Atrial FibrillationPhase 4NCT03844841
The Deep Sedation for Ablation Study
A Phase 4 study testing Propofol and Dexmedetomidine in people with Atrial Fibrillation and Ablation, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
Catheter ablation (CA) is an established therapeutic option for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). During the procedure, patients are usually sedated and analgesized, most commonly by administration of Propofol combined with opioids under the supervision of the electrophysiologist. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Atrial Fibrillation, Ablation, Sedation
- What is being tested?
- Propofol and Dexmedetomidine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 160 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2019to 31 Dec 2020
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥18 years
- Informed consent as documented by signature
- Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation at the Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern
Who cannot join
- Contraindication to sedation by the electrophysiologist
- Contraindications to either propofol or dexmedetomidine sedation
- Contraindication for targeted controlled propofol infusion (BMI > 35)
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification > III
- Advanced heart block (second or third degree), if no pacemaker or internal cardioverter defibrillator is implanted
- Arterial hypotension (mean < 80 mmHg)
Show all 9Show fewer
- Severe heart failure (LVEF ≤ 30%)
- Indication for general anaesthesia
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Switzerland1 site
Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Inselspital Bern
Bern, Canton of Bern, 3010
About this study
Official title: DExmEdetomidine Sedation Versus Propofol SEDATION FOR Catheter ABLATION of Atrial Fibrillation Under a Cardiologist Supervision: A Randomized Controlled Pilot STUDY
Catheter ablation (CA) is an established therapeutic option for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). During the procedure, patients are usually sedated and analgesized, most commonly by administration of Propofol combined with opioids under the supervision of the electrophysiologist. However, due to the depressive effect of Propofol on the respiratory system, this regimen is not without risk. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective alpha 2 agonist that demonstrates both analgesic and hypnotic properties with only weak effect on the respiratory system. The pharmacological profile of Dexmedetomidine may be advantageous for sedation during CA of AF. The aim of this randomized trial is to test this hypothesis and explore the safety and efficacy of Dexmedetomidine during CA of AF.
Read the detailed description
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia. In symptomatic patients, electroanatomic mapping aided catheter ablation (CA) is an established therapeutic option. The intervention may last several hours, during which patients are required to lie as still as possible, as inadequate patient movements disturb the electroanatomic map, prolong the intervention and increase its complication risks. Therefore patients are usually sedated and analgesized, most commonly by administration of Propofol combined with opioids under the supervision of the electrophysiologist. Despite its wide use, this regimen is not without risk, as Propofol has a pronounced depressive effect on the respiratory system.
Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective alpha 2 agonist that demonstrates both analgesic and hypnotic properties with only weak respiratory depression. By reducing sympathetic activity it also reduces the stress response to an intervention. For these reasons, Dexmedetomidine is commonly used in intensive care units, where it has been shown to be well tolerated. Consequently, its range of application has been increasingly widened and good experience has been made with its use in transfemoral valve replacement procedures or gastroenterological interventions.
The pharmacological profile of dexmedetomidine may be also advantageous for sedation during CA of AF. The aim of this randomized trial is to test this hypothesis and explore the safety and efficacy of Dexmedetomidine during CA of AF.
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation, Ablation, Sedation, Propofol, Dexmedetomidine
- Being tested
- Propofol, Dexmedetomidine
- Keywords
- Atrial Fibrillation, Ablation, Sedation, Anesthesia, Propofol, Dexmedetomidine
- Medical subject headings
- Atrial Fibrillation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PropofolDrug
At minimum 5 minutes before start of sedation for atrial fibrillation ablation a bolus of fentanyl (20-50 µg) will be administered. Thereafter, sedation is induced via the continuous infusion of propofol using a target-controlled infusion (TCI) pump. The effect-site propofol concentration will be initially set to 1.5 µg/ml, unless the patient is already sedated by fentanyl. Subsequently, an effect-site propofol concentration of 1 µg/ml will be chosen adjusted stepwise (using steps of 0.3 µg/ml) to reach a target score of 2-3 on the MOAA/S scale. In case of pain fentanyl can be administered bolus-wise (10-30 µg) at the cardiologists discretion.
