AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Myocardial InfarctionAMISLEEPNCT04064593

Sleep Disordered Breathing (SDB) Prevalence and Cardiovascular Outcomes of Myocardial Infarction (MI) Survivors

A study testing Polygraphy in people with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Sleep Apnea, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The AMISLEEP study is nested in the "FRENCHIE" registry. The objective is to use routine clinical and polygraphic data to capture SDB/SAS (Sleep Disordered Breathing/Sleep Apnea Syndrome) physiological heterogeneity in relation to clinically relevant cardiovascular outcomes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acute Myocardial Infarction, Sleep Apnea
What is being tested?
Polygraphy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2,007 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
9 Apr 2019to 3 Dec 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient included in FRENCHIE registry (cf. NCT04050956 for FRENCHIE registry's selection criteria)
  • Signed consent for AMI-Sleep study

Who cannot join

  • Patient under treatment for SDB/SAS prior to its inclusion in FRENCHIE registry
  • Cognitive disorientation and communicative disabilities (left to investigator's discretion) not able to fill-out a questionnaire
  • Severe diseases with anticipated mortality less than 6 months

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Hôpital Bichat, AP-HP

    Paris

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: SDB Prevalence and Cardiovascular Outcomes of MI Survivors

The AMISLEEP study is nested in the "FRENCHIE" registry.

The objective is to use routine clinical and polygraphic data to capture SDB/SAS (Sleep Disordered Breathing/Sleep Apnea Syndrome) physiological heterogeneity in relation to clinically relevant cardiovascular outcomes.

Specifically, the investigators hypothesize that unique clusters (phenotypes) of patients could be identified by applying unsupervised learning methods to these data and that the clusters would be differentially associated with risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes (ACS), TIA, stroke or death). The ultimate goal is to identify patients more at risk that could be included in interventional studies that would test whether SDB/SAS treatment can improve this risk.

Read the detailed description

All patients included in the "FRENCHIE" registry (Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) patients hospitalized within 48h from symptom onset) are eligible, and will be asked for their written informed consent for this nested study in case of the absence of any non-inclusion criteria.

Baseline clinical examination and laboratory tests are based on the usual care and are those collected in "FRENCHIE".

A simplified polygraphy is performed during the hospitalization for AMI. Starting and ending of the recording will be programmed based on patient interview regarding usual sleep hours.

Together with the polygraphy, questionnaires will be given to the patient regarding general sleep quality

Polygraphic data will be scored in centralized manner. Results of the polygraphy will be sent to the cardiology department with advice for treatment and follow-up. If necessary, the core-lab will provide tele-counseling regarding SDB management to centers.

Follow-up will be performed through the national administrative databases, as in the "FRENCHIE" registry.

Being tested
Polygraphy
Keywords
Acute Myocardial Infarction, Sleep Apnea, Outcomes
Medical subject headings
Sleep Apnea Syndromes

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PolygraphyDiagnostic test

    The polygraphy consists of recording during sleep, respiratory flow by mean of a nasal cannula, respiratory movement by mean of a thoracic belt with inductance plethysmography, blood oxygenation and heartbeats by a fingertip transcutaneous oxymetry.

    Starting and ending of the recording will be programmed based on patient interview regarding usual sleep hours.

    Polygraphy data are anonymized before being sent to the Cloud and therefore to the core lab.

    Polygraphic data will be scored in centralized manner.

    Results of the polygraphy will be sent to the cardiology department with advice for treatment and follow-up.

    If necessary, the core-lab will provide tele-counseling regarding SDB management.

Study groups in NCT04064593
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PolygraphyExperimentalNot described
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Polygraphy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Contribution of SDB/SAS to events after AMI

    Contribution of SDB/SAS to incident cardiovascular events and mortality during the first year following acute myocardial infraction :

    Cardiovascular event will be defined as incident acute coronary syndrome (ACS), transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke or death of any cause after discharge during the first year following the AMI event. Time from discharge to the first event will be considered.

    Measured: 12 months follow up

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Associations between presence, type and severity of SDB and the severity of the initial coronary disease

    The severity of the index event (number of stents combined with revascularizations and coronary bypass) will be compared to type and severity of SDB (apnea-hypopnea index AHI), to evaluate if both are associated

    Measured: Through the end of hospitalization, an average of 5 days

  2. Validate the Berlin questionnaire to screen for obstructive and central SDB/SAS in the AMI patients

    Concordance between the result of the Berlin questionnaire and the presence of obstructive SDB/SAS measured by polygraphy as reference and concordance between the result of the Berlin questionnaire and the presence of central SDB/SAS measured by polygraphy as reference.

