Prevention of InfluenzaPhase 1NCT03893669
Safety, Tolerability and Immunogenicity of an Trivalent Inactivated Cell-Culture Influenza Vaccine in Healthy Adults
A Phase 1 study testing NBP607 and Agrippal in people with Prevention of Influenza, run by SK Chemicals Co., Ltd. at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
A randomized, double-blinded, controlled, Phase I clinical trial to assess the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of 'NBP607(trivalent inactivated cell-culture influenza vaccine)' compared to egg-based influenza vaccine in healthy adult volunteers Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 59 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Prevention of Influenza
- What is being tested?
- NBP607 and Agrippal
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- Sep 2012to Nov 2012
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 59 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- 20 to <60 years of age
- able and willing to give written informed consent prior to study entry
- if female, at least 2 years after post- menopausal and negative result of urine-human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) test at screening
Who cannot join
- hypersensitivity to any component of the study medication or chemically related substances, such as allergy to eggs or egg products
- Immunodeficiency disease
- history of hypersensitivity when vaccination, such as Guillain-Barre syndrome
- thrombocytopenia or Coagulation disorders
- experienced fever (>37.5°C) within the past 24 hours or any acute respiratory infection
- receipt of Immunosuppressants or Immunomodulators within the past 3 months
Show all 14Show fewer
- receipt of blood products or immunoglobulin within the past 3 months
- received influenza vaccine within the past 6 months
- received another vaccine within the past 1 month or plans vaccination within 1 months following the study vaccination
- participation on another clinical trial within 1 month prior to the study vaccination
- history of blood donation within 1 week prior to the study vaccination for plan of blood donation within 7 days following the study vaccination
- any chronic diseases that interfere with the clinical trial or Malignant tumors
- pregnant or breastfeeding
- any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, might interfere with the evaluation of the study objectives or might interfere with the safety of the study subject.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Randomized, Double-blinded, Controlled, Phase I Trial to Assess Safety, Tolerability and Immunogenicity of 'NBP607(Trivalent Inactivated Cell-Culture Influenza Vaccine)' Compared to Egg-based Influenza Vaccine in Healthy Adult
A randomized, double-blinded, controlled, Phase I clinical trial to assess the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of 'NBP607(trivalent inactivated cell-culture influenza vaccine)' compared to egg-based influenza vaccine in healthy adult volunteers
Read the detailed description
- Assessment of Safety
- Assessment of Immunogenicity
- Estimated Enrollment: 100
- Conditions
- Prevention of Influenza
- Being tested
- NBP607, Agrippal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NBP607Biological
1 dose, 0.5ml, Intramuscular (IM) injection
AgrippalBiological
1 dose, 0.5ml, Intramuscular (IM) injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Experimental | NBP607 0.5ml Receives: Biological: NBP607 |
| Group 2 | Active comparator | Agrippal 0.5ml Receives: Biological: Agrippal |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence rate of solicited local adverse events (AEs)
All AEs were classified and analyzed according to its severity and causality. The number and percentage of subjects with AEs were analyzed. Incidence rate, 95% confidence interval as well as number of occurrences were calculated.
Measured: Within 21 days after vaccination
Incidence rate of solicited systemic AEs
All AEs were classified and analyzed according to its severity and causality. The number and percentage of subjects with AEs were analyzed. Incidence rate, 95% confidence interval as well as number of occurrences were calculated.
Measured: Within 21 days after vaccination
Incidence rate of unsolicited AEs
All AEs were classified and analyzed according to its severity and causality. The number and percentage of subjects with AEs were analyzed. Incidence rate, 95% confidence interval as well as number of occurrences were calculated.
Measured: Within 21 days after vaccination
Pulse rate at each visit
Comparisons within each group between pre-/post- vaccination were summarized and presented.
Measured: 0-14 days prior to vaccination/day of vaccination/3-7 days after vaccination/21-28 days after vaccination
Blood pressure(systolic/diastolic) at each visit
Comparisons within each group between pre-/post- vaccination were summarized and presented.
