AzTrials
AzTrials

Pyruvate Kinase DeficiencyPhase 3NCT03853798

Extension Study of AG-348 in Adult Participants With Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency Previously Enrolled in AG-348-006 or AG348-C-007

A Phase 3 study testing Mitapivat in people with Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency, run by Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 42 sites in 16 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is an open-label, multicenter, extension study to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of treatment with mitapivat in participants who were previously enrolled in Study AG348-C-006 or Study AG348-C-007. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency
What is being tested?
Mitapivat
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
90 participants
Where
42 sitesin 16 countries
Study dates
21 Mar 2019to 3 Jul 2024
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Be willing and able to comply with study visits and procedures.
  • Have signed written informed consent prior to participating in this extension study.
  • Have completed either antecedent study AG348-C-006 or AG348-C-007 through the Part 2 Week 24 Visit.
  • Cohorts 2 and 3: Have demonstrated clinical benefit from mitapivat treatment in the antecedent study, in the opinion of the Investigator.
  • For women of reproductive potential, have a negative pregnancy test during screening of this extension study.
  • For women of reproductive potential as well as men with partners who are women of reproductive potential, be abstinent as part of their usual lifestyle, or agree to use 2 forms of contraception, 1 of which must be considered highly effective, from the time of giving informed consent, during the study, and for 28 days following the last dose of study drug for women and 90 days following the last dose of study drug for men.

Who cannot join

  • Have a significant medical condition (including clinically significant laboratory abnormality) that developed during his/her antecedent AG- 348 study that confers an unacceptable risk to participating in this extension study, that could confound the interpretation of the study data, and/or that compromises the ability of the participant to complete study visits and procedures.
  • Are currently pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Have a splenectomy scheduled during the study treatment period.
  • Meet the withdrawal criteria of his/her antecedent mitapivat study during screening of this extension study.
  • Are currently receiving medications that are strong inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 that have not been stopped for a duration of at least 5 days or a time frame equivalent to 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) before start of study drug; or strong inducers of CYP3A4 that have not been stopped for a duration of at least 28 days or a time frame equivalent to 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) before start of study drug on this extension study.
  • Have received anabolic steroids, including testosterone preparations, within 28 days prior to start of study drug on this extension study.
  • Have received hematopoietic stimulating agents (eg, erythropoietins, granulocyte colony stimulating factors, thrombopoietins) within 28 days prior to start of study drug on this extension study.
  • Have exposure to any investigational drug other than mitapivat, device, or procedure within 3 months prior to start of study drug on this extension study.

Trial locations and contacts

42 sites in 16 countries.

42 sites in 16 countries

United States12 sites
  • Emory-Children's Center

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • Boston Children's Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229

  • Wayne State University School of Medicine

    Detroit, Michigan, 48201

  • Duke University Medical Center

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

  • Houston Methodist Research Institute

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Indiana Hemophilia & Thrombosis Center Inc.

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46260

  • UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, Oakland

    Oakland, California, 95609

  • Phoenix Children's Hospital

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85016

  • University of Utah

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84113

  • Seattle Cancer Care Alliance

    Seattle, Washington, 98195

Other trials in United States

Japan5 sites
  • Kyoto Katsura Hospital

    Kyoto, 615-8256

  • Kansai Medical University, Dep. of Pediatrics, Hirakata Hospital

    Osaka, 573-1010

  • Tohoku University Hospital

    Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574

  • Toho University Omori Medical Center

    Tokyo, 8541

  • Mie University Hospital

    Tsu, Mie-ken, 514-8507

Other trials in Japan

France4 sites
  • CHU Hopitaux de Bordeaux - Hôpital Saint-André

    Bordeaux, 33000

  • CHU Hôpital Henri Mondor

    Créteil, 94010

  • Hospital La Timone

    Marseille, 13385

  • Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole

    Toulouse, 31100

Other trials in France

Italy4 sites
  • Ospedale Galliera

    Genova, 16128

  • Osp Maggiore Policlinico Milano

    Milan, 20122

  • AORN Cardarelli

    Naples, 00165

  • Università della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"

    Naples, 80318

Other trials in Italy

Spain3 sites
  • Hospital. U. Vall d'Hebron

    Barcelona, 08035

  • Hospital Universitario La Paz

    Madrid, 28046

  • Htal Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca.

