AzTrials
AzTrials

Anesthesia, ObstetricalPhase 4NCT04205344

Subarachnoid Bupivacaine in Obese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery

A Phase 4 study testing Bupivacaine 5 mg and Bupivacaine 10 mg in people with Anesthesia, Obstetrical, run by Hospital Civil de Guadalajara at 1 site in Mexico.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study evaluates the effect of subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine on mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) of pregnant patients with obesity undergoing cesarean section half of the patients will receive subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine at a dose of 5 mg while the other half will receive a dose of 10 mg Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Anesthesia, Obstetrical
What is being tested?
Bupivacaine 5 mg and Bupivacaine 10 mg
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteMexico
Study dates
1 Feb 2017to 30 May 2018
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with single fetus pregnancy ≥37 weeks gestation
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg / m2
  • Indication of termination of pregnancy via abdominal caesarean section
  • Indication of subarachnoid neuraxial block under mixed technique
  • Signing of consent under information

Who cannot join

  • Patients with a known allergy to local anesthetics
  • Patients with psychiatric treatment (antidepressants, anxiolytics, antipsychotics)
  • Patients with addiction to any type of drug
  • Patients with a history of liver disease
  • Patients with a history of renal pathology
  • Patients with a history of pulmonary pathology
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Patients with a history of cardiac pathology
  • Patients with a history of high blood pressure
  • Patient with a history of type I, II and gestational diabetes
  • Non-calming fetal state
  • Patients who refuse the anesthetic technique of neuraxial block

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Mexico1 site
  • Hospital Civil de Guadalajara

    Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44280

Other trials in Mexico

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness of Subarachnoid Hyperbaric Bupivacaine on Mean Arterial Blood Pressure in Pregnant Patients With Obesity Operated by Cesarean Section

This study evaluates the effect of subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine on mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) of pregnant patients with obesity undergoing cesarean section half of the patients will receive subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine at a dose of 5 mg while the other half will receive a dose of 10 mg

