End Stage Renal DiseaseNCT04163614
Blood Pressure Slopes and Ultrafiltration in Hemodialysis Patients
A study testing IBPS-Guided Ultrafiltration in people with End Stage Renal Disease and Hypertension, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Kidney failure has been recognized as one of the most costly chronic conditions among United States Veterans. Approximately 13,000 Veterans develop kidney failure each year, and most require hemodialysis initiation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- End Stage Renal Disease, Hypertension, Extracellular Volume Overload
- What is being tested?
- IBPS-Guided Ultrafiltration
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 48 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 10 Feb 2021to 1 Oct 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Hemodialysis patient
- Pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure greater than 140 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) averaged over 2 weeks OR post-dialysis systolic blood pressure greater than 130 millimeters of mercury averaged over 2 weeks
Who cannot join
- HemoDialysis Vintage Less than 2 months
- Pregnancy
- Mean systolic blood pressure nadir <95 millimeters of mercury in 2 weeks screening
- Mean pre- or post-dialysis systolic blood pressure >180 millimeters of mercury
- Mean pre to post-HD decrease in blood pressure >60 millimeters of mercury
- Routine intradialytic clonidine use
Show all 10Show fewer
- Routine intradialytic midodrine use
- Documented antihypertensive medication non-adherence
- Mean ultrafiltration rate >13 milliliters per kilogram per hour (mL/kg/hr) during 2 week screening
- For bioimpedance measurements only: amputation of a major extremity, presence of cardiac defibrillator or pacemaker, presence of a metallic implant (prosthetic joint)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
VA North Texas Health Care System Dallas VA Medical Center, Dallas, TX
Dallas, Texas, 75216-7167
About this study
Official title: Using Intradialytic Blood Pressure Slopes to Guide Ultrafiltration in Hemodialysis Patients
Kidney failure has been recognized as one of the most costly chronic conditions among United States Veterans. Approximately 13,000 Veterans develop kidney failure each year, and most require hemodialysis initiation. Hemodialysis patients suffer significantly increased risk of death and hospitalizations, and excessive body fluid is a major cause of this. While empiric aggressive fluid removal during dialysis is one approach to limit fluid overload, this can cause dangerous decreases in blood pressure during dialysis that independently contribute to the high death rate. In this study, I aim to test a new strategy that prescribes fluid removal based on a patient's recent blood pressure patterns during dialysis. This clinical trial will compare my strategy to standard care and assess the outcomes of overall blood pressure change between dialysis treatments in addition to the number of times the blood pressure becomes dangerously low during dialysis. Another aim is to determine how differences in the structure and function of the heart influence blood pressure during dialysis.
Read the detailed description
United States Veterans have disproportionately higher risk for end stage renal disease (ESRD) compared to the general population. Veterans with ESRD on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) suffer from alarmingly high mortality rates and hospitalizations mainly related to cardiovascular disease. Extracellular volume (ECV) excess is a primary contributing factor to cardiovascular disease and the heightened mortality rate in HD patients. Extracellular volume excess remains difficult to identify in clinical practice, and the standard approach to fluid management in the clinical setting involves arbitrary trial and error attempts to remove fluid without invoking hemodynamic instability such as intradialytic hypotension. Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is a useful research tool for assessing ECV; however, it is not feasible in routine practice, and there is little data on how its use affects intermediate and hard clinical outcomes. There is an unmet need for an approach to guide ultrafiltration in clinical practice that addresses both reduction of ECV and other mortality outcomes as well as minimization of intradialytic hypotension. The long-term goal of this study is to develop a more precise, patient-specific fluid management approach to be tested in a large clinical trial aimed at reducing mortality in Veterans on HD. The overall objective of this project is to utilize the investigators' novel, patient-specific ultrafiltration algorithm as an intervention in a clinical trial using mortality risk factors as the primary