AzTrials
AzTrials

KeratoconusNCT03990506

Photorefractive Intrastromal Crosslinking (PiXL) for the Treatment of Progressive Keratoconus

A study testing Epi-on PiXL and Epi-Off PiXL in people with Keratoconus and Corneal Crosslinking, run by Umeå University at 1 site in Sweden.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and postoperative ocular discomfort by comparing individually customized Photorefractive intrastromal crosslinking (PiXL) for progressive Keratoconus. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 35 years
What is being tested?
Epi-on PiXL and Epi-Off PiXL
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
32 participants
Where
1 siteSweden
Study dates
2 Apr 2019to 24 Jan 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 35 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients planned for corneal crosslinking.
  • Progressive keratoconus documented with a consistent decrease of best corrected visual acuity with no other explanation, an unquestionable historical progression, or a progression documented with the Pentacam Scheimpflug camera with at least 2 of the following: progressive anterior and/or posterior corneal steepening and/or progressive corneal thinning and/or increased rate of corneal thickness change from the periphery to the center.
  • A keratoconus diagnosis based on abnormal posterior elevation, abnormal corneal thickness distribution and clinical noninflammatory corneal thinning using the "Belin/Ambrósio enhanced ectasia" measurements of the Pentacam Scheimpflug camera.
  • Minimum corneal thickness of 400 µm at the thinnest point before epithelial removal.
  • 18-35 years of age
  • No ocular abnormalities except keratoconus
  • No previous ocular surgery
  • No cognitive insufficiency interfering with the informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Age under 18 or over 35
  • Any corneal abnormalities except keratoconus
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Previous ocular surgery
  • Cognitive insufficiency

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Sweden1 site
  • Department of Clinical Sciences/Ophthalmology, Umeå University

    Umeå, 901 85

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Epi-off and Epi-on Photorefractive Intrastromal Crosslinking (PiXL) for Progressive Keratoconus

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and postoperative ocular discomfort by comparing individually customized Photorefractive intrastromal crosslinking (PiXL) for progressive Keratoconus. The study compares two different protocols, PiXL with corneal epithelium debridement (Epi-off) and PiXL without epithelium debridement in high oxygen environment (Epi-on), with the hypothesis that Epi-on gives less postoperative ocular discomfort.

Read the detailed description

The study is designed as a prospective, single-masked intraindividually comparing randomized clinical trial involving participants of both genders aged 18-35 years with Keratoconus planned for routine corneal crosslinking at the Department of Ophthalmology, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden. The study includes 32 participants with bilateral Keratoconus, receiving Epi-off PiXL (n=32) in one eye and Epi-on PiXL in high oxygen environment (n=32) in the fellow eye. The participants are randomized to epi-on PiXL utilizing block randomization with a sample size of 16 in each block; 16 right eyes and 16 left eyes. All participants are informed about the procedures before consenting to participate in the study.

At baseline, before treatment, each eye is examined with slit-lamp microscopy, subjective refraction, determination of uncorrected (UCVA), low contrast visual acuity at 2.5 percentage contrast and 10 percentage contrast and best corrected (BSCVA) visual acuities using the LogMAR fast protocol and intraocular pressure (IOP) using Goldmann applanation tonometry. Under standardized, mesopic light conditions each eye is evaluated by keratometry readings and central corneal thickness using Schemipflug camera measurements, Pentacam HR® (Oculus, Inc. Lynnwood, WA).

Endothelial cellcount is assessed (SP-2000P, Topcon, Inc) and total ocular wavefront is measured with iTrace (Tracey Technologies, Inc.).

Ocular discomfort is subjectively evaluated in each eye by a specific visual analogous rating scale at 4h, 8h 24h and thereafter daily up to 1 week postoperatively.

All the above mentioned examinations are repeated at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment. At 1 day and 1 week after treatment, solely UCVA, Auto-refractor measurements and slit-lamp examination are evaluated.

