PainNCT02446262
Neural and Psychological Mechanisms of Pain Perception
A study testing Instructions, Attention and Thermal Pain in people with Pain and Normal Physiology, run by National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Background: Painful stimuli cause changes in a network of brain regions called the "Pain Matrix." But most of these regions respond to many other stimuli, not just pain. Researchers want to understand how different factors influence pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain, Normal Physiology, Healthy Volunteers
- What is being tested?
- Instructions, Attention and Thermal Pain
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 550 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 11 Jun 2015to 20 Feb 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Healthy
- Between 18 and 50 years old
- Fluent in English
- Able to provide written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Unable to comply with study procedures or follow-up visits.
- Has a major medical condition or medical history that in a clinician's assessment could affect heat sensitivity, pain thresholds, or ability to comply with study procedures. This may include cardiovascular, autonomic, or neurological conditions, including stroke, blindness, deafness, a history of brain damage, or a chronic systemic disease (e.g., diabetes).
- Has a current mood disorder, anxiety disorder, or substance use disorder, or has a history of psychosis, hospitalization for a mental health condition, or recurrent psychiatric episodes.
- Has a medical condition that in a clinician's assessment might affect somatosensation (e.g., Raynaud's disease, peripheral neuropathy, or circulatory disorder).
- Has a current chronic pain condition or has had chronic pain in the past (painful condition lasting more than six months).
- Has a dermatological condition affecting the testing region such as scars, burns, or recent tattoos that might influence cutaneous sensibility.
Show all 18Show fewer
- Regular use of prescription medication that has a significant effect on pain or heat perception. Excluded medications include central-acting agents such as opiates (morphine, tramadol), antidepressants (amitriptyline, duloxetine, milnacipran), anticonvulsants (gabapentin, pregabalin), anxiolytics (barbituates, benzodiazepines), hypnotics (zolpidem, sodium oxybate), antipsychotics (valproate, lithium, olanzapine), antimigraine agents (sumatriptan, ergotamine), and muscle relaxants (cyclobenzaprine, carisoprodol). Use of analgesic medications, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, salicylates, and acetaminophen, taken on an "as needed" basis is acceptable as long as the last dose taken was within 5 half-lives of testing.
- Is pregnant.
- NIH staff member who is a subordinate/relative/co-worker of any investigator on the protocol.
- Individuals with conditions that could pose a risk relating to the safety of the fMRI procedure or pain stimulation will be excluded from the MRI portion of the protocol, but may participate in the non-fMRI sessions (with the exception of pregnant women). Such conditions include:
- Those with ferromagnetic metal in the cranial cavity or eye, e.g. aneurysm clip, implanted neural stimulator, cochlear implant, ocular foreign body.
- Those with an abnormality on a structural MRI.
- Those with an implanted cardiac pacemaker or auto-defibrillator.
- Those with an insulin pump.
- Those with irremovable body piercing.
- Pregnant women (based on urine test completed within 24 hours prior to scan).
- Individuals who are left-handed (based on self-report or score on handedness questionnaire) will be excluded from fMRI substudies.
- -Participation in an NIH study of analgesia, as gleaned from CRIS.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, 20892
For more information at the NIH Clinical Center contact Office of Patient Recruitment (OPR), 800-411-1222 ext. TTY dial 711, ccopr@nih.gov
About this study
Background:
- Painful stimuli cause changes in a network of brain regions called the "Pain Matrix." But most of these regions respond to many other stimuli, not just pain. Researchers want to understand how different factors influence pain. They want to test what happens when people expect different levels of pain and receive treatments that can modify pain. They want to see if these factors influence decisions about pain and how the body responds to it. They also want to compare pain with responses like taste and vision.
Read more
Objectives:
- To better understand how pain and emotions are processed and influenced by psychological factors.
Eligibility:
- Healthy volunteers ages 18-50.
Design:
- This study requires 1 to 2 clinic visits that last 1 to 3 hours.
- Participants will be screened with medical history and physical exam.
- Some participants will have one or more magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of their brain. For MRI, participants will lie on a table that slides in and out of a cylinder. The scanner makes loud knocking noises. They will get earplugs.
