Cervical Spinal StenosisNCT04381663
CSS-Assessing the Course of Degenerative Cervical Spinal Stenosis Using Functional Outcomes
An observational study of Cervical Spinal Stenosis and Cervical Myelopathy, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
The study will consist of two parts: In Study A, objectively assessed physical activity, gait, balance, range of movement of specific joints during walking and neurophysiological findings between patients with cervical spine stenosis (CSS) without myelopathy who will be treated conservatively and patients with… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Spinal Stenosis, Cervical Myelopathy
- What is being tested?
- conservative treatment and surgical treatment
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 16 Sep 2019to Sep 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with degenerative cervical spine stenosis with or without myelopathy.
Who may be able to join
- Age > 18 years
- Diagnosis of degenerative cervical spine stenosis defined by MRI (stenosis grade 2 or grade 3
- Local clinical symptoms due to degenerative changes of the cervical vertebral column with or without clinically defined myelopathy
Who cannot join
- Stenosis after trauma or neoplasm
- Prior decompressive surgery
- Previous spine or extremity surgery with a consequent sensorimotor impairment
- Other pathologies than cervical spine stenosis causing gait disturbance
- BMI > 35 kg/m2
- Use of walking aids
Show all 9Show fewer
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Contraindications for recording of Motor evoked potentials (MEP)
- Contraindications to safely undergo MRI
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
The study will consist of two parts:
- In Study A, objectively assessed physical activity, gait, balance, range of movement of specific joints during walking and neurophysiological findings between patients with cervical spine stenosis (CSS) without myelopathy who will be treated conservatively and patients with stenosis and signs of myelopathy who are candidates for surgical Treatment will be compared.
- In Study B, the 6-month changes in the same outcomes in patients treated conservatively (from the first specialist consultation until 6 months later) and in patients treated surgically (preoperative day and 6-month post-operatively) will be quantified.
Read the detailed description
Study A is a single centre cross-sectional study with two study groups, one that will be treated conservatively (stenosis) and one that will be treated surgically (stenosis and myelopathy).
Study B is a single centre longitudinal study where the same patient groups will be followed up during the course of their treatment.
Clinical, radiological, biomechanical (kinematic and electromyographic), neurological and neurophysiological data will be collected. Differences in and the relationship between the clinical, radiological, biomechanical, neurological and neurophysiological data will be determined .
- Conditions
- Cervical Spinal Stenosis, Cervical Myelopathy
- Being tested
- conservative treatment, surgical treatment
- Keywords
- Cervical Spinal Stenosis, Cervical Myelopathy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
conservative treatmentProcedure or surgery
conservative treatment for patients with cervical spine stenosis without myelopathy
surgical treatmentProcedure or surgery
surgical decompress the spinal canal in patients with moderate to severe degenerative cervical spine myelopathy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| conservative treatment | In study A this group will be treated conservatively (stenosis). Study B is a single centre longitudinal study where the same patient groups will be followed up during the course of their treatment Receives: Procedure: conservative treatment | |
| surgical treatment (stenosis and myelopathy). | In study A this group that will be treated surgically (stenosis and myelopathy). Study B is a single centre longitudinal study where the same patient groups will be followed up during the course of their treatment Receives: Procedure: surgical treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Difference in gait symmetry
The subjects will perform an instrumented gait analysis on an overground walkway with two embedded force plates
Measured: approximate duration: 30 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2
Change in balance performance
Balance performance will be assessed using the modified clinical test of sensory integration of balance (m-CTSIB) using the Biodex Balance System SD
Measured: approximate duration: 30 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
Difference in neurophysiological outcome
Quantitative score of Motor evoked potentials (MEP) and Somato-sensory evoked potentials (SEP)
Measured: approximate duration: 30 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
Secondary outcomes (10)
Difference in daily physical activity
daily physical activity will be objectively monitored for 7 consecutive days using the ActiGraph wGT3X-BT (ActiGraph Corp, Pensacola Florida, USA) worn around the hip
Measured: monitored for 7 consecutive days at visit 1 or 1 week before surgery and 6 months later at visit 2
Difference in spinal cord gray and white matter areas
Participants will be investigated on the 3 Tesla (3T) whole body MRI research scanner using 2D-Averaged Magnetization Inversion Recovery Acquisitions (AMIRA) imaging
Measured: approximate duration of the scan: 30. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2 (Measurement at visit 2 only in patients with cervical spine stenosis treated conservatively).
