Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell NeoplasmNCT03892967
Enhanced, EHR-facilitated Cancer Symptom Control Pragmatic Clinical Trial
A study testing Interview, Quality-of-Life Assessment and Questionnaire Administration in people with Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell Neoplasm and Malignant Solid Neoplasm, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This early phase I trial investigates enhanced, electronic health record (EHR)-facilitated cancer system control. Cancer and its treatment are often associated with severe, disabling symptoms that have been causally linked to diminished survival, increased healthcare utilization, degraded quality of life… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell Neoplasm, Malignant Solid Neoplasm
- What is being tested?
- Interview, Quality-of-Life Assessment and Questionnaire Administration
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50,207 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 28 Mar 2019to 31 Jan 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Being seen for a solid or liquid cancer at a Midwest Mayo Clinic Midwest Mayo Clinic Health Systems (MCHS) site or for a solid tumor at Mayo Clinic Rochester
Who cannot join
- No Minors (under age 18) will receive the questionnaires but no further exclusions can be made based on the standard of care for questionnaire assignment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
About this study
Official title: Enhanced, EHR-Facilitated Cancer Symptom Control (E2C2) Trial
This early phase I trial investigates enhanced, electronic health record (EHR)-facilitated cancer system control. Cancer and its treatment are often associated with severe, disabling symptoms that have been causally linked to diminished survival, increased healthcare utilization, degraded quality of life, unemployment, and non-adherence to recommended cancer treatments. Collaborative case management for control of moderate or worse sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue (SPADE symptoms), and physical dysfunction among cancer survivors and patients with cancer may improve quality of life, symptom severity, and adherence to cancer treatment, and may also reduce need for acute care.
Read the detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- Conduct a cluster randomized pragmatic trial with a stepped wedge design to test the hypothesis that a symptom control-focused enhanced, electronic health record (EHR)-facilitated cancer symptom control (E2C2) intervention will significantly reduce sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue (SPADE) symptom and physical dysfunction scores, reduce unplanned hospitalizations and emergency department visits, improve adherence to cancer therapies, and improve self-reported quality of life.
II. Evaluate the hypothesis that use of a multifaceted, evidence-based implementation strategy to support adoption and use of the E2C2 system will result in improvements in implementation and clinical outcomes.
III. Conduct a mixed methods evaluation to detect, understand and reduce disparities in the adoption and implementation of the E2C2 intervention among elderly and rural-dwelling patients with cancer.
OUTLINE:
The first Primary Objective involves a stepped wedge enrollment into the study intervention. Involvement is based off the patients' responses to the pain questionnaire (low pain = no involvement, moderate pain = offer of patient education materials, severe pain = involvement of a Symptom Care Manager). Symptom Care Managers will work with interested patients who endorse high pain to help address and manage their pain. The third objective involves a subset of patients included in the E2C2 who are offered to participate in a one-time interview lasting 30-45 minutes. Providers and stakeholders also will be invited to participate in an interview lasting 15-30 minutes.
- Being tested
- Interview, Quality-of-Life Assessment, Questionnaire Administration
- Medical subject headings
- Hematologic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
InterviewOther
Participate in interview
Quality-of-Life AssessmentOther
Also called Quality of Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Questionnaire AdministrationOther
Ancillary studies
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Supportive care (interview) | Experimental | Patients randomized to E2C2 intervention participate in an interview over 30-45 minutes. Providers and stakeholders also participate in an interview over 15-30 minutes. Receives: Other: Interview; Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment; Other: Questionnaire Administration |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sleep Disturbance, Pain, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue (SPADE) Symptom Scores.
Measured by 11-point Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) for sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and physical function impairment at clinic encounters. Symptoms were assessed on a scale of 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.
Changes in sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and physical function impairment from baseline score were modeled jointly as a co-primary outcome.
Measured: Up to 46 months (beginning from a participants' index medical oncology encounter until death, last clinical encounter, or end of study)
Physical Function Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores
Measured by 11-point Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) for sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and physical function impairment at clinic encounters. Symptoms were assessed on a scale of 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.
Changes in sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and physical function impairment following any NRS score of >=4/10 modeled jointly as a co-primary outcome.
