Basal Cell CarcinomaEarly Phase 1NCT04279535
Topical Vitamin C for Treatment of Basal Cell Cancer
A Early Phase 1 study testing Topical Ascorbic Acid in people with Basal Cell Carcinoma, run by Center for Biomedical Research, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Randomized coomparative trial of a 30% solution of ascorbic acid in 95% dimethylsulfoxide applied topically twice a day for 8 weeks vs 5% imiquimod cream in the treatment biopsy proven basal cell carcinomas inotherwise healthy adult patients. Outcome measure was biopsy proven resolution of the carcinoma. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Basal Cell Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Topical Ascorbic Acid
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 25 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2018to 1 Jun 2019
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Presence of biopsy proven basal cell carcinoma
Who cannot join
- Absence of basal cell carcinoma
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Center for Biomedical Research,Inc.
Boise, Idaho, 83706
About this study
Official title: Topical Ascorbic Acid for Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma
Randomized coomparative trial of a 30% solution of ascorbic acid in 95% dimethylsulfoxide applied topically twice a day for 8 weeks vs 5% imiquimod cream in the treatment biopsy proven basal cell carcinomas inotherwise healthy adult patients. Outcome measure was biopsy proven resolution of the carcinoma.
Read the detailed description
Importance
Skin cancer is the most common cancer in the United States, with more people diagnosed each year than all other cancers combined (1). Basal cell cancer is the most common form with an estimated 4.3 million cases diagnosed annually (2,3). Costs of treating this cancer in the U.S. are estimated at $4.8 billion annually (4). Task force consensus guidelines suggest Mohs surgery as the treatment of choice, and as the single most precise and effective treatment method (5). However, cost and issues of cosmesis are principal disadvantages.
Objective
To evaluate efficacy of a therapeutic regimen in treating basal cell cancer, consisting of 30% ascorbic acid in 95% dimethylsulfoxide topically applied at home by patients twice a day for 8 weeks, vs 5% imiquimod cream which is an FDA approved treatment for BCC.
Design, Setting, and Participants This study was carried out in accordance with principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Detailed informed consent was obtained from each patient.
Eligible participants of any age had histologically confirmed primary, previously untreated, nodular or superficial BCC not arising at sites of high risk for sub clinical tumor spread (the nose, ear, eyelid, eyebrow, or temple ( )). Patients with infiltrative, recurrent, or morphoeic BCC were excluded from the study. Imiquimod was applied once daily for 5 days per week as per manufacturer instructions for treatment of BCC. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment group. Participants and outcome assessors were blinded to treatment protocol. Patients were seen at initial visit, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and six weeks after treatment conclusion for final biopsy. Those participants in the IMQ group who continued through 12 weeks of treatment were seen for an additional visit. The AA treatment was a solution while the IMQ a cream, however participants were simply told they would be receiving a topical treatment with instructions on how to apply, thus the blinding remained intact.
Histopathology showed 21 nodular and 8 superficial BCC subtypes upon enrollment. Thirteen patients (8 female 5 male) with a total of 15 lesions were randomized to the ascorbic acid (AA) treatment group, and 12 patients (6 female 6 male) with 14 lesions were randomized to the imiquimod group (IMQ). There was no difference in mean size of BCC in each group ( 11.4 +/-2.1 mm vs. 13.1 +/- 1.9mm). The AA group had 11 nodular and 4 superficial BCC and the IMQ group 10 nodular and 4 superficial.
Histopathology was confirmed by 2mm partial punch biopsy leaving
the bulk of the BCC intact prior to treatment. Patients in the AA group were treated
twice daily 7 days per week with a topical solution of 30% (w/v) ascorbic acid solution in 95% (v/v) dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and
5% (v/v) distilled water, while the IMQ patients received twice daily application of a commercial 5% cream 5 days per week according to manufacturer recommendations for treatment of BCC. Application was made with a small cuticle brush in the AA group. Patient compliance was high and no
patient had difficulty with the application. Volume of the ascorbic acid solution applied was 0.2-0.3ml per application. Treatment was
continued for 8 wks or until the lesion cleared. Subjects in the IMQ group whose lesions had failed to resolve at 8 weeks were treated for an additional 4 weeks in conformity with reports showing better outcomes with 12 weeks of treatment with IMQ ( ).
All patients had an appointment set for Mohs surgery
after study enrollment, so in the event of treatment failure no further delay in definitive treatment would occur.
Repeat 2mm punch biopsy of each site was taken at the conclusion of the study. Patients were seen in follow up after
12, 24, and 30 months
Interventions
An 8 wk therapeutic regimen of topical 30% (w/v) ascorbic acid, 95% (v/v) dimethylsulfoxide, and 5% (v/v) distilled water applied twice daily at home, or 5% imiquimod cream applied 5/wk according to manufacturer recommendations for treating BCC.
Main Outcomes and Measures
Number of lesions out that were cancer free after 8 wks of treatment.
- Conditions
- Basal Cell Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Topical Ascorbic Acid
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Basal Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Topical Ascorbic AcidDrug
Twice daily application of 300 microliters of 30% ascorbic acid solution with a small cuticle brush.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ascorbic acid | Experimental | Participants applied topical solution of ascorbic acid twice daily for 8 weeks Receives: Drug: Topical Ascorbic Acid |
| Imiquimod | Active comparator | Participants applied 5% imiquimod cream topically 5x/week Receives: Drug: Topical Ascorbic Acid |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Lesion Resolution
Number of lesions resolved out of total of 6 treated.