Measured: 0-14 days prior to vaccination/day of vaccination/3-7 days after vaccination/21-28 days after vaccination
Body temperature at each visit
Comparisons within each group between pre-/post- vaccination were summarized and presented.
Measured: 0-14 days prior to vaccination/day of vaccination/3-7 days after vaccination/21-28 days after vaccination
Rate of normal/abnormal results in Electrocardiogram (ECG) (ventricular rate, PR interval, QRS, QT, and QTc) collected during screening visit and close-out visit
Comparisons within each group between pre-/post- vaccination were summarized and presented.
Measured: Screening visit(0-14 days prior to vaccination)/close-out visit(21-28 days after vaccination)
Rate of normal/abnormal results in physical examination at each visit
Comparisons within each group between pre-/post- vaccination were summarized and presented.
Measured: 0-14 days prior to vaccination/day of vaccination/3-7 days after vaccination/21-28 days after vaccination
Rate of normal/abnormal results in clinical laboratory tests(Platelet, Cl, etc.) during screening visit and close-out visit
Comparisons within each group between pre-/post- vaccination were summarized and presented.
Measured: Screening visit(0-14 days prior to vaccination)/close-out visit(21-28 days after vaccination)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Seroconversion rate measured by pre-/post-vaccination Haemagglutination Inhibition (HI) titer[Immunogenicity]
The proportion of subjects achieving one of the following conditions; i)If the pre-vaccination HI titer were <1:10, subjects achieving an HI titer ≥1:40 after vaccination ii)If the pre-vaccination HI titers were ≥1:10, subjects with a minimum 4-fold rise in HI titer
Measured: 21-28 days after vaccination
Geometric Mean Ratio (GMR) measured by pre-/post-vaccination HI titer[Immunogenicity]
The mean increase in geometric mean HI titer
Measured: 21-28 days after vaccination
Seroprotection rate measured by post-vaccination HI titer[Immunogenicity]
The proportion of subjects with post-vaccination HI titers of ≥1:40
Measured: 21-28 days after vaccination
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Mar 2019
- Study startSep 2012
- Primary completionOct 2012
- Study completionNov 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Prevention of InfluenzaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- SK Chemicals Co., Ltd.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Woo Joo Kim, Ph.D., Principal investigator, Korea University Guro Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03893669
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NBP607_Flu_I_2012
- Status last verified
- Oct 2012
- First submitted
- 12 Dec 2012
- Last updated
- 28 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized, Double-blinded, Controlled, Phase I Trial to Assess Safety, Tolerability and Immunogenicity of 'NBP607(Trivalent Inactivated Cell-Culture Influenza Vaccine)' Compared to Egg-based Influenza Vaccine in Healthy Adult
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03893669
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NBP607_Flu_I_2012
- Conditions
- Prevention of Influenza
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SK Chemicals Co., Ltd.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Sep 2012
- Primary completion
- Oct 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A randomized, double-blinded, controlled, Phase I clinical trial to assess the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of 'NBP607(trivalent inactivated cell-culture influenza vaccine)' compared to egg-based influenza vaccine in healthy adult volunteers
Detailed description
- Assessment of Safety
- Assessment of Immunogenicity
- Estimated Enrollment: 100
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Experimental | Biological: NBP607NBP607 0.5ml |
| Group 2 | Active comparator | Biological: AgrippalAgrippal 0.5ml |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 59 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- 20 to <60 years of age
- able and willing to give written informed consent prior to study entry
- if female, at least 2 years after post- menopausal and negative result of urine-human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) test at screening
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- hypersensitivity to any component of the study medication or chemically related substances, such as allergy to eggs or egg products
- Immunodeficiency disease
- history of hypersensitivity when vaccination, such as Guillain-Barre syndrome
- thrombocytopenia or Coagulation disorders
- experienced fever (>37.5°C) within the past 24 hours or any acute respiratory infection
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NBP6071 dose, 0.5ml, Intramuscular (IM) injection | Biological | Group 1 |
| Agrippal1 dose, 0.5ml, Intramuscular (IM) injection | Biological | Group 2 |
Primary outcome
Incidence rate of solicited local adverse events (AEs)
Time frame: Within 21 days after vaccination
All AEs were classified and analyzed according to its severity and causality. The number and percentage of subjects with AEs were analyzed. Incidence rate, 95% confidence interval as well as number of occurrences were calculated.
