Social IsolationNCT04254198
Tertulias Social Isolation Women's Groups Study
A study testing TERTULIAS structured dialogue peer support groups in people with Social Isolation and Depression, run by University of New Mexico at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study will use a multi-level, community-engaged approach to implement "TERTULIAS" ("conversational gatherings" in Spanish). The intervention uses an innovative, culturally and contextually situated peer support group design that was developed by the investigators to improve health outcomes and reduce health… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Social Isolation, Depression
- What is being tested?
- TERTULIAS structured dialogue peer support groups
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 241 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2020to 30 Aug 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Over age 18
- Female immigrant
- Born in Mexico
- Reports household income under 250% Federal Poverty Level
- Speaks Spanish fluently
Who cannot join
- prisoners
- individuals unable to consent
- children
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Centro Savila
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87105
One Hope Centro De Vida Health Center
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108
About this study
Official title: Tertulias: Addressing Social Isolation to Reduce Depression Among Women of Mexican Origin
This study will use a multi-level, community-engaged approach to implement "TERTULIAS" ("conversational gatherings" in Spanish). The intervention uses an innovative, culturally and contextually situated peer support group design that was developed by the investigators to improve health outcomes and reduce health disparities for female mexican immigrant (FMI) participants in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The study will use a rigorous, transdisciplinary, QUAL⇒QUANT, mixed-method research design. The investigators will document results of the intervention on the primary hypotheses of a decrease in depression, and increases in resilience and social support, as well as on the secondary hypotheses of decreased stress (including the use of innovative testing of hair cortisol as a biomarker for chronic stress), and an increase in social connectedness and positive assessment of knowledge and empowerment gained through the TERTULIAS intervention.
Read the detailed description
Specific Aims. The investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial with 240 FMIs. Intervention participants will attend a weekly peer group session over 12 months. Control group participants will receive a bimonthly check-in call. All will be surveyed using validated instruments and give hair samples gathered at baseline and 12 months. A subset will be interviewed, and group sessions will be documented. Data will be triangulated using different methods with a QUAL⇒QUAN simultaneous data collection and analysis approach to integrate, converge, and elaborate findings in a way that would not be feasible using only one method.
Aim 1. To measure whether a culturally situated peer group intervention will reduce depression and stress associated with the experience of immigration. Question: Does an intervention design that reproduces culturally important interactions, activities, and constructs lost through immigration result in decreased participant depression and stress? Hypothesis: Incorporating peer-to-peer social interaction, food sharing, and storytelling into the design of a nonclinical peer support group intervention will leverage positive aspects of participant culture and create an experiential context that will (a) decrease participant depression scores by at least 6.5 points more on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) as compared to controls (effect size Cohen's d = 0.43), and (b) lower stress scores in participants more than in controls with d ≥ 0.5 as measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). The investigators will also assess stress using a cutting-edge biological assessment of hair cortisol as a biomarker for chronic stress.
Aim 2. To test whether an intervention using a "women's funds of knowledge" approach results in improved resilience, knowledge and empowerment. Question: Does an intervention design that encourages participants to share knowledge they developed through life experience and that values this knowledge as a form of expertise nurture protective factors (resilience and knowledge/empowerment) to help FMIs adapt to the immigration context and disrupt the mechanisms that produce health disparities? Hypothesis: Incorporating, valuing and validating women's knowledge and experience in the design of a peer support group intervention will improve participant capacity to adapt to the immigrant context and provide participants with empowering knowledge to deal with new situations. Intervention participants will have higher scores at 12 months and have a larger increase over time as compared to controls (d = 0.5) on the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-25 ("CD-RISC 25"). Knowledge and empowerment will be assessed at 12 months and expect to find high scores with the Trauma-Informed Practice (TIP) Scale (which is designed for post-use).
Aim 3. To investigate whether a culturally situated peer group intervention using a women's funds of knowledge approach can give participants' a sense and experience of social and physical connection ("emplacement") that is lost in the process of immigration. Question: Can the proposed peer support group intervention recreate social and physical connections lost through immigration and strengthen participant social networks? Hypothesis: The peer group will create a culturally appropriate context for establishing interpersonal connections between group members and will give participants a sense of belonging within a social and contextual milieu. At study end, (a) experimental participants will have a marked increase in social support scores v.s. the control group using the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS SSS) (d ≥ 0.5), and (b) stronger, more dense social connections as described by a social network analysis.
