Pain PerceptionCOMFORTEMGNCT04337814
The Effect of Combined Oral and Topical Analgesics to Reduce Pain Perception During Electrodiagnostic Testing
A study testing EMLA Cream and Ibuprofen in people with Pain Perception, run by Aga Khan University Hospital, Pakistan at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
Electromyography (EMG) is a useful test for diagnosis and monitoring of lower motor neuron disorders. It is mostly done in conjunction with a Nerve Conduction Study (NCS). Like other invasive medical procedures; electrodiagnostic tests have been known to cause iatrogenic pain for the patient, the intensity of which… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 months to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain Perception
- What is being tested?
- EMLA Cream and Ibuprofen
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 113 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 30 Dec 2019to 27 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 months to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Pediatric patients (6 months to 18 years) referred for NCS / EMG testing to the neurophysiology lab at AKUH
Who cannot join
- Patients not able to report pain scores on the scales used
- Patients using sedatives and prior analgesics within last 24 hours of study
- Patients with history of upper gastrointestinal tract bleed, renal disease, severe hepatic disease, glucose-6-phosphate deficiency, congenital or idiopathic methemoglobinemia
- Patients with known sensitivity / allergy to Ibuprofen or EMLA cream or their components
- Patients on class I antiarrhythmic drugs
- Patients with breach of skin on topical analgesic/placebo application sites
- Breastfeeding or sugary drink within one hour of start of study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Combined Oral and Topical Analgesics to Reduce Pain Perception During Electromyography in Pediatric Population-A Randomized Controlled Trial
Electromyography (EMG) is a useful test for diagnosis and monitoring of lower motor neuron disorders. It is mostly done in conjunction with a Nerve Conduction Study (NCS). Like other invasive medical procedures; electrodiagnostic tests have been known to cause iatrogenic pain for the patient, the intensity of which varies from person to person. Multiple modifiable as well as non-modifiable risk factors associated with EMG pain have been described in literature.Various approaches targeting different mechanisms of pain perception have been tested to make this procedure comfortable for the patients. These approaches range from simple distraction techniques to the use of topical and oral analgesics.Most of these studies have looked at adult population which has, supposedly, better pain tolerance as compared to children. Data on EMG associated pain in pediatric population is scant. This trial will assess the effect of combined oral and topical analgesics to reduce pain perception during NCS and EMG tests in the pediatric population.
Read the detailed description
Objectives:
To determine the effect of combined oral and topical analgesics (COTA) in reducing pain perception during NCS and EMG tests among the pediatric population.
To compare the effect of COTA and only oral analgesics (OA) in reducing pain perception during NCS and EMG tests among the pediatric population.
Methods:
Study Setting: This study will be conducted at the neurophysiology lab at Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH)
Study Design: This will be a stratified (6 months - 6 years and 7 - 18 years with balanced randomization), double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study conducted at the neurophysiology lab, AKUH.
Variables:
Independent Variables - Gender, age, weight (Kg), number of muscles sampled, distribution of muscles sampled, end plate noise detection, type of needle used, duration of EMG and NCS test, history of undergoing electrodiagnostic tests in the past, time duration between analgesic intake / application and start of the NCS and EMG test, number of needle insertions needed outside of applied cream area, number of times skin is pierced,result of electrodiagnostic examination, patient in parents lap, electromyographer, study arm.