Read the detailed description

Once the patients were admitted to the toco-surgery work area, patients over 18 years of age were captured, with pregnancy ≥37 weeks of gestation, which, based on weight and height prior to pregnancy, obesity is diagnosed with a BMI ≥30 kg / m2 and that had an indication of termination of pregnancy via abdominal caesarean section without compromising fetal well-being. Specifically, the objectives of the study protocol, benefits and risks were given and it was given to choose an envelope containing the consent letter under information, the data collection sheet and the group to which it was assigned. He was granted the consent letter under information to sign; the same procedure was performed with the husband or relative responsible for the patient They underwent pre-anesthetic evaluation, background check and review of laboratory tests, as well as taking vital signs such as non-invasive blood pressure, mean blood pressure (PAM), O2 saturation and heart rate, Fetal heart rate was taken with adult stethoscope. The administration of Hartmann solution at 10ml /kg pregestational weight and premedication with ranitidine 50 mg and metoclopramide 10 mg was informed prior to admission to the operating room In the operating room, room preparation was carried out with material for anesthesiology corresponding laryngoscope, intubation cannulas, oropharyngeal cannulas, verification of operation of anesthesia machine, verification of material of blocking equipment, needles, syringes, alcohol and iodo povidone; Verify hyperbaric bupivacaine drugs, ephedrine and atropine. In case of requiring a change in anesthetic technique, general anesthesia have necessary fentanyl opioid drugs, propofol inducer and rocuronium muscle relaxant. Preparation of emergency drugs atropine and ephedrine dilution of 1 ampoule in 10 ml of diluent solution. The patient was transferred to the operating room, baseline vital signs were taken, non-invasive blood pressure, MAP, O2 saturation and heart rate with the monitor team Simultaneously fetal heart rate was taken Permeability of peripheral pathways was verified The patient was placed in a sitting position and started with mixed technique neuraxial anesthetic anesthetic technique (placement of peridural catheter + subarachnoid block with brand blocking equipment) The anatomical reference of the intervertebral space L2-L3, L3-L4 was located in a seated position. Aseptic and antiseptic technique was performed with iodo povidone, and subsequently removed with alcohol Sterile fields were placed Skin and subcutaneous tissue were infiltrated with 2% lidocaine 5 ml of the selected intervertebral space Tuohy needle No. 17 was introduced with the "Gout of Gutierrez" technique, until the location was found, it was corroborated with the "resistance loss" technique. Through the Tuohy needle, the spinal needle "whitacre" pencil No. 27 was introduced until cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was obtained. The dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine blockade of 10 mg (2 ml) or mg (1 ml) was administered agreement with the assigned group, in approximately 20 seconds; the spinal needle pencil tip "whitacre" and an epidural catheter was introduced with cephalic direction and left 5 cm inside the epidural space, left inert. Catheter was attached to the back with adhesive tape The patient was placed in a dorsal recumbent position with a shifting wedge placement on the right hip approximately 15 degrees to the left. Vital signs monitoring was started every 3 minutes for the first 15 minutes and then every 5 minutes until the end of the anesthetic procedure When obtaining PAM record of less than 20% at baseline, ephedrine 10 mg is administered and total doses required were recorded until PAM records were recovered above 20% of baseline. Together with the record of the first taking of vital signs, the fetal heart rate was taken again After the second vital signs were taken, (3 minutes), a sensory block evaluation was started with a puncture technique from the dermatome where the block was placed and the ascending dermatome was registered where the patient reported pain. This assessment was performed every 3 minutes for the first 15 minutes, and then every 15 minutes until the end of the surgery. The blocking level was considered adequate to initiate the surgical procedure when the loss of sensitivity in the T4 dermatome was reached. After the second vital signs were taken (3 minutes), a motor block assessment with a Bromage scale was initiated, in which the patient was instructed to make movements with her legs to assess the capacity of movement that still remains. This assessment was performed every 3 minutes for the first 15 minutes, and then every 15 minutes until the end of the surgery After the second vital signs were taken (3 minutes), the patient was asked if she had a feeling of nausea or the presence of vomiting and was registered. At the extraction of the fetus, the Apgar assessment granted by the attached neonatology doctor at one minute and at 5 minutes of extrauterine life was recorded. Once the placenta was illuminated, a sample was taken for gasometry with a heparinized syringe of the umbilical artery and sent to the laboratory for processing. A dose of local anesthetic was administered via a 5% lidocaine 2% peridural catheter if necessary, when the patient reported discomfort or pain (referred to the decrease in sensory block) and the surgical procedure has not been completed. The time at which subsequent doses are administered is recorded The information collected was recorded on the data collection sheet. The presence of adverse reactions to drugs or the anesthetic technique were recorded in the adverse event sheets. The sample size was calculated with a formula for comparison of two means with finite population.

No results are found in previous publications with a statistically significant P, so a pilot test is carried out based on the specified criteria, which includes 30 patients, 15 patients in the group administered 5 mg of Subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine and 15 patients in the group who were administered 10 mg of the same drug, and a standard deviation of 14.46 was obtained for the maximum blood hypotension variable recorded. For the development of the finite population formula, the total of anesthesiology procedures is quantified, the total of cesarean surgeries performed in the operating rooms of the toco-surgery of the Civil Hospital of Guadalajara Fray Antonio Alcalde in 2015; where a total of 1,218 caesarean sections are obtained y Calculated losses 25% pregnant women with obesity per group N = 40 patients. The statistical analysis was carried out once both study groups were completed. The groups were divided with the assignment codes to group 5 or 10. The database was formed in the Microsoft Office Excel 2013 program, which was exported to the statistical program Statistics Product and Service Solution (SPSS) version 22 in order to carry out the data analysis. All patients were included in the statistical analysis. The data obtained are expressed through measures of central tendency and dispersion, mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables, and frequencies and percentages in the case of qualitative variables. Due to the sample size, it is decided to use non-parametric tests for data analysis. The intra-group differences for the quantitative variables were determined by the Wilcoxon rank test, while the differences between the groups were determined with the Mann Whitney U test. Qualitative variables were analyzed through the Chi Square test. A value of p≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Being tested
Bupivacaine 5 mg, Bupivacaine 10 mg
Keywords
Bupivacaine, Obesity, Pregnant, Subarachnoid, Cesarean, Subdural
Medical subject headings
Obesity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Bupivacaine 5 mgDrug

