HysterectomyPhase 4NCT03657407
B&O for TLH Post-operative Pain and Nausea
A Phase 4 study testing Belladonna Opium and Glycerin Suppository in people with Hysterectomy and Pain, Postoperative, run by Anna Reinert at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
A prospective, single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to assess the impact of immediate post-operative placement of a Belladonna and Opium (B\&O) rectal suppository on postoperative pain and nausea following laparoscopic and robot-assisted hysterectomy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Hysterectomy, Pain, Postoperative
- What is being tested?
- Belladonna Opium and Glycerin Suppository
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 56 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2016to 31 May 2017
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- between ages 18 and 75,
- undergoing level I total laparoscopic or robot-assisted hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, cystoscopy, lysis of adhesions, or surgical treatment of endometriosis
Who cannot join
- contraindications to the use of B\&O (i.e. glaucoma, severe hepatic or renal disease, bronchial asthma, history of narcotic idiosyncracies, respiratory depression, convulsive disorders, acute alcoholism or delirium tremens, or regular use of an anticholinergic medication (twice per week or more frequently)
- additional surgical procedures being performed
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Belladonna and Opium Rectal Suppository Effect on Postoperative Pain and Nausea Following Total Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy
A prospective, single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to assess the impact of immediate post-operative placement of a Belladonna and Opium (B\&O) rectal suppository on postoperative pain and nausea following laparoscopic and robot-assisted hysterectomy.
Read the detailed description
This study is a single-center, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial to assess the impact of immediate postoperative Belladonna and Opium rectal suppository use on postoperative pain and nausea following total laparoscopic and robot-assisted hysterectomy. Study took place at Mercy Medical Center, involving both outpatient and inpatient surgical settings. The duration of the trial was 12 months, with 56 patients enrolled during this time period. Patients eligible for trial participation were women between ages 18 and 75 undergoing level I total laparoscopic or robot-assisted hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, with or without cystoscopy performed post-procedure, with or without lysis of adhesions, and with or without surgical treatment of endometriosis, with no additional surgical procedures being performed (i.e. no lymph node dissection or urogynecologic suspension or sling procedures). Patients were excluded from the study if they had contraindications to the use of B\&O suppositories: these contraindications are glaucoma, severe hepatic or renal disease, bronchial asthma, history of narcotic idiosyncracies, respiratory depression, convulsive disorders, acute alcoholism or delirium tremens, or regular use of an anticholinergic medication (twice per week or more frequently). Patients were withdrawn from the study if the original planned surgery was not performed. If the original planned surgery was not performed, a suppository was not placed following surgery. There were no financial incentives offered for trial participation.
Only the patients of clinical investigators from this trial were considered for participation in this study. Clinical investigators posting patients for total laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy at Mercy Medical Center informed patients of the presence of the clinical trial at the time of surgical posting, using an IRB-approved script. The chart number of patients posted for total laparoscopic or robot-assisted hysterectomy was be forwarded to the co-investigator by the clinic surgical coordinator at the time of surgical posting. The co-investigator reviewed each chart and conducted a telephone interview with each patient prior to surgery to verify trial eligibility and to answer any questions about the trial. Patients were made aware that study participation is voluntary, and that if they chose to not participate, they would receive standard postoperative pain and nausea pharmacologic management. On the day of surgery, a member of the research team met with the patient pre-operatively in a private pre-operative holding area to review and sign a written consent for participation in the trial. This member of the research team was familiar with the study protocol and risks of the pharmacologic intervention under investigation. These steps allowed patients to be fully informed, and ensured patient safety and support during the short interval of the study.
