AzTrials
AzTrials

Osteoarthritis, KneePhase 2NCT03691974

Study to Evaluate the Effects of Fasinumab on Peripheral Nerve Function in Patients With Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee

A Phase 2 study testing Fasinumab in people with Osteoarthritis, Knee and Osteoarthritis, Hip, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 47 sites in 3 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of fasinumab compared to placebo on peripheral nerves in participants with pain due to Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip or knee. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Hip
What is being tested?
Fasinumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
180 participants
Where
47 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
15 Oct 2018to 7 Jan 2021
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • A clinical diagnosis of OA of the knee or hip based on the American College of Rheumatology criteria with radiologic evidence of OA (K-L score ≥2 for the index joint) at the screening visit
  • Moderate-to-severe pain in the index joint defined as a WOMAC average pain subscale score of ≥4 at both the screening and randomization visits
  • Willing to discontinue current pain medications and to adhere to study requirements for rescue treatments
  • A history of regular use of analgesic medications for OA pain (defined as an average of 4 days per week over the 4 weeks prior to the screening visit), including oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors, opioids, paracetamol/acetaminophen, or combinations thereof
  • Consent to allow all radiographs and medical/surgical/hospitalization records of care received elsewhere prior to and during the study period to be shared with the investigator

Who cannot join

  • History or presence at the screening visit of non-OA inflammatory joint disease (eg, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus erythematosus, psoriatic arthritis, pseudo-gout, gout, spondyloarthropathy, polymyalgia rheumatica, joint infections within the past 5 years), Paget's disease of the spine, pelvis or femur, neuropathic disorders, multiple sclerosis, fibromyalgia, tumors or infections of the spinal cord, or renal osteodystrophy
  • History or presence on imaging of arthropathy (osteonecrosis, subchondral insufficiency fracture, rapidly progressive OA type 1 or type 2), stress fracture, recent stress fracture, neuropathic joint arthropathy, hip dislocation (prosthetic hip dislocation is eligible), knee dislocation (patella dislocation is eligible), congenital hip dysplasia with degenerative joint disease, extensive subchondral cysts, evidence of bone fragmentation or collapse, or primary metastatic tumor with the exception of chondromas or pathologic fractures during the screening period
  • Trauma to the index joint within 3 months prior to the screening visit
  • History or presence of signs or symptoms of compression neuropathy, including carpal tunnel syndrome or sciatica
  • Participant is not a candidate for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
  • Poorly controlled diabetes
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
  • Known history of ocular herpes simplex virus, herpes simplex virus pneumonia, or herpes simplex virus encephalitis
  • History of poorly controlled hypertension
  • Known history of infection with hepatitis B or C virus
  • Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion apply

Trial locations and contacts

47 sites in 3 countries.

47 sites in 3 countries

United States21 sites
  • Regeneron Study Site

    Anaheim, California, 92805

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Bellaire, Texas, 77401

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Caro, Michigan, 48723

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60607

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45224

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Clearwater, Florida, 33756

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Columbus, Ohio, 43235

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Glendale, Arizona, 85306

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Glendale, Arizona, 85308

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Hartsdale, New York, 10530

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Houston, Texas, 77004

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Houston, Texas, 77058

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32256

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Miami, Florida, 33165

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Ocoee, Florida, 34761

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Orlando, Florida, 32808

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85053

  • Regeneron Study Site

    San Antonio, Texas, 72858

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Tucson, Arizona, 85412

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Woodstock, Georgia, 30189

Other trials in United States

United Kingdom17 sites
  • Regeneron Study Site

    Chorley, PR7 7NA

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Corby, NN172UR

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Edgbaston, B15 2SQ

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Glasgow, G20 0SP

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Hardwick, TS19 8PE

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Hexham, NE46 1QJ

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Kenilworth, CV81JD

  • Regeneron Study Site

    London, Greater London, WC1X8QD

  • Regulatory Study Site

    London, DA146LT

  • Regeneron Study Site

    London, RG401XS

  • Regeneron Study Site

    London, RM13PJ

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Manchester, M15 6SX

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Northwood, HA62RN

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Peterborough, PE73JL

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Reading, RG2 0TG

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Shipley, BD183SL

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Waterloo, L22 0LG

Other trials in United Kingdom

Poland9 sites
  • Regeneron Study Site

    Częstochowa, Silesian Voivodeship, 42-202

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship, 80-382

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Gdynia, Pomeranian Voivodeship, 81-537

