AzTrials
AzTrials

Intravitreal InjectionsPhase 4COPIVINNCT04343222

Control of Pain in Intravitreal Injections Using Topical NSAIDs

A Phase 4 study testing Bromfenac and Artificial tears in people with Intravitreal Injections and IVI, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Intravitreal injections (IVI) are a common form of treatment for multiple retinal pathologies. The investigators hypothesize that an intervention with a topical NSAID will alleviate pain experienced at intravitreal injection (IVI) and post-IVI. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Intravitreal Injections, IVI
What is being tested?
Bromfenac and Artificial tears
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
46 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
27 Jun 2019to 19 Dec 2019
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Eyes with retinal pathology requiring anti-VEGF therapy
  • Previously had an IVI

Who cannot join

  • History of previous eye surgery other than cataract extraction
  • Herpetic eye disease
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma
  • Uveitis
  • Acute conjunctivitis
  • Pregnancy
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Known previous adverse response or contraindication to intravitreal injection, Bromfenac, or other NSAIDs.
  • Keratitis including povidone-induced keratitis
  • Bullous keratopathy
  • Diagnosis of dry eye syndrome
  • Uncontrolled diabetes
  • NSAID use 3 days prior to IVI

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Wisconsin

    Madison, Wisconsin, 53792

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Control of Pain in Intravitreal Injections (COPIVIN Study): A Study Evaluating the Use of Combination Topical Anesthetic and Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)

Intravitreal injections (IVI) are a common form of treatment for multiple retinal pathologies. The investigators hypothesize that an intervention with a topical NSAID will alleviate pain experienced at intravitreal injection (IVI) and post-IVI. 46 participants will be recruited, randomized into 1 of 3 treatment arms, and can expect to be on study for a day.

Read the detailed description

Intravitreal injections are a very common form of treatment for a variety of ocular pathologies. The use of these injections has only increased given the large utility they provide. They both improved visual outcomes and provided patients an overall better quality of life. However, a problem experienced by patients who undergo these injections is the need for multiple reoccurring injections to maintain control of their disease. It has long been an issue to provide patients optimal pain relief both during and after their intravitreal injections. Topical anesthesia is often utilized through frequent rounds of proparacaine eye drops. Other providers often use Lidocaine gel or Lidocaine-soaked cotton swaps with variable results in terms of pain control. Subconjunctival lidocaine has also been utilized with variable control of pain, however patients did report anxiety with the thought of being given an additional injection.

Patient pain is subjective and difficult to objectively quantify when comparing different methods of post-injection control. One commonly employed pain rating system is the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale which has been quite successful in objectively quantifying patient discomfort. It should be noted that this scale is only reliable in a patient whom is able to understand how the scale works.

Other research studies have shown adequate to improved pain control through the use of topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) eye drops. One study looked at the use of topical Nepafenac 0.10% on post injection pain. This study used the McGill pain assessment questionnaire, which not only quantified pain but the additional benefit of describing the nature of the pain the patient experienced.

A clinical research study looked at pain immediately and 6 hours after injection. The researchers found that when compared to the control group (artificial tears) the group who received NSAID eye drops had better pain control. In a similar study, Bromfenac, another topical NSAID eye drop, provided good pain relief post injection, setting a precedent for the use of topical NSAIDs in controlling IVI pain.

However, studies have only reported pain relief immediately and 6 hours after injection. There have not been any studies showing pain control 24 hours post injection. Furthermore, no studies to date have compared the timing of application of a topical NSAID, in the alleviation of long-term pain patients experience. Bromfenac 0.09% is the agent of choice given its previously demonstrated effectiveness in pain control and also strength when compared to other ophthalmic NSAIDs. This was demonstrated in a paper by Sheppard that compared Bromfenac with other topical NSAID eye drops and proved that it offered approximately 3-4 times higher levels of COX-2 inhibition. It has been approved by the FDA as a one time daily eye drop to reduce inflammation. It is commonly utilized following cataract surgery to help reduce intraocular inflammation. This study looks at this medication's utility to control pain following IVI, another invasive procedure. Pain control would be assessed immediately following injection, 6 hours post injection and 24 hours post injection. This will allow evaluation of Bromfenac 0.09%'s effectiveness on overall immediate pain control as well as on ocular discomfort/soreness that can often follow IVI. Additionally, two intervention groups to compare Bromfenac 0.09% instillation 30 minutes prior to IVI and instillation immediately following IVI.

The primary goal of this study is to determine if topically administered Bromfenac 0.09% eye drops can reduce the discomfort that patient experience both during and after intravitreal injections. Additionally, the effect of both pre and post injection application of topical Bromfenac 0.09% on subjective pain scores will be investigated.

This study will be a pilot study consisting of 46 participants. These participants will be selected from those that have a diagnosis requiring intravitreal injection of an anti-VEGF agent (Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)). Participants that have already undergone intravitreal injection at least once before will be eligible. This will serve to minimize bias from initial injection anxiety and will give participants a comparative data point (prior injection discomfort). Participants will be randomized into one of three groups, which will be known as group A, B or C. The groups will have drop regimens as follows:

  • Group A: Will receive 1 drop of topical Bromfenac 0.09% 30 minutes prior to the injection and then 1 drop of an artificial tear eye drop immediately after the injection and wash.
  • Group B: Will receive 1 drop of an artificial tear eye drop 30 minutes prior to the injection and then 1 drop of topical Bromfenac 0.09% immediately after the injection and wash.
  • Group C: Will receive 1 drop of an artificial tear eye drop 30 minutes prior to the injection and then 1 drop of an artificial tear eye drop immediately after the injection and wash.

