Induction of LaborNCT04233008
Length of Cook Catheter Placement and Induction of Labor
A study testing Foley catheter length in people with Induction of Labor, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this study is to compare cook catheter placement for 6 vs. 12 hours to see if there is faster time to delivery for people admitted to labor and delivery undergoing induction of labor. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Induction of Labor
- What is being tested?
- Foley catheter length
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 178 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2019to 1 Jul 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- Non English speaking
- Contraindications to vaginal delivery
- Prior cesarean section
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02116
About this study
Official title: Length of Cook Catheter Placement and Induction of Labor: a Randomized Controlled Trial
The goal of this study is to compare cook catheter placement for 6 vs. 12 hours to see if there is faster time to delivery for people admitted to labor and delivery undergoing induction of labor.
Read the detailed description
Upon presentation to labor and delivery the participant will have a cook catheter inserted digitally or by direct visualization with a speculum. The uterine component of the balloon will be inflated to maximum 60mL. The catheter will be taped to the inner thigh with gentle traction. In both groups participants will be started on hospital-based oxytocin protocol. This protocol beings with 2 milliunits/min of oxytocin, increasing by 2 milliunits every 15 minutes until regular uterine contractions occur. The maximum dose of oxytocin is considered to be 30 milliunits. The cook catheter will then be removed at 6 vs. 12 hours based on randomization. At that point health care providers will manage active labor. Health care providers many perform amniotomy at any point during the induction process with recommendation for amniotomy with cervix more than 4cm dilated. Labor interventions are at the discretion of the healthcare provider. The participants will have continuous fetal monitoring throughout their induction, labor and delivery. Need for operative delivery or cesarean section will be at the discretion of the health provider.
- Conditions
- Induction of Labor
- Being tested
- Foley catheter length
- Keywords
- Maternal outcomes, Neonatal Outcomes
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Foley catheter lengthDevice
see arm description
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 6 hour foley | Experimental | The participant will have a cook catheter inserted digitally or by direct visualization with a speculum with the uterine component of the balloon inflated to maximum 60mL. The catheter will be taped to the inner thigh with gentle traction. Participants will be started on hospital-based oxytocin protocol. The cook catheter will then be removed at 6 hours, determined by randomization. At that point health care providers will manage active labor. Receives: Device: Foley catheter length |
| 12 hour foley | No intervention | The participant will have a cook catheter inserted digitally or by direct visualization with a speculum with the uterine component of the balloon inflated to maximum 60mL. The catheter will be taped to the inner thigh with gentle traction. Participants will be started on hospital-based oxytocin protocol. The cook catheter will then be removed at 12 hours, determined by randomization. At that point health care providers will manage active labor. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to Delivery
Time to delivery
Measured: Assessed following delivery (delivery day, day 0)
Secondary outcomes (11)
Cesarean Delivery Rate
Cesarean delivery rate
Measured: Assessed following delivery (delivery day, day 0)
Time to Active Labor
Time to reaching active labor (defined as 5cm)
Measured: Assessed following delivery (delivery day, day 0)
Delivery Within 12 Hours
The number of women in each group who deliver within 12 hours
Measured: Assessed following delivery (delivery day, day 0)
Delivery Within 24 Hours
The number of women in each group who deliver within 24 hours
Measured: Assessed following delivery (delivery day, day 0)
Maternal Length of Stay
Length of hospital stay from start of induction to postpartum discharge
Measured: Assessed at end of study period (week 4)
Indication for Cesarean Delivery
Number of Patient with Indication for Cesarean Delivery
Measured: Assessed following delivery (delivery day, day 0)
Maternal Complications
Estimated blood loss, blood transfusion, higher order laceration, endometritis, wound infection, venous thromboembolism, hysterectomy, ICU admission, maternal death
Measured: Assessed at end of study period (week 4)
Neonatal Complications
culture-proven neonatal sepsis, neonatal blood transfusion, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3 or 4, or therapeutic hypothermia
Measured: Assessed at end of study period (week 4)
NICU Admission
Number of infants admitted to NICU
Measured: Assessed at end of study period (week 4)
NICU Admission >48 Hours
Number of infants admitted to NICU for >48 hours
Measured: Assessed at end of study period (week 4)
Neonatal Length of Stay
Days of hospital stay
Measured: Assessed at end of study period (week 4)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jan 2020
- Study start1 Jan 2019
- Primary completion1 Jul 2020
- Study completion1 Jul 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Induction of LaborStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Brigham and Women's HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 178 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sarah E Little, Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Investigators
- Sarah E Little, MD, Principal investigator, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04233008
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 54321
- Status last verified
- May 2022
- First submitted
- 13 Jan 2020
- Last updated
- 24 Jun 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No: Research only shared within study staff
Publications
Battarbee AN, Palatnik A, Peress DA, Grobman WA. Association of Early Amniotomy After Foley Balloon Catheter Ripening and Duration of Nulliparous Labor Induction. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;128(3):592-597. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001563.
PubMed 27500341Boulvain M, Kelly A, Lohse C, Stan C, Irion O. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(4):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.
PubMed 11687101Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Agosti M, Serati M, Uccella S, Arlant V, Bolis P. Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;204(4):338.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.11.029. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
PubMed 21272849Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Births: Final Data for 2014. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015 Dec;64(12):1-64.
PubMed 26727629Levine LD, Downes KL, Elovitz MA, Parry S, Sammel MD, Srinivas SK. Mechanical and Pharmacologic Methods of Labor Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;128(6):1357-1364. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001778.
