AzTrials
AzTrials

Complications; Urethral CatheterNCT03713411

Is Urethral Catheter Necessary After Ureteroscopy and DJ Stent Placement?

A study testing urethral catheter placement in people with Complications; Urethral Catheter and Ureteral Catheterization, run by Marmara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

After semirigid or flexible ureteroscopy operations where a DJ stent was placed, there is diversity in practice of placing a urethral catheter. The presence of vesico-ureteral reflux due to DJ stents has been proven to exist and can cause flank pain and UTI due to retrograde urine flow. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
What is being tested?
urethral catheter placement
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
112 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Apr 2019to 31 Dec 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • adult patients
  • Patients with indications for semirigid or flexible ureteroscopy and DJ stent placement for unilateral ureteral and/or kidney stones according to European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Guidelines

Who cannot join

  • none

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Marmara University Hospital

    Istanbul, 34890

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Is Routine Urinary Bladder Catheterization Necessary After Ureteroscopy and Double J Stent Placement?

After semirigid or flexible ureteroscopy operations where a DJ stent was placed, there is diversity in practice of placing a urethral catheter. The presence of vesico-ureteral reflux due to DJ stents has been proven to exist and can cause flank pain and UTI due to retrograde urine flow. The main purpose to place a urethral catheter is to keep a low-pressure bladder in order to prevent reflux alongside the DJ stent. However, this practice doesn't have an evidence-based support on the literature and some surgeons also advice patients to void frequently in the early postoperative period to avoid these aforementioned complications. The purpose of this study is to compare the 2 different approaches after ureteroscopy and DJ stent placement by evaluating the patient-reported outcomes along with laboratory tests.

Read the detailed description

Ureteral stents and foley catheters are the most commonly used disposables in urological practice. Ureteral double J (DJ) stents are frequently used to relieve ureteral obstruction and almost as a routine part of the ureteroscopic procedures by many surgeons.

DJ stent placement has the potential side effects such as flank pain and urinary tract infection (UTI) due to retrograde urine flow. As the bladder pressure increases during voiding, urine reflux occurs both beside and through the DJ stent. In order to overcome these problems, stents with antireflux mechanisms are produced, however these new stents comes with higher costs compared to conventional stents.

Foley catheters are the hands and feet of all urologists and insertion of a foley catheter can easily keep the bladder pressures as low as required. The practice of insertion of a foley catheter into the urinary bladder after ureteroscopy for kidney or renal stones and DJ stent placement doesn't have an evidence-based background and it routinely depends on the choice of the surgeon.

The aim of this study is to evaluate whether routine insertion of a bladder catheter following ureteroscopy and DJ stent placement can reduce stent-related problems due to reflux and urinary tract infections.

Being tested
urethral catheter placement
Medical subject headings
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Flank Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • urethral catheter placementProcedure or surgery

    urethral catheter placement to provide low-pressure urinary bladder by providing active drainage of the bladder

Study groups in NCT03713411
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
No-catheterNo interventionafter semirigid or flexible ureteroscopy + double J stent placement for ureteral or kidney stones, patients in whom a urethral catheter wasn't placed
CatheterActive comparatorurethral catheter placement after semirigid or flexible ureteroscopy + double J stent placement for ureteral or kidney stones
Receives: Procedure: urethral catheter placement

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. ureteric stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ) score

    evaluation of flank pain

    Measured: at the 24th hour of the operation

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. white blood cell count on complete blood count

    evaluation of laboratory test results for infectious parameters

    Measured: at the 24th hour of the operation

  2. c-reactive protein (CRP) levels

    evaluation of laboratory test results for infectious parameters

    Measured: at the 24th hour of the operation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Oct 2018
  2. Study start1 Apr 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2023
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
112 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03713411
Sponsor's protocol ID
MAR.UAD.004
Status last verified
Aug 2023
First submitted
18 Oct 2018
Last updated
29 Jan 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing urethral catheter placement in people with Complications; Urethral Catheter and Ureteral Catheterization, run by Marmara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

ureteric stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ) score (time frame: at the 24th hour of the operation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jan 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in