All labels will be removed from the bottles and the participants will be blinded to which group they belong to. The treating physicians will also be blinded to which group the participants belong to.

Immediately following the injection, each participant will be asked to rate their pain using the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale as well as the McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ). Participants will then be given instructions and will be told to expect a call at 6 and 24 hours regarding further follow up phone questionnaires. Participants will also be provided with a phone number to contact should they have any complications (ie. discomfort, increased pain, vision changes, or any other questions). Participants will be provided with a copy of the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire to take home with them. Participants will be called 6 hours post-injection for further assessment of their pain using both the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ). At 24 hours, participants will again be contacted and their pain will be assessed one final time using both the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ). This will serve as the last point of data gathered from participants.

Being tested
Bromfenac, Artificial tears
Keywords
pain
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BromfenacDrug

    An NSAID used to treat eye pain and swelling

  • Artificial tearsDrug

    eye drops to lubricate the eye and maintain moisture

Study groups in NCT04343222
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group A: Bromfenac then Artificial TearsExperimentalParticipant receives 1 drop of topical Bromfenac 0.09% 30 minutes prior to the injection and then 1 drop of an artificial tear eye drop immediately after the injection and wash.
Receives: Drug: Bromfenac; Drug: Artificial tears
Group B: Artificial Tears then BromfenacExperimentalParticipant receives 1 drop of an artificial tear eye drop 30 minutes prior to the injection and then 1 drop of topical Bromfenac 0.09% immediately after the injection and wash.
Receives: Drug: Bromfenac; Drug: Artificial tears
Group C: Artificial Tears then Artificial TearsPlacebo comparatorParticipants receives 1 drop of an artificial tear eye drop 30 minutes prior to the injection and then 1 drop of an artificial tear eye drop immediately after the injection and wash.
Receives: Drug: Artificial tears

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Scores at Baseline

    Assessment of topical 0.09% Bromfenac's analgesic effect pre- and post-injection in participants undergoing intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-VEGFs as measured by the SF-MPQ. The SF-MPQ questionnaire contains 15 sensory and affective descriptors each rated on a 0-3 scale where 0 is none, 1 is mild, 2 is moderate, and 3 is severe. The total possible range of scores is 0-45 where the higher the score, the more intense the pain.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Scores at 6 Hours Post Injection

    Assessment of topical 0.09% Bromfenac's analgesic effect pre- and post-injection in participants undergoing intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-VEGFs as measured by the SF-MPQ. The SF-MPQ questionnaire contains 15 sensory and affective descriptors each rated on a 0-3 scale where 0 is none, 1 is mild, 2 is moderate, and 3 is severe. The total possible range of scores is 0-45 where the higher the score, the more intense the pain.

    Measured: 6 hours post injection

  3. McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Scores at 24 Hours Post Injection

    Assessment of topical 0.09% Bromfenac's analgesic effect pre- and post-injection in participants undergoing intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-VEGFs as measured by the SF-MPQ. The SF-MPQ questionnaire contains 15 sensory and affective descriptors each rated on a 0-3 scale where 0 is none, 1 is mild, 2 is moderate, and 3 is severe. The total possible range of scores is 0-45 where the higher the score, the more intense the pain.

    Measured: 24 hours post injection

  4. Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale Scores at Baseline

    Assessment of topical 0.09% Bromfenac's analgesic effect pre- and post-injection in patients undergoing intravitreal injections of anti-VEGFs as measured by the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale. This scale is compromised of drawings of faces that appear to be experiencing increasing pain, from which the participant chooses their current level of pain. Scoring is defined on the scale as, "Face 0 doesn't hurt at all. Face 2 hurts just a little bit. Face 4 hurts a little bit more. Face 6 hurts even more. Face 8 hurts a whole lot. Face 10 hurts as much as you can imagine, although you don't have to be crying to have this worst pain."

    Measured: Baseline

  5. Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale Scores at 6 Hours Post Injection

    Assessment of topical 0.09% Bromfenac's analgesic effect pre- and post-injection in patients undergoing intravitreal injections of anti-VEGFs as measured by the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale. This scale is compromised of drawings of faces that appear to be experiencing increasing pain, from which the participant chooses their current level of pain. Scoring is defined on the scale as, "Face 0 doesn't hurt at all. Face 2 hurts just a little bit. Face 4 hurts a little bit more. Face 6 hurts even more. Face 8 hurts a whole lot. Face 10 hurts as much as you can imagine, although you don't have to be crying to have this worst pain."

    Measured: 6 hours post injection

  6. Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale Scores at 24 Hours Post Injection

    Assessment of topical 0.09% Bromfenac's analgesic effect pre- and post-injection in patients undergoing intravitreal injections of anti-VEGFs as measured by the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale. This scale is compromised of drawings of faces that appear to be experiencing increasing pain, from which the participant chooses their current level of pain. Scoring is defined on the scale as, "Face 0 doesn't hurt at all. Face 2 hurts just a little bit. Face 4 hurts a little bit more. Face 6 hurts even more. Face 8 hurts a whole lot. Face 10 hurts as much as you can imagine, although you don't have to be crying to have this worst pain."

    Measured: 24 hours post injection

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Apr 2020
  2. Study start27 Jun 2019
  3. Primary completion19 Dec 2019
  4. Study completion19 Dec 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
46 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04343222
Sponsor's protocol ID
2019-0095
Other IDs
A536000, SMPH/OPHTHAL&VIS SCI/GEN
Acronym
COPIVIN
Status last verified
Sep 2020
First submitted
8 Apr 2020
Last updated
12 Jun 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Bromfenac and Artificial tears in people with Intravitreal Injections and IVI, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Oct 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) Scores at Baseline (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jun 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in