Osteoarthritis, KneePhase 2NCT03691974
Study to Evaluate the Effects of Fasinumab on Peripheral Nerve Function in Patients With Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee
A Phase 2 study testing Fasinumab in people with Osteoarthritis, Knee and Osteoarthritis, Hip, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 47 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of fasinumab compared to placebo on peripheral nerves in participants with pain due to Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip or knee. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Hip
- What is being tested?
- Fasinumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 180 participants
- Where
- 47 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 15 Oct 2018to 7 Jan 2021
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- A clinical diagnosis of OA of the knee or hip based on the American College of Rheumatology criteria with radiologic evidence of OA (K-L score ≥2 for the index joint) at the screening visit
- Moderate-to-severe pain in the index joint defined as a WOMAC average pain subscale score of ≥4 at both the screening and randomization visits
- Willing to discontinue current pain medications and to adhere to study requirements for rescue treatments
- A history of regular use of analgesic medications for OA pain (defined as an average of 4 days per week over the 4 weeks prior to the screening visit), including oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors, opioids, paracetamol/acetaminophen, or combinations thereof
- Consent to allow all radiographs and medical/surgical/hospitalization records of care received elsewhere prior to and during the study period to be shared with the investigator
Who cannot join
- History or presence at the screening visit of non-OA inflammatory joint disease (eg, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus erythematosus, psoriatic arthritis, pseudo-gout, gout, spondyloarthropathy, polymyalgia rheumatica, joint infections within the past 5 years), Paget's disease of the spine, pelvis or femur, neuropathic disorders, multiple sclerosis, fibromyalgia, tumors or infections of the spinal cord, or renal osteodystrophy
- History or presence on imaging of arthropathy (osteonecrosis, subchondral insufficiency fracture, rapidly progressive OA type 1 or type 2), stress fracture, recent stress fracture, neuropathic joint arthropathy, hip dislocation (prosthetic hip dislocation is eligible), knee dislocation (patella dislocation is eligible), congenital hip dysplasia with degenerative joint disease, extensive subchondral cysts, evidence of bone fragmentation or collapse, or primary metastatic tumor with the exception of chondromas or pathologic fractures during the screening period
- Trauma to the index joint within 3 months prior to the screening visit
- History or presence of signs or symptoms of compression neuropathy, including carpal tunnel syndrome or sciatica
- Participant is not a candidate for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
- Poorly controlled diabetes
Show all 11Show fewer
- Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
- Known history of ocular herpes simplex virus, herpes simplex virus pneumonia, or herpes simplex virus encephalitis
- History of poorly controlled hypertension
- Known history of infection with hepatitis B or C virus
- Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion apply
Trial locations and contacts
47 sites in 3 countries.
47 sites in 3 countries
United States21 sites
Regeneron Study Site
Anaheim, California, 92805
Regeneron Study Site
Bellaire, Texas, 77401
Regeneron Study Site
Caro, Michigan, 48723
Regeneron Study Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60607
Regeneron Study Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Regeneron Study Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45224
Regeneron Study Site
Clearwater, Florida, 33756
Regeneron Study Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43235
Regeneron Study Site
Glendale, Arizona, 85306
Regeneron Study Site
Glendale, Arizona, 85308
Regeneron Study Site
Hartsdale, New York, 10530
Regeneron Study Site
Houston, Texas, 77004
Regeneron Study Site
Houston, Texas, 77058
Regeneron Study Site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32256
Regeneron Study Site
Miami, Florida, 33165
Regeneron Study Site
Ocoee, Florida, 34761
Regeneron Study Site
Orlando, Florida, 32808
Regeneron Study Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85053
Regeneron Study Site
San Antonio, Texas, 72858
Regeneron Study Site
Tucson, Arizona, 85412
Regeneron Study Site
Woodstock, Georgia, 30189
United Kingdom17 sites
Regeneron Study Site
Chorley, PR7 7NA
Regeneron Study Site
Corby, NN172UR
Regeneron Study Site
Edgbaston, B15 2SQ
Regeneron Study Site
Glasgow, G20 0SP
Regeneron Study Site
Hardwick, TS19 8PE
Regeneron Study Site
Hexham, NE46 1QJ
Regeneron Study Site
Kenilworth, CV81JD
Regeneron Study Site
London, Greater London, WC1X8QD
Regulatory Study Site
London, DA146LT
Regeneron Study Site
London, RG401XS
Regeneron Study Site
London, RM13PJ
Regeneron Study Site
Manchester, M15 6SX
Regeneron Study Site
Northwood, HA62RN
Regeneron Study Site
Peterborough, PE73JL
Regeneron Study Site
Reading, RG2 0TG
Regeneron Study Site
Shipley, BD183SL
Regeneron Study Site
Waterloo, L22 0LG
Poland9 sites
Regeneron Study Site
Częstochowa, Silesian Voivodeship, 42-202
Regeneron Study Site
Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship, 80-382
Regeneron Study Site
Gdynia, Pomeranian Voivodeship, 81-537
Regeneron Study Site
Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship, 40-040
Regeneron Study Site
Lodz, 90-127
Regeneron Study Site
Lodz, Łódź Voivodeship, 91-211
Regeneron Study Site
Poznan, Greater Poland Voivodeship, 60-702
Regeneron Study Site
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 01-192
Regeneron Study Site
Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, 50-381
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Effects of Fasinumab on Peripheral Nerve Function in Patients With Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of fasinumab compared to placebo on peripheral nerves in participants with pain due to Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip or knee.
