Erectile Dysfunction Due to Arterial InsufficiencyPhase 2/3NCT04050020
Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) Injection for Treatment of Erectile Function
A Phase 2/3 study testing Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and Normal saline injection in people with Erectile Dysfunction Due to Arterial Insufficiency, run by Institute for the Study of Urological Diseases, Greece at 1 site in Greece.
Trial summary
The primary objective of the present study is to investigate and compare the treatment efficacy of PRP injection vs placebo treatment in men with mild-moderate vasculogenic ED, as measured by IIEF.The secondary objective of the present clinical trial is to study the adverse events and safety of the PRP injection… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 70 years, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Erectile Dysfunction Due to Arterial Insufficiency
- What is being tested?
- Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and Normal saline injection
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGreece
- Study dates
- 2 Sep 2019to 24 Sep 2020
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 70 years
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Consent to participate.
- Age 40-70 years.
- Sexually active in a stable, heterosexual relationship of more than three months duration.
- Presence of Erectile Dysfunction for at least 6 months.
- IIEF-ED: 11-25 at visit 1
- PDE5i users and report some/good response to PDE5i at the last month before screening.
- Agree to suspend all ED therapy for the duration of the study.
- Agree to attempt sexual intercourse at least 4 times every 4 weeks, for the duration of the study without being under the influence of alcohol or recreational drugs. Agree to document the outcome using the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary, as needed.
Who cannot join
- Previous major pelvic surgery or pelvic trauma that could impact erectile function, such as radical prostatectomy, radical cystectomy, rectal surgery. Patients with previous TURP surgery without sequelae of iatrogenic ED, may be included.
- Previous penile surgery of any kind except circumcision and condyloma removal, such as penile lengthening, penile cancer surgery, penile plication, grafting.
- Previous history of priapism or penile fracture
- Previous radiation therapy to pelvis.
- Abnormal morning serum testosterone level defined as a value lower than 300 ng/dL +/- 5 %(indicative of untreated hypogonadism), or greater than 1197 ng/dL +/- 5%.
- Current or previous hormone usage, other than prescribed testosterone, clomiphene or thyroid medication. Subjects with prior or current use of hormonal treatment for prostate cancer are also excluded.
Show all 19Show fewer
- Psychogenic ED.
- Peyronie's Disease or penile curvature that negatively influences sexual activity.
- Anatomical or neurological abnormalities in the treatment area.
- Any untreated medical condition (medical history)
- Patients with generalized polyneuropathy, or neurological conditions irrespective of cause, such as severe diabetes, multiple sclerosis or Parkinson's Disease.
- Refusal to suspend ED therapy for duration of study. Subjects who are using Tadalafil as a treatment for BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia) will also be excluded.
- Men deemed not healthy enough to participate in sexual activity.
- Any condition or behavior that indicates to the Principal Investigator that the subject is unlikely to be compliant with study procedures and visits.
- Any health history or laboratory result that indicates to the Principal Investigator that the subject has a significant medical condition and should not participate in the study.
- History of consistent treatment failure with PDE5 inhibitors for therapy of ED.
- Any history of significant psychiatric disease, such as bipolar disorder or psychosis, greater than one lifetime episode of major depression, current depression of moderate or greater severity. Patients who are currently using SSRI or psychotropic medications.
- Partners who are < 18 years of age, who are nursing, who are known to be pregnant at screening, who wish to become pregnant during the study period, who have any gynecologic problems, sexual dysfunction, or major medical conditions that would limit participation in sexual intercourse.
- Patients with any hematological disorder.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Platelet-rich Plasma(PRP) Injection Treatment on Erectile Function: a Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial
The primary objective of the present study is to investigate and compare the treatment efficacy of PRP injection vs placebo treatment in men with mild-moderate vasculogenic ED, as measured by IIEF.The secondary objective of the present clinical trial is to study the adverse events and safety of the PRP injection treatment in vasculogenic ED patients
- Being tested
- Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP), Normal saline injection
- Keywords
- PRP, Platelet-Rich Plasma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP)Biological
All subjects of this group will receive 2 sessions of PRP penile injection with 30 +/- 3 day treatment interval, 10 ml of PRP will be injected at each session.
Normal saline injectionBiological
All subjects of this group will receive 2 sessions of normal saline penile injection with 30 +/- 3 day treatment interval for all subjects, 10 ml of normal saline will be injected at each session.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Biological: Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) |
| Group B | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Biological: Normal saline injection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The % of patients in each group who attain Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in International Index of Erectile Function -Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) domain from baseline to 24 weeks after final treatment.