Dependent Variables - Pain Scores (MBPS and FPS-R)
Interventions/Study Protocol:
The guardians / patients who meet the inclusion criteria, as determined by the neurophysiology fellow or attending, will be instructed to reach the neurophysiology lab on the day of appointment one hour before the expected procedure time. All patients and/or their guardians referred for NCS / EMG will be given a standard explanation regarding the procedure and study details on the day of electrodiagnostic testing by the designated neurophysiology technologist. NCS would be explained as a test that checks the responses of the nerves and the subject will feel small zaps during the procedure. EMG would be explained as a procedure where a thin small microphone will be inserted in multiple muscles of the arm, leg and / or neck and back that will help us in identifying the problem. The word 'needle' and 'electric current' would not be used during this explanation. The guardian and patient, if old enough to understand, will also be explained the study protocol being carried out. Written Informed consent for the procedure itself and the study will be taken at this point by the neurophysiology fellow. Patients (older than 6 years) or their guardians will be instructed on how to administer the FPS-R scale. In addition guardians would be instructed to make sure that patients are not given sugary drinks or breastfeed during 1 hour prior to the procedure. During the study distractions will be kept to a minimum and similar for all patients. Sites of needle insertion will not be rubbed, stroked or tapped at the time of needle insertion. These factors are known confounders in reducing intramuscular injection pain. Those who have given consent will be assigned to one of the three arms of the study according to the randomization schedule; COTA arm (Ibuprofen Syrup and EMLA Cream), OA arm (Ibuprofen Syrup and Plain Cream) or Placebo arm (Plain Syrup and Plain Cream). All patients will be issued their interventions labeled with an allocation sequence according to the randomization schedule from the clinical trials unit (CTU), in a double blind manner, on the day of appointment. The syrup will be given to patients orally (10mg/Kg body weight) at least 1 hour prior to start of procedure. The electromyographer will demarcate all the possible muscle sampling sites required as per study protocol with a non-toxic marker and leave the room. A neurophysiology technologist will apply the cream on all demarcated sites. After application of cream, the site would be covered by an occlusive dressing until NCS / EMG is carried out so as to keep the applied cream in place and prevent accidental ingestion or application on mucosal surfaces by the patient. The patient will be kept under observation for adverse reactions including blanching and local erythema from application of cream till 15 minutes after the NCS / EMG procedure. Observation would be done by Neurophysiology fellow or the Neurophysiology attending. Neurophysiology technologists designated to carry out this exercise would be given combined sessions regarding the application technique to achieve consistency in results.
The EMG will be performed by board certified faculty or neurophysiology fellows under their supervision, each of them having a minimum of 6 months experience in doing electrodiagnostic testing. This involves intramuscular insertion of needle (that has a microphone at its tip) into multiple muscles. The occlusive dressing will be removed and area to be tested wiped with alcohol swabs. Nerve conduction studies will be conducted first followed by the needle procedures. During nerve conduction studies, patients feel an electric current like sensation whenever a nerve is tested. Attempt will be made to keep the needle movements to minimum. The guardian would accompany the child throughout the procedure. If the child wants, he/she would be allowed to sit in the guardians lap during the procedure.
Pain Assessment \& Data Collection:
For children aged 6 months to 6 years pain will be assessed by scoring facial expression, cry and body movements of the children using the Modified Behavioral Pain Scale (MBPS). For children aged 7 years to 18 years the Face Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) version will be used. Patients will be scored before NCS, after NCS and after EMG respectively on the data collection form. Two observers blinded to the rest of the study and not involved with carrying out NCS / EMG will be trained to administer these scores. The guardian, who would be unaware of what the child scored, will also be shown the FPS-R and asked to score how much pain patient seemed to feel during NCS and EMG respectively. Regarding FPS-R, the instruction will be to choose the face that most closely resembles the amount of pain being felt. Patient demographics, Clinical characteristics and NCS / EMG procedure characteristics will also be recorded on the form. The data collected will then be entered into an excel sheet at the end of each day.
Sample Size:
Assuming a difference in means of 1.4 with a standard deviation of 1.73 in the control group and 2.17 in the intervention group on the MBPS according to a study assessing effectiveness of EMLA cream for reducing pain during Intramuscular injections in the pediatric population, an alpha level of 0.05 and power of 80 % using a 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test with 3 pairwise comparisons; we will require 35 patients per group. Furthermore, assuming a 10 % dropout rate we will enroll 39 patients per group to account for it.
