AzTrials
AzTrials

Esophageal CancerNCT04074447

The Efficacy of Immunodetection Point Inhibitors for Advanced Esophageal Cancer

An observational study of Esophageal Cancer, run by Sun Yat-sen University at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Esophageal cancer is one of the most common malignancies of the digestive system. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is the main type of esophageal cancer, accounting for more than 90% of esophageal cancer in China. The 5-year survival rate is about 15%~25%. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Esophageal Cancer
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 May 2019to May 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: A total of 80 patients with advanced esophageal cancer were enrolled. Patients need to be treated with second - or third-line chemotherapy combined with immunocheckpoint inhibitors. 10ml of edta-anticoagulant blood was collected before the first treatment of the enrolled patients, and the blood samples were gently reversed in the anticoagulant tube for several times to fully anticoagulate. The upper plasma and the lower blood cells were centrifuged at 1800g for 10 min within 4 hours, respectively, and stored at -80 ℃ for later use and provide 5-10 tissue white sheets.

Who may be able to join

  • age above 18, male or female.
  • patients with esophageal cancer confirmed by pathology through tumor biopsy or puncture tissue.
  • the patient was assessed as untreatable by surgery.
  • patients received second-line or third-line chemotherapy and were treated with immunodetector point inhibitors.
  • the patient had complete preliminary pathological information, tumor site, pathological type and other information.
  • the patient must have adequate tumor tissue or 5-10 FFPE white tablets to provide; After treatment, patients were returned to the hospital for re-examination every 3 treatment cycles, and plasma and peripheral blood samples could be obtained during the whole process.
  • other indicators of the patients met the general clinical trial enrollment conditions.
  • subjects read and fully understand the instructions to patients, and sign the informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • blood samples cannot be obtained before treatment.
  • the patient has clear infection status.
  • the patient has other serious diseases besides esophageal cancer.
  • current patients with alcoholism or drug abuse. (6) pregnant female patients. (7) the patient has a clear history of neurological or mental disorders.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Dongsheng Zhang, MD.,PhD. contact

86-2087343804

Zhangdsh@sysucc.org.cn

Zhida Lv, BS. contact

86-2087343795

lvzd@sysucc.org.cn

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060

    Rui-Hua Xu, MD, PhD, +862087342635, lvzd@sysucc.org.cn

    Rui-hua Xu, MD, PhD

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Real World Study on the Efficacy of Immunodetection Point Inhibitors for Advanced Esophageal Cancer

Esophageal cancer is one of the most common malignancies of the digestive system. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is the main type of esophageal cancer, accounting for more than 90% of esophageal cancer in China. The 5-year survival rate is about 15%~25%. Many patients with esophageal cancer are initially diagnosed as advanced, and many patients with early initial diagnosis will still relapse and metastasis after radical treatment. Currently, chemotherapy plays a central role in palliative care, but its objective remission rate is only 20-40%, and the median survival is about 8-10 months. However, most of the current phase III studies on targeted drugs for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma have failed, and the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma has entered the bottleneck stage. Therefore, it is urgent to explore a treatment method that can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer. In recent years, with the development of biological immunotherapy, immunocheckpoint inhibitors, including pd-1 inhibitors, pd-l1 inhibitors and ctla-4 inhibitors, have achieved significant curative effect and made breakthroughs in the treatment of multiple solid tumors including melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer and kidney cancer. These immunocheckpoint inhibitors have also been tried for esophageal cancer, with initial success in immunotherapy for esophageal cancer. In this observational study, all patients with esophageal cancer who used immunocheckpoint inhibitors in clinical practice were included, without limitation on the number of treatment lines or combinations of different chemotherapy. Through follow-up observation, the purpose of this study was to analyze the efficacy of immunocheckpoint inhibitors for esophageal cancer in the real world, and to explore the differences in the efficacy of immunocheckpoint inhibitors in different stages of treatment, as well as the efficacy of different chemotherapy combinations, so as to provide clinical evidence for the use of immunotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer.

