PainPrePARENCT03965897
Preventing Persistent Post-Surgical Pain and Dysfunction
A study testing Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) in people with Pain and Function, run by University of Iowa at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Primary Aim: To examine the superior efficacy of ACT versus Attention Control (AC) on postoperative pain intensity and functioning in at-risk Veterans undergoing TKA. Changes in pain intensity and functioning from baseline to 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-TKA will be compared. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- What is being tested?
- Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 402 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 29 Jul 2019to 30 Jan 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- scheduled for unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
- identified to be "at-risk" at the enrollment visit (i.e. worst pain ≥7 on BPI (severe pain) OR worst pain ≥3 (moderate pain) on BPI PLUS anxiety symptoms ≥6 on the Anxiety Subscale of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale [DASS-21] or ≥10 on the Stress Subscale of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale [DASS-21] OR depressive symptoms ≥7 on Depression Subscale of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale [DASS-21] OR >20 on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale [PCS].
Who cannot join
- inability to complete study forms/procedures because of a language/literacy barrier;
- bipolar or psychotic disorder
- history of brain injury
- cognitive impairment (determined by score of <21 [high school or above] or <20 [< high school] on the Veterans Affairs Saint Louis University Mental Status [SLUMS] exam)
- ACT therapy within the past year
- inability to attend workshop prior to surgery
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Preventing Persistent Post-Surgical Pain and Dysfunction in At-Risk Veterans: Effect of a Brief Behavioral Intervention
Primary Aim: To examine the superior efficacy of ACT versus Attention Control (AC) on postoperative pain intensity and functioning in at-risk Veterans undergoing TKA. Changes in pain intensity and functioning from baseline to 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-TKA will be compared. Level of pain intensity will be measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Severity Subscale and level of functioning will be measured using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Activities of Daily Living and Quality Of Life Subscales.
Secondary Aims: A) To examine the superior efficacy of ACT versus AC on the severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms and improvements in coping skills. Changes from baseline to 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-TKA will be compared. Anxiety and depressive symptoms will be measured with the Hamilton Rating Scales (Ham-A and Ham-D, respectively). Coping skills (i.e. Pain Acceptance and Engagement in Values-Based Behavior) will be measured with the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire and the Chronic Pain Values Inventory. B) To evaluate whether decreases in distress-based symptoms and increases in coping skills mediate changes in pain and functioning at 6 months in Veterans receiving ACT. Changes in anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, pain acceptance and engagement in values-based behavior from baseline to 6 weeks and 3 months will be used as potential mediators for changes in pain and functioning at 6 months.
Exploratory Aim: Describe the pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies Veterans are using to manage pain and their perceived helpfulness. This will provide insights into the effects of the current opioid restrictions on pain management strategies. These strategies \& their perceived helpfulness will be assessed using the Pain Management Strategies Survey at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, and 6 months.
Read the detailed description
Persistent post-surgical pain (PPSP) is a common and debilitating problem following surgery.1 Orthopedic surgeries, such as Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), are consistently associated with high postoperative pain, putting patients at risk for PPSP.2, 3 In fact, TKA has the highest rate of PPSP at 6 months (49%) when compared to a variety of surgeries.4 Pain that persists beyond the expected period of healing serves little or no useful purpose and can be devastating to one's sense of well-being. Notably, pain severity is highly correlated with adverse effects on physical functioning, recovery and quality of life, including negative impacts on sleep, mood, daily activities, cognitive functions and social life.2, 5-13 PPSP is also highly correlated with prolonged opioid use following surgery. When pain and addiction are present, the patient's level of desperation rises, medical and psychiatric illness severity increases, and there is greater utilization of health care services.
Strong and consistent evidence indicates that patients with high levels of pain, anxiety and/or depressive symptoms (distress) prior to surgery are at risk for PPSP.5, 14-23 Notably, Veterans are at a particularly high risk for post-surgical problems because 80% experience some level of psychological distress prior to surgery and 50% report experiencing pain on a regular basis.9, 24 Furthermore, surgery presents a unique set of circumstances in which the precise timing of the physical insult and ensuing pain are known in advance. 25 It is, therefore, possible and critical that these risk factors be attended to in order to improve postoperative pain management and disrupt processes responsible for the transition from acute to chronic pain.
