AzTrials
AzTrials

CholedocholithiasisNCT03658863

"Endoscopy First" or "Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy First" for Patients With Intermediate Risk of Choledocholithiasis

A study testing endoscopic ultrasound, intraoperative cholangiography and ERCP in people with Choledocholithiasis, run by Vilnius University at 1 site in Lithuania.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study compares two different methods to evaluate extrahepatic bile ducts for possible stones for patients with cholecystolithiasis and intermediate risk for choledocholithiasis when laparoscopic cholecystectomy is indicated. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Choledocholithiasis
What is being tested?
endoscopic ultrasound, intraoperative cholangiography and ERCP
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
106 participants
Where
1 siteLithuania
Study dates
15 Dec 2017to 15 Dec 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • patients with cholecystolithiasis when laparoscopic cholecystectomy is indicated
  • intermediate risk for choledocholithiasis (VUHI 2,6 - 6,9 and one of the predictors: dilated common bile duct, elevated total bilirubin or suspected stone in CBD on ultrasound)

Who cannot join

  • pregnancy;
  • acute cholangitis;
  • biliary pancreatitis;
  • acute cholecystitis, degree II-III by Tokyo guidelines 2013;
  • anastomosis in upper gastrointestinal tract;
  • other known cholestatic hepatopancreatobiliary disease;
Show all 11Show fewer
  • known or suspected hepatitis of another origin (viral, toxic, etc.);
  • contraindications for general anaesthesia or surgery;
  • IV-VI class of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification;
  • morbid obesity (body mass index > 40);
  • patient's refusal to participate in the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Lithuania1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos

    Vilnius

    Gintaras Simutis, MD, PhD, +370 5 236 5255, gintaras.simutis@santa.lt

    Ausra Aleknaite, MD, +370 618 18076, ausra.aleknaite@santa.lt

    Recruiting

Other trials in Lithuania

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Two Management Strategies, "Endoscopy First" and "Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy First", for Patients With Gallbladder Stones and Intermediate Risk for Choledocholithiasis

The study compares two different methods to evaluate extrahepatic bile ducts for possible stones for patients with cholecystolithiasis and intermediate risk for choledocholithiasis when laparoscopic cholecystectomy is indicated.

Endosonoscopic evaluation of bile ducts and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP) on demand are performed before laparoscopic cholecystectomy for one arm. Intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and postoperative ERCP on demand are administered in another arm.

Read the detailed description

Use of ERCP as a diagnostic tool should be minimized as it carries considerable risk (5 to 10%) of post-procedural complications. It is noticed that adverse events occur more often to patients with low risk of choledocholithiasis. Therefore the best possible patient selection for ERCP procedure is needed.

At the Centre of Abdominal Surgery of Vilnius University Hospital Santaros klinikos an original prognostic index (Vilnius University Hospital index (VUHI)) is used for evaluation of risk of choledocholithiasis. It is calculated by formula VUHI = A/30 + 0.4×B, where A - total bilirubin concentration (µmol/l), B - common bile duct (CBD) diameter measured by ultrasound exam. A retrospective study evaluated its accuracy and determined threshold values for low, intermediate and high risk groups. The intermediate risk group (risk for choledocholithiasis 25-75%) would benefit from additional examination before ERCP. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and intraoperative cholangiography are less invasive procedures with high accuracy identifying common bile duct stones. Main hypothesis of the trial is that intraoperative cholangiography with ERCP on demand can shorten the duration and costs of treatment and avoid diagnostic ERCPs.

Being tested
endoscopic ultrasound, intraoperative cholangiography, ERCP, Ultrasound endoscope
Keywords
choledocholithiasis, endoscopic ultrasound, ERCP, intraoperative cholangiography, common bile duct stone, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, gallstone disease, cholelithiasis, bile duct obstruction, laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Medical subject headings
Choledocholithiasis, Gallstones, Cholelithiasis, Cholestasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • endoscopic ultrasoundProcedure or surgery

    Evaluation of bile ducts with endoscope with special ultrasonographic function

  • intraoperative cholangiographyProcedure or surgery

    evaluation of bile ducts by injecting radiocontrast media to cystic duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

  • ERCPProcedure or surgery

    Also called endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

    evaluation of bile ducts by injecting radiocontrast media to common bile duct via endoscope inserted to duodenum

  • Ultrasound endoscopeDevice

    Also called Endosonoscope

    Endoscope with built-in ultrasound function

Study groups in NCT03658863
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Endoscopy firstActive comparatorEndoscopic ultrasound is used to evaluate bile ducts. If stones in extrahepatic bile ducts are seen ERCP and stone evacuation is performed during the same anaesthesia. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is performed after endoscopic procedures in two days.
Receives: Procedure: endoscopic ultrasound; Procedure: ERCP; Device: Ultrasound endoscope
Cholecystectomy firstActive comparatorLaparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography is performed. If stones are found postoperative ERCP with stone evacuation is applied (during cholecystectomy if common bile duct is completely blocked or as soon as possible).
Receives: Procedure: intraoperative cholangiography; Procedure: ERCP

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Duration of treatment

    duration from admission to hospital or decision to perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy to discharge in days

    Measured: up to one month

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Accuracy of different management strategies

    Proportion of correctly diagnosed (true positive and true negative) cases in all sample

    Measured: 6 to 7 months

  2. Technical success of interventions (IOC, EUS, ERCP)

    For intraoperative cholangiography: successful cannulation and contrast media injection into CBD.

    For endoscopic sonoscopy: successful visualisation of CBD.

    For ERCP: successful cannulation and contrast media injection into CBD.

    Measured: up to one month

  3. Adverse events of interventions

    Bleeding, acute pancreatitis, perforation, allergic reactions

    Measured: up to one month

  4. Costs of treatment

    charges of diagnostic procedures, invasive procedures, surgery, antibacterial treatment if needed and hospital charges

    Measured: up to one month

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Sep 2018
  2. Study start15 Dec 2017
  3. Primary completion15 Dec 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion15 Dec 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
106 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03658863
Sponsor's protocol ID
TLA02
Status last verified
Oct 2019
First submitted
13 Aug 2018
Last updated
7 Oct 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Aleknaite A, Simutis G, Stanaitis J, Jucaitis T, Drungilas M, Valantinas J, Strupas K. Comparison of Endoscopy First and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy First Strategies for Patients With Gallstone Disease and Intermediate Risk of Choledocholithiasis: Protocol for a Clinical Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Feb 4;10(2):e18837. doi: 10.2196/18837.

    PubMed 33538700

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing endoscopic ultrasound, intraoperative cholangiography and ERCP in people with Choledocholithiasis, run by Vilnius University at 1 site in Lithuania.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Lithuania. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Duration of treatment (time frame: up to one month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03658863, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2019.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT03658863 | AzTrials