AzTrials
AzTrials

Bladder CancerNCT04245618

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Non Muscle Invasive T1b Bladder Cancer

An observational study of Bladder Cancer, run by Assiut University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of our study is to evaluate the benefit of NAC in T1b NMIBC . Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Bladder Cancer
What is being tested?
neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( cisplatin - gemcitabine)
How many people
50 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jul 2020to Sep 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients older than 18 years confirmed to have T1b Non muscle invasive bladder cancer by biopsy will take neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Who may be able to join

  • Patient who are older than 18 years old.
  • Histologically confirmed to have Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer, T1bN0M0 ,clinically and radiologically confirmed to have bladder cancer.
  • Patient should have Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performances status (ECOG)0-1 with adequate hematologic, hepatic and renal functions including hemoglobin>10 /dl, absolute neutrophil count ≥1,500/mm3, platelets ≥100,000/mm3, serum bilirubin <2 mg/dl ,both Alanine transaminase( ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase( AST) ≤2× upper limit of normal (ULN), alkaline phosphates ≤5×ULN,and serum creatinine ≤1.5 mg/dl or creatinine clearance ≥60 ml/min.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with radiographic evidence of nodal or distant metastases.
  • A past history of upper tract disease, neuroendocrine features.
  • Non-cisplatin-based NAC .
  • Prior radiation therapy to their pelvis.
  • A palpable three-dimensional mass on EUA.
  • Known to be stage 0, T1a, II, III, IV.
  • Active serious infection, or a psychiatric illness that would preclude obtaining informed consent or history of cardiac disease will be excluded.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Heba sheha, MD contact

+201005054776

beboo0412@gmail.com

abeer fayek, professor contact

Abeeramin210@yahoo.com

About this study

Official title: Role of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in the Conservative Management of Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) T1b

The aim of our study is to evaluate the benefit of NAC in T1b NMIBC .

Read the detailed description

Bladder cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy of the urinary tract and the fourth most frequent cancer in the United States, with 79,030 new cases and 16,870 deaths estimated for 2017.

The most common presenting symptom is hematuria, which occurs in about 85% of patients. Hematuria is typically intermittent, gross, and painless. Bladder irritability, usually presenting as urinary frequency, urgency, and dysuria, occurs in about 20% of patients.

Initial diagnostic workup usually involves cystoscopy and urine cytology. Cystoscopy is the gold standard for the initial diagnosis and staging of bladder cancer. If a bladder mass is detected, a transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) is performed for full primary tumor staging. The resected bladder tumor specimen should include muscle to fully assess the depth of tumor invasion. If carcinoma in situ (CIS) is detected, multiple random biopsies, including several different areas of the bladder and the prostatic urethra, may be required to assess the extent of involvement.

Abdominal imaging with either CT or MRI is recommended in patients with a high-grade tumor or muscle invasive disease to assess for local lymph node involvement, loco regional extent of disease and the presence of hydronephrosis.

Approximately 75% of patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder present with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), either confined to the mucosa (Ta and carcinoma in situ [CIS]) or invading the lamina propria (T1) . Clinical T1 high-grade (cT1HG) NMIBC has the highest rate of local recurrence and carries a significant risk of disease progression, clinical understaging, and death from urothelial carcinoma (UC) . The standard of care for adequately resected cT1HG NMIBC is intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) with early radical cystectomy (RC) for recurrent or refractory cT1HG disease Pathological upstaging to pathological tumor -2( pT2) is reported in approximately 50% when muscularis propria is absent from the original biopsy, and up to 25% will have lymph node (LN) metastases , which significantly increases the risk for cancer-specific death . These observations imply that a subset of patients with NMIBC that invades into the lamina propria is at a higher risk for clinical understaging and death from UC and may benefit from more aggressive therapy.

Long-term surveillance thus remains the cornerstone of long-term management, and cystoscopy has represented the gold standard modality for over 80 years.

Cisplatin- Gemcitabine (CG) neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) provides pathological downstaging and improved overall survival (OS) for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) undergoing RC.

Chemotherapy administered in a neoadjuvant setting comes with some advantages: the ability to deliver effective systemic therapy while the burden of micrometastatic disease is low and is given in a setting in which the patient's performance status is optimal (patient more fit, no loss of renal function, eligibility to optimal cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens).