As proof of concept, co-PIs Rakel and Dindo completed an R34-funded study evaluating the feasibility and potential efficacy of an intensive 1-day Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) workshop for preventing PPSP and prolonged opioid use following orthopedic surgery in at-risk Veterans. ACT is trans-diagnostic, with effectiveness across a range of conditions, including chronic pain, depression, and anxiety.16-18 The brief, 1-day format was used to optimize treatment adherence and chances for dissemination into clinical settings. Results were promising. 100% of the Veterans attending, completed the 1-day intervention. Compared to controls, Veterans randomly assigned to ACT reported a larger decrease in pain intensity 3 months post-TKA and reached pain and opioid cessation criteria sooner. Importantly, Veterans reporting larger changes in behavioral engagement (targeted mediator of ACT) exhibited significantly larger decreases in pain and opioid use. This application builds on these promising preliminary findings using a rigorous design to establish the unique effects of ACT beyond attention and explore mediators of treatment response.
In the context of the current opioid epidemic, it is also important for us to better understand how changes in opioid prescribing patterns are influencing postoperative pain management strategies. It is likely that complaints of pain will increase, putting patients at higher risk for PPSP and impaired functioning. Early reports suggests that patients are looking for substitute sources of pain relief, such as rogue Fentanyl powder and Gabapentin.26, 27 Using a multi-site, double-blind, two-arm, parallel, randomized controlled trial with Veterans at-risk for PPSP post-TKA, the following aims will be addressed:
Primary Aim: To examine the superior efficacy of ACT versus Attention Control (AC) on postoperative pain intensity and functioning in at-risk Veterans undergoing TKA. Changes in pain intensity and functioning from baseline to 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-TKA will be compared. Level of pain intensity will be measured using the BPI Pain Severity Subscale and level of functioning will be measured using the KOOS Activities of Daily Living and Quality Of Life Subscales.
Secondary Aims: A) To examine the superior efficacy of ACT versus AC on the severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms and improvements in coping skills. Changes from baseline to 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-TKA will be compared. Anxiety and depressive symptoms will be measured with the Hamilton Rating Scales (Ham-A and Ham-D, respectively). Coping skills (i.e. Pain Acceptance and Engagement in Values-Based Behavior) will be measured with the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire and the Chronic Pain Values Inventory. B) To evaluate whether decreases in distress-based symptoms and increases in coping skills mediate changes in pain and functioning at 6 months in Veterans receiving ACT. Changes in anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, pain acceptance and engagement in values-based behavior from baseline to 6 weeks and 3 months will be used as potential mediators for changes in pain and functioning at 6 months.
Exploratory Aim: Describe the pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies Veterans are using to manage pain and their perceived helpfulness. This will provide insights into the effects of the current opioid restrictions on pain management strategies. These strategies \& their perceived helpfulness will be assessed using the Pain Management Strategies Survey at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, and 6 months.
This project builds on promising preliminary data and has the potential to translate what is known about effective treatments of chronic pain to prevent poor surgical outcomes. It incorporates an interdisciplinary approach to the care of Veterans that attends to major risk factors of postoperative sequelae that significantly impact Veterans' quality of life and healthcare utilization. Using an effective, highly accepted and deployable intervention increases the clinical usefulness of these results which may be extended in the future to the many other conditions leading to chronic pain in both Veterans and Civilians.
- Conditions
- Pain, Function, Anxiety, Depression, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Veterans
- Being tested
- Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), Attention Control (AC)
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Anxiety Disorders, Depression
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)Behavioural
Overall, the goal of the ACT intervention is to cultivate psychological flexibility: to help Veterans respond to life events in ways which do not exacerbate difficulties or restrict engagement in meaningful activities. It increases patients' awareness of behaviors that exacerbate the pain (such as struggling with it) and recognition of avoidance strategies that interfere with life engagement.