outcomes. The central hypothesis is that prescribing ultrafiltration prospectively based on an individual patient's intradialytic blood pressure slopes (IBPS) from recent treatments is superior to standard care at reducing ambulatory blood pressure and ECV without increasing risk for intradialytic hypotension. Aim 1 will use an un-blinded, controlled randomized clinical trial to demonstrate the effects of an IBPS-based ultrafiltration prescription compared to standard clinical practice. Each month, updated ultrafiltration prescriptions for the IBPS group will be determined based on the most recent treatment data. The primary outcome will be change in mean systolic 44-hour ambulatory blood pressure after 4 months. Other outcomes will include 1) change in post-HD ECV/body weight using multifrequency bioimpedance spectroscopy, 2) change in post-HD total peripheral resistance index using a non-invasive cardiac output monitor, and 3) between-group comparison of the frequency of intradialytic hypotension and intradialytic symptoms. Aim 2 will involve a cross sectional analysis of baseline data of subjects from Aim 1 in addition to consecutive enrollment of additional hypertensive HD patients. In addition to Aim 1 measurements, subjects will undergo transthoracic echocardiograms on a non-HD day to obtain measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction as a metric of systolic function, mitral inflow and mitral annulus velocities as a metric of diastolic function, and left ventricular mass index. Mixed linear models will be used to determine how these metrics independently influence the association between ECV/body weight and IBPS. The strength of the association between IBPS and ECV/body weight will then be determined within each tertile of the distributions of systolic and diastolic dysfunction. Finally, there will be an assessment of how the echocardiogram based metrics influence the likelihood of intradialytic hypotension with prospective follow up while controlling for ECV/body weight. If successful, this study will provide nephrologists with an easily-implemented, individualized approach to fluid management in Veterans on HD that safely reduces ECV excess and related mortality risk factors. Because no approach currently exits, this could immediately change clinical practice of managing Veterans with ESRD. The long term impact will be the opportunity to utilize the data generated to design a large, multi-center trial directly evaluating this intervention's effect on mortality in Veterans with ESRD on HD. The observed reduction in blood pressure can be used to determine expected mortality, while the echocardiogram data can be used to determine phenotypes of patients that may need to be considered for inclusion/exclusion criteria.
- Conditions
- End Stage Renal Disease, Hypertension, Extracellular Volume Overload, Intradialytic Hypotension
- Being tested
- IBPS-Guided Ultrafiltration
- Keywords
- End Stage Renal Disease, Hypertension, Extracellular Volume, Intradialytic Hypotension, Bioimpedance Spectroscopy
- Medical subject headings
- Kidney Failure, Chronic, Hypertension
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IBPS-Guided UltrafiltrationOther
Each month, the study investigator will review the average intradialytic blood pressure slope from the prior two weeks. A prespecified algorithm will be used to prescribe additional fluid removal/weight reduction based on this slope.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | Participants in the control group will have their blood pressure, fluid status, as well as all other aspects of clinical care managed in entirety by their treating nephrologists. |
| IBPS (Intradialytic Blood Pressure Slope) Arm | Experimental | IBPS participants will have their target weight adjusted each month by the study investigator based on recent assessment of intradialytic blood pressure slopes. Receives: Other: IBPS-Guided Ultrafiltration |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure
Will compare between-group difference in change in ambulatory systolic blood pressure from baseline to 4-month follow up
Measured: 4 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Extracellular Volume
Will compare the between-group difference in change in post-dialysis extracellular water/body weight measured with multifrequency bioimpedance spectroscopy.
Measured: 4 months
Total Peripheral Resistance Index
Will compare the between-group difference in change in post-dialysis total peripheral resistance index measured with a non-invasive cardiac output monitor.
Measured: 4 months
Intradialytic Hypotension
The investigators will compare the between-group difference in the occurrence of intradialytic systolic blood pressure nadir less than 90 and 95 millimeters of mercury (mmHg).