On the day of surgery, patients were randomized to either B\&O rectal suppository or to a placebo of glycerin rectal suppository. This study employed a glycerin rectal suppository as a placebo because this over-the-counter medication has limited effects, similar to those of a Belladonna \& Opium Supprette, and is similar in size, physical appearance and mechanical properties to a Belladonna \& Opium Supprette. A placebo-free comparison group was not used, as this would have changed the study design from a double-blind clinical trial to a single-blind clinical trial, with greater potential for investigator bias to influence study results. Additionally, it is not thought that results for a placebo-free comparison group would substantially differ from those of a glycerin suppository placebo group, and would require a larger study population and greater study resources to achieve findings of similar significance and power. Randomization was performed by a biostatistician, with a sealed envelope created for each patient containing information regarding randomization to either placebo or intervention group. In the operating room, this envelope was opened, and the circulating nurse would draw the indicated medication from the Pyxis system. Drug dictionary entries were created within the Pyxis system by the Mercy Medical Center Department of Pharmacy, so that the Belladonna \& Opium Supprette #16A (16.2mg / 60mg), and the glycerin suppository were represented as "Protocol Drug A" and "Protocol Drug B". The patient's electronic medical record reflected that "Protocol Drug A" or "Protocol Drug B" was received by the patient, so that the nurses and physicians caring for the patient postoperatively were blinded as to which suppository the patient received.
A suppository was placed rectally by a member of the surgical team at the conclusion of surgery, prior to departure from the OR and awakening from anesthesia. Post-operative placement was selected to minimize interaction with intraoperative anesthetic and analgesic medications, to maximize peak plasma concentrations and therapeutic efficacy of Belladonna alkaloids and Opium within the immediate postoperative period, and control for variation in procedure length between study participants. The nurses caring for the patient postoperatively were blinded to which suppository the patient did receive, but were made aware that the patient had received a suppository containing either glycerin or one containing belladonna 16.2mg and opium 60mg, equivalent to approximately 6mg of morphine. The nurses were be educated about potential side effects of Belladonna \& Opium suppositories, and of potential drug interactions; they were asked to document and to inform the covering provider of the occurrence of any such adverse effects. Patients remaining in the hospital overnight following their surgery underwent a postoperative exam by a resident physician familiar with the study protocol and familiar with potential side effects of the B\&O suppository. Standard of care at Mercy Medical Center is for nurses to assess patient's postoperative pain by visual analog scale at regular time intervals. Data regarding patients' visual analog pain scores for the first 12 hours following surgery were extracted from the electronic medical record and analyzed by the research team. PO and IV narcotic use in IV morphine equivalents, PO and IV NSAIDs, and PO and IV antiemetic use were also assessed over the first 12 following surgery, this data was extracted from the electronic medical record and analyzed by the research team. Study surveillance did not extend beyond the duration of the participant's postoperative hospitalization, usually less than 24 hours.
- Conditions
- Hysterectomy, Pain, Postoperative
- Being tested
- Belladonna Opium, Glycerin Suppository
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Postoperative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Belladonna OpiumDrug
Belladonna Opium 16.2-60mg rectal suppository
Glycerin SuppositoryDrug
Glycerine rectal suppository
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| B&O | Active comparator | 29 women randomized to Belladonna \& Opium suppository Receives: Drug: Belladonna Opium |
| Placebo | Sham comparator | 27 women randomized to Glycerin suppository Receives: Drug: Glycerin Suppository |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Post-operative Pain: VAS
Visual analog pain scale (VAS) (0 to 10, 0 = no pain, 10 = maximum pain), averaged over duration of PACU stay until discharge criteria met
Measured: up to 4 hours
Secondary outcomes (3)
Narcotic Use
Cumulative oral and intravenous narcotics received in PACU until PACU discharge criteria met
Measured: up to 4 hours
Time Until Cleared for PACU Discharge
Time elapsed from conclusion of surgery until criteria for PACU discharge met
Measured: up to 4 hours
Number of Participants for Which Anti-emetics Were Received in PACU
Binary assessment of whether anti-emetics received in PACU
Measured: up to 4 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Sep 2018
- Study start1 Jun 2016
- Primary completion31 May 2017
- Study completion31 May 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for HysterectomyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomization to one-time intervention A (medicated suppository) or intervention B (placebo), allocation was sealed in consecutively numbered opaque envelopes generated by biostatistician using blocked randomized technique.