    Murcia, 30120

Other trials in Spain

United Kingdom3 sites
  • Addenbrooke's Hospital

    Cambridge, CB2 0QQ

  • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust

    London, W2 INY

  • University College London

    London, WC1E 6BT

Other trials in United Kingdom

Germany2 sites
  • Charite - UB - CVK - Medizinische Klinik

    Berlin, 10117

  • Universitätsklinik Würzburg

    Würzburg, 97080

Other trials in Germany

Brazil1 site
  • UNICAMP - Hemocentro

    São Paulo, 13083-878

Other trials in Brazil

Canada1 site
  • McMaster University

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8N3Z5

Other trials in Canada

Denmark1 site
  • Herlev University Hospital

    Herlev, 2730

Other trials in Denmark

Ireland1 site
  • St James's Hospital

    Dublin

Other trials in Ireland

Netherlands1 site
  • Van Creveldkliniek

    Utrecht, 3508 GA

Other trials in Netherlands

South Korea1 site
  • Yeungnam University Hospital

    Daegu, 705-703

Other trials in South Korea

Switzerland1 site
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV)

    Vaud (Lausanne), 1011

Other trials in Switzerland

Thailand1 site
  • Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital

    Bangkok, 10700

Other trials in Thailand

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine

    Ankara, 06100

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Extension Study of AG-348 in Adult Subjects With Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency Previously Enrolled in AG-348 Studies

This is an open-label, multicenter, extension study to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of treatment with mitapivat in participants who were previously enrolled in Study AG348-C-006 or Study AG348-C-007.

Being tested
Mitapivat
Medical subject headings
Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency of Red Cells

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MitapivatDrug

    Also called AG-348, AG-348 sulfate hydrate, Mitapivat sulfate

    Tablets

Study groups in NCT03853798
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cohort 1ExperimentalParticipants who received placebo in Study AG348-C-006 and met the eligibility criteria of this extension study were enrolled to receive mitapivat tablets, 5 milligrams (mg), twice daily (BID), administered orally, for 4 weeks as a starting dose, followed by two potential sequential dose level increases to 20 mg and 50 mg BID at Weeks 4 and 8 respectively as determined by the investigator based on safety and efficacy. The optimized dose for each participant was determined at Week 12, and participants then received that optimized dose for a period of 12 weeks (Weeks 13-24) as a fixed dose and from Week 25 to Week 193, until study withdrawal, or the study was closed.
Receives: Drug: Mitapivat
Cohort 2ExperimentalParticipants who received mitapivat at a dose of 5 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg, BID, in the fixed dose period of Study AG348-C-006 and met the eligibility criteria of this extension study continued to receive the same mitapivat dose up to Week 193 or until study withdrawal, or the study was closed.
Receives: Drug: Mitapivat
Cohort 3ExperimentalParticipants who received mitapivat at a dose of 5 mg, 20 mg, or 50 mg, BID, in the fixed dose period of Study AG348-C-007 and met the eligibility criteria of this extension study continued to receive the same mitapivat dose up to Week 193 or until study withdrawal, or the study was closed.
Receives: Drug: Mitapivat

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. All Cohorts: Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Related TEAEs and TEAEs With Severity Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3

    A clinical adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the study drug. TEAEs are AEs with an initial onset date during the on-treatment period or worsening from baseline and include both serious and non-serious TEAEs. Severity of AEs was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE; Version 4.03): grade 1: mild; grade 2: moderate; grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; grade 4: life threatening or disabling; grade 5: death related to AE.

    Measured: Up to 197 weeks

  2. All Cohorts: Number of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Dose Reduction, Treatment Interruption and Treatment Discontinuation

    A clinical AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the study drug. TEAEs are AEs with an initial onset date during the on-treatment period or worsening from baseline and include both serious and non-serious TEAEs. Number of participants with TEAEs leading to dose reduction, treatment interruption and treatment discontinuation are reported.

    Measured: Up to 197 weeks

  3. All Cohorts: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Parameters Reported as Grade Greater Than or Equal to (≥)3 TEAEs

    Clinical laboratory assessments including hematology, clinical chemistry, triglycerides, urate, coagulation, urinalysis, and liver function tests were performed in the study. Clinically significant treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities were graded according to the NCI CTCAE; Version 4.03: grade 1: mild; grade 2: moderate; grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; grade 4: life threatening or disabling; grade 5: death related to AE. Clinical significance was determined based on the judgment of the Investigator.

    Measured: Up to 197 weeks

  4. All Cohorts: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs Measurements and Physical Examinations Reported as TEAEs

    Vital signs and physical examinations including height, weight, body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, temperature were assessed. Number of participants who experienced clinically significant abnormalities in vital signs and physical examinations as TEAEs were reported. Clinical significance was determined based on the judgment of the Investigator.

    Measured: Up to 197 weeks

  5. All Cohorts: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Bone Mineral Density (BMD)

    BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans during the study. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities were reported. Clinical significance was determined based on the judgment of the Investigator.