Measured: 4 months
Association Between intradialytic blood pressure slope with systolic and diastolic dysfunction
The investigators will analyze the correlation between intradialytic blood pressure slopes with both ejection fraction and mitral inflow/mitral annuls velocities measured with transthoracic echocardiograms
Measured: 3 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Nov 2019
- Study start10 Feb 2021
- Primary completion1 Oct 2026
- Study completion1 Oct 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for End Stage Renal DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by VA Office of Research and DevelopmentThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Active Control Participants will be managed in entirety by their treating nephrologists. The intradialytic blood pressure slope (IBPS) group will have their target weight adjusted each month by study investigator based on recent intradialytic blood pressure slopes
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and Development
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Peter Noel Van Buren, MD, Principal investigator, VA North Texas Health Care System Dallas VA Medical Center, Dallas, TX
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04163614
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NEPH-020-19S
- Other IDs
- 5I01CX002009-06
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 12 Nov 2019
- Last updated
- 29 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Using Intradialytic Blood Pressure Slopes to Guide Ultrafiltration in Hemodialysis Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04163614
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NEPH-020-19S
- Conditions
- End Stage Renal Disease, Hypertension, Extracellular Volume Overload, Intradialytic Hypotension
- Keywords
- End Stage Renal Disease, Hypertension, Extracellular Volume, Intradialytic Hypotension, Bioimpedance Spectroscopy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and DevelopmentUS federal agency
- Study start
- 10 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Kidney failure has been recognized as one of the most costly chronic conditions among United States Veterans. Approximately 13,000 Veterans develop kidney failure each year, and most require hemodialysis initiation. Hemodialysis patients suffer significantly increased risk of death and hospitalizations, and excessive body fluid is a major cause of this. While empiric aggressive fluid removal during dialysis is one approach to limit fluid overload, this can cause dangerous decreases in blood pressure during dialysis that independently contribute to the high death rate. In this study, I aim to test a new strategy that prescribes fluid removal based on a patient's recent blood pressure patterns during dialysis. This clinical trial will compare my strategy to standard care and assess the outcomes of overall blood pressure change between dialysis treatments in addition to the number of times the blood pressure becomes dangerously low during dialysis. Another aim is to determine how differences in the structure and function of the heart influence blood pressure during dialysis.
Detailed description
United States Veterans have disproportionately higher risk for end stage renal disease (ESRD) compared to the general population. Veterans with ESRD on maintenance hemodialysis (HD) suffer from alarmingly high mortality rates and hospitalizations mainly related to cardiovascular disease. Extracellular volume (ECV) excess is a primary contributing factor to cardiovascular disease and the heightened mortality rate in HD patients. Extracellular volume excess remains difficult to identify in clinical practice, and the standard approach to fluid management in the clinical setting involves arbitrary trial and error attempts to remove fluid without invoking hemodynamic instability such as intradialytic hypotension. Bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) is a useful research tool for assessing ECV; however, it is not feasible in routine practice, and there is little data on how its use affects intermediate and hard clinical outcomes. There is an unmet need for an approach to guide ultrafiltration in clinical practice that addresses both reduction of ECV and other mortality outcomes as well as minimization of intradialytic hypotension. The long-term goal of this study is to develop a more precise, patient-specific fluid management approach to be tested in a large clinical trial aimed at reducing mortality in Veterans on HD. The overall objective of this project is to utilize the investigators' novel, patient-specific ultrafiltration algorithm as an intervention in a clinical trial using mortality risk factors as the primary outcomes. The central hypothesis is that prescribing ultrafiltration prospectively based on an individual patient's intradialytic blood pressure slopes (IBPS) from recent treatments is superior to standard care at reducing ambulatory blood pressure and ECV without increasing risk for intradialytic hypotension. Aim 1 will use an un-blinded, controlled randomized clinical trial to demonstrate the effects of an IBPS-based ultrafiltration prescription compared to standard clinical practice. Each month, updated ultrafiltration prescriptions for the IBPS group will be determined based on the most recent treatment data. The primary outcome will be change in mean systolic 44-hour ambulatory blood pressure after 4 months. Other outcomes will include 1) change in post-HD ECV/body weight using multifrequency bioimpedance spectroscopy, 2) change in post-HD