PubMed 27824758Lassey SC, Haber HR, Kanbergs A, Robinson JN, Little SE. Six versus twelve hours of single-balloon catheter placement with oxytocin administration for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun;224(6):611.e1-611.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.03.021. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
PubMed 33771496
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jun 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Length of Cook Catheter Placement and Induction of Labor: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04233008
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 54321
- Conditions
- Induction of Labor
- Keywords
- Maternal outcomes, Neonatal Outcomes
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 178 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Brigham and Women's HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 24 Jun 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study is to compare cook catheter placement for 6 vs. 12 hours to see if there is faster time to delivery for people admitted to labor and delivery undergoing induction of labor.
Detailed description
Upon presentation to labor and delivery the participant will have a cook catheter inserted digitally or by direct visualization with a speculum. The uterine component of the balloon will be inflated to maximum 60mL. The catheter will be taped to the inner thigh with gentle traction. In both groups participants will be started on hospital-based oxytocin protocol. This protocol beings with 2 milliunits/min of oxytocin, increasing by 2 milliunits every 15 minutes until regular uterine contractions occur. The maximum dose of oxytocin is considered to be 30 milliunits. The cook catheter will then be removed at 6 vs. 12 hours based on randomization. At that point health care providers will manage active labor. Health care providers many perform amniotomy at any point during the induction process with recommendation for amniotomy with cervix more than 4cm dilated. Labor interventions are at the discretion of the healthcare provider. The participants will have continuous fetal monitoring throughout their induction, labor and delivery. Need for operative delivery or cesarean section will be at the discretion of the health provider.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 6 hour foley | Experimental | Device: Foley catheter lengthThe participant will have a cook catheter inserted digitally or by direct visualization with a speculum with the uterine component of the balloon inflated to maximum 60mL. The catheter will be taped to the inner thigh with gentle traction. Participants will be started on hospital-based oxytocin protocol. The cook catheter will then be removed at 6 hours, determined by randomization. At that point health care providers will manage active labor. |
| 12 hour foley | No intervention | –The participant will have a cook catheter inserted digitally or by direct visualization with a speculum with the uterine component of the balloon inflated to maximum 60mL. The catheter will be taped to the inner thigh with gentle traction. Participants will be started on hospital-based oxytocin protocol. The cook catheter will then be removed at 12 hours, determined by randomization. At that point health care providers will manage active labor. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Non English speaking
- Contraindications to vaginal delivery
- Prior cesarean section
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Foley catheter lengthsee arm description | Device | 6 hour foley |
Primary outcome
Time to Delivery
Time frame: Assessed following delivery (delivery day, day 0)
Time to delivery
11 secondary outcomes
Cesarean Delivery Rate
Time frame: Assessed following delivery (delivery day, day 0)
Time to Active Labor
Time frame: Assessed following delivery (delivery day, day 0)
Delivery Within 12 Hours
Time frame: Assessed following delivery (delivery day, day 0)
Delivery Within 24 Hours
Time frame: Assessed following delivery (delivery day, day 0)
Maternal Length of Stay
Time frame: Assessed at end of study period (week 4)
Indication for Cesarean Delivery
Time frame: Assessed following delivery (delivery day, day 0)
Maternal Complications
Time frame: Assessed at end of study period (week 4)
Neonatal Complications
Time frame: Assessed at end of study period (week 4)
NICU Admission
Time frame: Assessed at end of study period (week 4)
NICU Admission >48 Hours
Time frame: Assessed at end of study period (week 4)
Neonatal Length of Stay
Time frame: Assessed at end of study period (week 4)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jun 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 27500341Battarbee AN, Palatnik A, Peress DA, Grobman WA. Association of Early Amniotomy After Foley Balloon Catheter Ripening and Duration of Nulliparous Labor Induction. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;128(3):592-597. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001563.
- Background: PubMed 11687101Boulvain M, Kelly A, Lohse C, Stan C, Irion O. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(4):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.
- Background: PubMed 21272849Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Agosti M, Serati M, Uccella S, Arlant V, Bolis P. Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Apr;204(4):338.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.11.029. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
- Background: PubMed 26727629Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Births: Final Data for 2014. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015 Dec;64(12):1-64.
- Background: PubMed 27824758Levine LD, Downes KL, Elovitz MA, Parry S, Sammel MD, Srinivas SK. Mechanical and Pharmacologic Methods of Labor Induction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Dec;128(6):1357-1364. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001778.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33771496Lassey SC, Haber HR, Kanbergs A, Robinson JN, Little SE. Six versus twelve hours of single-balloon catheter placement with oxytocin administration for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun;224(6):611.e1-611.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.03.021. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Research only shared within study staff
Related trials for Induction of Labor
Active, not recruiting
Implementation of a Disparities in Labor Outcomes Dashboard
Labor Induction, Cesarean Birth
Recruiting
Optimization of Saturation Targets And Resuscitation Trial (OptiSTART)
Premature Infants, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
RecruitingPhase 3
Preeclampsia Intervention Netherlands
Pre-Eclampsia Onset Less Than 37 Weeks, Pre-Eclampsia
Not yet recruiting
A Study to Lower Blood Pressure One Year After Childbirth in Women Who Had Preeclampsia
Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes, Cardiovascular Diseases
Not yet recruiting
Pre-Examination Reflexology for Anxiety and Pain During Pelvic Examination
Anxiety
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sarah E Little, MD principal investigator
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Foley catheter length in people with Induction of Labor, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Jun 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to Delivery (time frame: Assessed following delivery (delivery day, day 0)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04233008, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jun 2022.