Measured: Up to 46 months (beginning from a participants' index medical oncology encounter until death, last clinical encounter, or end of study)
Secondary outcomes (7)
Change in Anxiety Score
Measured PROMIS-CAT T-scores up to every four months, depending on visit frequency. A T-score of 50 represents the average score for the U.S. general population, with a standard deviation of 10. A higher score indicates a worse outcome. PROMIS-CAT T-scores were averaged for the control and intervention periods.
Measured: Baseline to 46 months
Change in Depression Score
Measured PROMIS-CAT T-score up to every four months, depending on visit frequency. A T-score of 50 represents the average score for the U.S. general population, with a standard deviation of 10. A higher score indicates a worse outcome. PROMIS-CAT T-scores were averaged for the control and intervention periods.
Measured: Baseline to 46 months
Change in Average Pain Interference Over the Past Week
Measured PROMIS-CAT T-score up to every four months, depending on visit frequency. A T-score of 50 represents the average score for the U.S. general population, with a standard deviation of 10. A higher score indicates a worse outcome. PROMIS-CAT T-scores were averaged for the control and intervention periods.
Measured: Baseline to 46 months
Change in Physical Function Score
Measured PROMIS-CAT up to every four months, depending on visit frequency. A T-score of 50 represents the average score for the U.S. general population, with a standard deviation of 10. A higher score indicates a better outcome. PROMIS-CAT T-scores were averaged for the control and intervention periods.
Measured: Baseline to 46 months
Health Care Utilization
ER visits, hospitalizations, and ICU admissions
Measured: Up to 46 months (beginning from a participants' index medical oncology encounter until death, 18 months after last clinical encounter, or end of study)
Adherence to Cancer Treatment
Number of doses of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide administered.
Measured: Up to 46 months (beginning from a participants' index medical oncology encounter until death or end of study)
Number of Deceased Participants
Vital status (living or deceased) was determined by Accurint record search across multiple sources, including the Social Security Death Index
Measured: Up to 46 months (beginning from a participants' index medical oncology encounter until death or end of study)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Mar 2019
- Study start28 Mar 2019
- Primary completion31 Jan 2023
- Study completion31 Jan 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell NeoplasmStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Mayo ClinicThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50,207 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mayo Clinic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Andrea L Cheville, Principal investigator, Mayo Clinic in Rochester
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03892967
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 18-007779
- Other IDs
- NCI-2020-06973, P30CA015083, UM1CA233033, E2C2
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 19 Mar 2019
- Last updated
- 7 Oct 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Finney Rutten LJ, Ruddy KJ, Chlan LL, Griffin JM, Herrin J, Leppin AL, Pachman DR, Ridgeway JL, Rahman PA, Storlie CB, Wilson PM, Cheville AL. Pragmatic cluster randomized trial to evaluate effectiveness and implementation of enhanced EHR-facilitated cancer symptom control (E2C2). Trials. 2020 Jun 5;21(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04335-w.
PubMed 32503661Cheville AL, Herrin J, Pachman DR, Grzegorczyk V, Kroenke K, Ridgeway JL, Minteer SA, Austin JD, Griffin JM, Chlan L, Tofthagen C, Mitchell SA, Smith A, Ruddy KJ. Electronic health record-facilitated symptom surveillance and collaborative care intervention in oncology (E2C2): a cluster-randomised, population-level, stepped-wedge, pragmatic trial. Lancet Oncol. 2026 Jan;27(1):125-136. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00526-1. Epub 2025 Dec 1.
PubMed 41344348Minteer SA, Ridgeway JL, Pachman DR, Austin JD, Griffin JM, Ruddy KJ, Cheville AL. Barriers and facilitators to using practice facilitators to implement a remote cancer symptom management intervention: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Sep 3;25(1):1189. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13378-1.
PubMed 40903741Kuharic M, Merle JL, Cella D, Mitchell SA, DiMartino L, Ridgeway JL, Dizon DS, Paudel R, Austin JD, Wong SL, Flores AM, Cheville AL, Smith JD; IMPACT Consortium. Psychometric evaluation of the NoMAD instrument in cancer care settings: assessing factorial validity, measurement invariance, and differential item functioning. Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Jun 16;6(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00756-3.
