AzTrials
AzTrials

Patellofemoral Pain SyndromeNCT03784235

Bone Metabolic Activity in the Patellofemoral Joint in Patients With Unilateral PFP

An observational study of Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome and Anterior Knee Pain Syndrome, run by University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to examine whether individuals with unilateral patellofemoral pain (PFP) have increased subchondral bone remodelling and thus increased 18F Sodium Fluoride (18F-NaF) uptake in the painful knee compared to the opposite knee measured by simultaneous positron emission tomography and computed tomography… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
18F NaF-PET/CT and cone beam CT scans
How many people
27 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
2 Jan 2019to 1 Dec 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adults (n = 30) with unilateral anterior knee pain / PFP (3> 10 NRS) will be included from the main study.

Who may be able to join

  • A clinical diagnosis of PFP in at least one knee confirmed by an experienced sports medicine doctor.
  • Visual analogue score rating of pain during activities of daily living during the previous week at a minimum of 3 on a 10 cm scale.
  • Insidious onset of symptoms unrelated to trauma and persistent for at least 4 weeks.
  • Pain in the anterior knee associated with at least 3 of the following:
  • During or after activity
  • Prolonged sitting
  • Stair ascent or descent
  • Squatting

Who cannot join

  • Meniscal or other intra-articular injury
  • Cruciate or collateral ligament laxity or tenderness
  • Patellar tendon, iliotibial band, or pes anserine tenderness
  • Osgood-Schlatter or Sinding-Larsen-Johansson syndrome
  • History of recurrent patellar subluxation or dislocation
  • History of surgery to the knee joint
Show all 9Show fewer
  • History of head injury or vestibular disorder within the last 6 months
  • Pregnancy
  • Breastfeeding

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Bispebjerg Hospital

    København NV, 2400

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Study of Subchondral Bone Remodeling With 18F NaF-PET / CT in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain. A Substudy for: Comparative Effectiveness of Therapeutic Hip and Knee Exercise for Patellofemoral Pain: a Pragmatic Randomised Trial (the COMPETE Trial)

This study aims to examine whether individuals with unilateral patellofemoral pain (PFP) have increased subchondral bone remodelling and thus increased 18F Sodium Fluoride (18F-NaF) uptake in the painful knee compared to the opposite knee measured by simultaneous positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) and to examine whether the increased uptake is associated with pain intensity, with patient-reported function and with pain localization. Furthermore we aim to investigate the effect of an acute patellofemoral loading bout on the bone remodelling.

Read the detailed description

Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a highly prevalent musculoskeletal condition mainly affecting younger people, causing pain, physical disability, and reduced quality of life. The cause of PFP is still unknown. It is, i.e., unclear whether there is a link between PFP and changes in the cartilaginous (subchondral) bone in the joint between the patella and the femur.

Our goals are to use 18F NaF PET/CT to evaluate whether subjects with unilateral patellofemoral pain exhibit elevated bone metabolic activity in the painful knee compared to the pain free knee and to determine whether bone metabolic activity correlates with pain intensity and location of pain. Furthermore, we aim to investigate the effects of acute loading on the bone metabolic activity.

The primary objective of this cross-sectional study is to assess whether patients with unilateral PFP have increased bone metabolic activity in the painful knee compared to the pain free knee. We will assess quantitative parameters indicative of bone metabolic activity (Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) and kinetic data) and compare values between the painful knee and the pain free knee. The secondary objectives are to 1) determine whether a bout of single leg weight bearing knee bends standing on a wedge result in increased bone metabolic activity acutely in the painful knee compared to the pain free knee, and 2) identify "hot" regions of abnormal tracer uptake and compare area and SUV values between the painful knee and the pain free knee.

An explorative objective is to determine the correlation between bone metabolic activity and pain intensity and location of pain.

Being tested
18F NaF-PET/CT and cone beam CT scans
Medical subject headings
Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 18F NaF-PET/CT and cone beam CT scansOther

    Cross sectional measures of 18F NaF-PET/CT and cone beam CT scans

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 18F NaF-PET/CT uptake

    Difference between painful knee and contralateral knee in mean, peak and maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) and in kinetic parameters

    Measured: Cross sectional assessment at baseline, i.e., before the loading programme.

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. 18F NaF-PET/CT uptake

    Response to acute patellofemoral joint loading in mean, peak and maximum SUV and in kinetic parameters. The outcome represents changes in the parameters from before to after the loading programme

    Measured: Assessed before and after an acute loading programme (on the same day).

  2. Regions of abnormal tracer uptake

    Identify "hot" regions of abnormal tracer uptake and compare area and SUV values between the painful knee and the pain free knee

    Measured: Cross sectional assessment at baseline, i.e., before the loading programme

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Dec 2018
  2. Study start2 Jan 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2021
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
27 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03784235
Sponsor's protocol ID
BFH_NaF-PET
Status last verified
May 2022
First submitted
17 Dec 2018
Last updated
31 May 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome and Anterior Knee Pain Syndrome, run by University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

18F NaF-PET/CT uptake (time frame: Cross sectional assessment at baseline, i.e., before the loading programme.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 May 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in