AzTrials
AzTrials

HIV/AIDSNCT04077047

Adolescents Living With HIV (ALWH): Social Networks, Adherence and Retention

A study testing iEngage in people with HIV/AIDS, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 2 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

human immunodeficiency virus / acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) is the second leading cause of death in Africa. Adolescents living with HIV (ALWH) are at increased risk for HIV-related morbidity and mortality due to poor retention in HIV care and suboptimal antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 to 21 years
Conditions the study is for
HIV/AIDS
What is being tested?
iEngage
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
2 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
1 Sep 2022to 31 Jul 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 to 21 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • reside in study area
  • able to provide consent or assent
  • agreeable to allowing the research team to have access to their clinic data to assess retention in human immunodeficiency virus- (HIV) care and antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence
  • each Adolescents living with HIV (ALWH) must recruit at least one social network member to participate in the intervention with them

Who cannot join

  • None

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 2 countries.

2 sites in 2 countries

United States1 site
  • Wake Forest University School of Medicine

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27101

Other trials in United States

South Africa1 site
  • Desmond Tutu Health Foundation

    Cape Town

Other trials in South Africa

About this study

Official title: Understanding and Developing a Network-based Social Support Intervention to Improve Retention in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Care and Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence for Adolescents Living With HIV

human immunodeficiency virus / acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) is the second leading cause of death in Africa. Adolescents living with HIV (ALWH) are at increased risk for HIV-related morbidity and mortality due to poor retention in HIV care and suboptimal antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence. Despite having the world's largest population of Adolescents living with HIV (ALWH) (15-24 years, n=870,000), only 14% of South African ALWH are on ART, 12% are retained in HIV care 1-2 years after ART initiation, and 10% are virally suppressed. During treatment interruption, the effects of ART quickly reverse, increasing transmission risk, treatment resistance, and potentially fatal complications. Unless their treatment retention and adherence improves, ALWH will continue to transmit the virus to their sexual partners and die prematurely.

While social support is often viewed as a bridge that joins ALWH to key resources within their environments, little is known about which types of social support are most impactful and from whom within their network, particularly among ALWH in endemic countries. Moreover, many South African ALWH lack social support from key social network members due to lack of HIV status disclosure, increasing their risk for poorer HIV-related outcomes when compare to their disclosed peers. Social network interventions (i.e., those that leverage the resources within one's network to improve behaviors and outcomes) that meet the needs of both ALWH who are disclosed and non-disclosed are needed, but lacking. Such inventions have the potential to facilitate appraisal support, during which ALWH receive targeted assistance with identifying appropriate and trustworthy people in their lives. More broadly, there exists a lack empirically supported interventions aimed at improving retention in HIV care and ART adherence for ALWH in low-middle income countries.

This proposal follows the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST), a comprehensive framework for optimizing and evaluating multicomponent behavioral interventions.

Read the detailed description

This K08 focuses on the preparation phase, which consists of compiling information from various sources, including behavioral theory, scientific literature, secondary analyses of existing data, and formative research to inform a theoretical model. This model guides intervention-related decisions, such as the selection of intervention components. Piloting of intervention components and the identification and operationalization of an optimization criterion also occur in this phase. The investigators will first use social network analyses to elucidate network characteristics that influence ALWHs' retention and adherence (Aim 1), then use participatory methods to inform intervention development (Aim 2), and lastly assess intervention acceptability, feasibility, safety and evidence of efficacy (Aim 3). Aim 3 is the clinical trial component and described in detail below. Aim 1 will determine how ALWHs' social networks influence their retention in HIV care and ART adherence and Aim 2 will then focus on the development of a network-based, social support intervention to improve ALWH retention in HIV care and ART adherence informed by Aim 1 and other relevant information.

The goal of aim 3 is to assess intervention acceptability, feasibility, safety and evidence of efficacy through open piloting. The investigators will assess intervention acceptability, feasibility, safety, and evidence of efficacy using an iterative process enabling feedback and continuing quality improvement over the course of implementation. This approach involves the piloting of the network intervention developed in Aim 2. The rationale is that the best interventions for ALWH will consider their unique needs and include tailored components. The outcome of this Aim will be a feasible and acceptable social network intervention that will be tested in an adaptive intervention using future grant funding. The hypothesis for aim 3 is that the intervention will be acceptable, feasible, and safe, with trends towards improved ALWH retention in HIV care and ART adherence.

Conditions
HIV/AIDS
Being tested
iEngage
Keywords
Adolescents
Medical subject headings
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • iEngageBehavioural

    Also called network-based, social support intervention

    The intervention is a network-based, social support intervention to improve Adolescents living with HIV (ALWH) retention in HIV care and antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence

Study groups in NCT04077047
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
iEngageExperimentalThe intervention is a network-based, social support intervention to improve ALWH retention in HIV care and ART adherence. The specific intervention will be developed during Aim 2 of the study and uses qualitative findings, along with data from Aim 1, to develop an interventions that integrates participant feedback and borrows components from two existing interventions
Receives: Behavioral: iEngage

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Feasibility: exit interviews

    Measured using exit interviews

    Measured: 12 month follow up

  2. Acceptability: exit interviews

    Measured using exit interviews

    Measured: 12 month follow up

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Change in HIV stigma & discrimination

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

    Measured: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

  2. Change in HIV knowledge

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

    Measured: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

  3. Change in autonomy

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

    Measured: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

  4. Change in sense of community

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

    Measured: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

  5. Change in basic psychological needs

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

    Measured: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

  6. Change in social support

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

    Measured: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

  7. Change in trust

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

    Measured: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

  8. Change in relationship equity

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

    Measured: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

  9. Change in agency

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

    Measured: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

  10. Change in future orientation

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

    Measured: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

  11. Change in mental health

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

    Measured: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

  12. Change in healthcare access

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

    Measured: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

  13. Change in physical health

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

    Measured: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

  14. Change in housing stability

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

    Measured: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

  15. Change in economic support

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

    Measured: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

  16. Change in income

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

    Measured: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

  17. Change in food security

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

    Measured: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

  18. Change in food transportation

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

    Measured: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

  19. Change in viral load

    Gathered from existing medical records

    Measured: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

  20. Change in ART adherence

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

    Measured: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

  21. Change in retention in HIV care

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

    Measured: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Sep 2019
  2. Study start1 Sep 2022
  3. Primary completion17 Jul 2025
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04077047
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB00099951
Other IDs
5K08MH118965-02
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
21 Aug 2019
Last updated
10 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing iEngage in people with HIV/AIDS, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences at 2 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States, South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Feasibility: exit interviews (time frame: 12 month follow up). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in