The secondary objectives of the study are to:
- Evaluate the efficacy of fasinumab compared to placebo in participants with pain due to OA of the hip or knee
- Evaluate the safety and tolerability of fasinumab compared to placebo in participants with pain due to OA of the hip or knee
- Characterize the concentrations of fasinumab in serum in participants with pain due to OA of the hip or knee
- Evaluate the immunogenicity of fasinumab in participants with pain due to OA of the hip or knee.
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Hip
- Being tested
- Fasinumab, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Hip
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FasinumabDrug
Also called REGN475
Subcutaneous (SC) every four weeks (Q4W)
PlaceboOther
Subcutaneous (SC) every four weeks (Q4W)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Fasinumab | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Fasinumab |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Peroneal Motor Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 16
Peroneal motor nerve conduction velocity was evaluated by electrical stimulation of the nerve and recorded the compound muscle action potential from surface electrodes overlying a muscle supplied by the nerve. Change from baseline in peroneal motor nerve conduction velocity at Week 16 was reported.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Peroneal Motor Nerve Action Potential Amplitude at Week 16
Peroneal motor nerve action potential amplitude was evaluated at ankle by electrical stimulation of the nerve and recorded the compound muscle action potential from surface electrodes overlying a muscle supplied by the nerve. Change from baseline in peroneal motor nerve action potential amplitude at Week 16 was reported.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Sural Sensory Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 16
Sural sensory nerve conduction velocity was evaluated by electrically stimulating sensory fibers and recorded the nerve action potential at a point further along that nerve. Change from baseline in sural sensory nerve conduction velocity at Week 16 was reported.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Sural Sensory Nerve Action Potential Amplitude at Week 16
Sural sensory nerve action potential amplitude was evaluated by electrically stimulating sensory fibers and recorded the nerve action potential at a point further along that nerve. Change from baseline in sural sensory nerve action potential amplitude at Week 16 was reported.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Ulnar Sensory Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 16
Ulnar sensory nerve conduction velocity was evaluated by electrically stimulating sensory fibers and recorded the nerve action potential at a point further along that nerve. Change from baseline in ulnar sensory nerve conduction velocity at Week 16 was reported.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Ulnar Sensory Nerve Action Potential Amplitude at Week 16
Ulnar sensory nerve action potential amplitude was evaluated by electrically stimulating sensory fibers and recorded the nerve action potential at a point further along that nerve. Change from baseline ulnar sensory nerve action potential amplitude at Week 16 was reported.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Secondary outcomes (11)
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16
WOMAC pain subscale was a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint (knee or hip) in past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (higher pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher pain. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Change from baseline in WOMAC Pain subscale score at Week 16 was reported.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 16
Physical function referred to subject's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale was a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score is 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate worse function. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Change from baseline in WOMAC physical function subscale score at Week 16 was reported.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. TEAE was defined as an AE with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious TEAEs. Number of participants with TEAEs were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Events
AA was a composite term that encompasses the following conditions: Rapidly progressive Osteoarthritis (OA) type 1 and 2, Subchondral insufficiency fractures, and Primary Osteonecrosis confirmed by an arthropathy adjudication committee. Number of confirmed AA events from baseline up to follow-up (Week 36) were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to follow-up (Week 36)
Number of AA Events Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) Criteria
AAs were evaluated to determine if they met Destructive Arthropathy (DA) criteria. DA is a unique clinical form of rapidly destructive arthropathy over and above that seen in the normal progression of OA. DA criteria can be associated with Rapidly Progressive OA type 2, Subchondral Insufficiency fracture, and Primary Osteonecrosis confirmed by an arthropathy adjudication committee. Number of confirmed AA events meeting DA criteria from baseline up to follow-up (Week 36) were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to follow-up (Week 36)
Number of Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) Dysfunction Events
Potential events of SNS dysfunction were monitored throughout the study through physical examination, AE reporting, assessment of orthostatic hypotension, and the Survey of Autonomic Symptoms. Sympathetic nervous system dysfunction was diagnosed after consultation with an appropriate specialist, such as a neurologist and/or cardiologist. Number of SNS dysfunction events from baseline up to follow-up (Week 36) were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to follow-up (Week 36)
Number of Peripheral Sensory Adverse Events (AEs) That Require a Neurology Consultation
Any peripheral sensory AE (for example [e.g.], paraesthesia and hypoaesthesia) that required a neurology consultation. Number of peripheral sensory adverse events from baseline up to follow-up (Week 36) were reported.