Attention Control (AC)Other
Information on any other coping practices will be omitted. The group facilitators will present one topic at a time, using the Pain Manual, and the participants will discuss and reflect about issues and experiences related to each topic. If necessary, the group facilitators will raise specific discussion questions to facilitate group dialogue and participant involvement.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Attention Control (AC) | Active comparator | The primary purpose of this workshop is to provide attention and education to participants. Topics of discussion will include: a) the pathophysiology of postoperative pain and how it differs from preoperative pain, b) the role of contextual factors (e.g., depressive or anxiety symptoms, expectation) on the experience of pain, d) the role of inflammation in pain and healing, e) types of pain medications and other pain relief strategies provided following surgery, and f) goals of pain medications. Additionally, deep (diaphragmatic) breathing strategies will be taught and a progressive muscle relaxation exercise will be performed in the workshop at strategic times to maintain Veteran engagement. Receives: Other: Attention Control (AC) |
| Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) | Experimental | The ACT intervention will include: 1) Acceptance and Mindfulness Training emphasizing new ways of managing troubling thoughts, feelings, and physical sensations (e.g., learning how to recognize, and develop cognitive distance from, unhelpful thoughts such as "I can't take this pain anymore" or "This is unfair") and learning how to willingly face experiences that cannot be changed; and 2) Behavioral Change Training involving a) teaching patients how to recognize ineffective patterns of behavior and habits, b) exploring and setting life goals and goals related to mental and physical health, and c) promoting effective and committed actions to achieve these goals despite the urge to do otherwise. The workshop will also include information on pain and pain control post-TKA. Receives: Behavioral: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain Intensity
Pain will be measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Scale: 0-10, with higher scores meaning worse pain
Measured: 6 weeks postop, 3 months postop and 6 months postop
Function
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Activities of Daily Living (ADL) subscore.
Scale: 0-100, with lower scores indicating poorer function.
Measured: 6 weeks postop, 3 months postop, and 6 months postop
Secondary outcomes (5)
Anxiety
Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21), Anxiety subscale. Range: 0-21 Lower scores indicate less severe anxiety
Measured: 6 weeks postop, 3 months postop, and 6 months postop
Depressive Symptoms
Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21), Depression subscale Scale: 0-21 Lower scores indicate less severe depression
Measured: 6 weeks postop, 3 months postop, and 6 months postop
Level of Pain Acceptance
Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) Scale: 0-120 Higher score indicates higher level of pain acceptance
Measured: 6 weeks postop, 3 months postop, and 6 months postop
Level of Success in Engagement in Values-Based Behavior
Chronic Pain Values Inventory Scale: 0-5 Lower score indicates suffering while higher score is associated with better concurrent and future functioning.
Measured: 6 weeks postop, 3 months postop, and 6 months postop
Number of Participants Using Pain Management Strategies
Pain Management Strategies Survey Survey of use of pharm and non-pharm pain relief strategies. No score. We are reporting on the number of participants who completed the survey.
Measured: 3 months postop and 6 months postop
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 May 2019
- Study start29 Jul 2019
- Primary completion30 Jul 2023
- Study completion30 Jan 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This study uses a cluster randomization approach where the unit of randomization is the workshops. Randomization occurs at the start of each workshop so that all participants attending that workshop are randomized to that intervention (i.e. ACT vs. AC). Statistician Dr. Zimmerman generates the randomization sequence using PLAN procedure (SAS v9.2). Randomization of workshops occurs in permuted blocks of 2 and 4 and are stratified by site (i.e. Iowa City versus Houston).
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 402 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Iowa
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Baylor College of Medicine, National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR), Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Center
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Barbara Rakel, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Iowa
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03965897
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 201812794
- Other IDs
- 1R01NR017610-01A1
- Acronym
- PrePARE
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 24 May 2019
- Last updated
- 6 May 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Data generated from this application will be shared with members of the research team (i.e., PIs and investigators) to address alternative research questions that were not included in the original application but that can be addressed from the data generated and are of particular interest to the research team members. These data will also be shared through publications, as appropriate. This sharing will be fostered and coordinated by the PIs in a manner that is consistent with NIH policy and human subject's protection including Privacy Rules. Finally, data from the study will be archived and stored at the University of Iowa, College of Nursing on a secure server for future use by other researchers outside the research team. The data manager, in collaboration with the project director, will be responsible for the archiving of these data.
Publications
Shanahan ML, Zimmerman B, Rodrigues M, Green D, Embree J, Buckwalter J, Garvin L, Hadlandsmyth K, Smith T, Rakel B, Dindo L. Intersectional pain disparities and resilience in veterans with chronic pain. Health Psychol. 2026 Jan;45(1):123-135. doi: 10.1037/hea0001555.
PubMed 41396638Dindo L, Hadlandsmyth K, Garvin L, Marchman J, Zimmerman MB, Buckwalter JA 4th, Green DM, Wollaeger JK, Strayer A, Kim KS, Liu W, Embree J, Rodrigues M, Rakel BA. ACT for postsurgical pain and dysfunction in at-risk veterans: Multisite, double-blind, cluster RCT. J Psychosom Res. 2025 Nov;198:112393. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112393. Epub 2025 Sep 24.
