Obsessive-compulsive Disorders and SymptomsRCT_TOC_16NCT03677947
Inference-Based Cognitive Therapy Versus Exposure and Response Prevention for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
A study testing Exposure and response prevention and Inference-based cognitive therapy in people with Obsessive-compulsive Disorders and Symptoms and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, run by Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en santé Mentale de Montréal at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a highly disabling psychiatric illness, characterized by obsessional thoughts that cause patients to perform time-consuming and distressing compulsive rituals. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Obsessive-compulsive Disorders and Symptoms, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Exposure and response prevention and Inference-based cognitive therapy
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2018to 31 Mar 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- a primary diagnosis of OCD according to Diagnostical and Statistical Manual, version 5 criteria;
- no change in medication during the 12 weeks before treatment for antidepressants (4 weeks for anxiolytics);
- willingness to keep medication stable while participating in the study;
- no evidence of suicidal intent;
- no evidence of current substance abuse;
- no evidence of current or past schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or organic mental disorder;
Show all 10Show fewer
- not undergoing a current psychological treatment;
- willingness to undergo active psychological treatment;
- willingness to undergo randomization into treatment modality;
- fluency in English and French.
Who cannot join
- another primary diagnosis than OCD requiring treatment;
- medication not stabilized for 12 weeks;
- medication will change during the participation;
- suicidal intent.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Centre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal
Montreal East, Quebec, H1N 3V2
About this study
Official title: Inference-Based Cognitive Therapy Versus Exposure and Response Prevention for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: a 16-Session Randomized Controlled Trial
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a highly disabling psychiatric illness, characterized by obsessional thoughts that cause patients to perform time-consuming and distressing compulsive rituals. Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) is a first-line psychological treatment of choice, which requires patients to face their fears by being exposed to feared stimuli. ERP has been shown to reduce symptoms among those who comply with treatment. However, there is still a significant portion of patients that do not improve, especially those who firmly believe their obsessions are realistic and reasonable (i.e. OCD with Overvalued Ideation (OVI)). Also, a signficant proportion of patients refuse the treatment or drop out during treatment due to the distress provoked by ERP. Even among those that do improve, residual symptoms often remain, or symptoms may reappear after treatment. One evidence-based approach to the treatment of OCD, termed inference-based cognitive therapy (IBCT) has been shown to be as effective as ERP with the potential to overcome some of the limitations of ERP. Since IBCT is a cognitive approach, the treatment does not require exposure to feared stimuli and likely more tolerable for patients with OCD. Also, there is evidence that IBCT is more effective than ERP for those with overvalued ideation, since it directly targets the distorted reasoning that is responsible for the intensity and persistence of the obsession. The current study aims to directly compare ERP with this promising evidence-based cognitive therapy, which is expected to be significantly more effective for those with overvalued ideation, as well as significantly more tolerable with lower rates of treatment refusal, drop-out and higher treatment satisfaction. The project is designed to maximize potential beneficial health outcomes and offer a new evidence-based treatment option for the large proportion of patients unable to benefit from ERP.
Read the detailed description
The proposed study is a parallel-group randomized controlled trial developed in accordance with CONSORT quality guidelines.The RCT will compare the outcome of 16 sessions of IBCT compared to 16 sessions of ERP in OCD patients. The principal investigators and independent evaluators will be blind to the random allocation treatment conditions with a randomization ratio of 1:1. Both treatments will be administered by trained therapists on a weekly one-on-one basis over a 16-week period with 6-month follow-up conforming to current thinking on relapse in OCD. Conditions of treatment delivery, duration and monitoring will be equivalent across all groups. Both treatments are manualized and any newly engaged therapists will receive intensive training in one therapy protocol to ensure optimal delivery of each modality.
The objective of the present study is to establish IBCT as a psychological treatment that is as effective as ERP, but significantly more tolerable and generalizable for the high proportion of patients who are unable to benefit from ERP.
The hypotheses are that 1) IBCT is non-inferior to ERP; 2) IBCT is superior to ERP among OCD patients with higher levels of OVI; 3) IBCT has lower rates of treatment refusal and drop-out than ERP; and, 4) IBCT has higher levels of acceptability, tolerability, credibility and satisfaction than ERP.
