Coronary Artery DiseaseiLITRONCT03767621
Concordance Between FFR and iFR for the Assessment of Intermediate Lesions in the Left Main Coronary Artery. A Prospective Validation of a Default Value for iFR
An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease and Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis, run by Fundación EPIC at 38 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
The assessment of Left Main Coronary Artery (LMCA) lesions by means of coronary angiography renders serious limitations. Studies with a limited number of patients have shown that a value of FFR (Fractional Flow Reserve) above 0.80 identify a low risk of events in case of not performing revascularization in patients… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease, Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis, Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
- What is being tested?
- Indication of revascularization
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 38 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- 19 Feb 2019to 30 Nov 2026
- How long will I take part?
- 5 Years
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with intermediate stenosis of the LMCA will be included by coronary angiography (estimate visual 25-60%) in which a functional study is performed with pressure and calculation guidance of iFR and FFR with intravenous adenosine in perfusion to guide the indication of revascularization.
Who may be able to join
- Patients with intermediate lesion in the LMCA (25-60% angiographic stenosis) by visual estimation) in which the realization of a study with guide of pressure for the determination of the iFR.
- Patients aged ≥18 years.
- Patients able of giving informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Patients with indication for coronary surgery regardless of the significance of the LMCA lesion.
- Patients with a LMCA lesion presenting with ulceration, dissection or thrombus.
- Patients with previous arterial or venous graft lesion functioning in the territory irrigated by the LMCA (LMCA protected).
- Patients with ACS (Acute Coronary Syndrome) with a potentially guilty lesion in the LMCA.
- Patients unable to obtain informed consent.
- Patients with known terminal illness that conditions a life expectancy less than 1 year.
- Patients with hemodynamic instability with Killip III or IV class.
Trial locations and contacts
38 sites in 1 country.
38 sites in 1 country
Spain38 sites
Hospital General Universitario de Albacete
Albacete, 02006
Hospital Universitario de Badajoz
Badajoz, 06080
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias I Pujol de Badalona
Badalona, 08916
Hospital Del Mar
Barcelona, 08003
Hospital Clinic I Provincial de Barcelona
Barcelona, 08028
Hospital Universitari Vall D'Hebron
Barcelona, 08035
Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08041
Hospital Universitari Bellvitge
Barcelona, 08908
Hospital Universitario Puerto Real
Cadiz, 11510
Hospital General Universitario de Santa Lucia de Cartagena
Cartagena, Murcia, 30202
Hospital General Universitario de Castellón
Castellon, Valencia, 12004
Hospital General de Ciudad Real
Ciudad Real, 13005
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia
Córdoba, 14004
Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de La Arrixaca
El Palmar, Murcia, 30120
Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo
Galdakao, Vizcaya, 48960
Hospital Universitario de Cabueñes
Gijón, 33203
Hospital Universitari Doctor Josep Trueta
Girona, 17007
Hospital Universitario Virgen de Las Nieves
Granada, 18014
Hospital General Juan Ramón Jiménez
Huelva, 21005
Hospital de León
León, 24080
Hospital Universitari Lucus Agusti
Lugo, 27003
Hospital de La Princesa
Madrid, 28006
Clinica Universitaria de Navarra
Madrid, 28027
Hospital Clinico San Carlos
Madrid, 28040
Hospital Universitario de La Paz
Madrid, 28046
Hospital Universitario Virgen de La Victoria
Málaga, 29010
Hospital de Merida
Mérida, 06800
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
Oviedo, 33011
Hospital Universitario de Donostia
San Sebastián, 20014
Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla
Santander, 39008
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela
Santiago de Compostela, 15706
Hospital Universitari Joan Xxiii de Tarragona
Tarragona, 43005
Hospital Universitari Mutua de Terrassa
Terrassa, Barcelona, 08221
Hospital Universitario Virgen de La Salud
Toledo, 45004
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia
Valencia, 46010
Hospital Universitari I Politecnic La Fe
Valencia, 46026
Hospital Universitario Alvaro Cunqueiro
Vigo, 36312
Hospital Clinico Universitario Lozano Blesa
Zaragoza, 50009
About this study
Official title: Concordance Between FFR and iFR for the Assessment of Intermediate Lesions in the Left Main Coronary Artery. A Prospective Validation of a Default Value for iFR (iLITRO Study)
The assessment of Left Main Coronary Artery (LMCA) lesions by means of coronary angiography renders serious limitations.
