for qualitative interviews will have their second interview with Qual- EASE at this time.
Between months 4-6, participants will continue to use the CaRISMA intervention but will no longer have weekly follow-ups with a health coach except upon request or on an as-needed basis. At the end of month 6 (T2), they will receive a link to our online survey tool to complete Painimation, the SCSS, PROMIS, ASCQ-ME, PHQ-9, and GAD-7 for the third time. Participants will continue to complete daily pain intensity entries through the electronic diary.
Between months 6-12, participants will continue daily pain diary submissions and communication with health coaches only as desired. Additionally, Qual-EASE will conduct the final set of qualitative interviews with 48 of the 350 participants.
In the final month of the study (T3), participants will receive a link to our online survey tool to complete Painimation, the SCSS, PROMIS, ASCQ-ME, PHQ-9, GAD- 7 and COMM for the final time.
The pain diary may include some version of the following types of questions in daily assessments:
- Using any number from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable, what is your pain level today?
- Did you take opiate medications today?
- Which one of the following emojis best represents your mood today? The pain diary may include some version of the following types of questions in weekly assessments:
- Using any number from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable, what is your pain level today?
- Did you take opiate medications today?
- Compared to what you used yesterday, is the amount of opiate meds you took today less than yesterday, the same as yesterday, or more than yesterday?
- Did you take non-opiate medications today?
- This past week, how often have you been bothered by little interest or pleasure in doing things?
- This past week, how often have you been bothered by feeling down, depressed, or irritable?
- This past week, how often have you been bothered by feeling nervous, anxious, or on edge?
- This past week, how often have you been bothered by not being able to stop or control worry?
Medical Outcomes (PCORnet). For patients recruited at one of the five clinical sites, we will evaluate objectively measured opioid medication refills and emergency department visits or hospitalizations for pain crisis. We will be working in collaboration with PCORnet to collect data retrospectively (from the past 12 months) and prospectively (12 months from the date of enrollment) from patient medical records.
These data will allow us to track medications including opioid pain medication prescriptions and refills, and health care utilization (i.e., emergency department visits and hospitalizations), as well as lab values (e.g., hemoglobin level) and clinical outcomes (e.g., end-organ damage score). For the patients recruited from our community partner organizations or online who are not affiliated with a participating clinical center, we will only acquire or evaluate their medical records for the purpose of confirming their sickle cell diagnosis.
The primary outcome is the change in pain interference at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include changes in pain intensity, depression (PHQ), anxiety (GAD), quality of life (ASCQ-ME), self-efficacy (SCSES), opioid misuse (COMM), and health care utilization at 6 and 12 months. The study team has updated the outcomes to be more comprehensive due to the funder's requirement that it align with the contract milestones
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain, Depression, Anxiety, Opioid Use
- Being tested
- cCBT, m-Education
- Keywords
- sickle cell disease, pain, opioids, depression, cognitive behavioral therapy, mobile technology, digital health, mHealth, implementation science, community-based participatory research
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Pain, Depression, Anxiety Disorders, Anemia, Sickle Cell, Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cCBTOther
A digital, internet-delivered, evidence-based chatbot programmed to deliver content for both cCBT.
m-EducationOther
A digital, internet-delivered, evidence-based chatbot programmed to deliver content for both m-Education.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| cCBT | Experimental | Computerized cognitive behavioral therapy (cCBT) for pain. The cCBT program will teach users how to recognize negative thoughts and emotions, use cognitive skills and problem-solving, and apply coping behaviors such as distraction, activity scheduling, and relaxation. The cCBT arm emphasizes skills acquisition and learning through practice; this intervention is consistent with the tailored behavioral services patients would receive individually or as a group when working with a psychologist or behavioral pain specialist. Receives: Other: cCBT |
| m-Education | Experimental | Mobile-delivered pain and sickle cell disease education (m-Education). The m-Education program will teach users about chronic pain, healthy lifestyle tips (e.g., nutrition and exercise), and facts about SCD. This program is consistent with the education patients and families would receive with a patient educator. Receives: Other: m-Education |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
6-month Change in PROMIS Pain Interference
The 8-item Patient Reported Outcomes Measure Information System Pain Interference (PROMIS-8a) assesses the effect of patient-reported pain on relevant aspects of a person's life and may include the extent to which pain hinders engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and recreational activities in the past 7 days. The items use 1-5 Likert scale with higher scores indicating greater pain interference. The raw total score (ranging from 8 to 40) is transformed using a T-score for a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10, in referent population. Higher T-scores indicate greater pain.