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship, 40-040

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Lodz, 90-127

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Lodz, Łódź Voivodeship, 91-211

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Poznan, Greater Poland Voivodeship, 60-702

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 01-192

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, 50-381

Other trials in Poland

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Effects of Fasinumab on Peripheral Nerve Function in Patients With Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of fasinumab compared to placebo on peripheral nerves in participants with pain due to Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip or knee.

The secondary objectives of the study are to:

  • Evaluate the efficacy of fasinumab compared to placebo in participants with pain due to OA of the hip or knee
  • Evaluate the safety and tolerability of fasinumab compared to placebo in participants with pain due to OA of the hip or knee
  • Characterize the concentrations of fasinumab in serum in participants with pain due to OA of the hip or knee
  • Evaluate the immunogenicity of fasinumab in participants with pain due to OA of the hip or knee.
Being tested
Fasinumab, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Hip

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • FasinumabDrug

    Also called REGN475

    Subcutaneous (SC) every four weeks (Q4W)

  • PlaceboOther

    Subcutaneous (SC) every four weeks (Q4W)

Study groups in NCT03691974
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
FasinumabExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: Fasinumab
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Other: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Peroneal Motor Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 16

    Peroneal motor nerve conduction velocity was evaluated by electrical stimulation of the nerve and recorded the compound muscle action potential from surface electrodes overlying a muscle supplied by the nerve. Change from baseline in peroneal motor nerve conduction velocity at Week 16 was reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  2. Change From Baseline in Peroneal Motor Nerve Action Potential Amplitude at Week 16

    Peroneal motor nerve action potential amplitude was evaluated at ankle by electrical stimulation of the nerve and recorded the compound muscle action potential from surface electrodes overlying a muscle supplied by the nerve. Change from baseline in peroneal motor nerve action potential amplitude at Week 16 was reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  3. Change From Baseline in Sural Sensory Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 16

    Sural sensory nerve conduction velocity was evaluated by electrically stimulating sensory fibers and recorded the nerve action potential at a point further along that nerve. Change from baseline in sural sensory nerve conduction velocity at Week 16 was reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  4. Change From Baseline in Sural Sensory Nerve Action Potential Amplitude at Week 16

    Sural sensory nerve action potential amplitude was evaluated by electrically stimulating sensory fibers and recorded the nerve action potential at a point further along that nerve. Change from baseline in sural sensory nerve action potential amplitude at Week 16 was reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  5. Change From Baseline in Ulnar Sensory Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 16

    Ulnar sensory nerve conduction velocity was evaluated by electrically stimulating sensory fibers and recorded the nerve action potential at a point further along that nerve. Change from baseline in ulnar sensory nerve conduction velocity at Week 16 was reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  6. Change From Baseline in Ulnar Sensory Nerve Action Potential Amplitude at Week 16

    Ulnar sensory nerve action potential amplitude was evaluated by electrically stimulating sensory fibers and recorded the nerve action potential at a point further along that nerve. Change from baseline ulnar sensory nerve action potential amplitude at Week 16 was reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16

    WOMAC pain subscale was a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint (knee or hip) in past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (higher pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Change from baseline in WOMAC Pain subscale score at Week 16 was reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  2. Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 16

    Physical function referred to subject's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale was a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score is 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate worse function. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Change from baseline in WOMAC physical function subscale score at Week 16 was reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  3. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. TEAE was defined as an AE with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious TEAEs. Number of participants with TEAEs were reported.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 16

  4. Number of Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Events

    AA was a composite term that encompasses the following conditions: Rapidly progressive Osteoarthritis (OA) type 1 and 2, Subchondral insufficiency fractures, and Primary Osteonecrosis confirmed by an arthropathy adjudication committee. Number of confirmed AA events from baseline up to follow-up (Week 36) were reported.