Studies with a limited number of patients have shown that a value of FFR (Fractional Flow Reserve) above 0.80 identify a low risk of events in case of not performing revascularization in patients with intermediate stenosis in the LMCA. Although iFR (Instant wave Free Ratio) has recently been found equivalent to FFR The demonstration of the prognostic utility of iFR in patients with LMCA intermediate lesions could have an important clinical impact and justify its systematic use for the treatment decision in these high-risk patients.
Read the detailed description
The assessment of Left Main Coronary Artery (LMCA) lesions by means of coronary angiography renders serious limitations. In the case of intermediate stenoses (25-60%), invasive imaging tests, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) or functional by determining the Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR), have been proposed to identify those patients who could benefit from revascularization.
Studies with a limited number of patients have shown that a value of FFR above 0.80 identify a low risk of events in case of not performing revascularization in patients with intermediate stenosis in the LMCA. Although iFR (Instant wave Free Ratio) has recently been found equivalent to FFR in assessing the prognosis of patients with intermediate lesions, the validation of the prognostic power of this index in patients with intermediate LMCA lesions has not been demonstrated, although it is used in clinical practice assuming the results in other locations of the lesions.
The demonstration of the prognostic utility of iFR in patients with LMCA intermediate lesions could have an important clinical impact and justify its systematic use for the treatment decision in these high-risk patients.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease, Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis, Left Main Coronary Artery Disease, Restenosis, Coronary
- Being tested
- Indication of revascularization
- Keywords
- Left Main Coronary Artery, Intermediate Coronary Lesions, iFR, Coronary Physiology, IVUS
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Restenosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Indication of revascularizationOther
Device: iFR/FFR
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with intermediate lesions. | Patients with intermediate lesions (stenosis in angiography between 25% and 60%) in LMCA. Receives: Other: Indication of revascularization |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Assessment correlation between FFR>=0.80 and iFR >=0.89
Efficacy and correlation of two invasive indexes of functional assessment by intracoronary pressure guidance in intermediate lesions of the LMCA with a cut-off point to defer the treatment of FFR> = 0.80 (with intravenous adenosine) and iFR > = 0.89. the LMCA.
Measured: 1 day
Major Adverse Cardiac Events
Composite of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularisation
Measured: 30 days
Major Adverse Cardiac Events
Composite of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularisation
Measured: 1 year
Major Adverse Cardiac Events
Composite of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularisation
Measured: 5 years
Secondary outcomes (11)
Assessment correlation between iFR and IVUS
Assessment correlation between iFR and IVUS derived minimal luminal area
Measured: 5 years
Death (all cause)
Death (all cause)
Measured: 30 days, 1 and 5 years
Death (cardiovascular)
Death (cardiovascular)
Measured: 30 days, 1 and 5 years
Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction
Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction
Measured: 30 days, 1 and 5 years
Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction related to the LMCA lesion
Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction related to the LMCA lesion
Measured: 30 days, 1 and 5 years
Revascularization
Revascularization
Measured: 30 days, 1 and 5 years
Revascularization of the target lesion
Revascularization of the target lesion
Measured: 30 days, 1 and 5 years
Myocardial Infarction related to target lesion revascularization
Myocardial Infarction related to target lesion revascularization
Measured: 30 days, 1 and 5 years
Stent Thrombosis in the target lesion revascularization
Stent Thrombosis in the target lesion revascularization
Measured: 30 days, 1 and 5 years
Restenosis of the stent in target lesion
Restenosis of the stent in target lesion
Measured: 30 days, 1 and 5 years
New revascularization of the target lesion
New revascularization of the target lesion
Measured: 30 days, 1 and 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Dec 2018
- Study start19 Feb 2019
- Primary completion30 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Nov 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 5 Years
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fundación EPIC
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- José María de la Torre, PhD, MD, Principal investigator, Hospital Universitario Marqués de ValdecillaOriol Rodríguez Leor, PhD, MD, Principal investigator, Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03767621
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- iLITRO EPIC-07
- Acronym
- iLITRO
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 2 Dec 2018
- Last updated
- 5 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
De Bruyne B, Baudhuin T, Melin JA, Pijls NH, Sys SU, Bol A, Paulus WJ, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W. Coronary flow reserve calculated from pressure measurements in humans. Validation with positron emission tomography. Circulation. 1994 Mar;89(3):1013-22. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.3.1013.