Randomization:
To achieve comparable groups, randomization will be performed as stratified blocked randomization with random sizes in a 1:1 allocation ratio. Stratification will be done according to the age groups: 6 months - 6 years and 7 - 18 years with varying random block sizes. Allocation to intervention groups according to stratification will be carried out by a computer generated randomization schedule which will list the allocation sequences assigned to each of the three arms. The randomization schedule will only be available with the pharmacist in charge of preparing interventions. Interventions will be prepared in indistinguishable containers containing plain cream and EMLA cream and bottles containing plain syrup and Ibuprofen syrup. The creams will be prepared to be similar in consistency, texture and color. The syrups will also be similar in color and taste. Thirty Nine Intervention packages will be made for each of the intervention arms; COTA arm, OA arm and Placebo arm. Each intervention will be labelled with an allocation sequence according to the randomization schedule by the pharmacist. The independent study officer not involved with the preparation or packaging of interventions and blinded to the rest of the study will issue the intervention for each patient reporting on the day of the appointment. The random allocation sequence would be concealed from the rest of the study investigators / researchers.
Blinding:
Throughout the study the patients, the electromyographers, neurophysiology technologists / observers administering the validated pain scales will be unaware of the intervention assignments.
Safety Management:
The drugs used in intervention arm have FDA approval as analgesics in the study population. Moreover, no prior testing is recommended before administration of these over the counter analgesics. Our study involves a single time use of these drugs only. Possible side effects (1-10%) with Ibuprofen include dizziness, epigastric pain, heart burn, nausea, rash, vomiting and renal failure (<1%). Possible side effects (>10%) with EMLA application include application site pallor/blanching, erythema/pain and application site oedema (1-10%), itching. Rare adverse effects (<1%) include methemoglobinemia and myocardial dysfunction. Patients will be observed for 15 minutes post study for the development of any side effects. If any side effect is observed, patients would be referred to consult respective speciality as deemed appropriate, as per the severity of adverse event. The patient or his/her guardian will bear the expenses. This would be mentioned at the time of taking informed consent.
Data Handling \& Storage:
All patient related data would be kept safe in the custody of designated study officer who would be part of the neurophysiology lab. Informed consent forms would be signed in a separate room.
Statistical Analysis:
Data will be assessed for normality. We will use descriptive statistics for patient demographics, clinical characteristics and NCS / EMG test characteristics, including measures of central tendency and dispersion. Comparisons between three groups on pain perception will be performed using ANOVA. Differences in proportions will be assessed using chi-square test or Fischer exact test where appropriate. Logistic and Linear regression models will be used to assess the effect of patient demographics, clinical characteristics and NCS / EMG test characteristics on patient pain reduction within and across intervention groups. All p-values will be two sided and considered as statistically significant if < 0.05. All analyses will be conducted by using the Statistical package for social science SPSS (Release 19.0, standard version, copyright © SPSS; 1989-02).
- Conditions
- Pain Perception
- Being tested
- EMLA Cream, Ibuprofen, Placebo syrup, Placebo cream
- Keywords
- Electromyopharpy, Nerve conduction study, Electrodiagnostic testing, Edx study, EMG, NCS
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EMLA CreamDrug
Topical anaesthetic cream
IbuprofenDrug
Oral analgesic syrup (non-steroidal anti inflammatory drug)
Placebo syrupDrug
Placebo syrup similar to Ibuprofen
Placebo creamDrug
Placebo cream similar to EMLA
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| COTA Arm | Experimental | Patients getting combined (C) oral (O) and topical (T) analgesics (A) Receives: Drug: EMLA Cream; Drug: Ibuprofen |
| OA Arm | Experimental | Patients getting oral (O) analgesics (A) and topical placebo Receives: Drug: Ibuprofen; Drug: Placebo cream |
| Placebo Arm | Placebo comparator | Patients getting oral placebo and topical placebo Receives: Drug: Placebo syrup; Drug: Placebo cream |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain perception of patient during NCS and EMG tests
Pain perception of patient during NCS and EMG tests as measured by Modified Behavioral Pain Scale or patient reported Faces Pain Scale - Revised in COTA, OA and Placebo arms.