    Also called hyperbaric bupivacaine 1ml, bupivacaine/Dextrose 1ml

    Receive subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine at a dose of 5 mg

  • Bupivacaine 10 mgDrug

    Also called hyperbaric bupivacaine 2 ml, bupivacaine/Dextrose 1 ml

    Receive subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine at a dose of 10 mg

Study groups in NCT04205344
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bupivacaine 5 mgExperimentalReceive subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine at a dose of 5 mg
Receives: Drug: Bupivacaine 5 mg
Bupivacaine 10 mgExperimentalReceive subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine at a dose of 10 mg
Receives: Drug: Bupivacaine 10 mg

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Assess the mean blood pressure

    Number of participants with a decrease in mean arterial blood pressure after administration of subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine at a dose of 5 mg and 10 mg to preserve the mean blood pressure in pregnant patients with obesity undergoing caesarean section

    Measured: 2 hours

  2. Determine the effects on the heart rate

    Number of participants presenting changes in heart rate such as bradycardia (heart rate less than 60 beats minute) or tachycardia (heart rate greater than 120 beats minute) after administration of subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine in the pregnant patients with obesity, after subarachnoid block

    Measured: 2 hour

  3. Determine the effects on the respiratory rate

    Number of participants presenting changes in respiratory rate such as bradypnea (respiratory rate less than 12 minute breaths) after administration of subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine in the pregnant patient with obesity, after subarachnoid block

    Measured: 2 hour

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Describe the adverse effects

    Number of participants with side effects such as nausea or vomiting after administration of subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine in the pregnant patient with obesity, after subarachnoid block.

    Measured: 2 hours

  2. Identify the level of sensory blockade

    The number of participants with adequate sensory block (thoracic dermatome 4 is defined as adequate to begin the surgical technique), the level of sensory block reached after the subarachnoid block; The sensory block was evaluated using pinprick. Every 3 minutes the first 15 minutes after the subarcnoid block.

    Measured: 15 minutes

  3. Identify the intensity of motor blockade

    The number of participants with adequate intensity of motor blockade achieved after subarachnoid block, the intensity of the motor block was evaluated with the bromage scale (I Free movement of legs and feet. II Just able to flex Knees with free movement of feet, III Unable to flex knees, but with free movement of feet. IV Unable to move legs or feet) Level IV was considered adequate motor block. Every 3 minutes the first 15 minutes after the subarachnoid block.

    Measured: 15 minutes

  4. Measure the duration of the block

    Measure the duration of the block with a dose of 5 mg and 10 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine via subarachnoid route in pregnant patients with obesity

    Measured: 2 hour

  5. Describe the adverse effects on the fetus

    The number of patients with any side effect associated with the fetal bradycardia anesthetic technique (Fetal heart rate less than 120 beats minute) cardiac arrest (Fetal heart rate less than 100 beats minute) And in the newborn fetal acidosis (umbilical vein gasometry with Hydrogen Potential (pH) <7.0 or excess bases >-12 mmol/L)

    Measured: 1 hour

  6. Document the Apgar score

    Document the Apgar score in the newborn. (Apgar Score evaluate five sign: color, heart rate, reflex irritability, muscle tone and respiration) The score ranges from 0 to 2 per sign according to the criteria of the neonatologist, to grant a maximum score of 10 points. A grade of less than 7 points is considered low Apgar scores. This scores is registered t minute and five minutes of life.