- Being tested
- Exposure and response prevention, Inference-based cognitive therapy
- Keywords
- overvalued ideation, treatment acceptability, treatment adherence, treatment outcome, treatment resistance, treatment satisfaction, insight, cognitive therapy, inference based cognitive therapy, exposure and response prevention
- Medical subject headings
- Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Treatment Adherence and Compliance
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Exposure and response preventionBehavioural
Also called ERP
ERP is a treatment developed to help people confront their fears based on the rationale that exposure to feared objects, activities, or situations in a safe environment helps reduce fear and decrease avoidance. During the treatment, participants will engage in these exposures to feared stimuli within and between sessions according to hierarchies developed during the initial evaluation sessions, and refrain from engaging in compulsive behaviour until their anxiety subsides (i.e. ritual prevention). Exercises will consist of both exposure in vivo (i.e. exposure in real life situations) and/or imaginal exposure according to recommendations.
Inference-based cognitive therapyOther
Also called IBCT
The treatment primarily targets the dysfunctional reasoning that gives rise to obsessional doubts and overvalued ideas. IBCT does not include exposure in vivo, but instead, aims to bring resolution to the initial obsessional doubt or overvalued idea by showing the participant that the obsession is the result of incorrect reasoning.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Inference-based cognitive therapy | Active comparator | The treatment primarily targets the dysfunctional reasoning and overvalued ideas. IBCT does not include exposure, but aims to bring resolution to the initial obsessional doubt or overvalued idea by showing the participant that the obsession is the result of incorrect reasoning. Receives: Other: Inference-based cognitive therapy |
| Exposure and response prevention | Active comparator | ERP is a treatment developed to help people confront their fears based on the rationale that exposure to feared objects, activities, or situations in a safe environment helps reduce fear and decrease avoidance. During the treatment, patients will engage in these exposures to feared stimuli within and between sessions according to hierarchies developed during the initial evaluation sessions, and refrain from engaging in compulsive behaviour until their anxiety subsides (i.e. ritual prevention). Receives: Behavioral: Exposure and response prevention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
assessment of change in obsessive and compulsive symptoms and severity
The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) is a 10-item scale designed to measure the severity and type of symptoms in people with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) over the past seven days. The symptoms assessed are obsessions and compulsions. This scale is useful in tracking OCD symptoms at intake and during/after treatment.
Total Y-BOCS scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of OCD symptoms. Scores on the obsession and compulsion subscales range from 0 to 20, but only the total Y-BOCS score is interpreted. Total scores can be split into five categories, based on severity of symptoms. People who have a total Y-BOCS score:
Under 7 are likely to be subclinical, 8-15 are likely to have a mild case of OCD, 16-23 are likely to have a moderate case of OCD, 24-31 are likely to have a severe case of OCD, 32-40 are likely to have an extreme case of OCD.
Measured: baseline measure of obsessive and compulsive symptoms of OCD
assessment of change in obsessive and compulsive symptoms and severity
The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) is a 10-item scale designed to measure the severity and type of symptoms in people with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) over the past seven days. The symptoms assessed are obsessions and compulsions. This scale is useful in tracking OCD symptoms at intake and during/after treatment.
Total Y-BOCS scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of OCD symptoms. Scores on the obsession and compulsion subscales range from 0 to 20, but only the total Y-BOCS score is interpreted. Total scores can be split into five categories, based on severity of symptoms. People who have a total Y-BOCS score:
Under 7 are likely to be subclinical, 8-15 are likely to have a mild case of OCD, 16-23 are likely to have a moderate case of OCD, 24-31 are likely to have a severe case of OCD, 32-40 are likely to have an extreme case of OCD.
Measured: up to 8 weeks
assessment of change in obsessive and compulsive symptoms and severity
The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) is a 10-item scale designed to measure the severity and type of symptoms in people with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) over the past seven days. The symptoms assessed are obsessions and compulsions. This scale is useful in tracking OCD symptoms at intake and during/after treatment.
Total Y-BOCS scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of OCD symptoms. Scores on the obsession and compulsion subscales range from 0 to 20, but only the total Y-BOCS score is interpreted. Total scores can be split into five categories, based on severity of symptoms. People who have a total Y-BOCS score:
Under 7 are likely to be subclinical, 8-15 are likely to have a mild case of OCD, 16-23 are likely to have a moderate case of OCD, 24-31 are likely to have a severe case of OCD, 32-40 are likely to have an extreme case of OCD.