    Measured: Baseline up to follow-up (Week 36)

  5. Number of AA Events Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) Criteria

    AAs were evaluated to determine if they met Destructive Arthropathy (DA) criteria. DA is a unique clinical form of rapidly destructive arthropathy over and above that seen in the normal progression of OA. DA criteria can be associated with Rapidly Progressive OA type 2, Subchondral Insufficiency fracture, and Primary Osteonecrosis confirmed by an arthropathy adjudication committee. Number of confirmed AA events meeting DA criteria from baseline up to follow-up (Week 36) were reported.

    Measured: Baseline up to follow-up (Week 36)

  6. Number of Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) Dysfunction Events

    Potential events of SNS dysfunction were monitored throughout the study through physical examination, AE reporting, assessment of orthostatic hypotension, and the Survey of Autonomic Symptoms. Sympathetic nervous system dysfunction was diagnosed after consultation with an appropriate specialist, such as a neurologist and/or cardiologist. Number of SNS dysfunction events from baseline up to follow-up (Week 36) were reported.

    Measured: Baseline up to follow-up (Week 36)

  7. Number of Peripheral Sensory Adverse Events (AEs) That Require a Neurology Consultation

    Any peripheral sensory AE (for example [e.g.], paraesthesia and hypoaesthesia) that required a neurology consultation. Number of peripheral sensory adverse events from baseline up to follow-up (Week 36) were reported.

    Measured: Baseline up to follow-up (Week 36)

  8. Number of All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery Events

    All joint replacement surgery events regardless of cause.

    Measured: Baseline up to follow-up (Week 36)

  9. Number of Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery Events Reported at Telephone Survey After Last Dose of Study Drug

    An end of study phone contact was conducted approximately 52 weeks following the last dose of study drug (Week 64) to evaluate the number of participants who had undergone or were scheduled for JR surgery.

    Measured: Baseline up to EOS (Week 64)

  10. Serum Concentration of Functional Fasinumab

    Serum concentrations of functional Fasinumab were reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 36

  11. Number of Participants With At-least One Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA)

    Samples for ADA evaluation were collected at baseline and at subsequent study visits. ADA variables included ADA status (+/-) and titer as follows: Total participants negative in ADA assay at all time points analyzed. Pre-existing immunoreactivity- positive response at baseline with all post-dose results negative/positive response at baseline with all post-dose responses less than 9-fold over baseline titer levels. Treatment emergent - post-dose positive result when baseline results were negative. Persistent - A positive result detected in at least/ more 2 consecutive post baseline samples separated by at least a 16-week post baseline period, with no negative results in-between. Indeterminate - A positive result at the last collection time point analyzed only. Transient - Not persistent or indeterminate regardless of any missing samples. Treatment boosted- positive response in ADA assay post first dose that is greater than/equal 9-fold over baseline level when baseline is positive.

    Measured: Baseline up to follow-up period (Week 36)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Oct 2018
  2. Study start15 Oct 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Jan 2020
  4. Study completion7 Jan 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
180 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03691974
Sponsor's protocol ID
R475-OA-1758
Other IDs
2017-004921-33, 2017
Status last verified
Feb 2023
First submitted
12 Sep 2018
Last updated
1 Mar 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Fasinumab in people with Osteoarthritis, Knee and Osteoarthritis, Hip, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 47 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 47 sites in United States, United Kingdom, Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Mar 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Peroneal Motor Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 16 (time frame: Baseline, Week 16). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in