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Secondary outcomes (17)
6-month Change in Daily Pain Intensity
At each timepoint, participants will be asked to enter their daily pain via a mobile website for 2 weeks. The mean pain intensity is calculated during this 2 week period and used for analyses. Pain ratings range from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable.
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
6-month Change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)
PHQ-9 assesses the degree of depression severity. The PHQ-9 total score is for nine items, all rated as 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day), with total scores ranging from 0 to 27. Scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represent cut-off points for mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression, respectively.
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
6-month Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7)
GAD-7 evaluates the severity of anxiety. The GAD-7 total score for the 7 items ranges from 0 to 21. Scores of 5, 10, and 15 represent the cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe anxiety, respectively.
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
6-month Change in Adult Sickle Cell Quality of Life Measurement Information System (ASCQ-ME)
The ASCQ-ME emotional functioning and social impact quality-of-life measure was specifically designed for SCD and evaluates the health care experience of patients with SCD, emotional response to stress, and social relationships. For each subscale (emotional impact in the past 7 days and social functioning impact in the past 30 days), there are 5 questions using a 1-5 Likert scale with lower scores indicating worse health. Raw total scores (ranging from 5 to 25) are transformed using a T-score for a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10, in referent population. Lower T-scores indicate worse health.
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
6-month Change in Sickle Cell Self-Efficacy Scale (SCSES)
The Sickle Cell Disease Self-Efficacy Scale is a nine-item self-administered questionnaire that measures disease-specific perceptions of the ability to manage day-to-day issues resulting from sickle cell disease (SCD). Items are scores according to a five-point scale ranging from "1 - Not sure at all" to "5 - Very sure." Responses from individual items are summed to give an overall score with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy (ranging from 9 to 45).
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
Change From Baseline in Percent of Total Body Area Shaded (Painimation) at 6 Months
Painimation is an electronic pain assessment tool that allows users to better communicate pain symptoms. Patients are provided with a selection of animations (painimations) that they use to describe the quality of their pain. The painimations can be adjusted to reflect pain intensity. Screenshots of the Painimation app illustrate the splash screen, paintable body image, and selection of painimations to indicate the quality and intensity of pain. A higher mean % is indicative of greater pain. For analyses, mean percentages are transformed via arc-sine square in order to normalize.
Measured: Baseline and 6 months
12-month Change in PROMIS Pain Interference
The 8-item Patient Reported Outcomes Measure Information System Pain Interference (PROMIS-8a) assesses the effect of patient-reported pain on relevant aspects of a person's life and may include the extent to which pain hinders engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and recreational activities in the past 7 days. The items use 1-5 Likert scale with higher scores indicating greater pain interference. The raw total score (ranging from 8 to 40) is transformed using a T-score for a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10, in referent population. Higher T-scores indicate greater pain.
Measured: Baseline and 12 months
12-month Change in Daily Pain Intensity
At each timepoint, participants will be asked to enter their daily pain via a mobile website for 2 weeks. The mean pain intensity is calculated during this 2 week period and used for analyses. Pain ratings range from 0-10 where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable.
Measured: Baseline and 12 months
12-month Change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)
PHQ-9 assesses the degree of depression severity. The PHQ-9 total score is for nine items, all rated as 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day), with total scores ranging from 0 to 27. Scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represent cut-off points for mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression, respectively.