- Participants' heart activity will be recorded with electrocardiogram. Their pulse, sweating, and breathing will be monitored.
- Some participants will take a taste test. Others may perform simple tasks. Others may receive pain in their arm, leg, or hand. The pain will come from heat or electric shocks. Others may judge pain using a topical pain-relieving cream. Some of these tests may be given during MRI.
- Participants will fill out questionnaires.
- The study will last 3 years.
Read the detailed description
Objective
Pain is one of the most important signals for an organism s survival. The pathways that transfer noxious input from the periphery to the central nervous system are highly conserved across human and animal models. In humans, the ultimate experience of pain is also highly influenced by psychological factors. For example, the placebo effect leads to robust pain relief and can influence responses to noxious stimuli in the human brain. However, the psychological and neurobiological mechanisms by which psychological factors influence pain remain largely unknown.
Pain can be modulated by explicit beliefs about treatments, prior experience and learning, interpersonal processes that support the patient-provider relationship, and contextual factors related to the treatment environment. In the proposed series of experiments, we will systematically investigate the neural and psychological mechanisms that mediate the effects of these factors on acute pain. We will focus on expectations, attention, emotion, conditioning/associative learning, and social factors. These experiments will principally use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and psychophysiological measurements, as well as behavioral assays and self-reports. We will examine the effects of different types of pain-related expectations on decisions about pain as well as responses in the brain and periphery. We will also compare acute pain with other hedonic and perceptual processes. This will allow us to distinguish processes that are unique to pain perception from those that are not specific to pain, such as processes involved in perception and decision-making across domains.
Together, the proposed series of experiments aim to elucidate the psychological, neurobiological, and physiological mechanisms that modulate pain. This, in turn, can identify targets for pain treatment and inform mechanistic studies of altered pain processing in clinical populations.
Study Population
We plan to recruit 550 healthy volunteers between age 18 and 50.
Design
The aim of the proposed series of experiments is to understand how expectations, attention, and emotion influence acute pain. We will manipulate expectations about noxious stimuli using associative learning and verbal instructions, in both within-subjects and between-groups designs. We will measure decisions about pain experience (self-report) as well as neural and physiological responses to noxious stimuli that cause pain. We will combine computational modeling with advanced neuroimaging analyses to isolate the neural and psychological mechanisms that mediate the effects of expectations, attention, and emotion on subjective pain. To determine the specificity of these mechanisms, we will compare acute pain modalities (e.g., thermal pain versus shock-induced pain), and we will contrast pain with other hedonic and perceptual domains (e.g., taste).
Outcome measures
Dependent variables for all experiments will include decisions about pain and/or other percepts (e.g., sweetness of a taste) measured with visual analogue scales, reaction time, physiological responses (e.g., skin conductance, pupil dilation), and/or BOLD activation in regions of interest. We are specifically interested in processes within the network of regions known to be involved in pain processing (pain-processing network, PPN), as well as responses in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), ventral striatum (VS), and amygdala. We hypothesize that nociceptive stimuli and pain ratings will be associated with unique patterns of activation within the PPN, whereas responses in regions associated with value, executive function, and decision-making will be common across outcomes.
- Conditions
- Pain, Normal Physiology, Healthy Volunteers
- Being tested
- Instructions, Attention, Thermal Pain, Placebo instructions
- Keywords
- Pain, Visual Analogue Pain Scale, Placebo, Affective Neuroscience, Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
- Medical subject headings
- Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
InstructionsBehavioural
In sub-study 1, half the participants are instructed about outcomes, half learn through experience.
AttentionBehavioural
In sub-study 4, participants learn about outcomes and we manipulate attention toward or away from the pain.
Thermal PainBehavioural
In sub-studies 2 and 3, participants are exposed to thermal stimuli and/or tastants (sugar water, salt water, neutral rinse) and we are measuring how learning varies based on the type of outcome.