Measured: Pain scores to be recorded immediately after the procedure
Secondary outcomes (2)
Pain perception of patient according to guardian during NCS and EMG tests
Pain perception of patient according to guardian during NCS and EMG tests as measured by guardian-reported FPS-R
Measured: Pain scores to be recorded immediately after the procedure
Effect of Patient demographics, Clinical characteristics and NCS / EMG procedure characteristics on patient pain scores
Effect of Patient demographics, Clinical characteristics and NCS / EMG procedure characteristics on patient pain scores within and across each of the intervention arms
Measured: Pain scores to be recorded immediately after the procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Apr 2020
- Study start30 Dec 2019
- Primary completion27 Jun 2022
- Study completion27 Jun 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pain PerceptionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Double blind placebo controlled randamized controlled trial
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 113 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aga Khan University Hospital, Pakistan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Fazal ur Rehman, Aga Khan University Hospital, Pakistan
- Investigators
- Fazal Rehman, MBBS, FCPS, Principal investigator, Aga Khan UniversityHaris Hakeem, MBBS, FCPS, FRACP, Principal investigator, Aga Khan University Hospital, Monash University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04337814
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2019-0631-4863
- Acronym
- COMFORTEMG
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 16 Dec 2019
- Last updated
- 28 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Gans BM, Kraft GH. Pain perception in clinical electromyography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1977 Jan;58(1):13-6.
PubMed 831658Strommen JA, Daube JR. Determinants of pain in needle electromyography. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Aug;112(8):1414-8. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00552-1.
PubMed 11459681London ZN, Burke JF, Hazan R, Hastings MM, Callaghan BC. Electromyography-related pain: muscle selection is the key modifiable study characteristic. Muscle Nerve. 2014 Apr;49(4):570-4. doi: 10.1002/mus.23974. Epub 2014 Jan 25.
PubMed 23893537Yalinay Dikmen P, Ilgaz Aydinlar E, Karlikaya G. Expected and Experienced Pain Levels in Electromyography. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2013 Dec;50(4):364-367. doi: 10.4274/npa.y6699. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
PubMed 28360571Pohl M, Rosler A, Sunkeler I, Braune HJ, Oertel WH, Lautenbacher S. Insertion pain in needle electromyography can be reduced by simultaneous finger slapping. Neurology. 2000 Mar 14;54(5):1201-2. doi: 10.1212/wnl.54.5.1201-a. No abstract available.
PubMed 10720303Annaswamy TM, Morchower AH. Effect of lidocaine iontophoresis on pain during needle electromyography. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Dec;90(12):961-8. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318228c6d3.
PubMed 22019960Lamarche Y, Lebel M, Martin R. EMLA partially relieves the pain of EMG needling. Can J Anaesth. 1992 Oct;39(8):805-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03008292.
PubMed 1288906Kalantar SS, Abbasi M, Faghihi-Kashani S, Majedi H, Ahmadi M, Agah E, Tafakhori A. Paracetamol 325 mg/tramadol 37.5 mg effect on pain during needle electromyography: a double-blind crossover clinical trial. Acta Neurol Belg. 2016 Dec;116(4):599-604. doi: 10.1007/s13760-016-0621-6. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
PubMed 26957290El-Salem K, Shakhatreh M. Prospective double-blind crossover trial of ibuprofen in reducing EMG pain. Muscle Nerve. 2008 Aug;38(2):1016-20. doi: 10.1002/mus.21017.
PubMed 18663736Alshaikh NM, Martinez JP, Pitt MC. Perception of pain during electromyography in children: A prospective study. Muscle Nerve. 2016 Sep;54(3):422-6. doi: 10.1002/mus.25069. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
PubMed 26852012Taddio A, Ilersich AL, Ipp M, Kikuta A, Shah V; HELPinKIDS Team. Physical interventions and injection techniques for reducing injection pain during routine childhood immunizations: systematic review of randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized controlled trials. Clin Ther. 2009;31 Suppl 2:S48-76. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.07.024.
PubMed 19781436Taddio A, Appleton M, Bortolussi R, Chambers C, Dubey V, Halperin S, Hanrahan A, Ipp M, Lockett D, MacDonald N, Midmer D, Mousmanis P, Palda V, Pielak K, Riddell RP, Rieder M, Scott J, Shah V. Reducing the pain of childhood vaccination: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. CMAJ. 2010 Dec 14;182(18):E843-55. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101720. Epub 2010 Nov 22. No abstract available.
