AzTrials
AzTrials

Peripheral Artery DiseaseNCT03849300

Impacts of Aquatic vs Land Walking on Vascular Health and Exercise Tolerance in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease

A study testing Aquatic walking exercise program group 1, Aquatic walking exercise program group 2 and Land-based walking exercise group in people with Peripheral Artery Disease and Vascular Function, run by Pusan National University.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study was to examine the impacts of a 12-week aquatic walking exercise program on body composition, vascular function, cardiorespiratory capacity, exercise tolerance, muscular strength, and physical function in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 85 years
What is being tested?
Aquatic walking exercise program group 1, Aquatic walking exercise program group 2 and Land-based walking exercise group
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
147 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
9 May 2010to 4 Feb 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Peripheral artery disease (ankle-brachial index between 0.6 and 0.9)
  • 50-85 years of age
  • Sedentary (less than 1 hour of regular exercise participation per week within the previous year)

Who cannot join

  • current smoker (smoking within previous 6 months)
  • psychiatric conditions
  • pulmonary disease
  • renal disease
  • thyroid disease

About this study

Official title: The Impacts of Aquatic Walking and Land-based Walking Exercise Therapy Programs on Vascular Function, Cardiorespiratory Capacity, Exercise Tolerance, Muscular Strength, and Physical Function in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease

The purpose of this study was to examine the impacts of a 12-week aquatic walking exercise program on body composition, vascular function, cardiorespiratory capacity, exercise tolerance, muscular strength, and physical function in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). The effects of the 12-week aquatic walking exercise program were also compared to the effects of a 12-week land-based walking exercise program.

Being tested
Aquatic walking exercise program group 1, Aquatic walking exercise program group 2, Land-based walking exercise group
Keywords
arterial stiffness, cardiorespiratory capacity, exercise tolerance, VO2max
Medical subject headings
Peripheral Arterial Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Aquatic walking exercise program group 1Other

    12 week aquatic walking exercise program

  • Aquatic walking exercise program group 2Other

    12 week aquatic walking exercise program

  • Land-based walking exercise groupOther

    12 week land-based walking exercise program

Study groups in NCT03849300
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control GroupNo interventionNo exercise intervention
Aquatic walking exercise group 1ExperimentalThe aquatic walking exercise program was performed for 60 minutes per day, 4 times per week for 12 weeks. The program consisted of a warm-up (10 min) and cool-down (10 min) which included stretching and gait training. The 40-minute main exercise session included 10 minutes of hip flexion-extension, hip abduction-adduction, and knee flexion-extension. The last 30 minutes included water walking (forward, backward). The program intensity was established using heart rate reserve (HRR). Weeks 1-4 were at 50-60% HRR, weeks 5-8 were at 60-70% HRR, and weeks 9-12 were at 70-85% HRR. Subjects wore a heart rate monitor during the whole exercise training session in order to maintain the designated training intensity.
Receives: Other: Aquatic walking exercise program group 1
Aquatic walking exercise group 2ExperimentalThe aquatic walking exercise program was performed for 60 minutes per day, 4 times per week for 12 weeks. The program consisted of a warm-up (10 min) and cool-down (10 min) which included stretching and gait training. The 40-minute main exercise session included 10 minutes of hip flexion-extension, hip abduction-adduction, and knee flexion-extension. The last 30 minutes included water walking (forward, backward). The program intensity was established using heart rate reserve (HRR). Weeks 1-4 were at 50-60% HRR, weeks 5-8 were at 60-70% HRR, and weeks 9-12 were at 70-85% HRR. Subjects wore a heart rate monitor during the whole exercise training session in order to maintain the designated training intensity.
Receives: Other: Aquatic walking exercise program group 2
Land-based walking exercise groupActive comparatorThe land-based walking exercise program was performed for 60 minutes per day, 4 times per week for 12 weeks. The program consisted of a warm-up (10 min) and cool-down (10 min) which included stretching and gait training. The 40-minute main exercise session included 10 minutes of low-intensity forward, backward, and lateral side-stepping movements on flat group. The remaining 30 minutes included treadmill walking exercise. The program intensity was established using heart rate reserve (HRR). Weeks 1-4 were at 50-60% HRR, weeks 5-8 were at 60-70% HRR, and weeks 9-12 were at 70-85% HRR. Subjects wore a heart rate monitor during the whole exercise training session in order to maintain the designated training intensity.
Receives: Other: Land-based walking exercise group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Peripheral Arterial Stiffness

