Hip OsteoarthritisNCT04329897
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Delivered by Automated Software Messaging
A study testing Software Messaging in people with Hip Osteoarthritis and Knee Osteoarthritis, run by University of Iowa at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study aims to 1) observe the course of pain, 2) mental status, and 3) possible effect of a behavioral intervention delivered via an automated mobile phone messaging robot in patients were indicated and/or scheduled to undergo joint replacement but have been cancelled or delayed due to the COVID-19 crisis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Hip Osteoarthritis, Knee Osteoarthritis, Mental Stress
- What is being tested?
- Software Messaging
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 5 Apr 2020to 1 Jun 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Any patient who had been indicated for primary joint replacement but subsequently experienced a delay or cancellation in their surgical date due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Who cannot join
- Patients undergoing revision joint replacement
- Patients who do not own a mobile phone or do not utilize text messaging as a form of communication
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
About this study
This study aims to 1) observe the course of pain, 2) mental status, and 3) possible effect of a behavioral intervention delivered via an automated mobile phone messaging robot in patients were indicated and/or scheduled to undergo joint replacement but have been cancelled or delayed due to the COVID-19 crisis.
Read the detailed description
Adult patients presenting to a University Hospital and found to have hip and knee osteoarthritis that had failed conservative management were subsequently indicated for primary hip or knee replacement (arthroplasty). Patients who subsequently had their surgery delayed or cancelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic were eligible for this study. Eligible patients consenting to the study will be assigned a unique study identification number (ID). A master database linking patient ID to patient name and medical record number will be housed on a password protected and encrypted departmental server location, which only research personnel can access.
Participants will complete a basic demographics survey and preoperative/ baseline patient reported outcome surveys at enrollment, including the Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) Pain Intensity 1A short form, PROMIS Pain Intensity 3A short form, PROMIS Pain Interference 8A short form, and PROMIS 8A Emotional Distress-Anxiety 8A short forms. Following completion of these surveys, subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio using a random number generator into one of two study groups. The intervention group will receive mobile messages communicating the behavior intervention. The control group will not receive the intervention. Subjects will not be blinded to their study group. Participants randomized to the intervention group were subsequently enrolled into the automated mobile messaging protocol and received a confirmation message welcoming them to the study, which was reviewed with them by the research assistant. Subjects were instructed that they were only required to read all messages, no responses were required.
A single instance of follow-up will take place on Day 14 of the study. This will occur over the phone with a research team member. Subjects will fill out a second set of the patient reported outcome surveys completed at enrollment. Collection of these followup items marks the end of the subject's participation in the study. No data collection is planned following the two week study period. The study hypothesis is that subjects receiving the behavior intervention delivered via an automated mobile messaging robot would demonstrate better patient reported outcome survey scores than controls at follow-up.
- Conditions
- Hip Osteoarthritis, Knee Osteoarthritis, Mental Stress, Coronavirus
- Being tested
- Software Messaging
- Keywords
- COVID-19, Coranavirus, Mental health, Orthopaedics
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Hip, Osteoarthritis, Knee, Stress, Psychological, Coronavirus Infections, COVID-19, Psychological Well-Being
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Software MessagingBehavioural
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Delivered via an Automated Mobile Messaging Robot Mobile messages utilizing the principles of Acceptance and Commitment therapy. These messages were developed in collaboration with a pain psychologist who specializes in treating chronic pain with Acceptance and Commitment therapy. Subjects received twice-daily messages for two weeks following their orthopaedic procedure.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Software Messaging | Experimental | Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Subjects randomizing into this arm received the study intervention that consisted of twice-daily, AM and PM, text messages starting on postoperative day one and ending on postoperative day fourteen. Subjects were only required to read these messages, which utilized the principles of Acceptance and Commitment therapy Receives: Behavioral: Software Messaging |
| Control | No intervention | Subjects randomizing into this arm did not receive the text message study intervention. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in reported pain intensity score (PROMIS Pain Intensity 3A) Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system Pain Intensity (PROMIS) 3A short form scores collected from all participating subjects.
PROMIS Pain Intensity 3A short form is a 3 question survey measuring an individual's pain over the past 7 days. It utilizes a scale of 1 (no pain) to 5 (very severe pain) for all questions. The scores for the 3 questions are summed and then matched to a corresponding t-score for the instrument. The corresponding t-score is the final, reportable score and can range from 30.7 to 71.8 for the PROMIS Pain Intensity 3A instrument. Higher t-score values represent worse pain outcomes. More information on this instrument, including a scoring manual, can be found at http://www.healthmeasures.net
Measured: Measurements assessed via a computer interface of the standardized form listed above on the day of enrollment and on day fourteen, via telephone.