Measured: 8 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Feb 2020
- Study start1 Mar 2018
- Primary completion1 Mar 2019
- Study completion1 Jun 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Basal Cell CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Center for Biomedical Research, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Briant Burke, MD, Principal investigator, CBR,Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04279535
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BCC-001
- Status last verified
- Oct 2021
- First submitted
- 19 Feb 2020
- Last updated
- 2 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Topical Ascorbic Acid for Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04279535
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BCC-001
- Conditions
- Basal Cell Carcinoma
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Center for Biomedical Research, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Randomized coomparative trial of a 30% solution of ascorbic acid in 95% dimethylsulfoxide applied topically twice a day for 8 weeks vs 5% imiquimod cream in the treatment biopsy proven basal cell carcinomas inotherwise healthy adult patients. Outcome measure was biopsy proven resolution of the carcinoma.
Detailed description
Importance
Skin cancer is the most common cancer in the United States, with more people diagnosed each year than all other cancers combined (1). Basal cell cancer is the most common form with an estimated 4.3 million cases diagnosed annually (2,3). Costs of treating this cancer in the U.S. are estimated at $4.8 billion annually (4). Task force consensus guidelines suggest Mohs surgery as the treatment of choice, and as the single most precise and effective treatment method (5). However, cost and issues of cosmesis are principal disadvantages.
Objective
To evaluate efficacy of a therapeutic regimen in treating basal cell cancer, consisting of 30% ascorbic acid in 95% dimethylsulfoxide topically applied at home by patients twice a day for 8 weeks, vs 5% imiquimod cream which is an FDA approved treatment for BCC.
Design, Setting, and Participants This study was carried out in accordance with principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Detailed informed consent was obtained from each patient.
Eligible participants of any age had histologically confirmed primary, previously untreated, nodular or superficial BCC not arising at sites of high risk for sub clinical tumor spread (the nose, ear, eyelid, eyebrow, or temple ( )). Patients with infiltrative, recurrent, or morphoeic BCC were excluded from the study. Imiquimod was applied once daily for 5 days per week as per manufacturer instructions for treatment of BCC. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment group. Participants and outcome assessors were blinded to treatment protocol. Patients were seen at initial visit, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and six weeks after treatment conclusion for final biopsy. Those participants in the IMQ group who continued through 12 weeks of treatment were seen for an additional visit. The AA treatment was a solution while the IMQ a cream, however participants were simply told they would be receiving a topical treatment with instructions on how to apply, thus the blinding remained intact.
Histopathology showed 21 nodular and 8 superficial BCC subtypes upon enrollment. Thirteen patients (8 female 5 male) with a total of 15 lesions were randomized to the ascorbic acid (AA) treatment group, and 12 patients (6 female 6 male) with 14 lesions were randomized to the imiquimod group (IMQ). There was no difference in mean size of BCC in each group ( 11.4 +/-2.1 mm vs. 13.1 +/- 1.9mm). The AA group had 11 nodular and 4 superficial BCC and the IMQ group 10 nodular and 4 superficial.
Histopathology was confirmed by 2mm partial punch biopsy leaving
the bulk of the BCC intact prior to treatment. Patients in the AA group were treated
twice daily 7 days per week with a topical solution of 30% (w/v) ascorbic acid solution in 95% (v/v) dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and
5% (v/v) distilled water, while the IMQ patients received twice daily application of a commercial 5% cream 5 days per week according to manufacturer recommendations for treatment of BCC. Application was made with a small cuticle brush in the AA group. Patient compliance was high and no
patient had difficulty with the application. Volume of the ascorbic acid solution applied was 0.2-0.3ml per application. Treatment was
continued for 8 wks or until the lesion cleared. Subjects in the IMQ group whose lesions had failed to resolve at 8 weeks were treated for an additional 4 weeks in conformity with reports showing better outcomes with 12 weeks of treatment with IMQ ( ).
All patients had an appointment set for Mohs surgery
after study enrollment, so in the event of treatment failure no further delay in definitive treatment would occur.
Repeat 2mm punch biopsy of each site was taken at the conclusion of the study. Patients were seen in follow up after
12, 24, and 30 months
Interventions
An 8 wk therapeutic regimen of topical 30% (w/v) ascorbic acid, 95% (v/v) dimethylsulfoxide, and 5% (v/v) distilled water applied twice daily at home, or 5% imiquimod cream applied 5/wk according to manufacturer recommendations for treating BCC.
Main Outcomes and Measures
Number of lesions out that were cancer free after 8 wks of treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ascorbic acid | Experimental | Drug: Topical Ascorbic AcidParticipants applied topical solution of ascorbic acid twice daily for 8 weeks |
| Imiquimod | Active comparator | Drug: Topical Ascorbic AcidParticipants applied 5% imiquimod cream topically 5x/week |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Presence of biopsy proven basal cell carcinoma
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Absence of basal cell carcinoma
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Topical Ascorbic AcidTwice daily application of 300 microliters of 30% ascorbic acid solution with a small cuticle brush. | Drug | Imiquimod, ascorbic acid |
Primary outcome
Lesion Resolution
Time frame: 8 weeks
Number of lesions resolved out of total of 6 treated.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Nov 2021.
Related trials for Basal Cell Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Evaluation of Efficacy and Safety of Cemiplimab as First Line Treatment for Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) Patients
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC), First Line Treatment
RecruitingPhase 3
Basal Cell Carcinoma Chemoprevention Trial
Basal Cell Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study Comparing Cemiplimab-based Treatments for Adult Participants With Locally Advanced Basal Cell Skin Cancer (laBCC)
Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Briant Burke, MD principal investigator
CBR,Inc.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing Topical Ascorbic Acid in people with Basal Cell Carcinoma, run by Center for Biomedical Research, Inc. at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Lesion Resolution (time frame: 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Nov 2021.