    Measured: Through the end of hospitalization, an average of 5 days

  3. Evaluate health care related costs during the year following hospital discharge.

    Health care related costs for SDB considered will be: confirmation of SDB by an additional polysomnography, SDB treatments.

    Measured: 12 months follow up

  4. Comparison of health care consumption between SDB and non-SDB patients

    Health care consumption and health care related costs will be compared between patients :

    • without SDB
    • with mild SDB (AHI between 5 and 14/h)
    • with moderate SDB (AHI between 15h to 29/h)
    • with severe SDB (AHI ≥ 30/h)

    Health care consumption and health care related costs considered will be AMI recurrence, incident TIA/stroke, cardiac arrhythmia, heart decompensation, diabetes, depression and cancers.

    Measured: 12 months follow up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Aug 2019
  2. Study start9 Apr 2019
  3. Primary completion3 Dec 2023
  4. Study completion3 Dec 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
2,007 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04064593
Sponsor's protocol ID
P171101J
Acronym
AMISLEEP
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
5 Aug 2019
Last updated
20 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Young T, Palta M, Dempsey J, Skatrud J, Weber S, Badr S. The occurrence of sleep-disordered breathing among middle-aged adults. N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 29;328(17):1230-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304293281704.

    PubMed 8464434
  • Duran J, Esnaola S, Rubio R, Iztueta A. Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea and related clinical features in a population-based sample of subjects aged 30 to 70 yr. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Mar;163(3 Pt 1):685-9. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.163.3.2005065.

    PubMed 11254524
  • Crawford-Achour E, Dauphinot V, Martin MS, Tardy M, Gonthier R, Barthelemy JC, Roche F. Protective Effect of Long-Term CPAP Therapy on Cognitive Performance in Elderly Patients with Severe OSA: The PROOF Study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2015 Apr 15;11(5):519-24. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.4694.

    PubMed 25700873
  • Cadelis G, Fayad Y Monteagudo OE. [Prevalence of symptoms and risk of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome assessed by the Berlin Questionnaire among professionals of a health facility]. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2016 Dec;64(6):405-414. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2016.06.332. Epub 2016 Oct 31. French.

    PubMed 27810127
  • Tishler PV, Larkin EK, Schluchter MD, Redline S. Incidence of sleep-disordered breathing in an urban adult population: the relative importance of risk factors in the development of sleep-disordered breathing. JAMA. 2003 May 7;289(17):2230-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.17.2230.

    PubMed 12734134
  • Heinzer R, Vat S, Marques-Vidal P, Marti-Soler H, Andries D, Tobback N, Mooser V, Preisig M, Malhotra A, Waeber G, Vollenweider P, Tafti M, Haba-Rubio J. Prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in the general population: the HypnoLaus study. Lancet Respir Med. 2015 Apr;3(4):310-8. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00043-0. Epub 2015 Feb 12.

    PubMed 25682233
  • Levendowski D, Steward D, Woodson BT, Olmstead R, Popovic D, Westbrook P. The impact of obstructive sleep apnea variability measured in-lab versus in-home on sample size calculations. Int Arch Med. 2009 Jan 2;2(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1755-7682-2-2.

    PubMed 19121211
  • Jesus EV, Dias-Filho EB, Mota Bde M, Souza Ld, Marques-Santos C, Rocha JB, Oliveira JL, Sousa AC, Barreto-Filho JA. Suspicion of obstructive sleep apnea by Berlin Questionnaire predicts events in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2010 Sep;95(3):313-20. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2010005000103. Epub 2010 Aug 6.

    PubMed 20676583
  • Gus M, Goncalves SC, Martinez D, de Abreu Silva EO, Moreira LB, Fuchs SC, Fuchs FD. Risk for Obstructive Sleep Apnea by Berlin Questionnaire, but not daytime sleepiness, is associated with resistant hypertension: a case-control study. Am J Hypertens. 2008 Jul;21(7):832-5. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2008.184. Epub 2008 May 1.

    PubMed 18451807
  • Balagny P, D'Ortho MP, Berard L, Rousseau A, Gourmelen J, Ravaud P, Durand-Zaleski I, Simon T, Steg PG; AMI SLEEP investigators. AMI-Sleep: protocol for a prospective study of sleep-disordered breathing/sleep apnoea syndrome and incident cardiovascular events after acute myocardial infarction. BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 18;15(2):e090093. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090093.

    PubMed 39965954

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Polygraphy in people with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Sleep Apnea, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Contribution of SDB/SAS to events after AMI (time frame: 12 months follow up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04064593, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in