Measured: Baseline up to follow-up (Week 36)
Number of All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery Events
All joint replacement surgery events regardless of cause.
Measured: Baseline up to follow-up (Week 36)
Number of Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery Events Reported at Telephone Survey After Last Dose of Study Drug
An end of study phone contact was conducted approximately 52 weeks following the last dose of study drug (Week 64) to evaluate the number of participants who had undergone or were scheduled for JR surgery.
Measured: Baseline up to EOS (Week 64)
Serum Concentration of Functional Fasinumab
Serum concentrations of functional Fasinumab were reported.
Measured: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 36
Number of Participants With At-least One Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA)
Samples for ADA evaluation were collected at baseline and at subsequent study visits. ADA variables included ADA status (+/-) and titer as follows: Total participants negative in ADA assay at all time points analyzed. Pre-existing immunoreactivity- positive response at baseline with all post-dose results negative/positive response at baseline with all post-dose responses less than 9-fold over baseline titer levels. Treatment emergent - post-dose positive result when baseline results were negative. Persistent - A positive result detected in at least/ more 2 consecutive post baseline samples separated by at least a 16-week post baseline period, with no negative results in-between. Indeterminate - A positive result at the last collection time point analyzed only. Transient - Not persistent or indeterminate regardless of any missing samples. Treatment boosted- positive response in ADA assay post first dose that is greater than/equal 9-fold over baseline level when baseline is positive.
Measured: Baseline up to follow-up period (Week 36)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Oct 2018
- Study start15 Oct 2018
- Primary completion30 Jan 2020
- Study completion7 Jan 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Osteoarthritis, KneeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Regeneron PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trial Management, Study director, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03691974
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R475-OA-1758
- Other IDs
- 2017-004921-33, 2017
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 12 Sep 2018
- Last updated
- 1 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Effects of Fasinumab on Peripheral Nerve Function in Patients With Pain Due to Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03691974
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- R475-OA-1758
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Hip
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Regeneron PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.
- Study start
- 15 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Jan 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 1 Mar 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of fasinumab compared to placebo on peripheral nerves in participants with pain due to Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip or knee.