Placebo instructionsBehavioural
In sub-study 5, we test whether placebo effects and expectancy cues modulate pain through similar mechanisms.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Substudy 1: Instructed subjects | Other | Participants are instructed about outcomes Receives: Behavioral: Instructions |
| Substudy 1: Uninstructed subjects | Other | Participants learn through experience Receives: Behavioral: Instructions |
| Substudy 2: heat group | Other | Participants learn about heat outcomes through conditioning Receives: Behavioral: Thermal Pain |
| Substudy 2: salt group | Other | Participants learn about salt outcomes through conditioning Receives: Behavioral: Thermal Pain |
| Substudy 2: sugar group | Other | Participants learn about sugar outcomes through conditioning Receives: Behavioral: Thermal Pain |
| Substudy 3: healthy volunteers | No intervention | All participants experience all outcomes, within subjects designs |
| Substudy 4: healthy volunteers | Other | Participants are instructed to attend toward or away from the stimulus Receives: Behavioral: Attention |
| Substudy 5: healthy volunteers | Other | Participants experience both placebo and cue-based expectations within subjects Receives: Behavioral: Placebo instructions |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Physiological responses (heart rate, skin conductance, respiration, pupil dilation, eye gaze position)
In behavioral and fMRI experiments, we measure autonomic responses in anticipation and response to painful and non-painful stimuli using non-invasive measures.
Measured: During the study visit in response to painful and non-painful stimuli.
Pain perception (pain ratings)
Substudies of pain collect pain ratings using a visual analogue scale, either verbally or via computer.
Measured: During the study visit in response to painful stimuli.
BOLD response in brain regions of interest measured using fMRI
FMRI substudies proceed following behavioral substudies. We measure brain responses in anticipation and response to painful and non-painful stimuli.
Measured: During the study visit in response to painful and non-painful stimuli.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Questionnaire measures (e.g. State-trait anxiety index, Fear of Pain questionnaire, Intolerance of Uncertainty questionnaire, McGill Pain Questionnaire)
Personality measures that have been linked with pain and emotion will be tested as moderators of effects on the above outcomes.
Measured: Trait measures are collected during initial screening visit ; State measures are collected on every visit
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 May 2015 (estimated)
- Study start11 Jun 2015
- Primary completion20 Feb 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion20 Feb 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 550 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
- Sponsor type
- US National Institutes of Health
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Lauren Y Atlas, Ph.D., Principal investigator, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02446262
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 150132
- Other IDs
- 15-AT-0132
- Status last verified
- 16 Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 14 May 2015
- Last updated
- 3 Nov 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: We will share deidentified data only as per language in the protocol.
Publications
Necka EA, Akintola T, Yu Q, Amir CM, Oretsky O, Atlas LY. Isolating Brain Mechanisms of Expectancy Effects on Pain: Cue-Based Stimulus Expectancies versus Placebo-Based Treatment Expectancies. J Neurosci. 2025 Aug 20;45(34):e0050252025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0050-25.2025.
PubMed 40721322Atlas LY, Dildine TC, Palacios-Barrios EE, Yu Q, Reynolds RC, Banker LA, Grant SS, Pine DS. Instructions and experiential learning have similar impacts on pain and pain-related brain responses but produce dissociations in value-based reversal learning. Elife. 2022 Nov 1;11:e73353. doi: 10.7554/eLife.73353.
PubMed 36317867
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Nov 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Neural and Psychological Mechanisms of Pain Perception
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02446262
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 150132
- Conditions
- Pain, Normal Physiology, Healthy Volunteers
- Keywords
- Pain, Visual Analogue Pain Scale, Placebo, Affective Neuroscience, Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 550 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)US National Institutes of Health
- Study start
- 11 Jun 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Feb 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 20 Feb 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 May 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background:
- Painful stimuli cause changes in a network of brain regions called the "Pain Matrix." But most of these regions respond to many other stimuli, not just pain. Researchers want to understand how different factors influence pain. They want to test what happens when people expect different levels of pain and receive treatments that can modify pain. They want to see if these factors influence decisions about pain and how the body responds to it. They also want to compare pain with responses like taste and vision.
Objectives:
- To better understand how pain and emotions are processed and influenced by psychological factors.
Eligibility:
- Healthy volunteers ages 18-50.
Design:
- This study requires 1 to 2 clinic visits that last 1 to 3 hours.