Change in segmental quantitative muscle strength
assessments of segmental muscle force via hand-held-dynamometry following the Treatment Research Initiative to Cure ALS (TRICALS) Protocol Isometric Strength Testing 2016 at each study visit
Measured: approximate duration: 10 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
Change in 25-foot walk test
time of 25-foot walk test
Measured: approximate duration: 3 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
Change in 6-minute walk test
distance of 6-minute walk test
Measured: approximate duration: 6 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
Change in dynamic stability and range of motion during walking
Subjects will first complete overground walking trials in their own shoes at normal and fast walking speed while naming months backward in a 25-m hallway while gait CSS Study Protocol Version 2, 15.8.2019 Page 12 of 21 kinematics will be recorded using the RehaGait system. Afterwards, patients will be asked to walk over the force plates in the laboratory at their preferred walking speed while kinematic, kinetic and Electromyography (EMG) data will be recorded.
Measured: approximate duration: 20 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
Change in pain
Numeric Pain Rate Scale (NPRS), a subjective measure in which individuals rate their pain on an eleven-point numerical scale. The scale is composed of 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (worst imaginable pain)
Measured: approximate duration: 2 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
Change in function
Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association - Scoring System (mJOA) questionnaire, This scale consists of four domain scores motor dysfunction in the upper extremities, motor dysfunction in the lower extremities, sensory function in the upper extremities and bladder function. Each scale ranges from 0 to 7, 5, 3, and 3, respectively, with a total score of 0 to 18.
The severity of myelopathy is defined as mild if the mJOA score is 15 or larger, moderate if the mJOA score ranges from 12 to 14 or severe if the mJOA score is less than 12
Measured: approximate duration: 13 min. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2
Change in disability
Neck Disability Index (NDI) questionnaire, a Patient-completed, condition-specific functional status questionnaire with 10 items including pain, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation.
The NDI has sufficient support and usefulness to retain its current status as the most commonly used self-report measure for neck pain. A score of 0-4 points means no disability, 5-14 points mild disability, 15-24 points moderate disability, 25-34 points severe disability, 35-50 points complete disability
Measured: approximate duration: 5 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
Change in risk of falling
The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) is a subjective measure for balance and risk of falling. Based on 14 items, vestibular function, balance ability, proprioception and muscle strength are assessed. The cut-off value for an elevated risk of falling is at 38 of 56 points. Older persons with a score of 45 of 56 points are able to ambulate safely and independently.
Measured: approximate duration: 10 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 May 2020
- Study start16 Sep 2019
- Primary completionSep 2025 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cervical Spinal StenosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Annegret Mündermann, Prof. Dr., Principal investigator, University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandCordula Netzer, Dr. med., Principal investigator, University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandRegina Schläger, PD Dr. med., Principal investigator, University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandMartin Hardmeier, PD Dr. med., Principal investigator, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04381663
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2019-01270;ch20Muendermann
- Other IDs
- 2019
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 29 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 9 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- CSS-Assessing the Course of Degenerative Cervical Spinal Stenosis Using Functional Outcomes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04381663
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2019-01270;ch20Muendermann
- Conditions
- Cervical Spinal Stenosis, Cervical Myelopathy
- Keywords
- Cervical Spinal Stenosis, Cervical Myelopathy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 May 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study will consist of two parts:
- In Study A, objectively assessed physical activity, gait, balance, range of movement of specific joints during walking and neurophysiological findings between patients with cervical spine stenosis (CSS) without myelopathy who will be treated conservatively and patients with stenosis and signs of myelopathy who are candidates for surgical Treatment will be compared.
- In Study B, the 6-month changes in the same outcomes in patients treated conservatively (from the first specialist consultation until 6 months later) and in patients treated surgically (preoperative day and 6-month post-operatively) will be quantified.
Detailed description
Study A is a single centre cross-sectional study with two study groups, one that will be treated conservatively (stenosis) and one that will be treated surgically (stenosis and myelopathy).
Study B is a single centre longitudinal study where the same patient groups will be followed up during the course of their treatment.