Measured: up to 16 weeks
assessment of change in obsessive and compulsive symptoms and severity
The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) is a 10-item scale designed to measure the severity and type of symptoms in people with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) over the past seven days. The symptoms assessed are obsessions and compulsions. This scale is useful in tracking OCD symptoms at intake and during/after treatment.
Total Y-BOCS scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of OCD symptoms. Scores on the obsession and compulsion subscales range from 0 to 20, but only the total Y-BOCS score is interpreted. Total scores can be split into five categories, based on severity of symptoms. People who have a total Y-BOCS score:
Under 7 are likely to be subclinical, 8-15 are likely to have a mild case of OCD, 16-23 are likely to have a moderate case of OCD, 24-31 are likely to have a severe case of OCD, 32-40 are likely to have an extreme case of OCD.
Measured: change from baseline at 6 months
establishing baseline level of overvalued ideation
The Over-Valued Ideas Scale (OVIS) is an 11-item clinician administered scale assess severity of overvalued ideation. These include how strong obsessive belief; how reasonable the belief is; how weak and strong the belief has fluctuated over the past week; how accurate the belief is; the extent to which others share the same beliefs; how the patient attributes similar or differing beliefs in other people; how effective and important the compulsions are; the extent to which their disorder has caused their obsessive belief; and their degree of resistance toward the belief on a 1 to 10 scale. The average of the 11 items provides an estimate of one's degree of OVI, where higher scores represent greater levels of OVI.
Measured: baseline measure
assess change in level of overvalued ideation
The Over-Valued Ideas Scale (OVIS) is an 11-item clinician administered scale assess severity of overvalued ideation. These include how strong obsessive belief; how reasonable the belief is; how weak and strong the belief has fluctuated over the past week; how accurate the belief is; the extent to which others share the same beliefs; how the patient attributes similar or differing beliefs in other people; how effective and important the compulsions are; the extent to which their disorder has caused their obsessive belief; and their degree of resistance toward the belief on a 1 to 10 scale. The average of the 11 items provides an estimate of one's degree of OVI, where higher scores represent greater levels of OVI.
Measured: change from baseline at 8 weeks
assess change in level of overvalued ideation
The Over-Valued Ideas Scale (OVIS) is an 11-item clinician administered scale assess severity of overvalued ideation. These include how strong obsessive belief; how reasonable the belief is; how weak and strong the belief has fluctuated over the past week; how accurate the belief is; the extent to which others share the same beliefs; how the patient attributes similar or differing beliefs in other people; how effective and important the compulsions are; the extent to which their disorder has caused their obsessive belief; and their degree of resistance toward the belief on a 1 to 10 scale. The average of the 11 items provides an estimate of one's degree of OVI, where higher scores represent greater levels of OVI.
Measured: change from baseline at 16 weeks
assess change in level of overvalued ideation
The Over-Valued Ideas Scale (OVIS) is an 11-item clinician administered scale assess severity of overvalued ideation. These include how strong obsessive belief; how reasonable the belief is; how weak and strong the belief has fluctuated over the past week; how accurate the belief is; the extent to which others share the same beliefs; how the patient attributes similar or differing beliefs in other people; how effective and important the compulsions are; the extent to which their disorder has caused their obsessive belief; and their degree of resistance toward the belief on a 1 to 10 scale. The average of the 11 items provides an estimate of one's degree of OVI, where higher scores represent greater levels of OVI.