Measured: Baseline and 12 months
12-month Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7)
GAD-7 evaluates the severity of anxiety. The GAD-7 total score for the 7 items ranges from 0 to 21. Scores of 5, 10, and 15 represent the cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe anxiety, respectively.
Measured: Baseline and 12 months
12-month Change in Adult Sickle Cell Quality of Life Measurement Information System (ASCQ-ME)
The ASCQ-ME emotional functioning and social impact quality-of-life measure was specifically designed for SCD and evaluates the health care experience of patients with SCD, emotional response to stress, and social relationships. For each subscale (emotional impact in the past 7 days and social functioning impact in the past 30 days), there are 5 questions using a 1-5 Likert scale with lower scores indicating worse health. Raw total scores (ranging from 5 to 25) are transformed using a T-score for a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10, in referent population. Lower T-scores indicate worse health.
Measured: Baseline and 12 months
12-month Change in Sickle Cell Self-Efficacy Scale (SCSES)
The Sickle Cell Disease Self-Efficacy Scale is a nine-item self-administered questionnaire that measures disease-specific perceptions of the ability to manage day-to-day issues resulting from sickle cell disease (SCD). Items are scores according to a five-point scale ranging from "1 - Not sure at all" to "5 - Very sure." Responses from individual items are summed to give an overall score with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy (ranging from 9 to 45).
Measured: Baseline and 12 months
12-month Change in Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM)
Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM) is a self-reported measure to monitor indicators of current aberrant drug-related behaviors in patients with chronic pain on opioid therapy. Total scores are summed across the 9 individual items and range from 0-36, with higher scores representing greater misuse.
Measured: Baseline and 12 months
Change From Baseline in Percent of Total Body Area Shaded (Painimation) at 12 Months
Painimation is an electronic pain assessment tool that allows users to better communicate pain symptoms. Patients are provided with a selection of animations (painimations) that they use to describe the quality of their pain. The painimations can be adjusted to reflect pain intensity. Screenshots of the Painimation app illustrate the splash screen, paintable body image, and selection of painimations to indicate the quality and intensity of pain. A higher mean % is indicative of greater pain. For analyses, mean percentages are transformed via arc-sine square in order to normalize.
Measured: 12 months
Number of Opioid Prescriptions
For patients recruited at one of the six clinical sites, study team will evaluate objectively measured opioid medication prescriptions and refills. Study team will work in collaboration with PCORnet to collect outcome data 12 months after enrollment from patients' electronic health records.
Measured: 12 months
Number of Emergency Department Visits
For patients recruited at one of the six clinical sites, study team will evaluate objectively measured emergency department visits. Study team will work in collaboration with PCORnet to collect outcome data 12 months after enrollment from patients' electronic health records.
Measured: 12 months
Number of Hospitalizations
For patients recruited at one of the six clinical sites, study team will evaluate objectively measured hospitalizations. Study team will work in collaboration with PCORnet to collect outcome data 12 months after enrollment from patients' electronic health records.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Jun 2020
- Study start12 Aug 2020
- Primary completion31 May 2023
- Study completion11 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of PittsburghThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- comparative effectiveness trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 359 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Pittsburgh
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Kaleab Abebe, PhD, University of Pittsburgh
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04419168
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY20110346
- Other IDs
- CER-2018C2-13320 20
- Acronym
- CaRISMA
- Status last verified
- Jan 2025
- First submitted
- 28 May 2020
- Last updated
- 19 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Oluwole OB, Chen YF, Lalama CM, O'Brien JA, De Castro LM, Carroll CP, Liles D, Shah N, Saraf SL, Gordeuk VR, Saint Jean L, DeBaun M, Cronin RM, Palermo TM, Badawy SM, Hamm ME, Stinson JN, Lalloo C, Lanzkron SM, Trimnell C, Bailey L, Lawrence RH, Abebe KZ, Jonassaint CR. Digital cognitive behavioral therapy versus Education for chronic pain in adults with sickle cell disease: 12-month randomized trial results. Ann Behav Med. 2026 Jan 7;60(1):kaag030. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaag030.