PubMed 41032959
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Preventing Persistent Post-Surgical Pain and Dysfunction in At-Risk Veterans: Effect of a Brief Behavioral Intervention
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03965897
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PrePARE / 201812794
- Conditions
- Pain, Function, Anxiety, Depression, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Veterans
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 402 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of IowaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Baylor College of Medicine, National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR), Iowa City Veterans Affairs Medical Center
- Study start
- 29 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jan 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 May 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 6 May 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primary Aim: To examine the superior efficacy of ACT versus Attention Control (AC) on postoperative pain intensity and functioning in at-risk Veterans undergoing TKA. Changes in pain intensity and functioning from baseline to 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-TKA will be compared. Level of pain intensity will be measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Severity Subscale and level of functioning will be measured using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Activities of Daily Living and Quality Of Life Subscales.
Secondary Aims: A) To examine the superior efficacy of ACT versus AC on the severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms and improvements in coping skills. Changes from baseline to 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-TKA will be compared. Anxiety and depressive symptoms will be measured with the Hamilton Rating Scales (Ham-A and Ham-D, respectively). Coping skills (i.e. Pain Acceptance and Engagement in Values-Based Behavior) will be measured with the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire and the Chronic Pain Values Inventory. B) To evaluate whether decreases in distress-based symptoms and increases in coping skills mediate changes in pain and functioning at 6 months in Veterans receiving ACT. Changes in anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, pain acceptance and engagement in values-based behavior from baseline to 6 weeks and 3 months will be used as potential mediators for changes in pain and functioning at 6 months.
Exploratory Aim: Describe the pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies Veterans are using to manage pain and their perceived helpfulness. This will provide insights into the effects of the current opioid restrictions on pain management strategies. These strategies \& their perceived helpfulness will be assessed using the Pain Management Strategies Survey at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, and 6 months.
Detailed description
Persistent post-surgical pain (PPSP) is a common and debilitating problem following surgery.1 Orthopedic surgeries, such as Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), are consistently associated with high postoperative pain, putting patients at risk for PPSP.2, 3 In fact, TKA has the highest rate of PPSP at 6 months (49%) when compared to a variety of surgeries.4 Pain that persists beyond the expected period of healing serves little or no useful purpose and can be devastating to one's sense of well-being. Notably, pain severity is highly correlated with adverse effects on physical functioning, recovery and quality of life, including negative impacts on sleep, mood, daily activities, cognitive functions and social life.2, 5-13 PPSP is also highly correlated with prolonged opioid use following surgery. When pain and addiction are present, the patient's level of desperation rises, medical and psychiatric illness severity increases, and there is greater utilization of health care services.
Strong and consistent evidence indicates that patients with high levels of pain, anxiety and/or depressive symptoms (distress) prior to surgery are at risk for PPSP.5, 14-23 Notably, Veterans are at a particularly high risk for post-surgical problems because 80% experience some level of psychological distress prior to surgery and 50% report experiencing pain on a regular basis.9, 24 Furthermore, surgery presents a unique set of circumstances in which the precise timing of the physical insult and ensuing pain are known in advance. 25 It is, therefore, possible and critical that these risk factors be attended to in order to improve postoperative pain management and disrupt processes responsible for the transition from acute to chronic pain.
As proof of concept, co-PIs Rakel and Dindo completed an R34-funded study evaluating the feasibility and potential efficacy of an intensive 1-day Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) workshop for preventing PPSP and prolonged opioid use following orthopedic surgery in at-risk Veterans. ACT is trans-diagnostic, with effectiveness across a range of conditions, including chronic pain, depression, and anxiety.16-18 The brief, 1-day format was used to optimize treatment adherence and chances for dissemination into clinical settings. Results were promising. 100% of the Veterans attending, completed the 1-day intervention. Compared to controls, Veterans randomly assigned to ACT reported a larger decrease in pain intensity 3 months post-TKA and reached pain and opioid cessation criteria sooner. Importantly, Veterans reporting larger changes in behavioral engagement (targeted mediator of ACT) exhibited significantly larger decreases in pain and opioid use. This application builds on these promising preliminary findings using a rigorous design to establish the unique effects of ACT beyond attention and explore mediators of treatment response.