    Measured: Up to 192 weeks

  6. All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Adjusted Spine T-score

    T-score of adjusted spine were assessed by DXA scans. The T-score is the number of standard deviations that bone density is above or below the average. A score of ≥ -1 indicates normal bone density; score between < -1 and > -2.5 indicates a sign of osteopenia (bone density below normal), and score of ≤ -2.5 indicates a sign of osteoporosis.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 192

  7. All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Adjusted Spine Z-score

    The Z-score is a statistical measure to describe whether a value was above or below the standard. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the standard. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the standard and higher numbers indicate values higher than the standard.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 192

  8. All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Femoral Total T-score

    T-score of femoral total were assessed by DXA scans. The T-score is the number of standard deviations that bone density is above or below the average. A score of ≥ -1 indicates normal bone density; score between < -1 and > -2.5 indicates a sign of osteopenia (bone density below normal), and score of ≤ -2.5 indicates a sign of osteoporosis.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 192

  9. All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Femoral Total Z-score

    The Z-score is a statistical measure to describe whether a value was above or below the standard. A Z-score of 0 is equal to the standard. Lower numbers indicate values lower than the standard and higher numbers indicate values higher than the standard.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 192

  10. All Cohorts: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters Reported as TEAEs

    The following ECG parameters including RR, PR, heart rate-corrected QT interval using the Fridericia's formula (QRS), QT, and QTc were assessed during the study. Number of Participants with clinically significant abnormalities in ECG parameters as TEAEs were reported. Clinical significance was determined based on the judgment of the Investigator.

    Measured: Up to 197 weeks

Secondary outcomes (18)
  1. Cohort 1: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Hemoglobin (Hb) Response

    The Hb response was defined as a greater than or equal to (≥)1.5 grams per deciliter (g/dL) (0.93 millimoles per liter [mmol/L]) increase in Hb concentration from baseline that is sustained at 2 or more scheduled assessments, excluding those within 2 months (61 days) of transfusion. The baseline value for cohort 1 participants was the average of all available measurements from the central laboratory within 45 (42+3) days before start of study treatment in study AG348-C-011, excluding values within 61 days after a transfusion, or the baseline value from study AG348-C-006 if no assessment is available.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 24

  2. Cohort 1: Average Change From Baseline in Hb Concentration at Weeks 16, 20, and 24

    The baseline value for participants was the average of all available measurements from the central laboratory within 45 (42+3) days before start of study treatment in study AG348-C-011, excluding values within 61 days after a transfusion, or the baseline value from study AG348-C-006 if no assessment is available. The mean of average change from baseline in Hb concentration across Weeks 16, 20 and 24 is reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 16, 20, and 24

  3. Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 8-hours Post-dose (AUC0-8) of Mitapivat

    Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-dose at Week 12

  4. Cohort 1: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-last) of Mitapivat

    Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-dose at Week 12

  5. Cohort 1: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Mitapivat

    Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-dose at Week 12

  6. Cohort 1: Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Mitapivat

    Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-dose at Week 12

  7. Cohort 1: Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (Tlast) of Mitapivat

    Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-dose at Week 12

  8. Cohort 1: Plasma Concentration (Ctrough) at the End of a Dosing Interval of Mitapivat

    Measured: Pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-dose at Week 12

  9. Cohort 1: Exposure-response (E-R) Relationship Between Safety Parameters and Mitapivat Concentration and Relevant Mitapivat Pharmacokinetic Parameters

    Measured: First dose to up to 24 weeks

  10. Cohorts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Hb Concentration

    The baseline value for cohort 1 participant was the average of all available measurements from the central laboratory within 45 (42+3) days before start of study treatment in study AG348-C-011, excluding values within 61 days after a transfusion, or the baseline value from study AG348-C-006 if no assessment was available. The baseline value for cohort 2 was from Study AG348-C-006.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 192

  11. Cohorts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Indirect Bilirubin

    The baseline value for cohort 1 participant was the average of all available measurements from the central laboratory within 45 (42+3) days before start of study treatment in study AG348-C-011, excluding values within 61 days after a transfusion, or the baseline value from study AG348-C-006 if no assessment is available. The baseline value for cohort 2 was from Study AG348-C-006.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 192

  12. Cohorts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH)

    The baseline value for cohort 1 participant was the average of all available measurements from the central laboratory within 45 (42+3) days before start of study treatment in study AG348-C-011, excluding values within 61 days after a transfusion, or the baseline value from study AG348-C-006 if no assessment was available. The baseline value for cohort 2 was from Study AG348-C-006.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 192

  13. Cohorts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Haptoglobin Levels

    The baseline value for Cohort 1 participant was the average of all available measurements from the central laboratory within 45 (42+3) days before start of study treatment in study AG348-C-011, excluding values within 61 days after a transfusion, or the baseline value from study AG348-C-006 if no assessment was available. The baseline value for Cohort 2 was from Study AG348-C-006.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 192