PubMed 42847392Oluwole OB, McGill LS, Gayle K, O'Brien JA, Abebe KZ, Jonassaint CR, Hamm M. Experiences With a Multicomponent Digital Behavioral Pain Management Intervention for Adults With Sickle Cell Disease: Qualitative Analysis of the CaRISMA Trial. JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Aug 5;12:e73719. doi: 10.2196/73719.
PubMed 40763347Jonassaint CR, Parchuri E, O'Brien JA, Lalama CM, Lin J, Badawy SM, Hamm ME, Stinson J, Lalloo C, Carroll CP, Saraf SL, Gordeuk VR, Cronin R, Shah N, Lanzkron SM, Liles D, Trimnell C, Bailey L, Lawrence RH, Abebe KZ. Mental health, pain and likelihood of opioid misuse among adults with sickle cell disease. Br J Haematol. 2024 Mar;204(3):1029-1038. doi: 10.1111/bjh.19243. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
PubMed 38171495Badawy SM, Abebe KZ, Reichman CA, Checo G, Hamm ME, Stinson J, Lalloo C, Carroll P, Saraf SL, Gordeuk VR, Desai P, Shah N, Liles D, Trimnell C, Jonassaint CR. Comparing the Effectiveness of Education Versus Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adults With Sickle Cell Disease: Protocol for the Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Real-time Pain Management Intervention for Sickle Cell via Mobile Applications (CaRISMA) Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 May 14;10(5):e29014. doi: 10.2196/29014.
PubMed 33988517
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Real-Time Pain Management Intervention for Sickle Cell Via Mobile Applications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04419168
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CaRISMA / STUDY20110346
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain, Depression, Anxiety, Opioid Use
- Keywords
- sickle cell disease, pain, opioids, depression, cognitive behavioral therapy, mobile technology, digital health, mHealth
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 359 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of PittsburghUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 12 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 19 Feb 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators are conducting a comparative effectiveness trial among adult patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) who report chronic pain (N = 350), randomized to receive either mobile phone-delivered computerized cognitive behavioral therapy (cCBT; n = 175) or digital education (m-Education; n = 175). Both intervention groups will receive weekly (more frequent if requested or needed) follow-up with a health coach for at least 3 months to reinforce learned materials. Both groups will also use their mobile device to track daily pain, mood, and medication used for two-week periods at baseline and each of the follow-up points (3, 6 and 12 months). Participants will also be given access to a study-associated online support group page where members can discuss with other patients, issues participants faced and what skills were or could be used to address them. Participants will continue all routine care including opioid pain management and novel therapies.
Detailed description
CaRISMA is a randomized comparative effectiveness trial among adult patients with SCD who report chronic pain (N = 350) randomized to receive either cCBT (n = 175) or m-Education (n = 175). A third group of adult patients with SCD who do not meet the criteria for having chronic pain or who are not interested in participating in the intervention will be a convenience non-chronic pain comparison group and will not receive any intervention or scheduled follow-up. The non-chronic pain comparison group will only complete the battery of questionnaires at baseline and each time they return to the clinic for a medical visit. The study will access patients' stored information or verbally obtained information to assess a person's eligibility and suitability for potential participation in the study.
All adult patients, age 18 or above, with a self-report SCD diagnosis, are willing to complete a brief stress and pain functioning screener (stress/pain screener). The stress/pain screener includes measures of depression, anxiety, disability, pain (intensity, quality, and location), and quality of life. The PHQ-9 and GAD-7 measures are administered as part of routine clinical care at the UPMC comprehensive sickle cell clinic and will both be utilized as part of the stress and pain functioning screener for research purposes in the study. Each patient completes electronic versions of all or some of these scales before the sickle cell clinic social worker or psychologist sees them. The total screener typically takes patients about 15-20 minutes to complete.