PubMed 40524282Austin JD, Finney Rutten LJ, Fischer K, Ridgeway J, Minteer S, Griffin JM, Pachman DR, Ruddy KJ, Cheville A. Advancing Care Team Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems for Cancer Symptom Management: Findings From a Hybrid Type II, Cluster-Randomized, Stepped-Wedge Trial. JCO Oncol Pract. 2025 Feb;21(2):209-217. doi: 10.1200/OP.24.00280. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
PubMed 39106420Ridgeway JL, Cheville AL, Fischer KJ, Tesch NK, Austin JD, Minteer SA, Pachman DR, Chlan LL, Ruddy KJ, Griffin JM. Tracking activities and adaptations in a multi-site stepped wedge pragmatic trial of a cancer symptom management intervention. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Feb 9;38:101269. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101269. eCollection 2024 Apr.
PubMed 38380342Kroenke K, Lam V, Ruddy KJ, Pachman DR, Herrin J, Rahman PA, Griffin JM, Cheville AL. Prevalence, Severity, and Co-Occurrence of SPPADE Symptoms in 31,866 Patients With Cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 May;65(5):367-377. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.01.020. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
PubMed 36738867
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Oct 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Enhanced, EHR-Facilitated Cancer Symptom Control (E2C2) Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03892967
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 18-007779
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50,207 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mayo ClinicUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- 28 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 7 Oct 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This early phase I trial investigates enhanced, electronic health record (EHR)-facilitated cancer system control. Cancer and its treatment are often associated with severe, disabling symptoms that have been causally linked to diminished survival, increased healthcare utilization, degraded quality of life, unemployment, and non-adherence to recommended cancer treatments. Collaborative case management for control of moderate or worse sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue (SPADE symptoms), and physical dysfunction among cancer survivors and patients with cancer may improve quality of life, symptom severity, and adherence to cancer treatment, and may also reduce need for acute care.
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
- Conduct a cluster randomized pragmatic trial with a stepped wedge design to test the hypothesis that a symptom control-focused enhanced, electronic health record (EHR)-facilitated cancer symptom control (E2C2) intervention will significantly reduce sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue (SPADE) symptom and physical dysfunction scores, reduce unplanned hospitalizations and emergency department visits, improve adherence to cancer therapies, and improve self-reported quality of life.
II. Evaluate the hypothesis that use of a multifaceted, evidence-based implementation strategy to support adoption and use of the E2C2 system will result in improvements in implementation and clinical outcomes.
III. Conduct a mixed methods evaluation to detect, understand and reduce disparities in the adoption and implementation of the E2C2 intervention among elderly and rural-dwelling patients with cancer.
OUTLINE:
The first Primary Objective involves a stepped wedge enrollment into the study intervention. Involvement is based off the patients' responses to the pain questionnaire (low pain = no involvement, moderate pain = offer of patient education materials, severe pain = involvement of a Symptom Care Manager). Symptom Care Managers will work with interested patients who endorse high pain to help address and manage their pain. The third objective involves a subset of patients included in the E2C2 who are offered to participate in a one-time interview lasting 30-45 minutes. Providers and stakeholders also will be invited to participate in an interview lasting 15-30 minutes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Supportive care (interview) | Experimental | Other: Interview, Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment, Other: Questionnaire AdministrationPatients randomized to E2C2 intervention participate in an interview over 30-45 minutes. Providers and stakeholders also participate in an interview over 15-30 minutes. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Being seen for a solid or liquid cancer at a Midwest Mayo Clinic Midwest Mayo Clinic Health Systems (MCHS) site or for a solid tumor at Mayo Clinic Rochester
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- No Minors (under age 18) will receive the questionnaires but no further exclusions can be made based on the standard of care for questionnaire assignment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| InterviewParticipate in interview | Other | Supportive care (interview) |
| Quality-of-Life AssessmentAlso: Quality of Life AssessmentAncillary studies | Other | Supportive care (interview) |
| Questionnaire AdministrationAncillary studies | Other | Supportive care (interview) |
Primary outcome
Sleep Disturbance, Pain, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue (SPADE) Symptom Scores.
Time frame: Up to 46 months (beginning from a participants' index medical oncology encounter until death, last clinical encounter, or end of study)
Measured by 11-point Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) for sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and physical function impairment at clinic encounters. Symptoms were assessed on a scale of 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. Changes in sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and physical function impairment from baseline score were modeled jointly as a co-primary outcome.
Physical Function Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Scores
Time frame: Up to 46 months (beginning from a participants' index medical oncology encounter until death, last clinical encounter, or end of study)
Measured by 11-point Numeric Rating Scales (NRS) for sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and physical function impairment at clinic encounters. Symptoms were assessed on a scale of 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. Changes in sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and physical function impairment following any NRS score of >=4/10 modeled jointly as a co-primary outcome.
