AzTrials
AzTrials

Pain, PostoperativeShortstitchNCT03828409

Comparison of Post-operative Pain in Short Versus Long Stitch for Laparotomy Closure

A study testing Short stitch and Long stitch in people with Pain, Postoperative, run by University of Malaya.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Laparotomy is a surgical procedure where an incision is made through the abdominal wall in order to gain access to the peritoneal cavity. Midline laparotomy incisions were the main type of abdominal access. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Pain, Postoperative
What is being tested?
Short stitch and Long stitch
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
86 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2017to Nov 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Elective primary midline laparotomy,
  • ASA Class I to III
  • hemodynamically stable
  • able to provide consent for surgery

Who cannot join

  • Emergency laparotomy
  • pregnancy
  • history of previous midline laparotomy
  • allergic to opiates
  • unable to use PCA morphine (handicapped)
  • patient will be planned for stoma creation

About this study

Official title: Comparison Of Post-operative Pain In Short Versus Long Stitch Technique For Abdominal Wall Closure After Elective Laparotomy- A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

Laparotomy is a surgical procedure where an incision is made through the abdominal wall in order to gain access to the peritoneal cavity. Midline laparotomy incisions were the main type of abdominal access. However, there were complications associated with laparotomy such as incisional hernia, post-operative pain, surgical site infection and burst abdomen. The anterior abdominal wall consists of skin, fascia, subcutaneous fat, external oblique aponeurosis, internal oblique muscles, transversus abdominis and rectus muscles. The skin and parietal peritoneum are supplied by T7- T12 and L1 nerve. Hence, breaching of the peritoneum, giving rise to post-operative laparotomy pain. It is reported that approximately 60% of patients who underwent laparotomy do complain of post-operative pain.

Techniques of abdominal wall closure has been constantly in order to develop an ideal suture technique to minimise wound complications. One of the most significant changes in abdominal closure technique was the introduction of mass closure technique, known as 'long stitch' (LS). This conventional mass closure, uses a suture-to-wound length ratio (SL:WL) of 4:1, achieved by the use of continuous sutures at one centimetre from rectus edge with inter-suture distance of one centimetre. Studies have shown LS caused compression of tissues enclosed in the mass stitch, leading to tissue ischaemia and necrosis. 'Short stitch' (SS) was introduced in 1980s where it was reported to result in lower rate of incisional hernia and surgical site infection. It has a SL:WL of more than four, achieved by placing the suture five millimetres from rectus edge with inter-suture distance of five millimetre as well. It incorporates only the linea alba, which may reduce tension and post-operative pain.Studies has indicate that approximately 40% of post-operative patients reported inadequate pain relief despite therapeutic intervention. Inadequate pain control is associated with complications such as atelectasis, prolonged immobilization and hospital stay, thromboembolic event, cardiac morbidity, insomnia, ileus and poor wound healing The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of pain is commonly used as measures of pain score or intensity in clinical trials. A more objective way to evaluate the post-operative pain is to assess the usage of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) over a period of time. The commonly used PCA drug for post-operative patient is morphine. As SS relies on less tension and proper distribution of force along the fascial plane, it is possible that it might reduce post-operative pain as compared to LS technique. It can be assessed using total usage of analgesia (intravenous infusion or PCA), with correlation to the respective visual-analogue scales (VAS) or numeric rating scales (NRS) at that particular time. There is no study that evaluate post-operative pain difference between SS and LS technique.

The hypothesis of this study is that SS will reduce PCA morphine usage after midline laparotomy, which translate into reduction in post-operative pain. In order to detect the 30% reduction of PCA morphine, 86 patients are required.

Read the detailed description

Laparotomy is a surgical procedure where an incision is made through the abdominal wall in order to gain access to the peritoneal cavity. Midline laparotomy incisions were the main type of abdominal access However, there were complications associated with laparotomy such as incisional hernia, post-operative pain, surgical site infection and burst abdomen. The anterior abdominal wall consists of skin, fascia, subcutaneous fat, external oblique aponeurosis, internal oblique muscles, transversus abdominis and rectus muscles. The rectus abdominis muscles is covered by rectus sheath, formed by aponeurosis of the internal oblique muscles except posterior layer from the arcuate line downwards. The sheath contains the ends of the lower six thoracic nerves (T7-T12) with first lumbar nerve The skin and parietal peritoneum are supplied by T7- T12 and L1 nerve. Hence, breaching of the peritoneum, giving rise to post-operative laparotomy pain. It is reported that approximately 60% of patients who underwent laparotomy do complain of post-operative pain.