Patients who do meet the criteria for having chronic pain will be randomized to one of the two intervention groups. For at least 12 weeks, one group will be asked to engage in a mobile cCBT program tailored for adults with SCD. The second group will receive pain and SCD education on mobile phones (m-Education). Both programs use identical mobile technology platforms; only the content differs. The cCBT program focuses on teaching behavioral coping skills through participants' "seeing and doing" while the pain education arm focuses on improving self-management through participants' "learning and knowing" more about pain and SCD. All participants in the intervention group will have weekly follow-ups with a health coach and will track pain symptoms daily during the intervention. A smartphone is required to participate in the intervention. If an interested and eligible participant does not have a smartphone, one may be provided to them. Upon completion of the study, the participant may keep the phone after completing all study elements, including having the study team remove all study-related data from the phone.
Both arms of the intervention will be delivered through pre-programmed chatbot interactions administered in a mobile messaging app. The intervention arm is automatically assigned via the chatbot. When the CaRISMA intervention is opened for the first time, it will automatically randomize each participant to either study arm: cCBT or m-Education. The participants will not know which arm they have been assigned to, and they will only have access to the materials included in the respective study arm
Participants will receive a link to our online survey tool where they will be asked to respond to a set of questionnaires and Painimation, a novel pain assessment tool.
The questionnaires are as follows: Sickle Cell Self-Efficacy Scale (SCSS), Patient- Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference, Adult Sickle Cell Quality of Life Measurement Information System (ASCQ-ME), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorders Scale (GAD- 7), and the Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM). For participants who are eligible to be randomized, in addition to baseline questionnaires, items from the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ) will be asked through the messaging app as participants progress through their respective programs.
The Painimation tool is an electronic pain assessment tool developed by our team at the University of Pittsburgh that allows users to better communicate their pain symptoms. Patients are provided with a selection of animations that they use to describe the quality of their pain. The animations can be increased or decreased in speed, color saturation, focus, and size, to reflect the intensity of their pain.
For intervention participants, in addition to the quantitative assessments, our partners at the Qualitative, Evaluation, And Stakeholder Engagement (Qual EASE) Research Services will conduct a set of qualitative interviews to further understand which intervention works best for whom and when, the lived experience of patients in the trial, and differences in perceptions between depression subgroups. Qual- EASE will randomly select 48 participants (of the 350) to be interviewed. Attending the qualitative interviews is completely voluntary and participants may opt out at any time. However, if one of the 48 selected participants does opt out, Qual-EASE will invite another participant, of those not previously selected, as a replacement.
In the first three months of the study, intervention participants will complete all modules of their assigned study arm (cCBT or m-Education) at their own pace. The recommended progression is one module per week; this will give participants time to practice the techniques taught in each module. Participants will be asked to complete a daily electronic diary to track their pain symptoms. Only intervention arm participants will receive follow-up assessment. The convenience comparison group will not be followed with scheduled assessments.
At the 3-month assessment (T1) (i.e., three months after enrollment, on the same date the participant began the study) participants will again receive a link to our online survey tool to complete the second iteration of Painimation, the SCSS, PROMIS, ASCQ-ME, PHQ-9 and GAD-7. If participants have questions while completing these questionnaires, they may contact their health coach for guidance.
Participants will also be asked to complete daily pain intensity entries in the electronic diary. If participants do not complete the questionnaires or the pain intensity entries, health coaches will contact them and remind them to do so. The 48 patients selected for qualitative interviews will have their second interview with Qual- EASE at this time.
Between months 4-6, participants will continue to use the CaRISMA intervention but will no longer have weekly follow-ups with a health coach except upon request or on an as-needed basis. At the end of month 6 (T2), they will receive a link to our online survey tool to complete Painimation, the SCSS, PROMIS, ASCQ-ME, PHQ-9, and GAD-7 for the third time. Participants will continue to complete daily pain intensity entries through the electronic diary.
Between months 6-12, participants will continue daily pain diary submissions and communication with health coaches only as desired. Additionally, Qual-EASE will conduct the final set of qualitative interviews with 48 of the 350 participants.