Project Outcomes. This intervention with FMIs will test an innovative intervention to reduce social isolation as a mechanism for reducing depression by leveraging positive cultural dynamics and women's funds of knowledge to nurture social connectedness, knowledge, and resiliency factors in the lives of participants in a transformative way. Generalizability. This trial of TERTULIAS will create a replicable, scalable model for culturally appropriate health promotion with FMIs that has implications for health promotion work with other women from recent and first generation immigrant populations.
- Conditions
- Social Isolation, Depression
- Being tested
- TERTULIAS structured dialogue peer support groups, Modified Attention Placebo Control (MAPC)
- Keywords
- Immigrant, Women, Peer support group, Community-engaged
- Medical subject headings
- Social Isolation, Depression
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TERTULIAS structured dialogue peer support groupsBehavioural
TERTULIAS will involve structured dialogue groups using the model developed and tested by the investigators through their preliminary research. Each group will have 10 women and will meet weekly for two hours over a 12-month period. Group meetings will be conducted in Spanish, led by a team of two FMI facilitators. Facilitation will use the structured dialogue approach. In the last two months of each cohort, participants will be invited to write their own stories or recipes, or produce poetry or art representing their experience to share with the group. These contributions will be gathered and reproduced in "booklet" form and each participant will receive a copy.
Modified Attention Placebo Control (MAPC)Behavioural
MAPC participants will receive a phone call every other month from the project coordinator to document that their contact information is up to date, to remind them that they are in the study and to tell them that the study is continuing. Survey data and hair samples will be gathered from them at baseline and 12 months
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Placebo comparator | Modified Attention Placebo Control Receives: Behavioral: Modified Attention Placebo Control (MAPC) |
| TERTULIAS structured dialogue peer support groups | Experimental | Structured Dialogue peer support group Receives: Behavioral: TERTULIAS structured dialogue peer support groups |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Depression
Comparison of intervention and control participants of their change in depression scores between baseline and 12 months as measured by the summed scores of the 20-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Summed scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating higher levels of depression. Changes will be measured as 12 months - Baseline, so negative change scores indicate decreased depression.
Measured: Baseline, 12 months
Change in Resilience
Comparison of intervention and control participants of their change in resilience scores between baseline and 12 months as measured by the summed scores of the 25-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-25 (CD-RISC 25).Summed scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating higher levels of resilience. Changes will be measured as 12 months - Baseline, so positive change scores indicate increased resilience.
Measured: Baseline, 12 months
Change in Social Support
Comparison of intervention and control participants of their change in social support scores between baseline and 12 months as measured by the total scaled scores of the 19-item Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS SSS).Total scaled scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating higher levels of social support. Changes will be measured as 12 months - Baseline, so positive change scores indicated increased social support.
Measured: Baseline, 12 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Change in Perceived Stress
Comparison of intervention and control participants of their change in social support scores between baseline and 12 months as measured by the summed scores of the 14-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14). Summed scores range from 0 to 56 with higher scores indicating higher levels of stress. Changes will be measured as 12 months - Baseline, so negative change scores indicate decreased perceived stress.
Measured: Baseline, 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Feb 2020
- Study start1 Jul 2020
- Primary completion30 Aug 2024
- Study completion30 Aug 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Social IsolationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized Control Trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 241 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of New Mexico
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Janet M Page-Reeves, University of New Mexico
- Investigators
- Janet M Page-Reeves, PhD, Principal investigator, UNM Dept. of Family and Community Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04254198
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 19-160
- Other IDs
- 1R01MD014153-01
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 26 Sep 2019
- Last updated
- 1 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Page-Reeves J, Murray-Krezan C, Regino L, Perez J, Bleecker M, Perez D, Wagner B, Tigert S, Bearer EL, Willging CE. A randomized control trial to test a peer support group approach for reducing social isolation and depression among female Mexican immigrants. BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 11;21(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09867-z.