Clinical, radiological, biomechanical (kinematic and electromyographic), neurological and neurophysiological data will be collected. Differences in and the relationship between the clinical, radiological, biomechanical, neurological and neurophysiological data will be determined .
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Other
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| conservative treatment | – | Procedure: conservative treatmentIn study A this group will be treated conservatively (stenosis). Study B is a single centre longitudinal study where the same patient groups will be followed up during the course of their treatment |
| surgical treatment (stenosis and myelopathy). | – | Procedure: surgical treatmentIn study A this group that will be treated surgically (stenosis and myelopathy). Study B is a single centre longitudinal study where the same patient groups will be followed up during the course of their treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with degenerative cervical spine stenosis with or without myelopathy.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age > 18 years
- Diagnosis of degenerative cervical spine stenosis defined by MRI (stenosis grade 2 or grade 3
- Local clinical symptoms due to degenerative changes of the cervical vertebral column with or without clinically defined myelopathy
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Stenosis after trauma or neoplasm
- Prior decompressive surgery
- Previous spine or extremity surgery with a consequent sensorimotor impairment
- Other pathologies than cervical spine stenosis causing gait disturbance
- BMI > 35 kg/m2
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| conservative treatmentconservative treatment for patients with cervical spine stenosis without myelopathy | Procedure or surgery | conservative treatment |
| surgical treatmentsurgical decompress the spinal canal in patients with moderate to severe degenerative cervical spine myelopathy | Procedure or surgery | surgical treatment (stenosis and myelopathy). |
Primary outcome
Difference in gait symmetry
Time frame: approximate duration: 30 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2
The subjects will perform an instrumented gait analysis on an overground walkway with two embedded force plates
Change in balance performance
Time frame: approximate duration: 30 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
Balance performance will be assessed using the modified clinical test of sensory integration of balance (m-CTSIB) using the Biodex Balance System SD
Difference in neurophysiological outcome
Time frame: approximate duration: 30 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
Quantitative score of Motor evoked potentials (MEP) and Somato-sensory evoked potentials (SEP)
10 secondary outcomes
Difference in daily physical activity
Time frame: monitored for 7 consecutive days at visit 1 or 1 week before surgery and 6 months later at visit 2
Difference in spinal cord gray and white matter areas
Time frame: approximate duration of the scan: 30. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2 (Measurement at visit 2 only in patients with cervical spine stenosis treated conservatively).
Change in segmental quantitative muscle strength
Time frame: approximate duration: 10 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
Change in 25-foot walk test
Time frame: approximate duration: 3 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
Change in 6-minute walk test
Time frame: approximate duration: 6 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
Change in dynamic stability and range of motion during walking
Time frame: approximate duration: 20 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
Change in pain
Time frame: approximate duration: 2 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
Change in function
Time frame: approximate duration: 13 min. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2
Change in disability
Time frame: approximate duration: 5 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
Change in risk of falling
Time frame: approximate duration: 10 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Dec 2024.
Related trials for Cervical Spinal Stenosis
Enrolling by invitation
Assessing Microbiome in Primary Anterior Cervical Fusion Patients
Cervical Stenosis, Myelopathy
Recruiting
Hard Cervical Collar Use Following Posterior Cervical Fusion
Spinal Stenosis Cervical, Radiculopathy, Cervical Region
RecruitingObservational study
PMCF Study Fortilink-SC
Degenerative Disc Disease in Cervical Spine, Stenosis Cervical Spine
RecruitingPhase 4
Success Rates and Safety of Steroid Injections in Managing Spinal and Sacro-Iliac Pain (CORTisone Injection Spine Study)
Back Pain Lower Back, Neck Pain
Recruiting
Correlation Between Parameters and Prognosis of Cervical Single Open-door Surgery
Cervical Spinal Stenosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Annegret Mündermann, Prof. Dr. principal investigator
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Cordula Netzer, Dr. med. principal investigator
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Regina Schläger, PD Dr. med. principal investigator
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cervical Spinal Stenosis and Cervical Myelopathy, run by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Difference in gait symmetry (time frame: approximate duration: 30 minutes. Assessment will be performed at visit 1 and will be repeated 6 months after study inclusion at visit 2). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Dec 2024.