PubMed 8124786Authors/Task Force members; Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C, Head SJ, Juni P, Kappetein AP, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Landmesser U, Laufer G, Neumann FJ, Richter DJ, Schauerte P, Sousa Uva M, Stefanini GG, Taggart DP, Torracca L, Valgimigli M, Wijns W, Witkowski A. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 1;35(37):2541-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278. Epub 2014 Aug 29. No abstract available.
PubMed 25173339Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van't Veer M, Bar F, Hoorntje J, Koolen J, Wijns W, de Bruyne B. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 May 29;49(21):2105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.087. Epub 2007 May 17.
PubMed 17531660Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van' t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611.
PubMed 19144937Sen S, Escaned J, Malik IS, Mikhail GW, Foale RA, Mila R, Tarkin J, Petraco R, Broyd C, Jabbour R, Sethi A, Baker CS, Bellamy M, Al-Bustami M, Hackett D, Khan M, Lefroy D, Parker KH, Hughes AD, Francis DP, Di Mario C, Mayet J, Davies JE. Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 10;59(15):1392-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.003. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
PubMed 22154731Davies JE, Sen S, Dehbi HM, Al-Lamee R, Petraco R, Nijjer SS, Bhindi R, Lehman SJ, Walters D, Sapontis J, Janssens L, Vrints CJ, Khashaba A, Laine M, Van Belle E, Krackhardt F, Bojara W, Going O, Harle T, Indolfi C, Niccoli G, Ribichini F, Tanaka N, Yokoi H, Takashima H, Kikuta Y, Erglis A, Vinhas H, Canas Silva P, Baptista SB, Alghamdi A, Hellig F, Koo BK, Nam CW, Shin ES, Doh JH, Brugaletta S, Alegria-Barrero E, Meuwissen M, Piek JJ, van Royen N, Sezer M, Di Mario C, Gerber RT, Malik IS, Sharp ASP, Talwar S, Tang K, Samady H, Altman J, Seto AH, Singh J, Jeremias A, Matsuo H, Kharbanda RK, Patel MR, Serruys P, Escaned J. Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 11;376(19):1824-1834. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700445. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
PubMed 28317458Gotberg M, Christiansen EH, Gudmundsdottir IJ, Sandhall L, Danielewicz M, Jakobsen L, Olsson SE, Ohagen P, Olsson H, Omerovic E, Calais F, Lindroos P, Maeng M, Todt T, Venetsanos D, James SK, Karegren A, Nilsson M, Carlsson J, Hauer D, Jensen J, Karlsson AC, Panayi G, Erlinge D, Frobert O; iFR-SWEDEHEART Investigators. Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 11;376(19):1813-1823. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1616540. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
PubMed 28317438de la Torre Hernandez JM, Hernandez Hernandez F, Alfonso F, Rumoroso JR, Lopez-Palop R, Sadaba M, Carrillo P, Rondan J, Lozano I, Ruiz Nodar JM, Baz JA, Fernandez Nofrerias E, Pajin F, Garcia Camarero T, Gutierrez H; LITRO Study Group (Spanish Working Group on Interventional Cardiology). Prospective application of pre-defined intravascular ultrasound criteria for assessment of intermediate left main coronary artery lesions results from the multicenter LITRO study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jul 19;58(4):351-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.064.
PubMed 21757111Hamilos M, Muller O, Cuisset T, Ntalianis A, Chlouverakis G, Sarno G, Nelis O, Bartunek J, Vanderheyden M, Wyffels E, Barbato E, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W, De Bruyne B. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided treatment in patients with angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation. 2009 Oct 13;120(15):1505-12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.850073. Epub 2009 Sep 28.