MCID is defined according to baseline ED severity as:Improvement by 5 or more in the EF domain score of the IIEF for patients with moderate ED at baseline and by 2 or more in the EF domain score of the IIEF for patients with moderate ED at baseline
Measured: at 24 weeks follow up visit
Secondary outcomes (11)
The % of patients in each group who attain MCID in IIEF-EF domain from baseline to 12 weeks after final treatment.
MCID is defined according to baseline ED severity as:Improvement by 5 or more in the EF domain score of the IIEF for patients with moderate ED at baseline and by 2 or more in the EF domain score of the IIEF for patients with moderate ED at baseline
Measured: at 12 weeks follow up visit
The % of patients in each group who attain MCID in IIEF-EF domain from baseline to 4 weeks after final treatment.
MCID is defined according to baseline ED severity as:Improvement by 5 or more in the EF domain score of the IIEF for patients with moderate ED at baseline and by 2 or more in the EF domain score of the IIEF for patients with moderate ED at baseline
Measured: at 4 weeks follow up visit
The difference between the PRP group (2 sessions of PRP) and the placebo group in the change of the IIEF-ED score from baseline to 4 weeks after final treatment.
EF domain of the IIEF questionnaire will be completed. IIEF-EF consists of items 1,2,3,4,5,15 of the IIEF questionnaire.According to the score of the iIEF-EF there are five categories of erectile function: 1-10 (Severe Erectile Dysfunction), 11-16(Moderate dysfunction), 17-21(Mild to moderate dysfunction), 22-25(Mild dysfunction), 26-30 (No dysfunction).
Measured: baseline and 4 weeks follow up visit
The difference between the PRP group (2 sessions of PRP) and the placebo group in the change of the IIEF-ED score from baseline to 12 weeks after final treatment.
EF domain of the IIEF questionnaire will be completed.IIEF-EF consists of items 1,2,3,4,5,15 of the IIEF questionnaire.According to the score of the iIEF-EF there are five categories of erectile function: 1-10 (Severe Erectile Dysfunction), 11-16(Moderate dysfunction), 17-21(Mild to moderate dysfunction), 22-25(Mild dysfunction), 26-30 (No dysfunction)
Measured: baseline and 12 weeks follow up visit
The difference between the PRP group (2 sessions of PRP) and the placebo group in the change of the IIEF-ED score from baseline to 24 weeks after final treatment.
EF domain of the IIEF questionnaire will be completed.IIEF-EF consists of items 1,2,3,4,5,15 of the IIEF questionnaire.According to the score of the iIEF-EF there are five categories of erectile function: 1-10 (Severe Erectile Dysfunction), 11-16(Moderate dysfunction), 17-21(Mild to moderate dysfunction), 22-25(Mild dysfunction), 26-30 (No dysfunction)
Measured: baseline and 24 weeks follow up visit
The difference between the PRP group (2 sessions of PRP) and the placebo group in the change in Sexual Encounter Profile Question 3 (SEP3) score from baseline to 4 weeks after final treatment.
The percent of subjects who answer ''YES'' in question 3 of SEP questionnaire will be reported
Measured: baseline and 4 weeks follow up visit
The difference between the PRP group (2 sessions of PRP) and the placebo group in the change in Sexual Encounter Profile Question 3 (SEP3) score from baseline to 12 weeks after final treatment.
The percent of subjects who answer ''YES'' in question 3 of SEP questionnaire will be reported
Measured: baseline and 12 weeks follow up visit
The difference between the PRP group (2 sessions of PRP) and the placebo group in the change in Sexual Encounter Profile Question 3 (SEP3) score from baseline to 24 weeks after final treatment.
The percent of subjects who answer ''YES'' in question 3 of SEP questionnaire will be reported
Measured: baseline and 24 weeks follow up visit
The difference between the PRP group (2 sessions of PRP) and the placebo group in Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire score
EDITS is an 11-item validated questionnaire assessing treatment satisfaction. The 11 items in the EDITS questionnaire are combined into an index score by computing the mean of the 11 item scores and multiplying this value by 25. This results in an EDITS index score with a range of 0 (extremely low treatment satisfaction) to 100 (extremely high treatment satisfaction) for an individual patient.
