Total Knee ArthroplastyPhase 4NCT04086186
Adductor Canal Block Versus Liposomal Bupivacaine in TKA
A Phase 4 study testing Liposomal Bupivacaine Peri-articular Injection and Adductor canal block in people with Total Knee Arthroplasty and Post-operative Pain Control, run by Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center, Oregon at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a randomized prospective study of 60 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty evaluating the clinical outcomes of liposomal bupivacaine periarticular injections (PAI) when compared to single shot adductor canal block using bupivacaine HCl. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Total Knee Arthroplasty, Post-operative Pain Control
- What is being tested?
- Liposomal Bupivacaine Peri-articular Injection and Adductor canal block
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 22 Mar 2017to 18 Dec 2018
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients undergoing unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty for end stage osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis.
- All adults > 18 years of age.
Who cannot join
- Not cleared by PCP and appropriate specialists to undergo TKA (Check No if patient has been cleared.)
- Adults undergoing bilateral primary total knee arthroplasties.
- Women who are pregnant.
- Women who are breastfeeding.
- Inability to receive successful spinal anesthesia.
- Allergy to amide anesthetics.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Inability to receive IV tranexamic acid.
- Patients who are unable to speak English.
- Patients who are less than 66kg.
- Patients who are opioid dependent. We define opioid dependency as patients who are on a long-acting narcotic or patients who are taking more than six tablets of hydrocodone 5mg or equivalent.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center
Corvallis, Oregon, 97330
About this study
Official title: Clinical Outcomes of an Adductor Canal Block Versus Liposomal Bupivacaine in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients: A Randomized Prospective Study
This is a randomized prospective study of 60 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty evaluating the clinical outcomes of liposomal bupivacaine periarticular injections (PAI) when compared to single shot adductor canal block using bupivacaine HCl.
Read the detailed description
Total knee arthroplasty(TKA) is an effective solution for end stage arthritis of the knee; however, post-surgical pain can be difficult to manage and the optimal peri-operative pain management strategy has not been established. This study serves to evaluate the clinical outcomes of liposomal bupivacaine PAI when compared to single shot adductor canal block using bupivacaine HCl in patients undergoing a TKA. The investigators hypothesized that peri-articular injection with liposomal bupivacaine would not be inferior to an adductor canal block using bupivacaine HCl. A total of 60 patients were recruited. Thirty patients were randomized to receive intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine periarticular injection, and another thirty patients randomized to receive a pre-operative adductor canal block using bupivacaine. Both groups otherwise received standard pain management strategies peri-operatively. The primary outcome of interest was post-operative pain, which was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary measures included changes in patient function which was measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), knee range of motion, post-operative ambulation distance, and hospital length of stay.
- Being tested
- Liposomal Bupivacaine Peri-articular Injection, Adductor canal block
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Liposomal Bupivacaine Peri-articular InjectionProcedure or surgery
Also called Exparel peri-articular injection
A 20mL solution of 266mg of liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel) was mixed with 40mL of normal saline, which was then infiltrated consistently in the posterior capsule, medial and lateral side of the arthrotomy, patella tendon, quadriceps tendon, quadriceps musculature, and subcutaneous soft tissue.