In the context of the current opioid epidemic, it is also important for us to better understand how changes in opioid prescribing patterns are influencing postoperative pain management strategies. It is likely that complaints of pain will increase, putting patients at higher risk for PPSP and impaired functioning. Early reports suggests that patients are looking for substitute sources of pain relief, such as rogue Fentanyl powder and Gabapentin.26, 27 Using a multi-site, double-blind, two-arm, parallel, randomized controlled trial with Veterans at-risk for PPSP post-TKA, the following aims will be addressed:
Primary Aim: To examine the superior efficacy of ACT versus Attention Control (AC) on postoperative pain intensity and functioning in at-risk Veterans undergoing TKA. Changes in pain intensity and functioning from baseline to 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-TKA will be compared. Level of pain intensity will be measured using the BPI Pain Severity Subscale and level of functioning will be measured using the KOOS Activities of Daily Living and Quality Of Life Subscales.
Secondary Aims: A) To examine the superior efficacy of ACT versus AC on the severity of anxiety and depressive symptoms and improvements in coping skills. Changes from baseline to 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-TKA will be compared. Anxiety and depressive symptoms will be measured with the Hamilton Rating Scales (Ham-A and Ham-D, respectively). Coping skills (i.e. Pain Acceptance and Engagement in Values-Based Behavior) will be measured with the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire and the Chronic Pain Values Inventory. B) To evaluate whether decreases in distress-based symptoms and increases in coping skills mediate changes in pain and functioning at 6 months in Veterans receiving ACT. Changes in anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, pain acceptance and engagement in values-based behavior from baseline to 6 weeks and 3 months will be used as potential mediators for changes in pain and functioning at 6 months.
Exploratory Aim: Describe the pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies Veterans are using to manage pain and their perceived helpfulness. This will provide insights into the effects of the current opioid restrictions on pain management strategies. These strategies \& their perceived helpfulness will be assessed using the Pain Management Strategies Survey at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, and 6 months.
This project builds on promising preliminary data and has the potential to translate what is known about effective treatments of chronic pain to prevent poor surgical outcomes. It incorporates an interdisciplinary approach to the care of Veterans that attends to major risk factors of postoperative sequelae that significantly impact Veterans' quality of life and healthcare utilization. Using an effective, highly accepted and deployable intervention increases the clinical usefulness of these results which may be extended in the future to the many other conditions leading to chronic pain in both Veterans and Civilians.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study uses a cluster randomization approach where the unit of randomization is the workshops. Randomization occurs at the start of each workshop so that all participants attending that workshop are randomized to that intervention (i.e. ACT vs. AC). Statistician Dr. Zimmerman generates the randomization sequence using PLAN procedure (SAS v9.2). Randomization of workshops occurs in permuted blocks of 2 and 4 and are stratified by site (i.e. Iowa City versus Houston).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Attention Control (AC) | Active comparator | Other: Attention Control (AC)The primary purpose of this workshop is to provide attention and education to participants. Topics of discussion will include: a) the pathophysiology of postoperative pain and how it differs from preoperative pain, b) the role of contextual factors (e.g., depressive or anxiety symptoms, expectation) on the experience of pain, d) the role of inflammation in pain and healing, e) types of pain medications and other pain relief strategies provided following surgery, and f) goals of pain medications. Additionally, deep (diaphragmatic) breathing strategies will be taught and a progressive muscle relaxation exercise will be performed in the workshop at strategic times to maintain Veteran engagement. |
| Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) | Experimental | Behavioral: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)The ACT intervention will include: 1) Acceptance and Mindfulness Training emphasizing new ways of managing troubling thoughts, feelings, and physical sensations (e.g., learning how to recognize, and develop cognitive distance from, unhelpful thoughts such as "I can't take this pain anymore" or "This is unfair") and learning how to willingly face experiences that cannot be changed; and 2) Behavioral Change Training involving a) teaching patients how to recognize ineffective patterns of behavior and habits, b) exploring and setting life goals and goals related to mental and physical health, and c) promoting effective and committed actions to achieve these goals despite the urge to do otherwise. The workshop will also include information on pain and pain control post-TKA. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- scheduled for unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
- identified to be "at-risk" at the enrollment visit (i.e. worst pain ≥7 on BPI (severe pain) OR worst pain ≥3 (moderate pain) on BPI PLUS anxiety symptoms ≥6 on the Anxiety Subscale of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale [DASS-21] or ≥10 on the Stress Subscale of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale [DASS-21] OR depressive symptoms ≥7 on Depression Subscale of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale [DASS-21] OR >20 on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale [PCS].
