AzTrials
AzTrials

Cesarean Section, RepeatedNCT03915847

Evaluation of Cesarean Scar After Three Different Uterine Closure Technis

A study testing Single layer closure, Double layer closure and Doble layer closure with trimming in people with Cesarean Section, Repeated and Cesarean, Uterine Scar Thickness, run by Ataturk University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study compares three techniques of uterine closure on myometrium thickness at the site of uterine scar of women who underwent repeated cesarean section. Cesarean scar will be evaluated by transvaginal ultrasound six months after cesarean. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Single layer closure, Double layer closure and Doble layer closure with trimming
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
90 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
16 Apr 2019to 16 Apr 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Previous two or three cesarean
  • Gestational weeks >=36 weeks

Who cannot join

  • Risk of obstetric haemorrhage
  • Suspicion or diagnosis placenta previa or accrete syndrome
  • Chorioamnionitis
  • Uterine myoma in the anterior uterine segment
  • Hysterotomy other than lower segment uterine incision at previous cesarean

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Ataturk University Hospital

    Erzurum

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of Cesarean Scar After Three Different Uterine Closure Technis: A Randomised Trial

The study compares three techniques of uterine closure on myometrium thickness at the site of uterine scar of women who underwent repeated cesarean section. Cesarean scar will be evaluated by transvaginal ultrasound six months after cesarean.

Being tested
Single layer closure, Double layer closure, Doble layer closure with trimming

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Single layer closureProcedure or surgery

    Uterine incision will be approximated with continuous unlocked suture, including a narrow band of the endometrial layer, without trimming incision edges.

  • Double layer closureProcedure or surgery

    The first layer suture penetrated the whole thickness of the uterine wall, including a narrow band of the endometrial layer. Second layer sture is acontinous sture performed in a lateral-to lateral position , imbricating first layer.

  • Doble layer closure with trimmingProcedure or surgery

    Uterine incision will be trimmed and old scar tissue will be removed. The first layer suture penetrated the whole thickness of the uterine wall, including a narrow band of the endometrial layer. Second layer sture is acontinous sture performed in a lateral-to lateral position , imbricating first layer.

Study groups in NCT03915847
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Single layer closureActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Single layer closure
Double layer closureActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Double layer closure
Doble layer closure with trimmingActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Doble layer closure with trimming

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Residual myometrial thickness

    Myometrial thickness at the uterine scar by transvaginal ultrasound

    Measured: 6 months after cesarean

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Existence of cesarean scar defect

    The presence or absence of a cesarean scar defect that was defined as any unechogenic area visualised by transvaginal ultrasound at the site of the cesarean scar with a depth of at least 2 mm.

    Measured: 6 months after cesarean

  2. Width of defect

    In a sagittal plane, the width at base of defect

    Measured: 6 months after cesarean

  3. Depth of defect (niche)

    In a sagittal plane, the distance from the base lining of the endometrium to the apex

    Measured: 6 months after cesarean

  4. Operation time

    Skin-to-skin operation time

    Measured: 10 minute after cesarean completed

  5. Change in hemoglobin

    Difference in haemoglobin measured preoperatively and postoperatively 48 hours

    Measured: 48 hours after cesarean

  6. Blood product transfusion

    Unite number of transfused packed erythrocyte

    Measured: One week after cesarean

  7. Maternal infectious morbidity

    Prevalence of postpartum endometritis, skin wound dehiscence and post operative fever.

    Measured: Six weeks after cesarean

  8. Length of hospitalization

    Duration in days

    Measured: One month after cesarean

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Apr 2019
  2. Study start16 Apr 2019
  3. Primary completion16 Apr 2020
  4. Study completion16 Apr 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
90 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03915847
Sponsor's protocol ID
ATA35
Status last verified
May 2020
First submitted
10 Apr 2019
Last updated
11 May 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Single layer closure, Double layer closure and Doble layer closure with trimming in people with Cesarean Section, Repeated and Cesarean, Uterine Scar Thickness, run by Ataturk University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Residual myometrial thickness (time frame: 6 months after cesarean). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in