PubMed 19786633de la Torre Hernandez JM, Baz Alonso JA, Gomez Hospital JA, Alfonso Manterola F, Garcia Camarero T, Gimeno de Carlos F, Roura Ferrer G, Recalde AS, Martinez-Luengas IL, Gomez Lara J, Hernandez Hernandez F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Cequier Fillat A, Perez de Prado A, Gonzalez-Trevilla AA, Jimenez Navarro MF, Mauri Ferre J, Fernandez Diaz JA, Pinar Bermudez E, Zueco Gil J; IVUS-TRONCO-ICP Spanish study. Clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance in drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary disease: pooled analysis at the patient-level of 4 registries. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Mar;7(3):244-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.09.014.
PubMed 24650399Rodriguez-Leor O, de la Torre Hernandez JM, Garcia-Camarero T, Garcia Del Blanco B, Lopez-Palop R, Fernandez-Nofrerias E, Cuellas Ramon C, Jimenez-Kockar M, Jimenez-Mazuecos J, Fernandez Salinas F, Gomez-Lara J, Brugaletta S, Alfonso F, Palma R, Gomez-Menchero AE, Millan R, Tejada Ponce D, Linares Vicente JA, Ojeda S, Pinar E, Fernandez-Pelegrina E, Morales-Ponce FJ, Cid-Alvarez AB, Rama-Merchan JC, Molina Navarro E, Escaned J, Perez de Prado A. Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio for the Assessment of Intermediate Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Correlations With Fractional Flow Reserve/Intravascular Ultrasound and Prognostic Implications: The iLITRO-EPIC07 Study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Nov;15(11):861-871. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012328. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
PubMed 36111801
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Concordance Between FFR and iFR for the Assessment of Intermediate Lesions in the Left Main Coronary Artery. A Prospective Validation of a Default Value for iFR (iLITRO Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03767621
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- iLITRO / iLITRO EPIC-07
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease, Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis, Left Main Coronary Artery Disease, Restenosis, Coronary
- Keywords
- Left Main Coronary Artery, Intermediate Coronary Lesions, iFR, Coronary Physiology, IVUS
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Fundación EPICUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 19 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Dec 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The assessment of Left Main Coronary Artery (LMCA) lesions by means of coronary angiography renders serious limitations.
Studies with a limited number of patients have shown that a value of FFR (Fractional Flow Reserve) above 0.80 identify a low risk of events in case of not performing revascularization in patients with intermediate stenosis in the LMCA. Although iFR (Instant wave Free Ratio) has recently been found equivalent to FFR The demonstration of the prognostic utility of iFR in patients with LMCA intermediate lesions could have an important clinical impact and justify its systematic use for the treatment decision in these high-risk patients.
Detailed description
The assessment of Left Main Coronary Artery (LMCA) lesions by means of coronary angiography renders serious limitations. In the case of intermediate stenoses (25-60%), invasive imaging tests, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) or functional by determining the Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR), have been proposed to identify those patients who could benefit from revascularization.
Studies with a limited number of patients have shown that a value of FFR above 0.80 identify a low risk of events in case of not performing revascularization in patients with intermediate stenosis in the LMCA. Although iFR (Instant wave Free Ratio) has recently been found equivalent to FFR in assessing the prognosis of patients with intermediate lesions, the validation of the prognostic power of this index in patients with intermediate LMCA lesions has not been demonstrated, although it is used in clinical practice assuming the results in other locations of the lesions.
The demonstration of the prognostic utility of iFR in patients with LMCA intermediate lesions could have an important clinical impact and justify its systematic use for the treatment decision in these high-risk patients.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 5 Years
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with intermediate lesions. | – | Other: Indication of revascularizationPatients with intermediate lesions (stenosis in angiography between 25% and 60%) in LMCA. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with intermediate stenosis of the LMCA will be included by coronary angiography (estimate visual 25-60%) in which a functional study is performed with pressure and calculation guidance of iFR and FFR with intravenous adenosine in perfusion to guide the indication of revascularization.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with intermediate lesion in the LMCA (25-60% angiographic stenosis) by visual estimation) in which the realization of a study with guide of pressure for the determination of the iFR.