DexmedetomidineDrug
At minimum 5 minutes before start of sedation for atrial fibrillation ablation a bolus of fentanyl (20-50 µg) will be administered. Thereafter, sedation is induced with a loading dose of dexmedetomidine (0.8 µg/kg) over 10 minutes. The maintenance dexmedetomidine dose is adjusted to the appropriate sedation criteria for CA (0.4 µg/kg/h) and for a target score of 2-3 on the MOAA/S scale. In case of pain, additional fentanyl can be administered bolus-wise (10-30 µg) at the cardiologists discretion.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Propofol | Active comparator | Active agent: Propofolum (2,6-Diisopropylphenol). Route of administration: intravenous Receives: Drug: Propofol |
| Dexmedetomidine | Active comparator | Active agent: Dexmedetomidinum ut Dexmedetomidini hydrochloridum. Route of administration: intravenous Receives: Drug: Dexmedetomidine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Combined Incidence of Sedation-Emergent Adverse Events (Combined Safety Endpoint)
- Number of participants with sustained bradycardia necessitating cardiac pacing
- Number of participants with Hypercapnia, defined as rise of transcutaneously measured carbon dioxide levels (tcCO2) > 20mmHg
- Number of participants with Oxygen desaturation (<90%) necessitating assisted ventilation or further airway management in any form (including chin lift, oropharyngeal airway, bag, and mask ventilation or intubation)
- Number of participants with Hypotension necessitating termination of sedation or vasopressor administration
- Number of participants with necessity of termination or change of sedation protocol
- Number of participants with aborted procedure due to sedation issues
Measured: within 24 hours after completion of procedure
Secondary outcomes (14)
Incidence of Sedation-Emergent Adverse Events (Individual Safety Endpoints)
All single components of the primary endpoint
Measured: within 24 hours after completion of procedure
Other complications
Number of complications not related to sedation (cardiac tamponade, stroke/transient ischemic attack, pericardial effusion necessitating therapeutic intervention, bleeding necessitating therapeutic intervention, others) [number of events]
Measured: from start until end of ablation procedure
Opiod dose
Opiod dose required for analgesia [ug]
Measured: from start until end of ablation procedure
Procedure duration
Total duration of the procedure [minutes]
Measured: from start until end of ablation procedure
Fluoroscopy time
Duration of fluoroscopy [minutes]
Measured: from start until end of ablation procedure
General sedation efficacy: occurrence and number of shiftings
General sedation efficacy assessed by the occurrence and number of shiftings of the acquired 3D map due to patient movements, necessitating remapping [number of events]
Measured: from start until end of ablation procedure
Sedation depth
Depth of sedation assessed by the Modified Observer's Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scale [mean score]
Measured: from start until end of ablation procedure
Blood pressure
Mean systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure during sedation and mean drop of blood pressure (pre-procedural blood pressure minus mean blood pressure during sedation) [mmHg]
Measured: from start until end of ablation procedure
Heart rate
Mean heart rate during sedation and mean drop of heart rate (pre-procedural heart rate minus mean heart rate during sedation) [beats per minute]
Measured: from start until end of ablation procedure
Refractory period
Effective refractory period of the atria and atrioventricular node [ms]
Measured: from start until end of ablation procedure
Wenckebach point
Wenckebach point of the atrioventricular node [ms]
Measured: from start until end of ablation procedure
Arrhythmia inducibility
Rate of inducibility of supraventricular arrhythmias during pacing manoeuvres (number of successful/number of attempts) [%]
Measured: from start until end of ablation procedure
Patient satisfaction: Patient Satisfaction with Sedation Instrument (PSSI) [score]
Patient satisfaction as assessed by the Patient Satisfaction with Sedation Instrument (PSSI) [score]
Measured: within 24 hours after completion of procedure
Cardiologist satisfaction: Clinician Satisfaction with Sedation Instrument (CSSI) [score]
Cardiologist satisfaction as assessed by the Clinician Satisfaction with Sedation Instrument (CSSI) [score]
Measured: within 24 hours after completion of procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Feb 2019
- Study start1 Jul 2019
- Primary completion31 Dec 2020
- Study completion31 Dec 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atrial FibrillationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Helge Servatius, MD, Principal investigator, Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03844841
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2018-02128
- Other IDs
- 2018
- Status last verified
- Jan 2021
- First submitted
- 30 Oct 2018
- Last updated
- 25 Jan 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Servatius H, Kueffer T, Erdoes G, Seiler J, Tanner H, Noti F, Haeberlin A, Madaffari A, Branca M, Dutschler S, Theiler L, Reichlin T, Roten L. Electrophysiological differences of randomized deep sedation with dexmedetomidine versus propofol. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Jul 31;24(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02647-x.