Adductor canal blockProcedure or surgery
Anesthesiologist performs preoperative adductor canal block using 15mL of 0.5% Bupivacaine HCl
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Adductor Canal Block Group | Active comparator | Standard method for peri-operative pain control. Adductor canal block is performed by anesthesiologist prior to surgery. Receives: Procedure: Adductor canal block |
| Liposomal Bupivacaine Group | Experimental | Experimental method for peri-operative pain control. Liposomal bupivacaine peri-articular injection is performed by surgeon during surgery. Receives: Procedure: Liposomal Bupivacaine Peri-articular Injection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Visual analog pain scale ranges from zero (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain)
Measured: VAS pain score on post-operative day #1
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Visual analog pain scale ranges from zero (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain)
Measured: VAS pain score on post-operative day #2
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Visual analog pain scale ranges from zero (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain)
Measured: VAS pain score on post-operative day #4
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Visual analog pain scale ranges from zero (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain)
Measured: VAS pain score on post-operative day #7
Secondary outcomes (4)
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
Reported WOMAC Score ranges between 0 (worst) to 100 (best)
Measured: Outcome measure will be assessed up to 8 weeks
Knee range of motion
Knee flexion and extension will be recorded during follow up visits
Measured: Outcome measure will be assessed up to 8 weeks
Ambulation distance after surgery
Distance walked in feet will be assessed and recorded by physical therapist
Measured: Recorded on post-operative day #1
Hospital length of stay
Measured by number of nights patient stayed in hospital after surgery
Measured: Measure outcome will be assess through study completion, on average of 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Sep 2019
- Study start22 Mar 2017
- Primary completion25 Nov 2018
- Study completion18 Dec 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Total Knee ArthroplastyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center, Oregon
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Justin Than, Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center, Oregon
- Investigators
- Justin Than, DO, Principal investigator, Samaritan Health Services
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04086186
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB16-021
- Status last verified
- Sep 2019
- First submitted
- 13 Mar 2019
- Last updated
- 11 Sep 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222.
PubMed 17403800Affas F, Nygards EB, Stiller CO, Wretenberg P, Olofsson C. Pain control after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial comparing local infiltration anesthesia and continuous femoral block. Acta Orthop. 2011 Aug;82(4):441-7. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.581264. Epub 2011 May 11.
PubMed 21561303Busch CA, Shore BJ, Bhandari R, Ganapathy S, MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, McCalden RW. Efficacy of periarticular multimodal drug injection in total knee arthroplasty. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 May;88(5):959-63. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00344.
PubMed 16651569Tong YC, Kaye AD, Urman RD. Liposomal bupivacaine and clinical outcomes. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014 Mar;28(1):15-27. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
PubMed 24815964Maheshwari AV, Blum YC, Shekhar L, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Multimodal pain management after total hip and knee arthroplasty at the Ranawat Orthopaedic Center. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jun;467(6):1418-23. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0728-7. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
PubMed 19214642Suarez JC, Al-Mansoori AA, Kanwar S, Semien GA, Villa JM, McNamara CA, Patel PD. Effectiveness of Novel Adjuncts in Pain Management Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7S):S136-S141. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.088. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
PubMed 29628196Zlotnicki JP, Hamlin BR, Plakseychuk AY, Levison TJ, Rothenberger SD, Urish KL. Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Plain Bupivacaine in Periarticular Injection for Control of Pain and Early Motion in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Prospective Study. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Aug;33(8):2460-2464. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
PubMed 29656977Snyder MA, Scheuerman CM, Gregg JL, Ruhnke CJ, Eten K. Improving total knee arthroplasty perioperative pain management using a periarticular injection with bupivacaine liposomal suspension. Arthroplast Today. 2016 Jan 11;2(1):37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2015.05.005. eCollection 2016 Mar.
PubMed 28326395Smith EB, Kazarian GS, Maltenfort MG, Lonner JH, Sharkey PF, Good RP. Periarticular Liposomal Bupivacaine Injection Versus Intra-Articular Bupivacaine Infusion Catheter for Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Aug 16;99(16):1337-1344. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00571.
PubMed 28816893Schwarzkopf R, Drexler M, Ma MW, Schultz VM, Le KT, Rutenberg TF, Rinehart JB. Is There a Benefit for Liposomal Bupivacaine Compared to a Traditional Periarticular Injection in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients With a History of Chronic Opioid Use? J Arthroplasty. 2016 Aug;31(8):1702-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.037. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
PubMed 26897490Jain RK, Porat MD, Klingenstein GG, Reid JJ, Post RE, Schoifet SD. The AAHKS Clinical Research Award: Liposomal Bupivacaine and Periarticular Injection Are Not Superior to Single-Shot Intra-articular Injection for Pain Control in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9 Suppl):22-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.036. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
PubMed 27113945Bramlett K, Onel E, Viscusi ER, Jones K. A randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study comparing wound infiltration of DepoFoam bupivacaine, an extended-release liposomal bupivacaine, to bupivacaine HCl for postsurgical analgesia in total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2012 Oct;19(5):530-6. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Jan 28.