- Participants will be screened with medical history and physical exam.
- Some participants will have one or more magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of their brain. For MRI, participants will lie on a table that slides in and out of a cylinder. The scanner makes loud knocking noises. They will get earplugs.
- Participants' heart activity will be recorded with electrocardiogram. Their pulse, sweating, and breathing will be monitored.
- Some participants will take a taste test. Others may perform simple tasks. Others may receive pain in their arm, leg, or hand. The pain will come from heat or electric shocks. Others may judge pain using a topical pain-relieving cream. Some of these tests may be given during MRI.
- Participants will fill out questionnaires.
- The study will last 3 years.
Detailed description
Objective
Pain is one of the most important signals for an organism s survival. The pathways that transfer noxious input from the periphery to the central nervous system are highly conserved across human and animal models. In humans, the ultimate experience of pain is also highly influenced by psychological factors. For example, the placebo effect leads to robust pain relief and can influence responses to noxious stimuli in the human brain. However, the psychological and neurobiological mechanisms by which psychological factors influence pain remain largely unknown.
Pain can be modulated by explicit beliefs about treatments, prior experience and learning, interpersonal processes that support the patient-provider relationship, and contextual factors related to the treatment environment. In the proposed series of experiments, we will systematically investigate the neural and psychological mechanisms that mediate the effects of these factors on acute pain. We will focus on expectations, attention, emotion, conditioning/associative learning, and social factors. These experiments will principally use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and psychophysiological measurements, as well as behavioral assays and self-reports. We will examine the effects of different types of pain-related expectations on decisions about pain as well as responses in the brain and periphery. We will also compare acute pain with other hedonic and perceptual processes. This will allow us to distinguish processes that are unique to pain perception from those that are not specific to pain, such as processes involved in perception and decision-making across domains.
Together, the proposed series of experiments aim to elucidate the psychological, neurobiological, and physiological mechanisms that modulate pain. This, in turn, can identify targets for pain treatment and inform mechanistic studies of altered pain processing in clinical populations.
Study Population
We plan to recruit 550 healthy volunteers between age 18 and 50.
Design
The aim of the proposed series of experiments is to understand how expectations, attention, and emotion influence acute pain. We will manipulate expectations about noxious stimuli using associative learning and verbal instructions, in both within-subjects and between-groups designs. We will measure decisions about pain experience (self-report) as well as neural and physiological responses to noxious stimuli that cause pain. We will combine computational modeling with advanced neuroimaging analyses to isolate the neural and psychological mechanisms that mediate the effects of expectations, attention, and emotion on subjective pain. To determine the specificity of these mechanisms, we will compare acute pain modalities (e.g., thermal pain versus shock-induced pain), and we will contrast pain with other hedonic and perceptual domains (e.g., taste).
Outcome measures
Dependent variables for all experiments will include decisions about pain and/or other percepts (e.g., sweetness of a taste) measured with visual analogue scales, reaction time, physiological responses (e.g., skin conductance, pupil dilation), and/or BOLD activation in regions of interest. We are specifically interested in processes within the network of regions known to be involved in pain processing (pain-processing network, PPN), as well as responses in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), ventral striatum (VS), and amygdala. We hypothesize that nociceptive stimuli and pain ratings will be associated with unique patterns of activation within the PPN, whereas responses in regions associated with value, executive function, and decision-making will be common across outcomes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 8
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Substudy 1: Instructed subjects | Other | Behavioral: InstructionsParticipants are instructed about outcomes |
| Substudy 1: Uninstructed subjects | Other | Behavioral: InstructionsParticipants learn through experience |
| Substudy 2: heat group | Other | Behavioral: Thermal PainParticipants learn about heat outcomes through conditioning |
| Substudy 2: salt group | Other | Behavioral: Thermal PainParticipants learn about salt outcomes through conditioning |
| Substudy 2: sugar group | Other | Behavioral: Thermal PainParticipants learn about sugar outcomes through conditioning |
| Substudy 3: healthy volunteers | No intervention | –All participants experience all outcomes, within subjects designs |
| Substudy 4: healthy volunteers | Other | Behavioral: AttentionParticipants are instructed to attend toward or away from the stimulus |
| Substudy 5: healthy volunteers | Other | Behavioral: Placebo instructionsParticipants experience both placebo and cue-based expectations within subjects |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Healthy
- Between 18 and 50 years old
- Fluent in English
- Able to provide written informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Unable to comply with study procedures or follow-up visits.