PubMed 39085782
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jan 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- DExmEdetomidine Sedation Versus Propofol SEDATION FOR Catheter ABLATION of Atrial Fibrillation Under a Cardiologist Supervision: A Randomized Controlled Pilot STUDY
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03844841
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2018-02128
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation, Ablation, Sedation, Propofol, Dexmedetomidine
- Keywords
- Atrial Fibrillation, Ablation, Sedation, Anesthesia, Propofol, Dexmedetomidine
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Catheter ablation (CA) is an established therapeutic option for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). During the procedure, patients are usually sedated and analgesized, most commonly by administration of Propofol combined with opioids under the supervision of the electrophysiologist. However, due to the depressive effect of Propofol on the respiratory system, this regimen is not without risk. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective alpha 2 agonist that demonstrates both analgesic and hypnotic properties with only weak effect on the respiratory system. The pharmacological profile of Dexmedetomidine may be advantageous for sedation during CA of AF. The aim of this randomized trial is to test this hypothesis and explore the safety and efficacy of Dexmedetomidine during CA of AF.
Detailed description
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia. In symptomatic patients, electroanatomic mapping aided catheter ablation (CA) is an established therapeutic option. The intervention may last several hours, during which patients are required to lie as still as possible, as inadequate patient movements disturb the electroanatomic map, prolong the intervention and increase its complication risks. Therefore patients are usually sedated and analgesized, most commonly by administration of Propofol combined with opioids under the supervision of the electrophysiologist. Despite its wide use, this regimen is not without risk, as Propofol has a pronounced depressive effect on the respiratory system.
Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective alpha 2 agonist that demonstrates both analgesic and hypnotic properties with only weak respiratory depression. By reducing sympathetic activity it also reduces the stress response to an intervention. For these reasons, Dexmedetomidine is commonly used in intensive care units, where it has been shown to be well tolerated. Consequently, its range of application has been increasingly widened and good experience has been made with its use in transfemoral valve replacement procedures or gastroenterological interventions.
The pharmacological profile of dexmedetomidine may be also advantageous for sedation during CA of AF. The aim of this randomized trial is to test this hypothesis and explore the safety and efficacy of Dexmedetomidine during CA of AF.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Propofol | Active comparator | Drug: PropofolActive agent: Propofolum (2,6-Diisopropylphenol). Route of administration: intravenous |
| Dexmedetomidine | Active comparator | Drug: DexmedetomidineActive agent: Dexmedetomidinum ut Dexmedetomidini hydrochloridum. Route of administration: intravenous |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age ≥18 years
- Informed consent as documented by signature
- Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation at the Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Contraindication to sedation by the electrophysiologist
- Contraindications to either propofol or dexmedetomidine sedation
- Contraindication for targeted controlled propofol infusion (BMI > 35)
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification > III
- Advanced heart block (second or third degree), if no pacemaker or internal cardioverter defibrillator is implanted
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PropofolAt minimum 5 minutes before start of sedation for atrial fibrillation ablation a bolus of fentanyl (20-50 µg) will be administered. Thereafter, sedation is induced via the continuous infusion of propofol using a target-controlled infusion (TCI) pump. The effect-site propofol concentration will be initially set to 1.5 µg/ml, unless the patient is already sedated by fentanyl. Subsequently, an effect-site propofol concentration of 1 µg/ml will be chosen adjusted stepwise (using steps of 0.3 µg/ml) to reach a target score of 2-3 on the MOAA/S scale. In case of pain fentanyl can be administered bolus-wise (10-30 µg) at the cardiologists discretion. | Drug | Propofol |