Change in reported pain intensity score (PROMIS Pain Intensity 1A) Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system Pain Intensity (PROMIS) 1A short form scores collected from all participating subjects.
PROMIS Pain Intensity 1A short form is a 1 question survey measuring an individual's average pain over the past 7 days. It utilizes a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Higher values represent worse pain outcomes.
More information on this instrument, including a scoring manual, can be found at http://www.healthmeasures.net
Measured: Measurements assessed via a computer interface of the standardized form listed above on the day of enrollment and on day fourteen, via telephone.
Change in reported pain interference score Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) Pain Interference 8A short form scores collected from all participating subjects.
The PROMIS Pain Interference 8A short form is an 8 question survey that measures how much pain has interfered in the respondent's life over the past 7 days. It utilizes a scale of 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much) for all questions.
The scores for all 8 questions are summed and then matched to a corresponding t-score for the instrument. The corresponding t-score is the final, reportable score and can range from 40.7 to 77.0 for the PROMIS Pain Interference 8A instrument. Higher t-score values represent worse pain interference outcomes.
More information on this instrument, including a scoring manual, can be found at http://www.healthmeasures.net
Measured: Measurements assessed via a computer interface of the standardized form listed above on the day of enrollment and on day fourteen, via telephone.
Change in reported emotional distress (anxiety) score. Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) Emotional Distress-Anxiety 8A short form scores collected from all participating subjects.
The PROMIS Emotional Distress-Anxiety 8A short form is an 8 statement survey that measures how much emotional distress, specifically due to anxiety, a respondent has experienced over the past 7 days. It utilizes a scale of 1 (never) to 5 (always) for all the statements. The scores for all 8 statements are summed and then matched to a corresponding t-score for the instrument. The corresponding t-score is the final, reportable score and can range from 37.1 to 83.1 for the PROMIS Emotional Distress-Anxiety 8A instrument. Higher t-score values represent worse anxiety caused emotional distress outcomes. More information on this instrument, including a scoring manual, can be found at http://www.healthmeasures.net
Measured: Measurements assessed via a computer interface of the standardized form listed above on the day of enrollment and on day fourteen, via telephone.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Apr 2020
- Study start5 Apr 2020
- Primary completion15 May 2020
- Study completion1 Jun 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hip OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Parallel Assignment Two study groups. The intervention group and the control group that does not receive the intervention
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Iowa
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Nicholas Bedard, University of Iowa
- Investigators
- Nic Bedard, MD, Study director, University of Iowa Department of Orthopaedics
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04329897
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 201412701-1
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 30 Mar 2020
- Last updated
- 16 Jul 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Jones J Jr, Southerland W, Catalani B. The Importance of Optimizing Acute Pain in the Orthopedic Trauma Patient. Orthop Clin North Am. 2017 Oct;48(4):445-465. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2017.06.003.
PubMed 28870305Anthony CA, Peterson AR. Utilization of a text-messaging robot to assess intraday variation in concussion symptom severity scores. Clin J Sport Med. 2015 Mar;25(2):149-52. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000115.
PubMed 24905538Anthony CA, Polgreen LA, Chounramany J, Foster ED, Goerdt CJ, Miller ML, Suneja M, Segre AM, Carter BL, Polgreen PM. Outpatient blood pressure monitoring using bi-directional text messaging. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2015 May;9(5):375-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
PubMed 25771023Hughes LS, Clark J, Colclough JA, Dale E, McMillan D. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Clin J Pain. 2017 Jun;33(6):552-568. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000425.
PubMed 27479642Rathbone AL, Prescott J. The Use of Mobile Apps and SMS Messaging as Physical and Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 24;19(8):e295. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7740.