High risk features (HRFs) in NMIBC were defined as follows: lymph-vascular invasion (LVI), thickening or induration on Examination under anesthesia( EUA) , tumor-associated hydronephrosis, and variant histology. Tumors with a primary urothelial component and presence of micropapillary, squamous, sarcomatoid, nested variant, glandular, plasmacytoid, adenocarcinoma, or lymphoepithelioma components were classified as tumors of variant histology ( ,also T1b substage has bad prognosis.

The investigators hypothesized that similar high-risk features (HRFs) might identify a high-risk subset of UC patients that could benefit from NAC in the absence of evidence for muscle invasion.

Conditions
Bladder Cancer
Being tested
neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( cisplatin - gemcitabine)
Medical subject headings
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( cisplatin - gemcitabine)Drug

    Also called cisplatin - gemzar

    Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before TURBT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Evaluation of the benefit of NAC in T1b NMIBC .

    assessment of the response in correlation with high risk features.

    Measured: baseline

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS).

    Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS).

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jan 2020
  2. Study startJul 2020 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionJul 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04245618
Sponsor's protocol ID
NAC in T1 Bladder cancer
Status last verified
Jan 2020
First submitted
26 Jan 2020
Last updated
30 Jan 2020
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Cambier S, Sylvester RJ, Collette L, Gontero P, Brausi MA, van Andel G, Kirkels WJ, Silva FC, Oosterlinck W, Prescott S, Kirkali Z, Powell PH, de Reijke TM, Turkeri L, Collette S, Oddens J. EORTC Nomograms and Risk Groups for Predicting Recurrence, Progression, and Disease-specific and Overall Survival in Non-Muscle-invasive Stage Ta-T1 Urothelial Bladder Cancer Patients Treated with 1-3 Years of Maintenance Bacillus Calmette-Guerin. Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):60-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.045. Epub 2015 Jul 23.

    PubMed 26210894
  • Tarin TV, Power NE, Ehdaie B, Sfakianos JP, Silberstein JL, Savage CJ, Sjoberg D, Dalbagni G, Bochner BH. Lymph node-positive bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy and lymphadenectomy: effect of the level of node positivity. Eur Urol. 2012 May;61(5):1025-30. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.049. Epub 2012 Feb 7.

    PubMed 22342773
  • Chahal R, Harrison SC. Re: an interval longer than 12 weeks between the diagnosis of muscle invasion and cystectomy is associated with worse outcome in bladder carcinoma. J Urol. 2003 Oct;170(4 Pt 1):1327; author reply 1327. No abstract available.

    PubMed 14515867
  • Black PC, Brown GA, Dinney CP. The impact of variant histology on the outcome of bladder cancer treated with curative intent. Urol Oncol. 2009 Jan-Feb;27(1):3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2007.07.010. Epub 2008 Jan 14.

    PubMed 18367107
  • Otto W, van Rhijn BW, Breyer J, Bertz S, Eckstein M, Mayr R, Lausenmeyer EM, Denzinger S, Burger M, Hartmann A. Infiltrative lamina propria invasion pattern as an independent predictor for cancer-specific and overall survival of instillation treatment-naive stage T1 high-grade urothelial bladder cancer. Int J Urol. 2018 May;25(5):442-449. doi: 10.1111/iju.13532. Epub 2018 Feb 22.

    PubMed 29473226
  • Babjuk M, Burger M, Comperat EM, Gontero P, Mostafid AH, Palou J, van Rhijn BWG, Roupret M, Shariat SF, Sylvester R, Zigeuner R, Capoun O, Cohen D, Escrig JLD, Hernandez V, Peyronnet B, Seisen T, Soukup V. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (TaT1 and Carcinoma In Situ) - 2019 Update. Eur Urol. 2019 Nov;76(5):639-657. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.016. Epub 2019 Aug 20.

    PubMed 31443960
  • Martin-Doyle W, Leow JJ, Orsola A, Chang SL, Bellmunt J. Improving selection criteria for early cystectomy in high-grade t1 bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of 15,215 patients. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb 20;33(6):643-50. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.6967. Epub 2015 Jan 5.

    PubMed 25559810
  • Yoshida S, Koga F, Kobayashi S, Ishii C, Tanaka H, Tanaka H, Komai Y, Saito K, Masuda H, Fujii Y, Kawakami S, Kihara K. Role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in predicting sensitivity to chemoradiotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 May 1;83(1):e21-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.065. Epub 2012 Mar 11.

    PubMed 22414281

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Bladder Cancer, run by Assiut University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Heba sheha, MD (+201005054776, beboo0412@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Evaluation of the benefit of NAC in T1b NMIBC . (time frame: baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04245618, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in