PubMed 22285545Yu S, Szulc A, Walton S, Bosco J, Iorio R. Pain Control and Functional Milestones in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Liposomal Bupivacaine versus Femoral Nerve Block. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):110-117. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4740-4.
PubMed 26883652Kirkness CS, Asche CV, Ren J, Gordon K, Maurer P, Maurer B, Maurer BT. Assessment of liposome bupivacaine infiltration versus continuous femoral nerve block for postsurgical analgesia following total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016 Oct;32(10):1727-1733. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1205007. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
PubMed 27326760Horn BJ, Cien A, Reeves NP, Pathak P, Taunt CJ Jr. Femoral Nerve Block vs Periarticular Bupivacaine Liposome Injection After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Effect on Patient Outcomes. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2015 Dec;115(12):714-9. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2015.146.
PubMed 26618816
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Sep 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Outcomes of an Adductor Canal Block Versus Liposomal Bupivacaine in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients: A Randomized Prospective Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04086186
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB16-021
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center, OregonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 22 Mar 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Nov 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Dec 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a randomized prospective study of 60 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty evaluating the clinical outcomes of liposomal bupivacaine periarticular injections (PAI) when compared to single shot adductor canal block using bupivacaine HCl.
Detailed description
Total knee arthroplasty(TKA) is an effective solution for end stage arthritis of the knee; however, post-surgical pain can be difficult to manage and the optimal peri-operative pain management strategy has not been established. This study serves to evaluate the clinical outcomes of liposomal bupivacaine PAI when compared to single shot adductor canal block using bupivacaine HCl in patients undergoing a TKA. The investigators hypothesized that peri-articular injection with liposomal bupivacaine would not be inferior to an adductor canal block using bupivacaine HCl. A total of 60 patients were recruited. Thirty patients were randomized to receive intraoperative liposomal bupivacaine periarticular injection, and another thirty patients randomized to receive a pre-operative adductor canal block using bupivacaine. Both groups otherwise received standard pain management strategies peri-operatively. The primary outcome of interest was post-operative pain, which was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary measures included changes in patient function which was measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), knee range of motion, post-operative ambulation distance, and hospital length of stay.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Adductor Canal Block Group | Active comparator | Procedure: Adductor canal blockStandard method for peri-operative pain control. Adductor canal block is performed by anesthesiologist prior to surgery. |
| Liposomal Bupivacaine Group | Experimental | Procedure: Liposomal Bupivacaine Peri-articular InjectionExperimental method for peri-operative pain control. Liposomal bupivacaine peri-articular injection is performed by surgeon during surgery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients undergoing unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty for end stage osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis.
- All adults > 18 years of age.
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Not cleared by PCP and appropriate specialists to undergo TKA (Check No if patient has been cleared.)
- Adults undergoing bilateral primary total knee arthroplasties.
- Women who are pregnant.
- Women who are breastfeeding.
- Inability to receive successful spinal anesthesia.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Liposomal Bupivacaine Peri-articular InjectionAlso: Exparel peri-articular injectionA 20mL solution of 266mg of liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel) was mixed with 40mL of normal saline, which was then infiltrated consistently in the posterior capsule, medial and lateral side of the arthrotomy, patella tendon, quadriceps tendon, quadriceps musculature, and subcutaneous soft tissue. | Procedure or surgery | Liposomal Bupivacaine Group |
| Adductor canal blockAnesthesiologist performs preoperative adductor canal block using 15mL of 0.5% Bupivacaine HCl | Procedure or surgery | Adductor Canal Block Group |
Primary outcome
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: VAS pain score on post-operative day #1
Visual analog pain scale ranges from zero (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: VAS pain score on post-operative day #2
Visual analog pain scale ranges from zero (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: VAS pain score on post-operative day #4
Visual analog pain scale ranges from zero (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time frame: VAS pain score on post-operative day #7
Visual analog pain scale ranges from zero (no pain) to 10 (maximum pain)
4 secondary outcomes
Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time frame: Outcome measure will be assessed up to 8 weeks
Knee range of motion
Time frame: Outcome measure will be assessed up to 8 weeks
Ambulation distance after surgery
Time frame: Recorded on post-operative day #1
Hospital length of stay
Time frame: Measure outcome will be assess through study completion, on average of 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Sep 2019.