Incidence rate of solicited systemic AEs
Time frame: Within 21 days after vaccination
All AEs were classified and analyzed according to its severity and causality. The number and percentage of subjects with AEs were analyzed. Incidence rate, 95% confidence interval as well as number of occurrences were calculated.
Incidence rate of unsolicited AEs
Time frame: Within 21 days after vaccination
All AEs were classified and analyzed according to its severity and causality. The number and percentage of subjects with AEs were analyzed. Incidence rate, 95% confidence interval as well as number of occurrences were calculated.
Pulse rate at each visit
Time frame: 0-14 days prior to vaccination/day of vaccination/3-7 days after vaccination/21-28 days after vaccination
Comparisons within each group between pre-/post- vaccination were summarized and presented.
Blood pressure(systolic/diastolic) at each visit
Time frame: 0-14 days prior to vaccination/day of vaccination/3-7 days after vaccination/21-28 days after vaccination
Comparisons within each group between pre-/post- vaccination were summarized and presented.
Body temperature at each visit
Time frame: 0-14 days prior to vaccination/day of vaccination/3-7 days after vaccination/21-28 days after vaccination
Comparisons within each group between pre-/post- vaccination were summarized and presented.
Rate of normal/abnormal results in Electrocardiogram (ECG) (ventricular rate, PR interval, QRS, QT, and QTc) collected during screening visit and close-out visit
Time frame: Screening visit(0-14 days prior to vaccination)/close-out visit(21-28 days after vaccination)
Comparisons within each group between pre-/post- vaccination were summarized and presented.
Rate of normal/abnormal results in physical examination at each visit
Time frame: 0-14 days prior to vaccination/day of vaccination/3-7 days after vaccination/21-28 days after vaccination
Comparisons within each group between pre-/post- vaccination were summarized and presented.
Rate of normal/abnormal results in clinical laboratory tests(Platelet, Cl, etc.) during screening visit and close-out visit
Time frame: Screening visit(0-14 days prior to vaccination)/close-out visit(21-28 days after vaccination)
Comparisons within each group between pre-/post- vaccination were summarized and presented.
3 secondary outcomes
Seroconversion rate measured by pre-/post-vaccination Haemagglutination Inhibition (HI) titer[Immunogenicity]
Time frame: 21-28 days after vaccination
Geometric Mean Ratio (GMR) measured by pre-/post-vaccination HI titer[Immunogenicity]
Time frame: 21-28 days after vaccination
Seroprotection rate measured by post-vaccination HI titer[Immunogenicity]
Time frame: 21-28 days after vaccination
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Mar 2019.
Related trials for Prevention of Influenza
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK-1406/CD388 for Prevention of Influenza (MK-1406-005/CD388.SQ.3.06)
Influenza
RecruitingPhase 1
A Trial to Evaluate the Effect of CD388/MK1406 on the Immunogenicity of Fluzone® HD Vaccine (CD388.SQ.1.08/MK-1406-007)
Healthy Participants
RecruitingPhase 1
Evaluating the Dose, Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of Mosaic Hexavalent Influenza Vaccine VRCFLUMOS0116-00-VP (FluMos-v2) With and Without ALFQ Adjuvant in Healthy Adults
Influenza Prevention, Seasonal Influenza
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Confirm Efficacy of a Single Dose of Baloxavir Marboxil in the Post-exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) of Influenza Virus Infection in Chinese Participants
Influenza, Human, Respiratory Tract Infections
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Preoperative Pneumococcal and Influenza Vaccination to Prevent Postoperative Pulmonary Infection in Patients Undergoing Lung Resection for Pulmonary Nodules or Lung Cancer
Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine, Influenza Vaccines
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Woo Joo Kim, Ph.D. principal investigator
Korea University Guro Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing NBP607 and Agrippal in people with Prevention of Influenza, run by SK Chemicals Co., Ltd. at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence rate of solicited local adverse events (AEs) (time frame: Within 21 days after vaccination). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Mar 2019.