PubMed 21098062Taddio A, Hogan ME, Moyer P, Girgis A, Gerges S, Wang L, Ipp M. Evaluation of the reliability, validity and practicality of 3 measures of acute pain in infants undergoing immunization injections. Vaccine. 2011 Feb 4;29(7):1390-4. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.12.051. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
PubMed 21195076Hicks CL, von Baeyer CL, Spafford PA, van Korlaar I, Goodenough B. The Faces Pain Scale-Revised: toward a common metric in pediatric pain measurement. Pain. 2001 Aug;93(2):173-183. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00314-1.
PubMed 11427329von Baeyer CL. Children's self-reports of pain intensity: scale selection, limitations and interpretation. Pain Res Manag. 2006 Autumn;11(3):157-62. doi: 10.1155/2006/197616.
PubMed 16960632
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Combined Oral and Topical Analgesics to Reduce Pain Perception During Electromyography in Pediatric Population-A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04337814
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COMFORTEMG / 2019-0631-4863
- Conditions
- Pain Perception
- Keywords
- Electromyopharpy, Nerve conduction study, Electrodiagnostic testing, Edx study, EMG, NCS
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 113 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Aga Khan University Hospital, PakistanUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Electromyography (EMG) is a useful test for diagnosis and monitoring of lower motor neuron disorders. It is mostly done in conjunction with a Nerve Conduction Study (NCS). Like other invasive medical procedures; electrodiagnostic tests have been known to cause iatrogenic pain for the patient, the intensity of which varies from person to person. Multiple modifiable as well as non-modifiable risk factors associated with EMG pain have been described in literature.Various approaches targeting different mechanisms of pain perception have been tested to make this procedure comfortable for the patients. These approaches range from simple distraction techniques to the use of topical and oral analgesics.Most of these studies have looked at adult population which has, supposedly, better pain tolerance as compared to children. Data on EMG associated pain in pediatric population is scant. This trial will assess the effect of combined oral and topical analgesics to reduce pain perception during NCS and EMG tests in the pediatric population.
Detailed description
Objectives:
To determine the effect of combined oral and topical analgesics (COTA) in reducing pain perception during NCS and EMG tests among the pediatric population.
To compare the effect of COTA and only oral analgesics (OA) in reducing pain perception during NCS and EMG tests among the pediatric population.
Methods:
Study Setting: This study will be conducted at the neurophysiology lab at Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH)
Study Design: This will be a stratified (6 months - 6 years and 7 - 18 years with balanced randomization), double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study conducted at the neurophysiology lab, AKUH.
Variables:
Independent Variables - Gender, age, weight (Kg), number of muscles sampled, distribution of muscles sampled, end plate noise detection, type of needle used, duration of EMG and NCS test, history of undergoing electrodiagnostic tests in the past, time duration between analgesic intake / application and start of the NCS and EMG test, number of needle insertions needed outside of applied cream area, number of times skin is pierced,result of electrodiagnostic examination, patient in parents lap, electromyographer, study arm.
Dependent Variables - Pain Scores (MBPS and FPS-R)
Interventions/Study Protocol:
The guardians / patients who meet the inclusion criteria, as determined by the neurophysiology fellow or attending, will be instructed to reach the neurophysiology lab on the day of appointment one hour before the expected procedure time. All patients and/or their guardians referred for NCS / EMG will be given a standard explanation regarding the procedure and study details on the day of electrodiagnostic testing by the designated neurophysiology technologist. NCS would be explained as a test that checks the responses of the nerves and the subject will feel small zaps during the procedure. EMG would be explained as a procedure where a thin small microphone will be inserted in multiple muscles of the arm, leg and / or neck and back that will help us in identifying the problem. The word 'needle' and 'electric current' would not be used during this explanation. The guardian and patient, if old enough to understand, will also be explained the study protocol being carried out. Written Informed consent for the procedure itself and the study will be taken at this point by the neurophysiology fellow. Patients (older than 6 years) or their guardians will be instructed on how to administer the FPS-R scale. In addition guardians would be instructed to make sure that patients are not given sugary drinks or breastfeed during 1 hour prior to the procedure. During the study distractions will be kept to a minimum and similar for all patients. Sites of needle insertion will not be rubbed, stroked or tapped at the time of needle insertion. These factors are known confounders in reducing intramuscular injection pain. Those who have given consent will be assigned to one of the three arms of the study according to the randomization schedule; COTA arm (Ibuprofen Syrup and EMLA Cream), OA arm (Ibuprofen Syrup and Plain Cream) or Placebo arm (Plain Syrup and Plain Cream). All patients will be issued their interventions labeled with an allocation sequence according to the randomization schedule from the clinical trials unit (CTU), in a double blind manner, on the day of appointment. The syrup will be given to patients orally (10mg/Kg body weight) at least 1 hour prior to start of procedure. The electromyographer will demarcate all the possible muscle sampling sites required as per study protocol with a non-toxic marker and leave the room. A neurophysiology technologist will apply the cream on all demarcated sites. After application of cream, the site would be covered by an occlusive dressing until NCS / EMG is carried out so as to keep the applied cream in place and prevent accidental ingestion or application on mucosal surfaces by the patient. The patient will be kept under observation for adverse reactions including blanching and local erythema from application of cream till 15 minutes after the NCS / EMG procedure. Observation would be done by Neurophysiology fellow or the Neurophysiology attending. Neurophysiology technologists designated to carry out this exercise would be given combined sessions regarding the application technique to achieve consistency in results.
