ObstetricANGLEDNCT07667010
Hyperangulated vs. Macintosh Style Blades for Intubation in Obstetric Patients
A study testing Macintosh Style Blade and Hyperangulated blade in people with Obstetric and Cesarean Birth, run by Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Cesarean section under general anesthesia requires intubation (insertion of a tube through the mouth into the breathing pipe to support breathing during the surgery). A device called a video laryngoscope is used, which has a smooth, curved, or less curved component called 'a blade' that helps the doctor gently see the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Obstetric, Cesarean Birth, Airway Anesthesia
- What is being tested?
- Macintosh Style Blade and Hyperangulated blade
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 15 Jun 2026to 30 Jun 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 1. Pregnant patients undergoing emergency or urgent cesarean delivery under general anesthesia requiring tracheal intubation.
Who cannot join
- No tracheal intubation performed and (ii) patient refusal of consent.
- Patients not receiving general anesthesia.
- Patients that previously participated in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Canada1 site
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5
Fabricio Zasso, MD, 416-586-4800 ext. 5270, fabricio.zasso@uhn.ca
Fabricio Zasso, MD
About this study
Official title: HyperANGulated Versus Macintosh styLE blaDes for INtubation in OBstetric Patients: a Cluster Randomized Feasibility Study
Cesarean section under general anesthesia requires intubation (insertion of a tube through the mouth into the breathing pipe to support breathing during the surgery). A device called a video laryngoscope is used, which has a smooth, curved, or less curved component called 'a blade' that helps the doctor gently see the voice box and guide the breathing tube safely into place during anesthesia; it is not a sharp tool blade.
There are two types of video laryngoscopes blades: a Macintosh- style blade with a gentle curve, approximately 90 degrees) and a hyperangulated blade (with a more pronounced curve).
Read more
Although video laryngoscopes are safe and both types have been used for around 20 years, it is not known whether one type works better that the other in patients undergoing cesarean delivery under general anesthesia. Because general anesthesia is used in only a small proportion (about 5%) of all cesarean deliveries, research in this area is limited.
The main purpose of the study is to assess if a study comparing these two types of blades in the obstetric population is feasible. This is also known as a feasibility study, which aims to test the study plan and determine whether enough participants will join a larger study and accept the study procedures. The results will be used as a guide for a larger study.
Read the detailed description
Study design and setting.
This will be a single-site, prospective feasibility study conducted within the Department of Anesthesia and Pain management, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, a high-volume tertiary obstetric centre with established expertise in obstetric anesthesia and airway research.
Intervention and Cluster Assignment
Because individual randomization immediately before induction is often impractical in obstetric emergencies, blade assignment will occur by randomized time-based clusters. Randomization will occur in 4 clusters of 4 months each, separated by one-month washout periods. Four consecutive four-month periods will be randomly assigned to use either a hyperangulated or Macintosh-style blade as the default for the first intubation attempt. Clinicians may deviate from the assigned blade for patient safety. The time-block design minimizes contamination associated with rapid decision-making in obstetric emergencies and aligns with real-world workflow on labour and delivery units.
Randomization
Time-block cluster allocation will be generated by a study statistician who is not involved in clinical care, participant enrollment, or study implementation. The allocation schedule will be finalized prior to study initiation and maintained without modification.
Data Collection
A trained research assistant will extract patient demographic and perioperative data from the electronic medical record and confirm key airway variables with the attending anesthesiologist within 72 hours of Cesarean delivery (CD). Patients will be contacted by telephone on postoperative day 3 to assess airway-related morbidity, including minor oral or dental injuries (lacerations of the lips, teeth, tongue, or oral mucosa) and postoperative sore throat.
Outcomes
The primary feasibility outcomes are patient enrollment, intervention adherence, and data completeness .