- Has a major medical condition or medical history that in a clinician's assessment could affect heat sensitivity, pain thresholds, or ability to comply with study procedures. This may include cardiovascular, autonomic, or neurological conditions, including stroke, blindness, deafness, a history of brain damage, or a chronic systemic disease (e.g., diabetes).
- Has a current mood disorder, anxiety disorder, or substance use disorder, or has a history of psychosis, hospitalization for a mental health condition, or recurrent psychiatric episodes.
- Has a medical condition that in a clinician's assessment might affect somatosensation (e.g., Raynaud's disease, peripheral neuropathy, or circulatory disorder).
- Has a current chronic pain condition or has had chronic pain in the past (painful condition lasting more than six months).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| InstructionsIn sub-study 1, half the participants are instructed about outcomes, half learn through experience. | Behavioural | Substudy 1: Instructed subjects, Substudy 1: Uninstructed subjects |
| AttentionIn sub-study 4, participants learn about outcomes and we manipulate attention toward or away from the pain. | Behavioural | Substudy 4: healthy volunteers |
| Thermal PainIn sub-studies 2 and 3, participants are exposed to thermal stimuli and/or tastants (sugar water, salt water, neutral rinse) and we are measuring how learning varies based on the type of outcome. | Behavioural | Substudy 2: heat group, Substudy 2: salt group, Substudy 2: sugar group |
| Placebo instructionsIn sub-study 5, we test whether placebo effects and expectancy cues modulate pain through similar mechanisms. | Behavioural | Substudy 5: healthy volunteers |
Primary outcome
Physiological responses (heart rate, skin conductance, respiration, pupil dilation, eye gaze position)
Time frame: During the study visit in response to painful and non-painful stimuli.
In behavioral and fMRI experiments, we measure autonomic responses in anticipation and response to painful and non-painful stimuli using non-invasive measures.
Pain perception (pain ratings)
Time frame: During the study visit in response to painful stimuli.
Substudies of pain collect pain ratings using a visual analogue scale, either verbally or via computer.
BOLD response in brain regions of interest measured using fMRI
Time frame: During the study visit in response to painful and non-painful stimuli.
FMRI substudies proceed following behavioral substudies. We measure brain responses in anticipation and response to painful and non-painful stimuli.
1 secondary outcome
Questionnaire measures (e.g. State-trait anxiety index, Fear of Pain questionnaire, Intolerance of Uncertainty questionnaire, McGill Pain Questionnaire)
Time frame: Trait measures are collected during initial screening visit ; State measures are collected on every visit
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Nov 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40721322Necka EA, Akintola T, Yu Q, Amir CM, Oretsky O, Atlas LY. Isolating Brain Mechanisms of Expectancy Effects on Pain: Cue-Based Stimulus Expectancies versus Placebo-Based Treatment Expectancies. J Neurosci. 2025 Aug 20;45(34):e0050252025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0050-25.2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36317867Atlas LY, Dildine TC, Palacios-Barrios EE, Yu Q, Reynolds RC, Banker LA, Grant SS, Pine DS. Instructions and experiential learning have similar impacts on pain and pain-related brain responses but produce dissociations in value-based reversal learning. Elife. 2022 Nov 1;11:e73353. doi: 10.7554/eLife.73353.
- NIH Clinical Center Detailed Web PageLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. We will share deidentified data only as per language in the protocol.
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Lauren Y Atlas, Ph.D. principal investigator
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Instructions, Attention and Thermal Pain in people with Pain and Normal Physiology, run by National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH) at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Adebisi O Ayodele, C.R.N.P. ((301) 827-0415, bisi.ayodele@nih.gov), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Physiological responses (heart rate, skin conductance, respiration, pupil dilation, eye gaze position) (time frame: During the study visit in response to painful and non-painful stimuli.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02446262, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Nov 2026.