In the final month of the study (T3), participants will receive a link to our online survey tool to complete Painimation, the SCSS, PROMIS, ASCQ-ME, PHQ-9, GAD- 7 and COMM for the final time.
The pain diary may include some version of the following types of questions in daily assessments:
- Using any number from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable, what is your pain level today?
- Did you take opiate medications today?
- Which one of the following emojis best represents your mood today? The pain diary may include some version of the following types of questions in weekly assessments:
- Using any number from 0 to 10, where 0 is no pain and 10 is the worst pain imaginable, what is your pain level today?
- Did you take opiate medications today?
- Compared to what you used yesterday, is the amount of opiate meds you took today less than yesterday, the same as yesterday, or more than yesterday?
- Did you take non-opiate medications today?
- This past week, how often have you been bothered by little interest or pleasure in doing things?
- This past week, how often have you been bothered by feeling down, depressed, or irritable?
- This past week, how often have you been bothered by feeling nervous, anxious, or on edge?
- This past week, how often have you been bothered by not being able to stop or control worry?
Medical Outcomes (PCORnet). For patients recruited at one of the five clinical sites, we will evaluate objectively measured opioid medication refills and emergency department visits or hospitalizations for pain crisis. We will be working in collaboration with PCORnet to collect data retrospectively (from the past 12 months) and prospectively (12 months from the date of enrollment) from patient medical records.
These data will allow us to track medications including opioid pain medication prescriptions and refills, and health care utilization (i.e., emergency department visits and hospitalizations), as well as lab values (e.g., hemoglobin level) and clinical outcomes (e.g., end-organ damage score). For the patients recruited from our community partner organizations or online who are not affiliated with a participating clinical center, we will only acquire or evaluate their medical records for the purpose of confirming their sickle cell diagnosis.
The primary outcome is the change in pain interference at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include changes in pain intensity, depression (PHQ), anxiety (GAD), quality of life (ASCQ-ME), self-efficacy (SCSES), opioid misuse (COMM), and health care utilization at 6 and 12 months. The study team has updated the outcomes to be more comprehensive due to the funder's requirement that it align with the contract milestones
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- comparative effectiveness trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| cCBT | Experimental | Other: cCBTComputerized cognitive behavioral therapy (cCBT) for pain. The cCBT program will teach users how to recognize negative thoughts and emotions, use cognitive skills and problem-solving, and apply coping behaviors such as distraction, activity scheduling, and relaxation. The cCBT arm emphasizes skills acquisition and learning through practice; this intervention is consistent with the tailored behavioral services patients would receive individually or as a group when working with a psychologist or behavioral pain specialist. |
| m-Education | Experimental | Other: m-EducationMobile-delivered pain and sickle cell disease education (m-Education). The m-Education program will teach users about chronic pain, healthy lifestyle tips (e.g., nutrition and exercise), and facts about SCD. This program is consistent with the education patients and families would receive with a patient educator. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- People with any type of sickle cell disease
- Male or female, age 18 years or older
- Reports chronic pain: i.e pain more days that not for the past 3 months or longer and/or is prescribed daily or long-acting opioids for pain.
- English speaking
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Any potential participants who fail consent comprehension questions
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cCBTA digital, internet-delivered, evidence-based chatbot programmed to deliver content for both cCBT. | Other | cCBT |
| m-EducationA digital, internet-delivered, evidence-based chatbot programmed to deliver content for both m-Education. | Other | m-Education |
Primary outcome
6-month Change in PROMIS Pain Interference
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
The 8-item Patient Reported Outcomes Measure Information System Pain Interference (PROMIS-8a) assesses the effect of patient-reported pain on relevant aspects of a person's life and may include the extent to which pain hinders engagement with social, cognitive, emotional, physical, and recreational activities in the past 7 days. The items use 1-5 Likert scale with higher scores indicating greater pain interference. The raw total score (ranging from 8 to 40) is transformed using a T-score for a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10, in referent population. Higher T-scores indicate greater pain.