PubMed 28838887Anthony CA, Lawler EA, Glass NA, McDonald K, Shah AS. Delivery of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments by Automated Mobile Phone Text Messaging. Hand (N Y). 2017 Nov;12(6):614-621. doi: 10.1177/1558944716672201. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
PubMed 29091492
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jul 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Delivered by Automated Software Messaging
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04329897
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 201412701-1
- Conditions
- Hip Osteoarthritis, Knee Osteoarthritis, Mental Stress, Coronavirus
- Keywords
- COVID-19, Coranavirus, Mental health, Orthopaedics
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of IowaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 May 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to 1) observe the course of pain, 2) mental status, and 3) possible effect of a behavioral intervention delivered via an automated mobile phone messaging robot in patients were indicated and/or scheduled to undergo joint replacement but have been cancelled or delayed due to the COVID-19 crisis.
Detailed description
Adult patients presenting to a University Hospital and found to have hip and knee osteoarthritis that had failed conservative management were subsequently indicated for primary hip or knee replacement (arthroplasty). Patients who subsequently had their surgery delayed or cancelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic were eligible for this study. Eligible patients consenting to the study will be assigned a unique study identification number (ID). A master database linking patient ID to patient name and medical record number will be housed on a password protected and encrypted departmental server location, which only research personnel can access.
Participants will complete a basic demographics survey and preoperative/ baseline patient reported outcome surveys at enrollment, including the Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) Pain Intensity 1A short form, PROMIS Pain Intensity 3A short form, PROMIS Pain Interference 8A short form, and PROMIS 8A Emotional Distress-Anxiety 8A short forms. Following completion of these surveys, subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio using a random number generator into one of two study groups. The intervention group will receive mobile messages communicating the behavior intervention. The control group will not receive the intervention. Subjects will not be blinded to their study group. Participants randomized to the intervention group were subsequently enrolled into the automated mobile messaging protocol and received a confirmation message welcoming them to the study, which was reviewed with them by the research assistant. Subjects were instructed that they were only required to read all messages, no responses were required.
A single instance of follow-up will take place on Day 14 of the study. This will occur over the phone with a research team member. Subjects will fill out a second set of the patient reported outcome surveys completed at enrollment. Collection of these followup items marks the end of the subject's participation in the study. No data collection is planned following the two week study period. The study hypothesis is that subjects receiving the behavior intervention delivered via an automated mobile messaging robot would demonstrate better patient reported outcome survey scores than controls at follow-up.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Parallel Assignment Two study groups. The intervention group and the control group that does not receive the intervention
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Software Messaging | Experimental | Behavioral: Software MessagingAcceptance and Commitment Therapy Subjects randomizing into this arm received the study intervention that consisted of twice-daily, AM and PM, text messages starting on postoperative day one and ending on postoperative day fourteen. Subjects were only required to read these messages, which utilized the principles of Acceptance and Commitment therapy |
| Control | No intervention | –Subjects randomizing into this arm did not receive the text message study intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Any patient who had been indicated for primary joint replacement but subsequently experienced a delay or cancellation in their surgical date due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients undergoing revision joint replacement
- Patients who do not own a mobile phone or do not utilize text messaging as a form of communication
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Software MessagingAcceptance and Commitment Therapy Delivered via an Automated Mobile Messaging Robot Mobile messages utilizing the principles of Acceptance and Commitment therapy. These messages were developed in collaboration with a pain psychologist who specializes in treating chronic pain with Acceptance and Commitment therapy. Subjects received twice-daily messages for two weeks following their orthopaedic procedure. | Behavioural | Software Messaging |
Primary outcome
Change in reported pain intensity score (PROMIS Pain Intensity 3A) Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system Pain Intensity (PROMIS) 3A short form scores collected from all participating subjects.
Time frame: Measurements assessed via a computer interface of the standardized form listed above on the day of enrollment and on day fourteen, via telephone.
PROMIS Pain Intensity 3A short form is a 3 question survey measuring an individual's pain over the past 7 days. It utilizes a scale of 1 (no pain) to 5 (very severe pain) for all questions. The scores for the 3 questions are summed and then matched to a corresponding t-score for the instrument. The corresponding t-score is the final, reportable score and can range from 30.7 to 71.8 for the PROMIS Pain Intensity 3A instrument. Higher t-score values represent worse pain outcomes. More information on this instrument, including a scoring manual, can be found at http://www.healthmeasures.net
Change in reported pain intensity score (PROMIS Pain Intensity 1A) Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system Pain Intensity (PROMIS) 1A short form scores collected from all participating subjects.
Time frame: Measurements assessed via a computer interface of the standardized form listed above on the day of enrollment and on day fourteen, via telephone.