Measured: change from baseline at 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Sep 2018
- Study start1 Sep 2018
- Primary completion31 Mar 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Mar 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Obsessive-compulsive Disorders and SymptomsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The RCT will compare the outcome of 16 sessions of IBCT compared to 16 sessions of ERP in OCD patients. The evaluators will be blind to the random allocation treatment conditions with a randomization ratio of 1:1. Both treatments will be administered by trained therapists on a weekly one-on-one basis over a 16-week period with 6-month follow-up conforming to current thinking on relapse in OCD. Conditions of treatment delivery, duration and monitoring will be equivalent across all groups. Both treatments are manualized and therapists will receive intensive training in one therapy protocol to ensure optimal delivery of each modality. Due to COVID-19, as of April, 2020, treatment will be delivered to participants by videoconferencing only. To protect the integrity and internal validity of the trial, participants who were recruited before this date and received the majority of treatment sessions in face-to-face physical meetings will be excluded from the principal statistical analyses.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en santé Mentale de Montréal
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- McMaster University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Frederick Aardema, Advanced Bionics
- Investigators
- Frederick Aardema, Ph. D., Principal investigator, Université de Montréal
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03677947
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2018-1463
- Acronym
- RCT_TOC_16
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 20 Apr 2018
- Last updated
- 4 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Inference-Based Cognitive Therapy Versus Exposure and Response Prevention for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: a 16-Session Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03677947
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RCT_TOC_16 / 2018-1463
- Keywords
- overvalued ideation, treatment acceptability, treatment adherence, treatment outcome, treatment resistance, treatment satisfaction, insight, cognitive therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en santé Mentale de MontréalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- McMaster University
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a highly disabling psychiatric illness, characterized by obsessional thoughts that cause patients to perform time-consuming and distressing compulsive rituals. Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) is a first-line psychological treatment of choice, which requires patients to face their fears by being exposed to feared stimuli. ERP has been shown to reduce symptoms among those who comply with treatment. However, there is still a significant portion of patients that do not improve, especially those who firmly believe their obsessions are realistic and reasonable (i.e. OCD with Overvalued Ideation (OVI)). Also, a signficant proportion of patients refuse the treatment or drop out during treatment due to the distress provoked by ERP. Even among those that do improve, residual symptoms often remain, or symptoms may reappear after treatment. One evidence-based approach to the treatment of OCD, termed inference-based cognitive therapy (IBCT) has been shown to be as effective as ERP with the potential to overcome some of the limitations of ERP. Since IBCT is a cognitive approach, the treatment does not require exposure to feared stimuli and likely more tolerable for patients with OCD. Also, there is evidence that IBCT is more effective than ERP for those with overvalued ideation, since it directly targets the distorted reasoning that is responsible for the intensity and persistence of the obsession. The current study aims to directly compare ERP with this promising evidence-based cognitive therapy, which is expected to be significantly more effective for those with overvalued ideation, as well as significantly more tolerable with lower rates of treatment refusal, drop-out and higher treatment satisfaction. The project is designed to maximize potential beneficial health outcomes and offer a new evidence-based treatment option for the large proportion of patients unable to benefit from ERP.
Detailed description
The proposed study is a parallel-group randomized controlled trial developed in accordance with CONSORT quality guidelines.The RCT will compare the outcome of 16 sessions of IBCT compared to 16 sessions of ERP in OCD patients. The principal investigators and independent evaluators will be blind to the random allocation treatment conditions with a randomization ratio of 1:1. Both treatments will be administered by trained therapists on a weekly one-on-one basis over a 16-week period with 6-month follow-up conforming to current thinking on relapse in OCD. Conditions of treatment delivery, duration and monitoring will be equivalent across all groups. Both treatments are manualized and any newly engaged therapists will receive intensive training in one therapy protocol to ensure optimal delivery of each modality.
The objective of the present study is to establish IBCT as a psychological treatment that is as effective as ERP, but significantly more tolerable and generalizable for the high proportion of patients who are unable to benefit from ERP.
