AzTrials
AzTrials

GastroparesisNCT04287647

Transpyloric Stenting as a Predictor for G-POEM for Refractory Gastroparesis

A study testing Transpyloric stent in people with Gastroparesis, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a prospective sham study to investigate the role of transpyloric stenting with lumen apposing metal stent (LAMS) as a predictor for clinical response to gastric per-oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (GPOEM) for refractory gastroparesis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Gastroparesis
What is being tested?
Transpyloric stent
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
8 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
15 May 2019to 27 May 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients greater than 18 years of age with gastroparesis refractory to standard medical therapy (lifestyle and diet modifications, prokinetics) or contraindication to standard therapies (e.g. allergies to prokinetic agents)
  • Patients with diabetic, idiopathic or post-surgical gastroparesis
  • Patients with confirmed diagnosis of gastroparesis via gastric emptying study (abnormal gastric emptying will be defined as ≥10 % residual activity at 4 h on a standardized nuclear medicine TC-99 m sulfur colloid solid-phase gastric emptying study)

Who cannot join

  • Patients with prior history of gastroenteric anastomosis or any GI surgeries with pyloric involvement
  • Patients with gastroesophageal malignancy
  • Patients who are unable to tolerate upper endoscopy secondary to cardiopulmonary instability or other contraindications to endoscopy
  • Patients with cirrhosis
  • Patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Patients with uncorrectable coagulopathy defined by INR >1.5 or platelets <50

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Northwestern University

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Transpyloric Stenting for Refractory Gastroparesis Prior to Gastric Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy: A Prospective Sham Study

This is a prospective sham study to investigate the role of transpyloric stenting with lumen apposing metal stent (LAMS) as a predictor for clinical response to gastric per-oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (GPOEM) for refractory gastroparesis. The study hypothesizes that clinical improvement with transpyloric stenting in patients with refractory gastroparesis is a predictor of subsequent clinical success of GPOEM.

Read the detailed description

Gastroparesis is defined as a complex syndrome of symptoms including early satiety, post-prandial fullness, nausea, vomiting, bloating, and upper abdominal pain with a corresponding objective delay in gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Recent epidemiologic data has shown a substantial increase of 158% in hospitalizations related to gastroparesis in recent years. The pathogenesis underlying gastroparesis is complex with multiple potential underlying mechanisms including impaired gastric accommodation, autonomic neuropathy, vagal nerve injury, uncoordinated gastric contractility, and pyloric dysfunction.

Effective and durable medical treatment of gastroparesis has remained clinically challenging. Currently metoclopramide is the only medication approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for diabetic gastroparesis, and treatment courses are recommended to be limited to a maximum of 12 weeks due to the risk of the irreversible side effect of tardive dyskinesia. Surgical treatments for gastroparesis also remain limited, with sparse existing data to support the use of implanted gastric electrical stimulation for treatment of refractory gastroparesis, which is currently approved by the FDA only for compassionate use. More recently, surgical pyloroplasty has been examined in treatment of gastroparesis, which has long been recognized as a technique to improve gastric drainage for mechanical obstructions and during elective vagotomy after gastric surgery. A recent study examined surgical pyloroplasty in 28 patients with post-surgical gastroparesis with 83% patients reporting significant clinical improvement at one-month follow-up but current surgical literature remains limited in this area and has focused primarily on post-surgical gastroparesis.

Given the lack of effective treatment options, endoscopic therapies for gastroparesis have recently been investigated as adjunctive or alternative methods to treat gastroparesis. Pyloric dysfunction characterized by pyloric restriction or pylorospasm with prolonged periods of increased pyloric tone and contractions has been brought to attention as an area of targetable therapy for a subset of patients with gastroparesis. Pyloric botulinum toxin injections initially demonstrated improvement in gastric emptying after treatment, but subsequent results from double-blinded placebo-control studies failed to demonstrate a difference in symptoms compared to placebo.

Transpyloric stenting was initially reported in 2013 in three cases of refractory gastroparesis with placement of a double layered, fully-covered, Niti-S self-expandable metal stent (TaeWoong Medical) across the pylorus with improvement in gastric emptying and symptoms in all three patients. A subsequent study of 30 patients with refractory gastroparesis who underwent transpyloric stenting demonstrated high technical success of stent placement (98%) with improvement of clinical symptoms in 75% of patients and 4-hour gastric emptying studies in 69% of patients. Stent migration was found to occur in 59% of patients without any associated adverse events. Current focus on transpyloric stenting in gastroparesis centers around determining optimal stent type and method of stent anchorage as well as the role of transpyloric stenting in treatment given lack of long-term durability.

With advancements in endoscopic submucosal dissection, G-POEM has recently come in to light as a minimally invasive technique to treat refractory gastroparesis. Esophageal endoscopic myotomy has previously been well-described as a procedure for treatment of achalasia, and this technique was adopted by in 2013 with the first G-POEM for refractory gastroparesis. A subsequent multicenter study in 2017 reported on 30 patients with refractory gastroparesis who underwent G-POEM with a technical success rate of 100%. At 5.5-month follow-up, 86% of patients were found to have clinical response. Repeat gastric emptying studies after G-POEM also normalized or improved in 47% and 37% of patients respectively. G-POEM has now gained both national and international recognition in succeeding studies as a feasible and safe technique to effectively treat refractory gastroparesis in a subset of patients.

Identifying predictors of success of G-POEM for treatment of gastroparesis is essential in further recognizing appropriate patients who would benefit from this therapy. As transpyloric stenting and G-POEM share underlying mechanisms of disruption of the pylorus, the investigators propose that improvement with transpyloric stenting in patients with refractory gastroparesis can be a predictor of subsequent response with G-POEM.

Conditions
Gastroparesis
Being tested
Transpyloric stent, Sham
Medical subject headings
Gastroparesis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Transpyloric stentDevice

    See arm/group descriptions

  • ShamOther

    Sham

Study groups in NCT04287647
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Transpyloric stentActive comparatorIn this group, patient's will be randomized to receive a transpyloric stent for treatment of refractory gastroparesis. They will be blinded for one month after stent placement as to whether they received a stent or sham.
Receives: Device: Transpyloric stent
ShamSham comparatorIn this group, patient's will be randomized to sham for treatment of refractory gastroparesis. They will be blinded for one month after stent placement as to whether they received a stent or sham.
Receives: Other: Sham

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Clinical response will be assessed by the gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI) scores

    GCSI assessment is based off an average of 16 questions that are scored from 0-5, with higher scores indicating a worse clinical outcome.

    Measured: 1-2 years

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Age

    Assessed in years

    Measured: 1-2 years

  2. Weight

    Assessed in kilograms

    Measured: 1-2 years

  3. Height

    Assessed in inches

    Measured: 1-2 years

  4. BMI

    Assessed in kg/m^2

    Measured: 1-2 years

  5. Adverse events

    Assessed based on current American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guideline definitions for endoscopic adverse events

    Measured: 1-2 years

  6. Procedure length

    Assessed in minutes

    Measured: intraoperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Feb 2020
  2. Study start15 May 2019
  3. Primary completion27 May 2026
  4. Study completion27 May 2026

Why it stopped: Excessive stent migration.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
8 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04287647
Sponsor's protocol ID
STU00209539
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
4 Dec 2019
Last updated
1 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Transpyloric stent in people with Gastroparesis, run by Northwestern University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Excessive stent migration.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Clinical response will be assessed by the gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI) scores (time frame: 1-2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in