PubMed 33430845
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Tertulias: Addressing Social Isolation to Reduce Depression Among Women of Mexican Origin
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04254198
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 19-160
- Conditions
- Social Isolation, Depression
- Keywords
- Immigrant, Women, Peer support group, Community-engaged
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 241 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of New MexicoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Aug 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 1 Dec 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will use a multi-level, community-engaged approach to implement "TERTULIAS" ("conversational gatherings" in Spanish). The intervention uses an innovative, culturally and contextually situated peer support group design that was developed by the investigators to improve health outcomes and reduce health disparities for female mexican immigrant (FMI) participants in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The study will use a rigorous, transdisciplinary, QUAL⇒QUANT, mixed-method research design. The investigators will document results of the intervention on the primary hypotheses of a decrease in depression, and increases in resilience and social support, as well as on the secondary hypotheses of decreased stress (including the use of innovative testing of hair cortisol as a biomarker for chronic stress), and an increase in social connectedness and positive assessment of knowledge and empowerment gained through the TERTULIAS intervention.
Detailed description
Specific Aims. The investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial with 240 FMIs. Intervention participants will attend a weekly peer group session over 12 months. Control group participants will receive a bimonthly check-in call. All will be surveyed using validated instruments and give hair samples gathered at baseline and 12 months. A subset will be interviewed, and group sessions will be documented. Data will be triangulated using different methods with a QUAL⇒QUAN simultaneous data collection and analysis approach to integrate, converge, and elaborate findings in a way that would not be feasible using only one method.
Aim 1. To measure whether a culturally situated peer group intervention will reduce depression and stress associated with the experience of immigration. Question: Does an intervention design that reproduces culturally important interactions, activities, and constructs lost through immigration result in decreased participant depression and stress? Hypothesis: Incorporating peer-to-peer social interaction, food sharing, and storytelling into the design of a nonclinical peer support group intervention will leverage positive aspects of participant culture and create an experiential context that will (a) decrease participant depression scores by at least 6.5 points more on the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) as compared to controls (effect size Cohen's d = 0.43), and (b) lower stress scores in participants more than in controls with d ≥ 0.5 as measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). The investigators will also assess stress using a cutting-edge biological assessment of hair cortisol as a biomarker for chronic stress.
Aim 2. To test whether an intervention using a "women's funds of knowledge" approach results in improved resilience, knowledge and empowerment. Question: Does an intervention design that encourages participants to share knowledge they developed through life experience and that values this knowledge as a form of expertise nurture protective factors (resilience and knowledge/empowerment) to help FMIs adapt to the immigration context and disrupt the mechanisms that produce health disparities? Hypothesis: Incorporating, valuing and validating women's knowledge and experience in the design of a peer support group intervention will improve participant capacity to adapt to the immigrant context and provide participants with empowering knowledge to deal with new situations. Intervention participants will have higher scores at 12 months and have a larger increase over time as compared to controls (d = 0.5) on the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-25 ("CD-RISC 25"). Knowledge and empowerment will be assessed at 12 months and expect to find high scores with the Trauma-Informed Practice (TIP) Scale (which is designed for post-use).
Aim 3. To investigate whether a culturally situated peer group intervention using a women's funds of knowledge approach can give participants' a sense and experience of social and physical connection ("emplacement") that is lost in the process of immigration. Question: Can the proposed peer support group intervention recreate social and physical connections lost through immigration and strengthen participant social networks? Hypothesis: The peer group will create a culturally appropriate context for establishing interpersonal connections between group members and will give participants a sense of belonging within a social and contextual milieu. At study end, (a) experimental participants will have a marked increase in social support scores v.s. the control group using the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS SSS) (d ≥ 0.5), and (b) stronger, more dense social connections as described by a social network analysis.