The EMG will be performed by board certified faculty or neurophysiology fellows under their supervision, each of them having a minimum of 6 months experience in doing electrodiagnostic testing. This involves intramuscular insertion of needle (that has a microphone at its tip) into multiple muscles. The occlusive dressing will be removed and area to be tested wiped with alcohol swabs. Nerve conduction studies will be conducted first followed by the needle procedures. During nerve conduction studies, patients feel an electric current like sensation whenever a nerve is tested. Attempt will be made to keep the needle movements to minimum. The guardian would accompany the child throughout the procedure. If the child wants, he/she would be allowed to sit in the guardians lap during the procedure.
Pain Assessment \& Data Collection:
For children aged 6 months to 6 years pain will be assessed by scoring facial expression, cry and body movements of the children using the Modified Behavioral Pain Scale (MBPS). For children aged 7 years to 18 years the Face Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) version will be used. Patients will be scored before NCS, after NCS and after EMG respectively on the data collection form. Two observers blinded to the rest of the study and not involved with carrying out NCS / EMG will be trained to administer these scores. The guardian, who would be unaware of what the child scored, will also be shown the FPS-R and asked to score how much pain patient seemed to feel during NCS and EMG respectively. Regarding FPS-R, the instruction will be to choose the face that most closely resembles the amount of pain being felt. Patient demographics, Clinical characteristics and NCS / EMG procedure characteristics will also be recorded on the form. The data collected will then be entered into an excel sheet at the end of each day.
Sample Size:
Assuming a difference in means of 1.4 with a standard deviation of 1.73 in the control group and 2.17 in the intervention group on the MBPS according to a study assessing effectiveness of EMLA cream for reducing pain during Intramuscular injections in the pediatric population, an alpha level of 0.05 and power of 80 % using a 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test with 3 pairwise comparisons; we will require 35 patients per group. Furthermore, assuming a 10 % dropout rate we will enroll 39 patients per group to account for it.
Randomization:
To achieve comparable groups, randomization will be performed as stratified blocked randomization with random sizes in a 1:1 allocation ratio. Stratification will be done according to the age groups: 6 months - 6 years and 7 - 18 years with varying random block sizes. Allocation to intervention groups according to stratification will be carried out by a computer generated randomization schedule which will list the allocation sequences assigned to each of the three arms. The randomization schedule will only be available with the pharmacist in charge of preparing interventions. Interventions will be prepared in indistinguishable containers containing plain cream and EMLA cream and bottles containing plain syrup and Ibuprofen syrup. The creams will be prepared to be similar in consistency, texture and color. The syrups will also be similar in color and taste. Thirty Nine Intervention packages will be made for each of the intervention arms; COTA arm, OA arm and Placebo arm. Each intervention will be labelled with an allocation sequence according to the randomization schedule by the pharmacist. The independent study officer not involved with the preparation or packaging of interventions and blinded to the rest of the study will issue the intervention for each patient reporting on the day of the appointment. The random allocation sequence would be concealed from the rest of the study investigators / researchers.