Measured: 4,12, 24 weeks follow up visit
The difference between the PRP group (2 sessions of PRP) and the placebo group in the the Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) after each injection treatment session
It will be assessed by the pain VAS, right after each LIST session. Pain VAS is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity . It is a continuous scale comprised of a horizontal (HVAS) or vertical (VVAS) line, usually 10 centimeters (100 mm) in length, anchored by 2 verbal descriptors, one for each symptom extreme. For pain intensity, the scale is most commonly anchored by "no pain" (score of 0) and "pain as bad as it could be" or "worst imaginable pain" (score of 100 [100-mm scale]. To avoid clustering of scores around a preferred numeric value, numbers or verbal descriptors at intermediate points are not recommended. The following cut points on the pain VAS have been recommended: no pain (0-4 mm), mild pain (5-44 mm), moderate pain (45-74 mm), and severe pain (75- 100 mm
Measured: at week 0 and 4
Number of patients with treatment related adverse events
Potential treatment related adverse events after the first PRP injection session and during the 3 month follow up period will be reported
Measured: 28 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Aug 2019
- Study start2 Sep 2019
- Primary completion26 Mar 2020
- Study completion24 Sep 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Erectile Dysfunction Due to Arterial InsufficiencyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Institute for the Study of Urological Diseases, Greece
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- European Society for Sexual Medicine
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dimitrios Hatzichristou, Institute for the Study of Urological Diseases, Greece
- Investigators
- Dimitrios Hatzichristou, Prof., Principal investigator, G.Gennimatas General Hospital, Thessaloniki,Greece
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04050020
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 65-08/10/18
- Status last verified
- Oct 2020
- First submitted
- 6 Aug 2019
- Last updated
- 20 Oct 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Epifanova MV, Gvasalia BR, Durashov MA, Artemenko SA. Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy for Male Sexual Dysfunction: Myth or Reality? Sex Med Rev. 2020 Jan;8(1):106-113. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
PubMed 30898594Scott S, Roberts M, Chung E. Platelet-Rich Plasma and Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: Critical Review of Literature and Global Trends in Platelet-Rich Plasma Clinics. Sex Med Rev. 2019 Apr;7(2):306-312. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.12.006. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
PubMed 30833169Wu YN, Wu CC, Sheu MT, Chen KC, Ho HO, Chiang HS. Optimization of platelet-rich plasma and its effects on the recovery of erectile function after bilateral cavernous nerve injury in a rat model. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016 Oct;10(10):E294-E304. doi: 10.1002/term.1806. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
PubMed 23950105
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Oct 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Platelet-rich Plasma(PRP) Injection Treatment on Erectile Function: a Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04050020
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 65-08/10/18
- Keywords
- PRP, Platelet-Rich Plasma
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Institute for the Study of Urological Diseases, GreeceUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- European Society for Sexual Medicine
- Study start
- 2 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Sep 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of the present study is to investigate and compare the treatment efficacy of PRP injection vs placebo treatment in men with mild-moderate vasculogenic ED, as measured by IIEF.The secondary objective of the present clinical trial is to study the adverse events and safety of the PRP injection treatment in vasculogenic ED patients
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Active comparator | Biological: Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) |
| Group B | Placebo comparator | Biological: Normal saline injection |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 70 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Consent to participate.
- Age 40-70 years.
- Sexually active in a stable, heterosexual relationship of more than three months duration.
- Presence of Erectile Dysfunction for at least 6 months.
- IIEF-ED: 11-25 at visit 1
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Previous major pelvic surgery or pelvic trauma that could impact erectile function, such as radical prostatectomy, radical cystectomy, rectal surgery. Patients with previous TURP surgery without sequelae of iatrogenic ED, may be included.
- Previous penile surgery of any kind except circumcision and condyloma removal, such as penile lengthening, penile cancer surgery, penile plication, grafting.
- Previous history of priapism or penile fracture
- Previous radiation therapy to pelvis.
- Abnormal morning serum testosterone level defined as a value lower than 300 ng/dL +/- 5 %(indicative of untreated hypogonadism), or greater than 1197 ng/dL +/- 5%.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP)All subjects of this group will receive 2 sessions of PRP penile injection with 30 +/- 3 day treatment interval, 10 ml of PRP will be injected at each session. | Biological | Group A |
| Normal saline injectionAll subjects of this group will receive 2 sessions of normal saline penile injection with 30 +/- 3 day treatment interval for all subjects, 10 ml of normal saline will be injected at each session. | Biological | Group B |
Primary outcome
The % of patients in each group who attain Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in International Index of Erectile Function -Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) domain from baseline to 24 weeks after final treatment.