Techniques of abdominal wall closure has been constantly revised in order to develop an ideal suture technique to minimise wound complications. One of the most significant changes in abdominal closure technique was the introduction of mass closure technique, known as 'long stitch' (LS). This conventional mass closure, uses a suture-to-wound length ratio (SL:WL) of 4:1, achieved by the use of continuous sutures at one centimetre from rectus edge with inter-suture distance of one centimetre. Studies have shown LS caused compression of tissues enclosed in the mass stitch, leading to tissue ischaemia and necrosis. 'Short stitch' (SS) was introduced in 1980s where it was reported to result in lower rate of incisional hernia and surgical site infection. It has a SL:WL of more than four, achieved by placing the suture five millimetres from rectus edge with inter-suture distance of five millimetre as well. It incorporates only the linea alba, which may reduce tension and post-operative pain.

Effective post-operative pain management is an important aspect in surgical patient care. Studies has indicate that approximately 40% of post-operative patients reported inadequate pain relief despite therapeutic intervention. Inadequate pain control is associated with complications such as atelectasis, prolonged immobilization and hospital stay, thromboembolic event, cardiac morbidity, insomnia, ileus and poor wound healing. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of pain is commonly used as measures of pain score or intensity in clinical trials. A more objective way to evaluate the post-operative pain is to assess the usage of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) over a period of time. The commonly used PCA drug for post-operative patient is morphine. As SS relies on less tension and proper distribution of force along the fascial plane, it is possible that it might reduce post-operative pain as compared to LS technique. It can be assessed using total usage of analgesia (intravenous infusion or PCA), with correlation to the respective visual-analogue scales (VAS) or numeric rating scales (NRS) at that particular time. There is no study that evaluate post-operative pain difference between SS and LS technique.

This is a prospective, multi-centered, double-blind randomized controlled trial to look into comparison of post-operative pain after elective laparotomy: short versus long stitch technique of closure in two tertiary hospitals. The study started in January 2017 and completed in November 2018. Patient who fulfilled the criteria of recruitment were included into this study.

In order to detect difference of 30% of PCA morphine usage, 86 patients are required. Both group of patients will received equal pre-operative analgesia, antibiotics and induction again. Patients will be randomized into LS and SS group. Once the aim of the surgery is achieved, the operating surgeon will open the sealed enveloped, which contain the group and technique of suture used. Postoperatively patient will be receiving oral paracetamol and taught on PCA morphine usage. PCA morphine usage and VAS score will be assessed by medical officer that are blinded to the treatment. Primary outcome is PCA morphine usage 24 hours post-surgery. Secondary outcome are presence of surgical site infection and length of hospital stay. Patients will subsequently be discharged by the surgeon in charge based on the discharge criteria. Patients will be follow-up in outpatient clinic on same interval. Presence of adverse events or complications will be documented.

Being tested
Short stitch, Long stitch
Keywords
short stitch, post-operative pain, PCA morphine usage, elective midline laparotomy
Medical subject headings
Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Short stitchProcedure or surgery

    The rectus sheath are cleaned off the subcutaneous fats. Short stitch technique uses smaller needle and suture material. The suture is placed nearer to each other as compared to our conventional long stitch technique. It has inter-suture distance of 5mm and 5mm distance from rectus edge. The suture will be started at one end and sutured continuous until the other end. Hence, this technique is applied without tension.

  • Long stitchProcedure or surgery

    Long stitch uses a larger needle and suture material. The suture is placed 1cm from the linea alba and 1 cm from previous suture. This technique include mass closure sutures at the midline laparotomy

Study groups in NCT03828409
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Short stitchActive comparatorshort stitch used as one arm
Receives: Procedure: Short stitch; Procedure: Long stitch
Long stitchActive comparatorLong stitch as conventional mass-closure technique
Receives: Procedure: Short stitch; Procedure: Long stitch

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Reduction of PCA morphine usage post-operatively

    Measure total usage of PCA morphine

    Measured: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Presence of Surgical site infection

    Any surgical site infection at surgical site

    Measured: throughout hospital stay, 2 weeks, 6 weeks and then 8 weeks during follow up (up to 1 year)

  2. Length of hospital stay

    number of days patient was admitted in the ward

    Measured: since day 1 hospital admission until the time when patient is deemed fit to be discharged (up to 1 month)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Feb 2019
  2. Study startJan 2017
  3. Primary completionNov 2018
  4. Study completionNov 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Patients will be randomized into two arms (short stitch: SS and long stitch:LS).The LS belongs to our conventional mass closure technique for midline laparotomy. SS technique has been used to investigate other parameters such as surgical site infection and incisional hernia. This study is carried out to evaluate if SS technique will reduce post-operative pain.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
86 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03828409
Sponsor's protocol ID
NMRR-16-1892-32723
Acronym
Shortstitch
Status last verified
Jan 2019
First submitted
28 Jan 2019
Last updated
4 Feb 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Short stitch and Long stitch in people with Pain, Postoperative, run by University of Malaya.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Reduction of PCA morphine usage post-operatively (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Feb 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in