17 secondary outcomes
6-month Change in Daily Pain Intensity
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
6-month Change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
6-month Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7)
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
6-month Change in Adult Sickle Cell Quality of Life Measurement Information System (ASCQ-ME)
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
6-month Change in Sickle Cell Self-Efficacy Scale (SCSES)
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
Change From Baseline in Percent of Total Body Area Shaded (Painimation) at 6 Months
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months
12-month Change in PROMIS Pain Interference
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
12-month Change in Daily Pain Intensity
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
12-month Change in Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
12-month Change in Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7)
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
12-month Change in Adult Sickle Cell Quality of Life Measurement Information System (ASCQ-ME)
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
12-month Change in Sickle Cell Self-Efficacy Scale (SCSES)
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
12-month Change in Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM)
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
Change From Baseline in Percent of Total Body Area Shaded (Painimation) at 12 Months
Time frame: 12 months
Number of Opioid Prescriptions
Time frame: 12 months
Number of Emergency Department Visits
Time frame: 12 months
Number of Hospitalizations
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Feb 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42847392Oluwole OB, Chen YF, Lalama CM, O'Brien JA, De Castro LM, Carroll CP, Liles D, Shah N, Saraf SL, Gordeuk VR, Saint Jean L, DeBaun M, Cronin RM, Palermo TM, Badawy SM, Hamm ME, Stinson JN, Lalloo C, Lanzkron SM, Trimnell C, Bailey L, Lawrence RH, Abebe KZ, Jonassaint CR. Digital cognitive behavioral therapy versus Education for chronic pain in adults with sickle cell disease: 12-month randomized trial results. Ann Behav Med. 2026 Jan 7;60(1):kaag030. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaag030.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40763347Oluwole OB, McGill LS, Gayle K, O'Brien JA, Abebe KZ, Jonassaint CR, Hamm M. Experiences With a Multicomponent Digital Behavioral Pain Management Intervention for Adults With Sickle Cell Disease: Qualitative Analysis of the CaRISMA Trial. JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Aug 5;12:e73719. doi: 10.2196/73719.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38171495Jonassaint CR, Parchuri E, O'Brien JA, Lalama CM, Lin J, Badawy SM, Hamm ME, Stinson J, Lalloo C, Carroll CP, Saraf SL, Gordeuk VR, Cronin R, Shah N, Lanzkron SM, Liles D, Trimnell C, Bailey L, Lawrence RH, Abebe KZ. Mental health, pain and likelihood of opioid misuse among adults with sickle cell disease. Br J Haematol. 2024 Mar;204(3):1029-1038. doi: 10.1111/bjh.19243. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33988517Badawy SM, Abebe KZ, Reichman CA, Checo G, Hamm ME, Stinson J, Lalloo C, Carroll P, Saraf SL, Gordeuk VR, Desai P, Shah N, Liles D, Trimnell C, Jonassaint CR. Comparing the Effectiveness of Education Versus Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adults With Sickle Cell Disease: Protocol for the Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Real-time Pain Management Intervention for Sickle Cell via Mobile Applications (CaRISMA) Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 May 14;10(5):e29014. doi: 10.2196/29014.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Adding Vagal Neuromodulation to Manual Therapy in Women With Fibromyalgia
Fibromyalgia (FM) OR Fibromyalgia Syndrome, Manuel Therapy
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Veterans' Intervention Blending NeuRomodulation and YogA for Chronic Low BackPaiN Treatment: VIBRANT
Chronic Low Back Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Psilocybin-Assisted Physical Therapy in Chronic Low Back Pain
Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP), Physical Therapy
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Music During Walking on Pain and Muscle Activation in People With Chronic Pain Due to Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
PRP Versus NP Injections for Chronic Discogenic Low Back Pain
Discogenic Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
7 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing cCBT and m-Education in people with Chronic Pain and Depression, Anxiety, run by University of Pittsburgh at 7 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Feb 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
6-month Change in PROMIS Pain Interference (time frame: Baseline and 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04419168, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Feb 2025.