- Patients aged ≥18 years.
- Patients able of giving informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients with indication for coronary surgery regardless of the significance of the LMCA lesion.
- Patients with a LMCA lesion presenting with ulceration, dissection or thrombus.
- Patients with previous arterial or venous graft lesion functioning in the territory irrigated by the LMCA (LMCA protected).
- Patients with ACS (Acute Coronary Syndrome) with a potentially guilty lesion in the LMCA.
- Patients unable to obtain informed consent.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Indication of revascularizationDevice: iFR/FFR | Other | Patients with intermediate lesions. |
Primary outcome
Assessment correlation between FFR>=0.80 and iFR >=0.89
Time frame: 1 day
Efficacy and correlation of two invasive indexes of functional assessment by intracoronary pressure guidance in intermediate lesions of the LMCA with a cut-off point to defer the treatment of FFR> = 0.80 (with intravenous adenosine) and iFR > = 0.89. the LMCA.
Major Adverse Cardiac Events
Time frame: 30 days
Composite of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularisation
Major Adverse Cardiac Events
Time frame: 1 year
Composite of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularisation
Major Adverse Cardiac Events
Time frame: 5 years
Composite of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularisation
11 secondary outcomes
Assessment correlation between iFR and IVUS
Time frame: 5 years
Death (all cause)
Time frame: 30 days, 1 and 5 years
Death (cardiovascular)
Time frame: 30 days, 1 and 5 years
Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction
Time frame: 30 days, 1 and 5 years
Non-fatal Myocardial Infarction related to the LMCA lesion
Time frame: 30 days, 1 and 5 years
Revascularization
Time frame: 30 days, 1 and 5 years
Revascularization of the target lesion
Time frame: 30 days, 1 and 5 years
Myocardial Infarction related to target lesion revascularization
Time frame: 30 days, 1 and 5 years
Stent Thrombosis in the target lesion revascularization
Time frame: 30 days, 1 and 5 years
Restenosis of the stent in target lesion
Time frame: 30 days, 1 and 5 years
New revascularization of the target lesion
Time frame: 30 days, 1 and 5 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Mar 2025.
- Background: PubMed 8124786De Bruyne B, Baudhuin T, Melin JA, Pijls NH, Sys SU, Bol A, Paulus WJ, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W. Coronary flow reserve calculated from pressure measurements in humans. Validation with positron emission tomography. Circulation. 1994 Mar;89(3):1013-22. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.3.1013.
- Background: PubMed 25173339Authors/Task Force members; Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C, Head SJ, Juni P, Kappetein AP, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Landmesser U, Laufer G, Neumann FJ, Richter DJ, Schauerte P, Sousa Uva M, Stefanini GG, Taggart DP, Torracca L, Valgimigli M, Wijns W, Witkowski A. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 1;35(37):2541-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278. Epub 2014 Aug 29. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 17531660Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van't Veer M, Bar F, Hoorntje J, Koolen J, Wijns W, de Bruyne B. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 May 29;49(21):2105-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.087. Epub 2007 May 17.
- Background: PubMed 19144937Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van' t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611.