| DexmedetomidineAt minimum 5 minutes before start of sedation for atrial fibrillation ablation a bolus of fentanyl (20-50 µg) will be administered. Thereafter, sedation is induced with a loading dose of dexmedetomidine (0.8 µg/kg) over 10 minutes. The maintenance dexmedetomidine dose is adjusted to the appropriate sedation criteria for CA (0.4 µg/kg/h) and for a target score of 2-3 on the MOAA/S scale. In case of pain, additional fentanyl can be administered bolus-wise (10-30 µg) at the cardiologists discretion. | Drug | Dexmedetomidine |
Primary outcome
Combined Incidence of Sedation-Emergent Adverse Events (Combined Safety Endpoint)
Time frame: within 24 hours after completion of procedure
* Number of participants with sustained bradycardia necessitating cardiac pacing * Number of participants with Hypercapnia, defined as rise of transcutaneously measured carbon dioxide levels (tcCO2) > 20mmHg * Number of participants with Oxygen desaturation (<90%) necessitating assisted ventilation or further airway management in any form (including chin lift, oropharyngeal airway, bag, and mask ventilation or intubation) * Number of participants with Hypotension necessitating termination of sedation or vasopressor administration * Number of participants with necessity of termination or change of sedation protocol * Number of participants with aborted procedure due to sedation issues
14 secondary outcomes
Incidence of Sedation-Emergent Adverse Events (Individual Safety Endpoints)
Time frame: within 24 hours after completion of procedure
Other complications
Time frame: from start until end of ablation procedure
Opiod dose
Time frame: from start until end of ablation procedure
Procedure duration
Time frame: from start until end of ablation procedure
Fluoroscopy time
Time frame: from start until end of ablation procedure
General sedation efficacy: occurrence and number of shiftings
Time frame: from start until end of ablation procedure
Sedation depth
Time frame: from start until end of ablation procedure
Blood pressure
Time frame: from start until end of ablation procedure
Heart rate
Time frame: from start until end of ablation procedure
Refractory period
Time frame: from start until end of ablation procedure
Wenckebach point
Time frame: from start until end of ablation procedure
Arrhythmia inducibility
Time frame: from start until end of ablation procedure
Patient satisfaction: Patient Satisfaction with Sedation Instrument (PSSI) [score]
Time frame: within 24 hours after completion of procedure
Cardiologist satisfaction: Clinician Satisfaction with Sedation Instrument (CSSI) [score]
Time frame: within 24 hours after completion of procedure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jan 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39085782Servatius H, Kueffer T, Erdoes G, Seiler J, Tanner H, Noti F, Haeberlin A, Madaffari A, Branca M, Dutschler S, Theiler L, Reichlin T, Roten L. Electrophysiological differences of randomized deep sedation with dexmedetomidine versus propofol. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Jul 31;24(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02647-x.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Atrial Fibrillation
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Intracardiac Echocardiography Catheter Supply-Chain Reliability and Clinical Access Study
Cardiovascular Diseases, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Recruiting
Posterior Mitral Isthmus Line With Vein of Marshall Ethanolisation Compared With Anterior Mitral Lines in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Not yet recruiting
Exclusion of Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus in Emergency Department Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing CT to Assess for Pulmonary Embolus: A Feasibility Study
Atrial Fibrillation (AF), Pulmonary Embolism (PE)
Recruiting
Impact of Atrial Fibrosis Surface Area on the Occurrence of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Ischemic Stroke of Undetermined Origin: a Prospective Cardiac MRI Pilot Study.
Stroke, Implantation of an Implantable Cardiac Monitor
RecruitingObservational study
Globe Registry: Globe® Pulsed Field System Registry Study for Treating Patients With Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Helge Servatius, MD principal investigator
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Propofol and Dexmedetomidine in people with Atrial Fibrillation and Ablation, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jan 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Combined Incidence of Sedation-Emergent Adverse Events (Combined Safety Endpoint) (time frame: within 24 hours after completion of procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03844841, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jan 2021.