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- inability to complete study forms/procedures because of a language/literacy barrier;
- bipolar or psychotic disorder
- history of brain injury
- cognitive impairment (determined by score of <21 [high school or above] or <20 [< high school] on the Veterans Affairs Saint Louis University Mental Status [SLUMS] exam)
- ACT therapy within the past year
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)Overall, the goal of the ACT intervention is to cultivate psychological flexibility: to help Veterans respond to life events in ways which do not exacerbate difficulties or restrict engagement in meaningful activities. It increases patients' awareness of behaviors that exacerbate the pain (such as struggling with it) and recognition of avoidance strategies that interfere with life engagement. | Behavioural | Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) |
| Attention Control (AC)Information on any other coping practices will be omitted. The group facilitators will present one topic at a time, using the Pain Manual, and the participants will discuss and reflect about issues and experiences related to each topic. If necessary, the group facilitators will raise specific discussion questions to facilitate group dialogue and participant involvement. | Other | Attention Control (AC) |
Primary outcome
Pain Intensity
Time frame: 6 weeks postop, 3 months postop and 6 months postop
Pain will be measured using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Scale: 0-10, with higher scores meaning worse pain
Function
Time frame: 6 weeks postop, 3 months postop, and 6 months postop
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Activities of Daily Living (ADL) subscore. Scale: 0-100, with lower scores indicating poorer function.
5 secondary outcomes
Anxiety
Time frame: 6 weeks postop, 3 months postop, and 6 months postop
Depressive Symptoms
Time frame: 6 weeks postop, 3 months postop, and 6 months postop
Level of Pain Acceptance
Time frame: 6 weeks postop, 3 months postop, and 6 months postop
Level of Success in Engagement in Values-Based Behavior
Time frame: 6 weeks postop, 3 months postop, and 6 months postop
Number of Participants Using Pain Management Strategies
Time frame: 3 months postop and 6 months postop
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 May 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41396638Shanahan ML, Zimmerman B, Rodrigues M, Green D, Embree J, Buckwalter J, Garvin L, Hadlandsmyth K, Smith T, Rakel B, Dindo L. Intersectional pain disparities and resilience in veterans with chronic pain. Health Psychol. 2026 Jan;45(1):123-135. doi: 10.1037/hea0001555.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41032959Dindo L, Hadlandsmyth K, Garvin L, Marchman J, Zimmerman MB, Buckwalter JA 4th, Green DM, Wollaeger JK, Strayer A, Kim KS, Liu W, Embree J, Rodrigues M, Rakel BA. ACT for postsurgical pain and dysfunction in at-risk veterans: Multisite, double-blind, cluster RCT. J Psychosom Res. 2025 Nov;198:112393. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112393. Epub 2025 Sep 24.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Data generated from this application will be shared with members of the research team (i.e., PIs and investigators) to address alternative research questions that were not included in the original application but that can be addressed from the data generated and are of particular interest to the research team members. These data will also be shared through publications, as appropriate. This sharing will be fostered and coordinated by the PIs in a manner that is consistent with NIH policy and human subject's protection including Privacy Rules. Finally, data from the study will be archived and stored at the University of Iowa, College of Nursing on a secure server for future use by other researchers outside the research team. The data manager, in collaboration with the project director, will be responsible for the archiving of these data.
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Adding Vagal Neuromodulation to Manual Therapy in Women With Fibromyalgia
Fibromyalgia (FM) OR Fibromyalgia Syndrome, Manuel Therapy
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Veterans' Intervention Blending NeuRomodulation and YogA for Chronic Low BackPaiN Treatment: VIBRANT
Chronic Low Back Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain
Not yet recruiting
Testing the Timing and Application of Virtual Reality Distraction During Knee Injections in a VA Pain Clinic
Pain Management, Injection Pain Prevention
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of a Ginger Formula on Menstrual Health vs a Placebo
Painful Menstruation
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
Pain Sensitivity, Alcohol-Induced Analgesia, and Heavy Drinking in Individuals With Opioid Use Disorder
Opioid Use Disorder, Alcohol Intoxication
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Barbara Rakel, PhD principal investigator
University of Iowa
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) in people with Pain and Function, run by University of Iowa at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 May 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain Intensity (time frame: 6 weeks postop, 3 months postop and 6 months postop). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03965897, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 May 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.