Time frame: at 24 weeks follow up visit
MCID is defined according to baseline ED severity as:Improvement by 5 or more in the EF domain score of the IIEF for patients with moderate ED at baseline and by 2 or more in the EF domain score of the IIEF for patients with moderate ED at baseline
11 secondary outcomes
The % of patients in each group who attain MCID in IIEF-EF domain from baseline to 12 weeks after final treatment.
Time frame: at 12 weeks follow up visit
The % of patients in each group who attain MCID in IIEF-EF domain from baseline to 4 weeks after final treatment.
Time frame: at 4 weeks follow up visit
The difference between the PRP group (2 sessions of PRP) and the placebo group in the change of the IIEF-ED score from baseline to 4 weeks after final treatment.
Time frame: baseline and 4 weeks follow up visit
The difference between the PRP group (2 sessions of PRP) and the placebo group in the change of the IIEF-ED score from baseline to 12 weeks after final treatment.
Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks follow up visit
The difference between the PRP group (2 sessions of PRP) and the placebo group in the change of the IIEF-ED score from baseline to 24 weeks after final treatment.
Time frame: baseline and 24 weeks follow up visit
The difference between the PRP group (2 sessions of PRP) and the placebo group in the change in Sexual Encounter Profile Question 3 (SEP3) score from baseline to 4 weeks after final treatment.
Time frame: baseline and 4 weeks follow up visit
The difference between the PRP group (2 sessions of PRP) and the placebo group in the change in Sexual Encounter Profile Question 3 (SEP3) score from baseline to 12 weeks after final treatment.
Time frame: baseline and 12 weeks follow up visit
The difference between the PRP group (2 sessions of PRP) and the placebo group in the change in Sexual Encounter Profile Question 3 (SEP3) score from baseline to 24 weeks after final treatment.
Time frame: baseline and 24 weeks follow up visit
The difference between the PRP group (2 sessions of PRP) and the placebo group in Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaire score
Time frame: 4,12, 24 weeks follow up visit
The difference between the PRP group (2 sessions of PRP) and the placebo group in the the Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) after each injection treatment session
Time frame: at week 0 and 4
Number of patients with treatment related adverse events
Time frame: 28 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Oct 2020.
- Background: PubMed 30898594Epifanova MV, Gvasalia BR, Durashov MA, Artemenko SA. Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy for Male Sexual Dysfunction: Myth or Reality? Sex Med Rev. 2020 Jan;8(1):106-113. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
- Background: PubMed 30833169Scott S, Roberts M, Chung E. Platelet-Rich Plasma and Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: Critical Review of Literature and Global Trends in Platelet-Rich Plasma Clinics. Sex Med Rev. 2019 Apr;7(2):306-312. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2018.12.006. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
- Background: PubMed 23950105Wu YN, Wu CC, Sheu MT, Chen KC, Ho HO, Chiang HS. Optimization of platelet-rich plasma and its effects on the recovery of erectile function after bilateral cavernous nerve injury in a rat model. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2016 Oct;10(10):E294-E304. doi: 10.1002/term.1806. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Erectile Dysfunction Due to Arterial Insufficiency
Recruiting
Efficacy of Low-intensity Shockwave vs Radial Wave for Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction and Pelvic Pain
Erectile Dysfunction Due to Arterial Insufficiency, Erectile Dysfunction
RecruitingObservational study
EVERiST: Impact of Image Detected Accessory Pudendal Artery on Erection Recovery After Nerve Sparing Prostatectomy
Radical Prostatectomy, Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Clinical Trial Investigating the Effect of Exosomes as a Complementary Treatment in Severe to Moderate Erectile Dysfunction
Erectile Dysfunction, Erectile Dysfunction Associated With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
RecruitingPhase 2
PRP Exosomes Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction
Erectile Dysfunction Due to Arterial Insufficiency
Active, not recruiting
Low Intensity Shockwave Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction
Erectile Dysfunction, Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dimitrios Hatzichristou, Prof. principal investigator
G.Gennimatas General Hospital, Thessaloniki,Greece
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and Normal saline injection in people with Erectile Dysfunction Due to Arterial Insufficiency, run by Institute for the Study of Urological Diseases, Greece at 1 site in Greece.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Greece. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The % of patients in each group who attain Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in International Index of Erectile Function -Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) domain from baseline to 24 weeks after final treatment. (time frame: at 24 weeks follow up visit). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04050020, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2020.