PROMIS Pain Intensity 1A short form is a 1 question survey measuring an individual's average pain over the past 7 days. It utilizes a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Higher values represent worse pain outcomes. More information on this instrument, including a scoring manual, can be found at http://www.healthmeasures.net
Change in reported pain interference score Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) Pain Interference 8A short form scores collected from all participating subjects.
Time frame: Measurements assessed via a computer interface of the standardized form listed above on the day of enrollment and on day fourteen, via telephone.
The PROMIS Pain Interference 8A short form is an 8 question survey that measures how much pain has interfered in the respondent's life over the past 7 days. It utilizes a scale of 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much) for all questions. The scores for all 8 questions are summed and then matched to a corresponding t-score for the instrument. The corresponding t-score is the final, reportable score and can range from 40.7 to 77.0 for the PROMIS Pain Interference 8A instrument. Higher t-score values represent worse pain interference outcomes. More information on this instrument, including a scoring manual, can be found at http://www.healthmeasures.net
Change in reported emotional distress (anxiety) score. Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) Emotional Distress-Anxiety 8A short form scores collected from all participating subjects.
Time frame: Measurements assessed via a computer interface of the standardized form listed above on the day of enrollment and on day fourteen, via telephone.
The PROMIS Emotional Distress-Anxiety 8A short form is an 8 statement survey that measures how much emotional distress, specifically due to anxiety, a respondent has experienced over the past 7 days. It utilizes a scale of 1 (never) to 5 (always) for all the statements. The scores for all 8 statements are summed and then matched to a corresponding t-score for the instrument. The corresponding t-score is the final, reportable score and can range from 37.1 to 83.1 for the PROMIS Emotional Distress-Anxiety 8A instrument. Higher t-score values represent worse anxiety caused emotional distress outcomes. More information on this instrument, including a scoring manual, can be found at http://www.healthmeasures.net
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jul 2020.
- Background: PubMed 28870305Jones J Jr, Southerland W, Catalani B. The Importance of Optimizing Acute Pain in the Orthopedic Trauma Patient. Orthop Clin North Am. 2017 Oct;48(4):445-465. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2017.06.003.
- Background: PubMed 24905538Anthony CA, Peterson AR. Utilization of a text-messaging robot to assess intraday variation in concussion symptom severity scores. Clin J Sport Med. 2015 Mar;25(2):149-52. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000115.
- Background: PubMed 25771023Anthony CA, Polgreen LA, Chounramany J, Foster ED, Goerdt CJ, Miller ML, Suneja M, Segre AM, Carter BL, Polgreen PM. Outpatient blood pressure monitoring using bi-directional text messaging. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2015 May;9(5):375-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2015.01.008. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
- Background: PubMed 27479642Hughes LS, Clark J, Colclough JA, Dale E, McMillan D. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Clin J Pain. 2017 Jun;33(6):552-568. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000425.
- Background: PubMed 28838887Rathbone AL, Prescott J. The Use of Mobile Apps and SMS Messaging as Physical and Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 24;19(8):e295. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7740.
- Background: PubMed 29091492Anthony CA, Lawler EA, Glass NA, McDonald K, Shah AS. Delivery of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments by Automated Mobile Phone Text Messaging. Hand (N Y). 2017 Nov;12(6):614-621. doi: 10.1177/1558944716672201. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hip Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Training With and Without Hip Abductor Strengthening in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.(BFR)
Knee Osteoarthritis
Recruiting
FRONT Block for Quality of Recovery After Total Hip Arthroplasty
Osteoarthritis of the Hip, Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Post-Market Clinical Follow-up of Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid in Hip Osteoarthritis
Hip OA
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Validation of SMARTDIAGO for Remote Functional Assessment of Musculoskeletal Conditions
Knee Osteoarthristis, Hip Osteoarthritis
RecruitingObservational study
Z1 Hip System: Post-Market Clinical Follow Up Study
Hip Osteoarthritis, Acute Traumatic Fracture of the Femoral Head or Neck
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nic Bedard, MD study director
University of Iowa Department of Orthopaedics
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Software Messaging in people with Hip Osteoarthritis and Knee Osteoarthritis, run by University of Iowa at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in reported pain intensity score (PROMIS Pain Intensity 3A) Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system Pain Intensity (PROMIS) 3A short form scores collected from all participating subjects. (time frame: Measurements assessed via a computer interface of the standardized form listed above on the day of enrollment and on day fourteen, via telephone.). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04329897, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2020.