total peripheral resistance index using a non-invasive cardiac output monitor, and 3) between-group comparison of the frequency of intradialytic hypotension and intradialytic symptoms. Aim 2 will involve a cross sectional analysis of baseline data of subjects from Aim 1 in addition to consecutive enrollment of additional hypertensive HD patients. In addition to Aim 1 measurements, subjects will undergo transthoracic echocardiograms on a non-HD day to obtain measurements of left ventricular ejection fraction as a metric of systolic function, mitral inflow and mitral annulus velocities as a metric of diastolic function, and left ventricular mass index. Mixed linear models will be used to determine how these metrics independently influence the association between ECV/body weight and IBPS. The strength of the association between IBPS and ECV/body weight will then be determined within each tertile of the distributions of systolic and diastolic dysfunction. Finally, there will be an assessment of how the echocardiogram based metrics influence the likelihood of intradialytic hypotension with prospective follow up while controlling for ECV/body weight. If successful, this study will provide nephrologists with an easily-implemented, individualized approach to fluid management in Veterans on HD that safely reduces ECV excess and related mortality risk factors. Because no approach currently exits, this could immediately change clinical practice of managing Veterans with ESRD. The long term impact will be the opportunity to utilize the data generated to design a large, multi-center trial directly evaluating this intervention's effect on mortality in Veterans with ESRD on HD. The observed reduction in blood pressure can be used to determine expected mortality, while the echocardiogram data can be used to determine phenotypes of patients that may need to be considered for inclusion/exclusion criteria.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Active Control Participants will be managed in entirety by their treating nephrologists. The intradialytic blood pressure slope (IBPS) group will have their target weight adjusted each month by study investigator based on recent intradialytic blood pressure slopes
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | –Participants in the control group will have their blood pressure, fluid status, as well as all other aspects of clinical care managed in entirety by their treating nephrologists. |
| IBPS (Intradialytic Blood Pressure Slope) Arm | Experimental | Other: IBPS-Guided UltrafiltrationIBPS participants will have their target weight adjusted each month by the study investigator based on recent assessment of intradialytic blood pressure slopes. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Hemodialysis patient
- Pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure greater than 140 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) averaged over 2 weeks OR post-dialysis systolic blood pressure greater than 130 millimeters of mercury averaged over 2 weeks
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- HemoDialysis Vintage Less than 2 months
- Pregnancy
- Mean systolic blood pressure nadir <95 millimeters of mercury in 2 weeks screening
- Mean pre- or post-dialysis systolic blood pressure >180 millimeters of mercury
- Mean pre to post-HD decrease in blood pressure >60 millimeters of mercury
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IBPS-Guided UltrafiltrationEach month, the study investigator will review the average intradialytic blood pressure slope from the prior two weeks. A prespecified algorithm will be used to prescribe additional fluid removal/weight reduction based on this slope. | Other | IBPS (Intradialytic Blood Pressure Slope) Arm |
Primary outcome
Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure
Time frame: 4 months
Will compare between-group difference in change in ambulatory systolic blood pressure from baseline to 4-month follow up
4 secondary outcomes
Extracellular Volume
Time frame: 4 months
Total Peripheral Resistance Index
Time frame: 4 months
Intradialytic Hypotension
Time frame: 4 months
Association Between intradialytic blood pressure slope with systolic and diastolic dysfunction
Time frame: 3 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for End Stage Renal Disease
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Safety and Efficacy of Empagliflozin in Hemodialysis
End Stage Renal Disease
Not yet recruiting
Hypothermic Kidney Machine Perfusion With Omnisol
End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Kidney Transplant
Recruiting
Guiding Optimal Blood Pressure Management in Peritoneal Dialysis Pilot Trial
End Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD), Hypertension (HTN)
RecruitingObservational study
Physical Impairments in Children With Chronic Renal Failure
Chronic Kidney Failure, Chronic Kidney Diseases
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Test the Safety of the Study Drug Fosmanogepix and How the Body Handles It in Adults With Severe Kidney Failure on Dialysis
End Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis, Adult
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Peter Noel Van Buren, MD principal investigator
VA North Texas Health Care System Dallas VA Medical Center, Dallas, TX
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing IBPS-Guided Ultrafiltration in people with End Stage Renal Disease and Hypertension, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure (time frame: 4 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Oct 2026.