The secondary objectives of the study are to:
- Evaluate the efficacy of fasinumab compared to placebo in participants with pain due to OA of the hip or knee
- Evaluate the safety and tolerability of fasinumab compared to placebo in participants with pain due to OA of the hip or knee
- Characterize the concentrations of fasinumab in serum in participants with pain due to OA of the hip or knee
- Evaluate the immunogenicity of fasinumab in participants with pain due to OA of the hip or knee.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Fasinumab | Experimental | Drug: Fasinumab |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- A clinical diagnosis of OA of the knee or hip based on the American College of Rheumatology criteria with radiologic evidence of OA (K-L score ≥2 for the index joint) at the screening visit
- Moderate-to-severe pain in the index joint defined as a WOMAC average pain subscale score of ≥4 at both the screening and randomization visits
- Willing to discontinue current pain medications and to adhere to study requirements for rescue treatments
- A history of regular use of analgesic medications for OA pain (defined as an average of 4 days per week over the 4 weeks prior to the screening visit), including oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors, opioids, paracetamol/acetaminophen, or combinations thereof
- Consent to allow all radiographs and medical/surgical/hospitalization records of care received elsewhere prior to and during the study period to be shared with the investigator
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- History or presence at the screening visit of non-OA inflammatory joint disease (eg, rheumatoid arthritis, lupus erythematosus, psoriatic arthritis, pseudo-gout, gout, spondyloarthropathy, polymyalgia rheumatica, joint infections within the past 5 years), Paget's disease of the spine, pelvis or femur, neuropathic disorders, multiple sclerosis, fibromyalgia, tumors or infections of the spinal cord, or renal osteodystrophy
- History or presence on imaging of arthropathy (osteonecrosis, subchondral insufficiency fracture, rapidly progressive OA type 1 or type 2), stress fracture, recent stress fracture, neuropathic joint arthropathy, hip dislocation (prosthetic hip dislocation is eligible), knee dislocation (patella dislocation is eligible), congenital hip dysplasia with degenerative joint disease, extensive subchondral cysts, evidence of bone fragmentation or collapse, or primary metastatic tumor with the exception of chondromas or pathologic fractures during the screening period
- Trauma to the index joint within 3 months prior to the screening visit
- History or presence of signs or symptoms of compression neuropathy, including carpal tunnel syndrome or sciatica
- Participant is not a candidate for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FasinumabAlso: REGN475Subcutaneous (SC) every four weeks (Q4W) | Drug | Fasinumab |
| PlaceboSubcutaneous (SC) every four weeks (Q4W) | Other | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Peroneal Motor Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Peroneal motor nerve conduction velocity was evaluated by electrical stimulation of the nerve and recorded the compound muscle action potential from surface electrodes overlying a muscle supplied by the nerve. Change from baseline in peroneal motor nerve conduction velocity at Week 16 was reported.
Change From Baseline in Peroneal Motor Nerve Action Potential Amplitude at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Peroneal motor nerve action potential amplitude was evaluated at ankle by electrical stimulation of the nerve and recorded the compound muscle action potential from surface electrodes overlying a muscle supplied by the nerve. Change from baseline in peroneal motor nerve action potential amplitude at Week 16 was reported.
Change From Baseline in Sural Sensory Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Sural sensory nerve conduction velocity was evaluated by electrically stimulating sensory fibers and recorded the nerve action potential at a point further along that nerve. Change from baseline in sural sensory nerve conduction velocity at Week 16 was reported.
Change From Baseline in Sural Sensory Nerve Action Potential Amplitude at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Sural sensory nerve action potential amplitude was evaluated by electrically stimulating sensory fibers and recorded the nerve action potential at a point further along that nerve. Change from baseline in sural sensory nerve action potential amplitude at Week 16 was reported.
Change From Baseline in Ulnar Sensory Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Ulnar sensory nerve conduction velocity was evaluated by electrically stimulating sensory fibers and recorded the nerve action potential at a point further along that nerve. Change from baseline in ulnar sensory nerve conduction velocity at Week 16 was reported.
Change From Baseline in Ulnar Sensory Nerve Action Potential Amplitude at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Ulnar sensory nerve action potential amplitude was evaluated by electrically stimulating sensory fibers and recorded the nerve action potential at a point further along that nerve. Change from baseline ulnar sensory nerve action potential amplitude at Week 16 was reported.
11 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Events
Time frame: Baseline up to follow-up (Week 36)
Number of AA Events Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) Criteria
Time frame: Baseline up to follow-up (Week 36)
Number of Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) Dysfunction Events
Time frame: Baseline up to follow-up (Week 36)
Number of Peripheral Sensory Adverse Events (AEs) That Require a Neurology Consultation
Time frame: Baseline up to follow-up (Week 36)
Number of All-Cause Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery Events
Time frame: Baseline up to follow-up (Week 36)
Number of Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery Events Reported at Telephone Survey After Last Dose of Study Drug
Time frame: Baseline up to EOS (Week 64)
Serum Concentration of Functional Fasinumab
Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 36
Number of Participants With At-least One Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA)
Time frame: Baseline up to follow-up period (Week 36)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Mar 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Single vs Triple Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
The Feasibility of a Virtual/Home-based OA Treatment Program in Older Adults With OA and Multimorbidity
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
RecruitingObservational study
Exploring Factors Linked to Worsening Over Time in People With Early-stage Knee Osteoarthritis and Those With Prior Proven Acute Knee Injury.
Knee Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trial Management study director
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
47 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Fasinumab in people with Osteoarthritis, Knee and Osteoarthritis, Hip, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 47 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 47 sites in United States, United Kingdom, Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Mar 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Peroneal Motor Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 16 (time frame: Baseline, Week 16). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Mar 2023.