The hypotheses are that 1) IBCT is non-inferior to ERP; 2) IBCT is superior to ERP among OCD patients with higher levels of OVI; 3) IBCT has lower rates of treatment refusal and drop-out than ERP; and, 4) IBCT has higher levels of acceptability, tolerability, credibility and satisfaction than ERP.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The RCT will compare the outcome of 16 sessions of IBCT compared to 16 sessions of ERP in OCD patients. The evaluators will be blind to the random allocation treatment conditions with a randomization ratio of 1:1. Both treatments will be administered by trained therapists on a weekly one-on-one basis over a 16-week period with 6-month follow-up conforming to current thinking on relapse in OCD. Conditions of treatment delivery, duration and monitoring will be equivalent across all groups. Both treatments are manualized and therapists will receive intensive training in one therapy protocol to ensure optimal delivery of each modality. Due to COVID-19, as of April, 2020, treatment will be delivered to participants by videoconferencing only. To protect the integrity and internal validity of the trial, participants who were recruited before this date and received the majority of treatment sessions in face-to-face physical meetings will be excluded from the principal statistical analyses.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Inference-based cognitive therapy | Active comparator | Other: Inference-based cognitive therapyThe treatment primarily targets the dysfunctional reasoning and overvalued ideas. IBCT does not include exposure, but aims to bring resolution to the initial obsessional doubt or overvalued idea by showing the participant that the obsession is the result of incorrect reasoning. |
| Exposure and response prevention | Active comparator | Behavioral: Exposure and response preventionERP is a treatment developed to help people confront their fears based on the rationale that exposure to feared objects, activities, or situations in a safe environment helps reduce fear and decrease avoidance. During the treatment, patients will engage in these exposures to feared stimuli within and between sessions according to hierarchies developed during the initial evaluation sessions, and refrain from engaging in compulsive behaviour until their anxiety subsides (i.e. ritual prevention). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- a primary diagnosis of OCD according to Diagnostical and Statistical Manual, version 5 criteria;
- no change in medication during the 12 weeks before treatment for antidepressants (4 weeks for anxiolytics);
- willingness to keep medication stable while participating in the study;
- no evidence of suicidal intent;
- no evidence of current substance abuse;
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- another primary diagnosis than OCD requiring treatment;
- medication not stabilized for 12 weeks;
- medication will change during the participation;
- suicidal intent.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Exposure and response preventionAlso: ERPERP is a treatment developed to help people confront their fears based on the rationale that exposure to feared objects, activities, or situations in a safe environment helps reduce fear and decrease avoidance. During the treatment, participants will engage in these exposures to feared stimuli within and between sessions according to hierarchies developed during the initial evaluation sessions, and refrain from engaging in compulsive behaviour until their anxiety subsides (i.e. ritual prevention). Exercises will consist of both exposure in vivo (i.e. exposure in real life situations) and/or imaginal exposure according to recommendations. | Behavioural | Exposure and response prevention |
| Inference-based cognitive therapyAlso: IBCTThe treatment primarily targets the dysfunctional reasoning that gives rise to obsessional doubts and overvalued ideas. IBCT does not include exposure in vivo, but instead, aims to bring resolution to the initial obsessional doubt or overvalued idea by showing the participant that the obsession is the result of incorrect reasoning. | Other | Inference-based cognitive therapy |
Primary outcome
assessment of change in obsessive and compulsive symptoms and severity
Time frame: baseline measure of obsessive and compulsive symptoms of OCD
The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) is a 10-item scale designed to measure the severity and type of symptoms in people with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) over the past seven days. The symptoms assessed are obsessions and compulsions. This scale is useful in tracking OCD symptoms at intake and during/after treatment. Total Y-BOCS scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of OCD symptoms. Scores on the obsession and compulsion subscales range from 0 to 20, but only the total Y-BOCS score is interpreted. Total scores can be split into five categories, based on severity of symptoms. People who have a total Y-BOCS score: Under 7 are likely to be subclinical, 8-15 are likely to have a mild case of OCD, 16-23 are likely to have a moderate case of OCD, 24-31 are likely to have a severe case of OCD, 32-40 are likely to have an extreme case of OCD.
assessment of change in obsessive and compulsive symptoms and severity
Time frame: up to 8 weeks
The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) is a 10-item scale designed to measure the severity and type of symptoms in people with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) over the past seven days. The symptoms assessed are obsessions and compulsions. This scale is useful in tracking OCD symptoms at intake and during/after treatment. Total Y-BOCS scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of OCD symptoms. Scores on the obsession and compulsion subscales range from 0 to 20, but only the total Y-BOCS score is interpreted. Total scores can be split into five categories, based on severity of symptoms. People who have a total Y-BOCS score: Under 7 are likely to be subclinical, 8-15 are likely to have a mild case of OCD, 16-23 are likely to have a moderate case of OCD, 24-31 are likely to have a severe case of OCD, 32-40 are likely to have an extreme case of OCD.
assessment of change in obsessive and compulsive symptoms and severity
Time frame: up to 16 weeks
The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) is a 10-item scale designed to measure the severity and type of symptoms in people with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) over the past seven days. The symptoms assessed are obsessions and compulsions. This scale is useful in tracking OCD symptoms at intake and during/after treatment. Total Y-BOCS scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of OCD symptoms. Scores on the obsession and compulsion subscales range from 0 to 20, but only the total Y-BOCS score is interpreted. Total scores can be split into five categories, based on severity of symptoms. People who have a total Y-BOCS score: Under 7 are likely to be subclinical, 8-15 are likely to have a mild case of OCD, 16-23 are likely to have a moderate case of OCD, 24-31 are likely to have a severe case of OCD, 32-40 are likely to have an extreme case of OCD.