Blinding:
Throughout the study the patients, the electromyographers, neurophysiology technologists / observers administering the validated pain scales will be unaware of the intervention assignments.
Safety Management:
The drugs used in intervention arm have FDA approval as analgesics in the study population. Moreover, no prior testing is recommended before administration of these over the counter analgesics. Our study involves a single time use of these drugs only. Possible side effects (1-10%) with Ibuprofen include dizziness, epigastric pain, heart burn, nausea, rash, vomiting and renal failure (<1%). Possible side effects (>10%) with EMLA application include application site pallor/blanching, erythema/pain and application site oedema (1-10%), itching. Rare adverse effects (<1%) include methemoglobinemia and myocardial dysfunction. Patients will be observed for 15 minutes post study for the development of any side effects. If any side effect is observed, patients would be referred to consult respective speciality as deemed appropriate, as per the severity of adverse event. The patient or his/her guardian will bear the expenses. This would be mentioned at the time of taking informed consent.
Data Handling \& Storage:
All patient related data would be kept safe in the custody of designated study officer who would be part of the neurophysiology lab. Informed consent forms would be signed in a separate room.
Statistical Analysis:
Data will be assessed for normality. We will use descriptive statistics for patient demographics, clinical characteristics and NCS / EMG test characteristics, including measures of central tendency and dispersion. Comparisons between three groups on pain perception will be performed using ANOVA. Differences in proportions will be assessed using chi-square test or Fischer exact test where appropriate. Logistic and Linear regression models will be used to assess the effect of patient demographics, clinical characteristics and NCS / EMG test characteristics on patient pain reduction within and across intervention groups. All p-values will be two sided and considered as statistically significant if < 0.05. All analyses will be conducted by using the Statistical package for social science SPSS (Release 19.0, standard version, copyright © SPSS; 1989-02).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Double blind placebo controlled randamized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| COTA Arm | Experimental | Drug: EMLA Cream, Drug: IbuprofenPatients getting combined (C) oral (O) and topical (T) analgesics (A) |
| OA Arm | Experimental | Drug: Ibuprofen, Drug: Placebo creamPatients getting oral (O) analgesics (A) and topical placebo |
| Placebo Arm | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo syrup, Drug: Placebo creamPatients getting oral placebo and topical placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 months to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Pediatric patients (6 months to 18 years) referred for NCS / EMG testing to the neurophysiology lab at AKUH
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients not able to report pain scores on the scales used
- Patients using sedatives and prior analgesics within last 24 hours of study
- Patients with history of upper gastrointestinal tract bleed, renal disease, severe hepatic disease, glucose-6-phosphate deficiency, congenital or idiopathic methemoglobinemia
- Patients with known sensitivity / allergy to Ibuprofen or EMLA cream or their components
- Patients on class I antiarrhythmic drugs
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EMLA CreamTopical anaesthetic cream | Drug | COTA Arm |
| IbuprofenOral analgesic syrup (non-steroidal anti inflammatory drug) | Drug | COTA Arm, OA Arm |
| Placebo syrupPlacebo syrup similar to Ibuprofen | Drug | Placebo Arm |
| Placebo creamPlacebo cream similar to EMLA | Drug | OA Arm, Placebo Arm |
Primary outcome
Pain perception of patient during NCS and EMG tests
Time frame: Pain scores to be recorded immediately after the procedure
Pain perception of patient during NCS and EMG tests as measured by Modified Behavioral Pain Scale or patient reported Faces Pain Scale - Revised in COTA, OA and Placebo arms.
2 secondary outcomes
Pain perception of patient according to guardian during NCS and EMG tests
Time frame: Pain scores to be recorded immediately after the procedure
Effect of Patient demographics, Clinical characteristics and NCS / EMG procedure characteristics on patient pain scores
Time frame: Pain scores to be recorded immediately after the procedure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Feb 2023.
- Background: PubMed 831658Gans BM, Kraft GH. Pain perception in clinical electromyography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1977 Jan;58(1):13-6.
- Background: PubMed 11459681Strommen JA, Daube JR. Determinants of pain in needle electromyography. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Aug;112(8):1414-8. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(01)00552-1.