7 secondary outcomes
Change in Anxiety Score
Time frame: Baseline to 46 months
Change in Depression Score
Time frame: Baseline to 46 months
Change in Average Pain Interference Over the Past Week
Time frame: Baseline to 46 months
Change in Physical Function Score
Time frame: Baseline to 46 months
Health Care Utilization
Time frame: Up to 46 months (beginning from a participants' index medical oncology encounter until death, 18 months after last clinical encounter, or end of study)
Adherence to Cancer Treatment
Time frame: Up to 46 months (beginning from a participants' index medical oncology encounter until death or end of study)
Number of Deceased Participants
Time frame: Up to 46 months (beginning from a participants' index medical oncology encounter until death or end of study)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Oct 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 32503661Finney Rutten LJ, Ruddy KJ, Chlan LL, Griffin JM, Herrin J, Leppin AL, Pachman DR, Ridgeway JL, Rahman PA, Storlie CB, Wilson PM, Cheville AL. Pragmatic cluster randomized trial to evaluate effectiveness and implementation of enhanced EHR-facilitated cancer symptom control (E2C2). Trials. 2020 Jun 5;21(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04335-w.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41344348Cheville AL, Herrin J, Pachman DR, Grzegorczyk V, Kroenke K, Ridgeway JL, Minteer SA, Austin JD, Griffin JM, Chlan L, Tofthagen C, Mitchell SA, Smith A, Ruddy KJ. Electronic health record-facilitated symptom surveillance and collaborative care intervention in oncology (E2C2): a cluster-randomised, population-level, stepped-wedge, pragmatic trial. Lancet Oncol. 2026 Jan;27(1):125-136. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00526-1. Epub 2025 Dec 1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40903741Minteer SA, Ridgeway JL, Pachman DR, Austin JD, Griffin JM, Ruddy KJ, Cheville AL. Barriers and facilitators to using practice facilitators to implement a remote cancer symptom management intervention: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Sep 3;25(1):1189. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13378-1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40524282Kuharic M, Merle JL, Cella D, Mitchell SA, DiMartino L, Ridgeway JL, Dizon DS, Paudel R, Austin JD, Wong SL, Flores AM, Cheville AL, Smith JD; IMPACT Consortium. Psychometric evaluation of the NoMAD instrument in cancer care settings: assessing factorial validity, measurement invariance, and differential item functioning. Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Jun 16;6(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00756-3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39106420Austin JD, Finney Rutten LJ, Fischer K, Ridgeway J, Minteer S, Griffin JM, Pachman DR, Ruddy KJ, Cheville A. Advancing Care Team Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems for Cancer Symptom Management: Findings From a Hybrid Type II, Cluster-Randomized, Stepped-Wedge Trial. JCO Oncol Pract. 2025 Feb;21(2):209-217. doi: 10.1200/OP.24.00280. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38380342Ridgeway JL, Cheville AL, Fischer KJ, Tesch NK, Austin JD, Minteer SA, Pachman DR, Chlan LL, Ruddy KJ, Griffin JM. Tracking activities and adaptations in a multi-site stepped wedge pragmatic trial of a cancer symptom management intervention. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Feb 9;38:101269. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101269. eCollection 2024 Apr.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36738867Kroenke K, Lam V, Ruddy KJ, Pachman DR, Herrin J, Rahman PA, Griffin JM, Cheville AL. Prevalence, Severity, and Co-Occurrence of SPPADE Symptoms in 31,866 Patients With Cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 May;65(5):367-377. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.01.020. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
Related trials for Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing AZD5363 as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With AKT Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol Y)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing GDC-0032 (Taselisib) as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With PIK3CA Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol I)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Clonal Hematopoiesis and Therapy-Emergent Myeloid Neoplasms in Patients With Cancers, CHANCES Study
Recurrent Fallopian Tube Carcinoma, Recurrent Ovarian Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andrea L Cheville principal investigator
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Interview, Quality-of-Life Assessment and Questionnaire Administration in people with Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell Neoplasm and Malignant Solid Neoplasm, run by Mayo Clinic at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Oct 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sleep Disturbance, Pain, Anxiety, Depression, Fatigue (SPADE) Symptom Scores. (time frame: Up to 46 months (beginning from a participants' index medical oncology encounter until death, last clinical encounter, or end of study)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03892967, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2025.