assessment of change in obsessive and compulsive symptoms and severity
Time frame: change from baseline at 6 months
The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) is a 10-item scale designed to measure the severity and type of symptoms in people with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) over the past seven days. The symptoms assessed are obsessions and compulsions. This scale is useful in tracking OCD symptoms at intake and during/after treatment. Total Y-BOCS scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity of OCD symptoms. Scores on the obsession and compulsion subscales range from 0 to 20, but only the total Y-BOCS score is interpreted. Total scores can be split into five categories, based on severity of symptoms. People who have a total Y-BOCS score: Under 7 are likely to be subclinical, 8-15 are likely to have a mild case of OCD, 16-23 are likely to have a moderate case of OCD, 24-31 are likely to have a severe case of OCD, 32-40 are likely to have an extreme case of OCD.
establishing baseline level of overvalued ideation
Time frame: baseline measure
The Over-Valued Ideas Scale (OVIS) is an 11-item clinician administered scale assess severity of overvalued ideation. These include how strong obsessive belief; how reasonable the belief is; how weak and strong the belief has fluctuated over the past week; how accurate the belief is; the extent to which others share the same beliefs; how the patient attributes similar or differing beliefs in other people; how effective and important the compulsions are; the extent to which their disorder has caused their obsessive belief; and their degree of resistance toward the belief on a 1 to 10 scale. The average of the 11 items provides an estimate of one's degree of OVI, where higher scores represent greater levels of OVI.
assess change in level of overvalued ideation
Time frame: change from baseline at 8 weeks
The Over-Valued Ideas Scale (OVIS) is an 11-item clinician administered scale assess severity of overvalued ideation. These include how strong obsessive belief; how reasonable the belief is; how weak and strong the belief has fluctuated over the past week; how accurate the belief is; the extent to which others share the same beliefs; how the patient attributes similar or differing beliefs in other people; how effective and important the compulsions are; the extent to which their disorder has caused their obsessive belief; and their degree of resistance toward the belief on a 1 to 10 scale. The average of the 11 items provides an estimate of one's degree of OVI, where higher scores represent greater levels of OVI.
assess change in level of overvalued ideation
Time frame: change from baseline at 16 weeks
The Over-Valued Ideas Scale (OVIS) is an 11-item clinician administered scale assess severity of overvalued ideation. These include how strong obsessive belief; how reasonable the belief is; how weak and strong the belief has fluctuated over the past week; how accurate the belief is; the extent to which others share the same beliefs; how the patient attributes similar or differing beliefs in other people; how effective and important the compulsions are; the extent to which their disorder has caused their obsessive belief; and their degree of resistance toward the belief on a 1 to 10 scale. The average of the 11 items provides an estimate of one's degree of OVI, where higher scores represent greater levels of OVI.
assess change in level of overvalued ideation
Time frame: change from baseline at 6 months
The Over-Valued Ideas Scale (OVIS) is an 11-item clinician administered scale assess severity of overvalued ideation. These include how strong obsessive belief; how reasonable the belief is; how weak and strong the belief has fluctuated over the past week; how accurate the belief is; the extent to which others share the same beliefs; how the patient attributes similar or differing beliefs in other people; how effective and important the compulsions are; the extent to which their disorder has caused their obsessive belief; and their degree of resistance toward the belief on a 1 to 10 scale. The average of the 11 items provides an estimate of one's degree of OVI, where higher scores represent greater levels of OVI.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Oct 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Obsessive-compulsive Disorders and Symptoms
Recruiting
Mindfulness Intervention for Psychological and Family Dynamics in Children With Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviors
Mindfulness Skills, Psychosocial Education
Not yet recruiting
tDCS and Symptom Provocation in Treatment-Resistant OCD
Obsessive - Compulsive Disorder
Recruiting
Gamified Combined Cognitive Bias Modification in Adults Diagnosed With OCD: Randomized Controlled Trial
Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD)
Recruiting
Aerobic Exercise and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Symptoms
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD)
Recruiting
Treatment Resistance in Psychiatric Disorders: the Search for Biological Markers Predictive of Response to Treatment
Schizophrenia, Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Frederick Aardema, Ph. D. principal investigator
Université de Montréal
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Exposure and response prevention and Inference-based cognitive therapy in people with Obsessive-compulsive Disorders and Symptoms and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, run by Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en santé Mentale de Montréal at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
assessment of change in obsessive and compulsive symptoms and severity (time frame: baseline measure of obsessive and compulsive symptoms of OCD). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Oct 2024.