    Peripheral arterial stiffness was estimated as measurement of femoral-to-ankle pulse wave velocity (meters per second). A higher value represents a worse outcome. Scale range is approximately 7.0 - 14.0 meters per second for healthy populations.

    Measured: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Body Composition

    Body composition was measured using bioelectrical impedance analysis as percent body fat. A higher value represents a worse outcome. Scale range is approximately 10-35% for healthy populations.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  2. Resting Heart Rate

    Resting heart rate was measured as beats per minute (bpm). A higher value represents a worse outcome. Acceptable scale range is approximately 60-80 bpm for healthy populations.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  3. Systolic Blood Pressure

    Blood pressure was measured as millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Higher values represent a worse outcome. Scale range for systolic blood pressure is approximately 110-129mmHg for most healthy populations.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  4. Resting Metabolic Rate

    Resting metabolic rate was measured as kilocalories per day. A higher value represents a better outcome. Scale range is approximately 1200-2200 kilocalories per day for healthy populations.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  5. Cardiorespiratory Capacity

    Cardiorespiratory capacity was measured as the volume of maximal oxygen consumption in milliliters per kilogram per minute (VO2max, mL/kg/min). A higher value represents a better outcome. Scale range is approximately 25-60 mL/kg/min for healthy populations.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  6. Exercise Tolerance - Walking Capacity

    Walking capacity was measured using the 6-minute walk test in meters. A higher value represents a better outcome. Scale range is approximately 400-1000 meters for healthy populations.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  7. Upper Body Strength

    Upper body strength was measured as hand grip strength in kilograms (kg). A higher value represents a better outcome. Scale range is approximately 20-60kg for healthy populations.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  8. Lower Body Strength

    Lower body strength was measured with leg extension in kilograms (kg). A higher value represents a better outcome. Scale range is approximately 20-120 kg for healthy populations.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  9. Lower Body Flexibility

    Lower body flexibility was measured using sit-and-reach in centimeters (cm). A higher value represents a better outcome. Scale range is approximately 10-30 cm for healthy populations.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  10. Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 General Health Survey for Physical Function

    The physical function domain score of the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 General Health Survey was measured. The scale range is from 0 to 100 percent. Higher scores represent a better outcome.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  11. Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Blood pressure was measured as millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Higher values represent a worse outcome. Scale range for diastolic blood pressure is approximately 70-79 mmHg for most healthy populations.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  12. Systemic Arterial Stiffness

    Systemic arterial stiffness was estimated as measurement of brachial-to-ankle pulse wave velocity (meters per second). A higher value represents a worse outcome. Scale range is approximately 7.0 - 14.0 meters per second for healthy populations.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  13. Time to Onset of Claudication

    Time to onset of claudication was measured during the 6-minute walking distance test (seconds). A higher value represents a better outcome. Healthy populations can typically walk the entire 6 minutes (360 seconds) without experiencing claudication.

    Measured: 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Feb 2019
  2. Study start9 May 2010
  3. Primary completion8 Aug 2017
  4. Study completion4 Feb 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
aquatic walking exercise intervention group 1 vs. control group; aquatic walking exercise intervention group 2 vs. land-based walking exercise group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
147 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03849300
Sponsor's protocol ID
UNOmaha5
Status last verified
Oct 2020
First submitted
19 Feb 2019
Last updated
3 Nov 2020
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Aquatic walking exercise program group 1, Aquatic walking exercise program group 2 and Land-based walking exercise group in people with Peripheral Artery Disease and Vascular Function, run by Pusan National University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Mar 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Peripheral Arterial Stiffness (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Nov 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in