- Background: PubMed 23893537London ZN, Burke JF, Hazan R, Hastings MM, Callaghan BC. Electromyography-related pain: muscle selection is the key modifiable study characteristic. Muscle Nerve. 2014 Apr;49(4):570-4. doi: 10.1002/mus.23974. Epub 2014 Jan 25.
- Background: PubMed 28360571Yalinay Dikmen P, Ilgaz Aydinlar E, Karlikaya G. Expected and Experienced Pain Levels in Electromyography. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2013 Dec;50(4):364-367. doi: 10.4274/npa.y6699. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
- Background: PubMed 10720303Pohl M, Rosler A, Sunkeler I, Braune HJ, Oertel WH, Lautenbacher S. Insertion pain in needle electromyography can be reduced by simultaneous finger slapping. Neurology. 2000 Mar 14;54(5):1201-2. doi: 10.1212/wnl.54.5.1201-a. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 22019960Annaswamy TM, Morchower AH. Effect of lidocaine iontophoresis on pain during needle electromyography. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Dec;90(12):961-8. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318228c6d3.
- Background: PubMed 1288906Lamarche Y, Lebel M, Martin R. EMLA partially relieves the pain of EMG needling. Can J Anaesth. 1992 Oct;39(8):805-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03008292.
- Background: PubMed 26957290Kalantar SS, Abbasi M, Faghihi-Kashani S, Majedi H, Ahmadi M, Agah E, Tafakhori A. Paracetamol 325 mg/tramadol 37.5 mg effect on pain during needle electromyography: a double-blind crossover clinical trial. Acta Neurol Belg. 2016 Dec;116(4):599-604. doi: 10.1007/s13760-016-0621-6. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
- Background: PubMed 18663736El-Salem K, Shakhatreh M. Prospective double-blind crossover trial of ibuprofen in reducing EMG pain. Muscle Nerve. 2008 Aug;38(2):1016-20. doi: 10.1002/mus.21017.
- Background: PubMed 26852012Alshaikh NM, Martinez JP, Pitt MC. Perception of pain during electromyography in children: A prospective study. Muscle Nerve. 2016 Sep;54(3):422-6. doi: 10.1002/mus.25069. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
- Background: PubMed 19781436Taddio A, Ilersich AL, Ipp M, Kikuta A, Shah V; HELPinKIDS Team. Physical interventions and injection techniques for reducing injection pain during routine childhood immunizations: systematic review of randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized controlled trials. Clin Ther. 2009;31 Suppl 2:S48-76. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.07.024.
- Background: PubMed 21098062Taddio A, Appleton M, Bortolussi R, Chambers C, Dubey V, Halperin S, Hanrahan A, Ipp M, Lockett D, MacDonald N, Midmer D, Mousmanis P, Palda V, Pielak K, Riddell RP, Rieder M, Scott J, Shah V. Reducing the pain of childhood vaccination: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. CMAJ. 2010 Dec 14;182(18):E843-55. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101720. Epub 2010 Nov 22. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pain Perception
RecruitingPhase 2
Evaluating Intranasal Oxytocin (TNX-1900) for Pain Relief and Recovery After Pituitary Surgery
Pain, Pituitary Surgery
Recruiting
Pain Perception With Cordless Electronic Local Anesthetic Delivery System
Decayed Primary Molars
Recruiting
Neural and Psychological Mechanisms of Pain Perception
Pain, Normal Physiology
Recruiting
Vibratory Anesthesia on Pain Following Corticosteroid Injections
Bilateral Arthritis of Wrist, Tendinopathy
Recruiting
Shower Gel and Participant-Reported Post-Exercise Soreness in Regular Exercisers
Post-Exercise Recovery, Muscle Soreness
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fazal Rehman, MBBS, FCPS principal investigator
Aga Khan University
Haris Hakeem, MBBS, FCPS, FRACP principal investigator
Aga Khan University Hospital, Monash University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing EMLA Cream and Ibuprofen in people with Pain Perception, run by Aga Khan University Hospital, Pakistan at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain perception of patient during NCS and EMG tests (time frame: Pain scores to be recorded immediately after the procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04337814, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Feb 2023.