Project Outcomes. This intervention with FMIs will test an innovative intervention to reduce social isolation as a mechanism for reducing depression by leveraging positive cultural dynamics and women's funds of knowledge to nurture social connectedness, knowledge, and resiliency factors in the lives of participants in a transformative way. Generalizability. This trial of TERTULIAS will create a replicable, scalable model for culturally appropriate health promotion with FMIs that has implications for health promotion work with other women from recent and first generation immigrant populations.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized Control Trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Placebo comparator | Behavioral: Modified Attention Placebo Control (MAPC)Modified Attention Placebo Control |
| TERTULIAS structured dialogue peer support groups | Experimental | Behavioral: TERTULIAS structured dialogue peer support groupsStructured Dialogue peer support group |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Over age 18
- Female immigrant
- Born in Mexico
- Reports household income under 250% Federal Poverty Level
- Speaks Spanish fluently
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- prisoners
- individuals unable to consent
- children
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TERTULIAS structured dialogue peer support groupsTERTULIAS will involve structured dialogue groups using the model developed and tested by the investigators through their preliminary research. Each group will have 10 women and will meet weekly for two hours over a 12-month period. Group meetings will be conducted in Spanish, led by a team of two FMI facilitators. Facilitation will use the structured dialogue approach. In the last two months of each cohort, participants will be invited to write their own stories or recipes, or produce poetry or art representing their experience to share with the group. These contributions will be gathered and reproduced in "booklet" form and each participant will receive a copy. | Behavioural | TERTULIAS structured dialogue peer support groups |
| Modified Attention Placebo Control (MAPC)MAPC participants will receive a phone call every other month from the project coordinator to document that their contact information is up to date, to remind them that they are in the study and to tell them that the study is continuing. Survey data and hair samples will be gathered from them at baseline and 12 months | Behavioural | Control |
Primary outcome
Change in Depression
Time frame: Baseline, 12 months
Comparison of intervention and control participants of their change in depression scores between baseline and 12 months as measured by the summed scores of the 20-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Summed scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating higher levels of depression. Changes will be measured as 12 months - Baseline, so negative change scores indicate decreased depression.
Change in Resilience
Time frame: Baseline, 12 months
Comparison of intervention and control participants of their change in resilience scores between baseline and 12 months as measured by the summed scores of the 25-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-25 (CD-RISC 25).Summed scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating higher levels of resilience. Changes will be measured as 12 months - Baseline, so positive change scores indicate increased resilience.
Change in Social Support
Time frame: Baseline, 12 months
Comparison of intervention and control participants of their change in social support scores between baseline and 12 months as measured by the total scaled scores of the 19-item Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS SSS).Total scaled scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating higher levels of social support. Changes will be measured as 12 months - Baseline, so positive change scores indicated increased social support.
1 secondary outcome
Change in Perceived Stress
Time frame: Baseline, 12 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Dec 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33430845Page-Reeves J, Murray-Krezan C, Regino L, Perez J, Bleecker M, Perez D, Wagner B, Tigert S, Bearer EL, Willging CE. A randomized control trial to test a peer support group approach for reducing social isolation and depression among female Mexican immigrants. BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 11;21(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09867-z.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Social Isolation
Not yet recruiting
A Mobile Informatics Solution to Assist Caregivers in Care Coordination and Monitoring Social Engagement
Memory Disorders, Mild Cognitive Impairment
Recruiting
Does Attachment Anxiety Moderate the Influence of Social Rejection on Alcohol Use Among Young Adults?
Social Rejection, Attachement Style
Active, not recruiting
Multimodal Training With Immersive Virtual Reality to Improve the Cognitive Health and Emotional Well-being of Older Women Living Alone
Social Isolation in Older Adults, Poverty
Recruiting
Social Connection Collective for Older Adults in Subsidized Housing
Social Isolation in Older Adults, Social Isolation or Loneliness
Not yet recruiting
Improving Diet Quality of Community-Dwelling Seniors Using a Community-Based Participatory Approach
Diet Quality, Social Isolation in Older Adults
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janet M Page-Reeves, PhD principal investigator
UNM Dept. of Family and Community Medicine
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing TERTULIAS structured dialogue peer support groups in people with Social Isolation and Depression, run by University of New Mexico at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Dec 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Depression (time frame: Baseline, 12 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04254198, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Dec 2025.