- Background: PubMed 17403800Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222.
- Background: PubMed 21561303Affas F, Nygards EB, Stiller CO, Wretenberg P, Olofsson C. Pain control after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized trial comparing local infiltration anesthesia and continuous femoral block. Acta Orthop. 2011 Aug;82(4):441-7. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.581264. Epub 2011 May 11.
- Background: PubMed 16651569Busch CA, Shore BJ, Bhandari R, Ganapathy S, MacDonald SJ, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, McCalden RW. Efficacy of periarticular multimodal drug injection in total knee arthroplasty. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 May;88(5):959-63. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00344.
- Background: PubMed 24815964Tong YC, Kaye AD, Urman RD. Liposomal bupivacaine and clinical outcomes. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014 Mar;28(1):15-27. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
- Background: PubMed 19214642Maheshwari AV, Blum YC, Shekhar L, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. Multimodal pain management after total hip and knee arthroplasty at the Ranawat Orthopaedic Center. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jun;467(6):1418-23. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0728-7. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
- Background: PubMed 29628196Suarez JC, Al-Mansoori AA, Kanwar S, Semien GA, Villa JM, McNamara CA, Patel PD. Effectiveness of Novel Adjuncts in Pain Management Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7S):S136-S141. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.088. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
- Background: PubMed 29656977Zlotnicki JP, Hamlin BR, Plakseychuk AY, Levison TJ, Rothenberger SD, Urish KL. Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Plain Bupivacaine in Periarticular Injection for Control of Pain and Early Motion in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Prospective Study. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Aug;33(8):2460-2464. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
- Background: PubMed 28326395Snyder MA, Scheuerman CM, Gregg JL, Ruhnke CJ, Eten K. Improving total knee arthroplasty perioperative pain management using a periarticular injection with bupivacaine liposomal suspension. Arthroplast Today. 2016 Jan 11;2(1):37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2015.05.005. eCollection 2016 Mar.
- Background: PubMed 28816893Smith EB, Kazarian GS, Maltenfort MG, Lonner JH, Sharkey PF, Good RP. Periarticular Liposomal Bupivacaine Injection Versus Intra-Articular Bupivacaine Infusion Catheter for Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Aug 16;99(16):1337-1344. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00571.
- Background: PubMed 26897490Schwarzkopf R, Drexler M, Ma MW, Schultz VM, Le KT, Rutenberg TF, Rinehart JB. Is There a Benefit for Liposomal Bupivacaine Compared to a Traditional Periarticular Injection in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients With a History of Chronic Opioid Use? J Arthroplasty. 2016 Aug;31(8):1702-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.037. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
- Background: PubMed 27113945Jain RK, Porat MD, Klingenstein GG, Reid JJ, Post RE, Schoifet SD. The AAHKS Clinical Research Award: Liposomal Bupivacaine and Periarticular Injection Are Not Superior to Single-Shot Intra-articular Injection for Pain Control in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9 Suppl):22-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.036. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
- Background: PubMed 22285545Bramlett K, Onel E, Viscusi ER, Jones K. A randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study comparing wound infiltration of DepoFoam bupivacaine, an extended-release liposomal bupivacaine, to bupivacaine HCl for postsurgical analgesia in total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2012 Oct;19(5):530-6. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.12.004. Epub 2012 Jan 28.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Total Knee Arthroplasty
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 Versus Apixaban and Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adults
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
Recruiting
SII Levels Following iPACK Block With Adductor Canal Block in Knee Arthroplasty
Knee Osteoarthritis
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Persona SoluTion PPS Femur PMCF
Rhematoid Arthritis, Osteo Arthritis of the Knee
Recruiting
ACB and iPACK Blocks With Intravenous Dexamethasone and Perineural Dexmedetomidine in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Knee Osteoarthritis
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA) for Venous Thromboprophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adult Participants
Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Justin Than, DO principal investigator
Samaritan Health Services
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Liposomal Bupivacaine Peri-articular Injection and Adductor canal block in people with Total Knee Arthroplasty and Post-operative Pain Control, run by Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center, Oregon at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (time frame: VAS pain score on post-operative day #1). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04086186, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2019.