    Measured: 5 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Dec 2019
  2. Study start1 Feb 2017
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2017
  4. Study completion30 May 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Clinical trial open controlled parallel randomized simple
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04205344
Sponsor's protocol ID
005/16
Status last verified
Dec 2019
First submitted
7 Dec 2019
Last updated
23 Dec 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Teoh WH, Thomas E, Tan HM. Ultra-low dose combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with intrathecal bupivacaine 3.75 mg for cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2006 Oct;15(4):273-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.03.004. Epub 2006 Jun 13.

    PubMed 16774830
  • Tonidandel A, Booth J, D'Angelo R, Harris L, Tonidandel S. Anesthetic and obstetric outcomes in morbidly obese parturients: a 20-year follow-up retrospective cohort study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2014 Nov;23(4):357-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 Jun 4.

    PubMed 25201313
  • Ouzounian JG, Elkayam U. Physiologic changes during normal pregnancy and delivery. Cardiol Clin. 2012 Aug;30(3):317-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Jun 20.

    PubMed 22813360
  • Hood DD, Dewan DM. Anesthetic and obstetric outcome in morbidly obese parturients. Anesthesiology. 1993 Dec;79(6):1210-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199312000-00011.

    PubMed 8267196
  • Tan T, Sia AT. Anesthesia considerations in the obese gravida. Semin Perinatol. 2011 Dec;35(6):350-5. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2011.05.021.

    PubMed 22108086
  • Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Tan PE, Ng FF, Karmakar MK. Placental transfer and fetal metabolic effects of phenylephrine and ephedrine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2009 Sep;111(3):506-12. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b160a3.

    PubMed 19672175
  • Lee Y, Balki M, Parkes R, Carvalho JC. Dose requirement of intrathecal bupivacaine for cesarean delivery is similar in obese and normal weight women. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2009 Nov-Dec;59(6):674-83. doi: 10.1016/s0034-7094(09)70092-3. English, Portuguese.

    PubMed 20011857
  • Carvalho B, Collins J, Drover DR, Atkinson Ralls L, Riley ET. ED(50) and ED(95) of intrathecal bupivacaine in morbidly obese patients undergoing cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology. 2011 Mar;114(3):529-35. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318209a92d.

    PubMed 21307769
  • Ring LE. The anesthetic approach to operative delivery of the extremely obese parturient. Semin Perinatol. 2014 Oct;38(6):341-8. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Aug 19.

    PubMed 25146109
  • Badve MH, Golfeiz C, Vallejo MC. Anesthetic considerations for the morbid obese parturient. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2014 Summer;52(3):132-47. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0000000000000024. No abstract available.

    PubMed 24946047
  • Lamon AM, Habib AS. Managing anesthesia for cesarean section in obese patients: current perspectives. Local Reg Anesth. 2016 Aug 16;9:45-57. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S64279. eCollection 2016.

    PubMed 27574464
  • Dennis AT, Castro JM, Ong M, Carr C. Haemodynamics in obese pregnant women. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2012 Apr;21(2):129-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2011.11.007. Epub 2012 Feb 11.

    PubMed 22326199
  • Rodrigues FR, Brandao MJ. Regional anesthesia for cesarean section in obese pregnant women: a retrospective study. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2011 Jan-Feb;61(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(11)70002-2.

    PubMed 21334503
  • Wise RA, Polito AJ, Krishnan V. Respiratory physiologic changes in pregnancy. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2006 Feb;26(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2005.10.004.

    PubMed 16443140
  • Chandra S, Tripathi AK, Mishra S, Amzarul M, Vaish AK. Physiological changes in hematological parameters during pregnancy. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2012 Sep;28(3):144-6. doi: 10.1007/s12288-012-0175-6. Epub 2012 Jul 15.

    PubMed 23997449

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Bupivacaine 5 mg and Bupivacaine 10 mg in people with Anesthesia, Obstetrical, run by Hospital Civil de Guadalajara at 1 site in Mexico.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Mexico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Assess the mean blood pressure (time frame: 2 hours). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04205344, which also lists 31 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Dec 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in