Read the detailed description

Esophageal cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors of the digestive system. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, or esophageal squamous cell carcinoma for short, is the main type of esophageal cancer, accounting for more than 90% of esophageal cancer in China. The 5-year survival rate is about 15%~25%. Many patients with esophageal cancer are initially diagnosed as advanced, and many patients with early initial diagnosis will still relapse and metastasize after radical treatment. Currently, chemotherapy plays a central role in palliative care, but its objective remission rate is only 20-40%, and the median survival is about 8-10 months. However, most of the current phase III studies on targeted drugs for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma have failed, and the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma has entered the bottleneck stage. Therefore, it is urgent to explore a treatment method that can significantly improve the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer.

In recent years, with the development of biological immunotherapy, immunocheckpoint inhibitors, including PD-1 inhibitors, PD-L1 inhibitors and CTLA-4 inhibitors, have achieved significant curative effect and made breakthroughs in the treatment of multiple solid tumors including melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer and kidney cancer. These immunocheckpoint inhibitors have also been tried for esophageal cancer, with initial success in immunotherapy for esophageal cancer. In 2017, Toshihiko Doi et al. reported the research results of esophageal cancer, and screened a total of 83 cases of advanced esophageal cancer or gastroesophageal junction cancer, among which 37 patients had positive PD-L1 expression, with a positive rate of 44.6%. Finally, 23 patients were enrolled, 78% of whom were squamous cell carcinoma, 87% of whom had received second-line or above treatment before, among which more than 90% had received chemotherapy before, and the overall disease response rate was 30%. The overall partial remission rate was 30%, and 28% of the 18 patients with squamous cell carcinoma achieved partial remission . Another from Japan, multicenter single-arm phase Ⅱ clinical trials designed to explore Nivolumab clinical activity in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. The 65 included patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma received at least second-line treatment, but the expression level of pd-l1 was not detected. Sixty-four patients received intravenous Nivolumab, with median OS of 12.1 months, objective remission rate of 17.2% and disease control rate of 42%. However, the jury is still out on whether single immunocheckpoint inhibitors for esophageal cancer should be used in combination with chemotherapy, in the first line or in the back line, or in combination with different chemotherapy regiments.

CtDNA is an endogenous tumor DNA in circulating blood that is free from cells. It is generally believed that ctDNA in the blood of tumor patients mainly comes from the proliferation of tumor cells after necrosis and apoptosis and the release of tumor cells with active proliferation. At present, most studies have proved that there are consistent genetic changes in the DNA of tumor tissue cells and ctDNA. If there are driver gene mutations in the primary or metastatic foci of patients, it is possible to detect the same genetic changes in their plasma free DNA. Therefore, ctDNA is a characteristic tumor biomarker that can be followed qualitatively, quantitatively and dynamically. Immunodetection point inhibitors, including PD-1 inhibitors, PD-L1 inhibitors and CTLA-4 inhibitors, have achieved significant efficacy in a variety of tumors and are expected to change the current treatment status of tumors. However, there is no recognized indicator that can predict the efficacy of immunotherapy for esophageal cancer.

In this observational study, all patients with esophageal cancer who used immunocheckpoint inhibitors in clinical practice were included, without limitation on the number of treatment lines or combinations of different chemotherapy. Through follow-up observation, the purpose of this study was to analyze the efficacy of immunocheckpoint inhibitors for esophageal cancer in the real world, and to explore the differences in the efficacy of immunocheckpoint inhibitors in different stages of treatment, as well as the efficacy of different chemotherapy combinations, so as to provide clinical evidence for the use of immunotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer.

Medical subject headings
Esophageal Neoplasms

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The proportion of ctDNA content decreased in patients with good therapeutic effect

    The proportion of patients with good therapeutic effect whose serum ctDNA content decreased (in any follow-up)

    Measured: through study completion, an average of 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Aug 2019
  2. Study start1 May 2019
  3. Primary completionMay 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04074447
Sponsor's protocol ID
ctDNA-1
Status last verified
Sep 2019
First submitted
29 Aug 2019
Last updated
9 Sep 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Esophageal Cancer, run by Sun Yat-sen University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Dongsheng Zhang, MD.,PhD. (86-2087343804, Zhangdsh@sysucc.org.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The proportion of ctDNA content decreased in patients with good therapeutic effect (time frame: through study completion, an average of 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Sep 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in