  14. Cohorts 1 and 2: Change From Baseline in Reticulocytes/Erythrocytes Ratio

    The baseline value for Cohort 1 participants was the average of all available measurements from the central laboratory within 45 (42+3) days before start of study treatment in study AG348-C-011, excluding values within 61 days after a transfusion, or the baseline value from study AG348-C-006 if no assessment was available. The baseline value for Cohort 2 was from Study AG348-C-006.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 192

  15. Cohort 3: Change From Baseline in Number of Transfusion Episodes

    Number of transfusions at baseline was determined based on the transfusion data during the 52 weeks before informed consent for Cohort 3. Number of on-study transfusions was based on transfusions collected up to the end of the fixed dose period and standardized to 52 weeks. The change from baseline in number of transfusions was summarized for Cohort 3.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 192

  16. Cohort 3: Change From Baseline in Number of Red Blood Cell (RBC) Units Transfused

    Annualized total number of RBC units transfused (units/52-week) during the study, including data up to end of study (EOS), was the total number of RBC units transfused during the entire study*52 / [(date of EOS - date of start of study treatment + 1)/7]. Number of RBC units were determined based on the transfusion data during the 52 weeks before informed consent of the antecedent study for Cohort 3. Number of on-study RBC units was based on transfusion data collected up to the end of the fixed dose period and standardized to 52 weeks.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 192

  17. All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Scores: Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency Diary (PKDD)

    The PKDD is a validated, daily 7-item PRO instrument with a recall period of 24 hours that measures the core signs and symptoms associated with pyruvate kinase deficiency in adults. The symptoms include tiredness, jaundice, bone pain, shortness of breath, and energy level. PKDD daily scores were calculated based on the participant's response to the PKDD questionnaire. Score ranges from 25 to 76, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms and a higher disease burden. The change from baseline in weekly mean scores was summarized. A negative change from baseline indicates a lower disease burden. Baseline of weekly mean score was defined as average of daily scores collected within 7 days before start of study treatment (mitapivat). For Cohort 1, last measurement before the start of study treatment in AG348-C-011 was used as baseline; if baseline was missing, then baseline value from AG348-C-006 was used. For Cohorts 2 \& 3 baseline values from -006 and-007, respectively, were used.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  18. All Cohorts: Change From Baseline in HRQoL PRO Scores: Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency Impact Assessment (PKDIA)

    PKDIA is a 12-item PRO measure of common impacts of PK deficiency on activities of daily living. Participants rated how PK deficiency has impacted aspects of daily living in past 7 days, including impacts on relationships \& leisure and social, mental, and physical activities. PKDIA score at each visit was based on 8 items that were retained after in-trial psychometric validation and calculated at each visit based on participant's response to PKDIA questionnaire. Score ranges from 30 to 76, with higher scores indicating higher disease burden. Negative change from baseline indicates lower disease burden. Baseline was defined as the last complete assessment (with no missing item in response) before start of study treatment. For Cohort 1, last measurement before start of study treatment in AG348-C-011 was used as baseline; if baseline was missing, then baseline value from AG348-C-006 was used. For Cohorts 2 and 3, the baseline values from 006 and 007, respectively, were used.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Feb 2019
  2. Study start21 Mar 2019
  3. Primary completion3 Jul 2024
  4. Study completion3 Jul 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
90 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03853798
Sponsor's protocol ID
AG348-C-011
Other IDs
2018-003459-39, 2018
Status last verified
Nov 2025
First submitted
22 Feb 2019
Last updated
18 Nov 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • van Beers EJ, Al-Samkari H, Grace RF, Barcellini W, Glenthoj A, DiBacco M, Wind-Rotolo M, Xu R, Beynon V, Patel P, Porter JB, Kuo KHM. Mitapivat improves ineffective erythropoiesis and iron overload in adult patients with pyruvate kinase deficiency. Blood Adv. 2024 May 28;8(10):2433-2441. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011743.

    PubMed 38330179
  • Rab MAE, Van Oirschot BA, Kosinski PA, Hixon J, Johnson K, Chubukov V, Dang L, Pasterkamp G, Van Straaten S, Van Solinge WW, Van Beers EJ, Kung C, Van Wijk R. AG-348 (Mitapivat), an allosteric activator of red blood cell pyruvate kinase, increases enzymatic activity, protein stability, and ATP levels over a broad range of PKLR genotypes. Haematologica. 2021 Jan 1;106(1):238-249. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2019.238865.

    PubMed 31974203

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Mitapivat in people with Pyruvate Kinase Deficiency, run by Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 42 sites in 16 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 42 sites in United States, Japan, France, Italy, Spain and 11 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Nov 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

All Cohorts: Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Related TEAEs and TEAEs With Severity Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3 (time frame: Up to 197 weeks). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03853798, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Nov 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in