- Background: PubMed 22154731Sen S, Escaned J, Malik IS, Mikhail GW, Foale RA, Mila R, Tarkin J, Petraco R, Broyd C, Jabbour R, Sethi A, Baker CS, Bellamy M, Al-Bustami M, Hackett D, Khan M, Lefroy D, Parker KH, Hughes AD, Francis DP, Di Mario C, Mayet J, Davies JE. Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 10;59(15):1392-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.003. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
- Background: PubMed 28317458Davies JE, Sen S, Dehbi HM, Al-Lamee R, Petraco R, Nijjer SS, Bhindi R, Lehman SJ, Walters D, Sapontis J, Janssens L, Vrints CJ, Khashaba A, Laine M, Van Belle E, Krackhardt F, Bojara W, Going O, Harle T, Indolfi C, Niccoli G, Ribichini F, Tanaka N, Yokoi H, Takashima H, Kikuta Y, Erglis A, Vinhas H, Canas Silva P, Baptista SB, Alghamdi A, Hellig F, Koo BK, Nam CW, Shin ES, Doh JH, Brugaletta S, Alegria-Barrero E, Meuwissen M, Piek JJ, van Royen N, Sezer M, Di Mario C, Gerber RT, Malik IS, Sharp ASP, Talwar S, Tang K, Samady H, Altman J, Seto AH, Singh J, Jeremias A, Matsuo H, Kharbanda RK, Patel MR, Serruys P, Escaned J. Use of the Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve in PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 11;376(19):1824-1834. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1700445. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
- Background: PubMed 28317438Gotberg M, Christiansen EH, Gudmundsdottir IJ, Sandhall L, Danielewicz M, Jakobsen L, Olsson SE, Ohagen P, Olsson H, Omerovic E, Calais F, Lindroos P, Maeng M, Todt T, Venetsanos D, James SK, Karegren A, Nilsson M, Carlsson J, Hauer D, Jensen J, Karlsson AC, Panayi G, Erlinge D, Frobert O; iFR-SWEDEHEART Investigators. Instantaneous Wave-free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve to Guide PCI. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 11;376(19):1813-1823. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1616540. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
- Background: PubMed 21757111de la Torre Hernandez JM, Hernandez Hernandez F, Alfonso F, Rumoroso JR, Lopez-Palop R, Sadaba M, Carrillo P, Rondan J, Lozano I, Ruiz Nodar JM, Baz JA, Fernandez Nofrerias E, Pajin F, Garcia Camarero T, Gutierrez H; LITRO Study Group (Spanish Working Group on Interventional Cardiology). Prospective application of pre-defined intravascular ultrasound criteria for assessment of intermediate left main coronary artery lesions results from the multicenter LITRO study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jul 19;58(4):351-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.064.
- Background: PubMed 19786633Hamilos M, Muller O, Cuisset T, Ntalianis A, Chlouverakis G, Sarno G, Nelis O, Bartunek J, Vanderheyden M, Wyffels E, Barbato E, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W, De Bruyne B. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided treatment in patients with angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis. Circulation. 2009 Oct 13;120(15):1505-12. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.850073. Epub 2009 Sep 28.
- Background: PubMed 24650399de la Torre Hernandez JM, Baz Alonso JA, Gomez Hospital JA, Alfonso Manterola F, Garcia Camarero T, Gimeno de Carlos F, Roura Ferrer G, Recalde AS, Martinez-Luengas IL, Gomez Lara J, Hernandez Hernandez F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Cequier Fillat A, Perez de Prado A, Gonzalez-Trevilla AA, Jimenez Navarro MF, Mauri Ferre J, Fernandez Diaz JA, Pinar Bermudez E, Zueco Gil J; IVUS-TRONCO-ICP Spanish study. Clinical impact of intravascular ultrasound guidance in drug-eluting stent implantation for unprotected left main coronary disease: pooled analysis at the patient-level of 4 registries. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Mar;7(3):244-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.09.014.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36111801Rodriguez-Leor O, de la Torre Hernandez JM, Garcia-Camarero T, Garcia Del Blanco B, Lopez-Palop R, Fernandez-Nofrerias E, Cuellas Ramon C, Jimenez-Kockar M, Jimenez-Mazuecos J, Fernandez Salinas F, Gomez-Lara J, Brugaletta S, Alfonso F, Palma R, Gomez-Menchero AE, Millan R, Tejada Ponce D, Linares Vicente JA, Ojeda S, Pinar E, Fernandez-Pelegrina E, Morales-Ponce FJ, Cid-Alvarez AB, Rama-Merchan JC, Molina Navarro E, Escaned J, Perez de Prado A. Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio for the Assessment of Intermediate Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: Correlations With Fractional Flow Reserve/Intravascular Ultrasound and Prognostic Implications: The iLITRO-EPIC07 Study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Nov;15(11):861-871. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.122.012328. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
José María de la Torre, PhD, MD principal investigator
Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla
Oriol Rodríguez Leor, PhD, MD principal investigator
Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital
38 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Coronary Artery Disease and Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis, run by Fundación EPIC at 38 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 38 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Assessment correlation between FFR>=0.80 and iFR >=0.89 (time frame: 1 day). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03767621, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2025.