Being tested
Epi-on PiXL, Epi-Off PiXL
Medical subject headings
Keratoconus, Corneal Diseases, Eye Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Epi-on PiXLProcedure or surgery

    Photorefractive intrastromal crosslinking (PiXL) After local anaesthetics, the cornea is soaked in Riboflavin by repeated topical application during 10 minutes. For masking purposes, epithelial debridement is simulated by moving a scraping instrument in front of the cornea. A Riboflavin soaked sponge is used to lightly disrupt the epithelium tight junctions, without epithelium debridement. The cornea is illuminated with PiXL under 16:40 minutes during continuously delivery of humidified high oxygen via specific oxygen goggles. The UV-dosage is individually customized based upon Kmax; < 45D, 7.2J/cm2; 45-50D, 10J/cm2; > 50D, 15 J/cm2.

  • Epi-Off PiXLProcedure or surgery

    Photorefractive intrastromal crosslinking (PiXL) After local anaesthetics, the corneal epithelium is debrided and the cornea is soaked in Riboflavin by repeated topical application during 10 minutes. The cornea is then illuminated with individually customized topography-guided PiXL under 16:40 minutes. The UV-dosage is individually customized based upon Kmax; < 45D, 7.2J/cm2; 45-50D, 10J/cm2; > 50D, 15 J/cm2.

Study groups in NCT03990506
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Epi-on PiXLExperimentalPhotorefractive intrastromal corneal crosslinking without epithelium debridement during humidified high oxygen flow.
Receives: Procedure: Epi-on PiXL
Epi-off PiXLActive comparatorPhotorefractive intrastromal corneal crosslinking with epithelium debridement.
Receives: Procedure: Epi-Off PiXL

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Maximal keratometry (Kmax)

    Kmax assessed with the Pentacam HR Scheimpflug camera, Diopters.

    Measured: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after treatment

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA)

    Change from baseline in distance uncorrected visual acuity, LogMAR

    Measured: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after treatment

  2. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA)

    Change from baseline in distance best corrected visual acuity, LogMAR

    Measured: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after treatment

  3. Mean keratometry (Kmean)

    Kmean (average) assessed with the Pentacam HR Scheimpflug camera, Diopters.

    Measured: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after treatment

  4. Subjective Ocular Discomfort Scores

    Subjective Ocular Discomfort Scores, Visual Analog Score (0 (no discomfort) - 10 (maximum discomfort)) for each eye, mm.

    Measured: 4 hours, 8 hours, 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, 4 days, 5 days, 6 days and 7 days after treatment

  5. Low contrast visual acuity (LCVA)

    Change from baseline in low contrast visual acuities at 10 % and 2.5 % contrast, LogMAR

    Measured: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after treatment

  6. Manifest spherical equivalent (MRSE)

    Change from baseline in spherical equivalent on subjective distance refraction, Diopters

    Measured: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after treatment

  7. Central corneal thickness (CCT)

    Change from baseline in central corneal thickness assessed with Pentacam, Scheimpflug camera, μm.

    Measured: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after treatment

  8. Change from baseline in ocular wavefront aberrometry

    Change from baseline in higher order aberrations assessed with iTrace, Root mean square.

    Measured: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after treatment

  9. Endothelial cell density (ECC)

    Change from baseline in endothelial cell density, cells/mm2

    Measured: 24 months after treatment

  10. Intraocular pressure (IOP)

    Change from baseline in intraocular pressure assessed with Goldmann applanation tonometry, mmHg.

    Measured: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Jun 2019
  2. Study start2 Apr 2019
  3. Primary completion24 Jan 2023
  4. Study completion24 Jan 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Prospective, single-masked intraindividually comparing randomized controlled trial. Participants will be randomized to receive Epi-off PiXL in one eye and Epi-on PiXL in the other, which is masked to the participant. The participant can choose to treat in eye at a time or both eyes during the same visit.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
32 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03990506
Sponsor's protocol ID
PiXLKC-I
Status last verified
Aug 2023
First submitted
12 Jun 2019
Last updated
1 Sep 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Epi-on PiXL and Epi-Off PiXL in people with Keratoconus and Corneal Crosslinking, run by Umeå University at 1 site in Sweden.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Maximal keratometry (Kmax) (time frame: 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months after treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Sep 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT03990506 | AzTrials