Each feasibility outcome will be assessed against its predefined threshold to determine whether to proceed to a full-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT), proceed with protocol modifications, or discontinue the study if feasibility cannot be achieved despite modifications. Recruitment strategies will be adapted if enrollment falls below two patients per week for several consecutive weeks. Feasibility will be interpreted using a green/yellow/red framework. Outcomes meeting green thresholds will be considered feasible (>80%); outcomes meeting yellow thresholds will prompt protocol modification (60-79%); and outcomes meeting red thresholds will be considered not feasible (<60%). Secondary exploratory outcomes include first-attempt intubation success, number of intubation attempts, need for rescue airway techniques, and airway-related complications.
Potential risks associated:
This study poses minimal risk to participants, as it compares two standard-of-care video-laryngoscope blades used by experienced clinicians, with no restriction on clinical judgment or rescue airway management. Both hyperangulated and Macintosh-style video-laryngoscope blades are widely used, approved devices and are part of standard clinical practice at Mount Sinai Hospital. No experimental devices or techniques are being introduced. The choice of blade does not expose participants to risks beyond those already inherent to general anesthesia (GA) and tracheal intubation for cesarean delivery.
Sample Size
A pragmatic sample of 100 participants will be enrolled over 19 months. This sample is sufficient to estimate feasibility parameters with acceptable precision but is not powered to detect clinical superiority.
Statistical Analysis
Feasibility outcomes will be summarized descriptively using proportions and 95% confidence intervals and evaluated using the pre-specified green/yellow/red framework to guide progression to a multicentre RCT. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize patient characteristics and secondary outcomes. Categorical variables will be summarized as frequencies and percentages; continuous variables as means with standard deviation.
Significance/Importance
By establishing feasibility for a definitive multicentre RCT, this study represents a critical step toward optimizing airway management during CD under general anesthesia. Ultimately, this work has the potential to improve first-attempt intubation success, reduce airway-related complications, and enhance maternal and fetal safety nationwide.
- Conditions
- Obstetric, Cesarean Birth, Airway Anesthesia, Intubation, General Anesthesia; Tracheal Intubation, Video Laryngoscopy
- Being tested
- Macintosh Style Blade, Hyperangulated blade
- Keywords
- obstetric, obstetric anesthesia, intubation, airway safety in OB patients, video laryngoscopy, cesarean delivery, general anesthesia in cesarean delivery, macintosh blade, hyperangulated blade, intubation in OB patients, general anesthesia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Macintosh Style BladeDevice
Macintosh- style blade with a gentle curve, approximately 90 degrees
Hyperangulated bladeDevice
hyperangulated blade (with a more pronounced curve
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Macintosh style blade | Active comparator | Study patients in this arm will be intubated using a Macintosh style blade Receives: Device: Macintosh Style Blade |
| Hyperangulated blade | Active comparator | Study patients in this arm will be intubated using a Hyperangulated style blade Receives: Device: Hyperangulated blade |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient Enrollment
Percentage of eligible cesarean deliveries under general anesthesia in which patients are recruited and consented
Measured: 3 days
Intervention Adherence
Percentage of cases in which the assigned time-block blade was used for the first intubation attempt, with documentation of crossovers and reasons
Measured: 3 days
Data Completeness
Percentage of patients with complete data on key airway and perioperative outcomes including postoperatively 3-day follow-up data.
Measured: 3 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jun 2026
- Study start15 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for ObstetricStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Cluster randomization study, with a parallel interventional study model. Participants undergoing a Cesarean delivery (CD) under general anesthesia are assigned to intubation with either a Macintosh- or Hyperangulated-style blade. This assignment of participants is based on the 4-month time block at Mount Sinai Hospital's anesthesia department, which uses either the Macintosh- or Hyperangulated-style blade for airway intubation. Participants undergo general anesthesia (and airway intubation) based on the blade strategy that is in place during their procedure at Mount Sinai Hospital.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07667010
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1599
- Acronym
- ANGLED
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 15 Jun 2026
- Last updated
- 24 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: This is a feasibility study