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Anna Reinert
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Maryland
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Anna Reinert, Mercy Medical Center
- Investigators
- Kevin Audlin, MD, Principal investigator, Surgeon
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03657407
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MMC 2015-63
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 27 Aug 2018
- Last updated
- 2 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Belladonna and Opium Rectal Suppository Effect on Postoperative Pain and Nausea Following Total Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03657407
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MMC 2015-63
- Conditions
- Hysterectomy, Pain, Postoperative
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Anna ReinertUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Maryland
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 2 Apr 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A prospective, single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to assess the impact of immediate post-operative placement of a Belladonna and Opium (B\&O) rectal suppository on postoperative pain and nausea following laparoscopic and robot-assisted hysterectomy.
Detailed description
This study is a single-center, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial to assess the impact of immediate postoperative Belladonna and Opium rectal suppository use on postoperative pain and nausea following total laparoscopic and robot-assisted hysterectomy. Study took place at Mercy Medical Center, involving both outpatient and inpatient surgical settings. The duration of the trial was 12 months, with 56 patients enrolled during this time period. Patients eligible for trial participation were women between ages 18 and 75 undergoing level I total laparoscopic or robot-assisted hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, with or without cystoscopy performed post-procedure, with or without lysis of adhesions, and with or without surgical treatment of endometriosis, with no additional surgical procedures being performed (i.e. no lymph node dissection or urogynecologic suspension or sling procedures). Patients were excluded from the study if they had contraindications to the use of B\&O suppositories: these contraindications are glaucoma, severe hepatic or renal disease, bronchial asthma, history of narcotic idiosyncracies, respiratory depression, convulsive disorders, acute alcoholism or delirium tremens, or regular use of an anticholinergic medication (twice per week or more frequently). Patients were withdrawn from the study if the original planned surgery was not performed. If the original planned surgery was not performed, a suppository was not placed following surgery. There were no financial incentives offered for trial participation.
Only the patients of clinical investigators from this trial were considered for participation in this study. Clinical investigators posting patients for total laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy at Mercy Medical Center informed patients of the presence of the clinical trial at the time of surgical posting, using an IRB-approved script. The chart number of patients posted for total laparoscopic or robot-assisted hysterectomy was be forwarded to the co-investigator by the clinic surgical coordinator at the time of surgical posting. The co-investigator reviewed each chart and conducted a telephone interview with each patient prior to surgery to verify trial eligibility and to answer any questions about the trial. Patients were made aware that study participation is voluntary, and that if they chose to not participate, they would receive standard postoperative pain and nausea pharmacologic management. On the day of surgery, a member of the research team met with the patient pre-operatively in a private pre-operative holding area to review and sign a written consent for participation in the trial. This member of the research team was familiar with the study protocol and risks of the pharmacologic intervention under investigation. These steps allowed patients to be fully informed, and ensured patient safety and support during the short interval of the study.
On the day of surgery, patients were randomized to either B\&O rectal suppository or to a placebo of glycerin rectal suppository. This study employed a glycerin rectal suppository as a placebo because this over-the-counter medication has limited effects, similar to those of a Belladonna \& Opium Supprette, and is similar in size, physical appearance and mechanical properties to a Belladonna \& Opium Supprette. A placebo-free comparison group was not used, as this would have changed the study design from a double-blind clinical trial to a single-blind clinical trial, with greater potential for investigator bias to influence study results. Additionally, it is not thought that results for a placebo-free comparison group would substantially differ from those of a glycerin suppository placebo group, and would require a larger study population and greater study resources to achieve findings of similar significance and power. Randomization was performed by a biostatistician, with a sealed envelope created for each patient containing information regarding randomization to either placebo or intervention group. In the operating room, this envelope was opened, and the circulating nurse would draw the indicated medication from the Pyxis system. Drug dictionary entries were created within the Pyxis system by the Mercy Medical Center Department of Pharmacy, so that the Belladonna \& Opium Supprette #16A (16.2mg / 60mg), and the glycerin suppository were represented as "Protocol Drug A" and "Protocol Drug B". The patient's electronic medical record reflected that "Protocol Drug A" or "Protocol Drug B" was received by the patient, so that the nurses and physicians caring for the patient postoperatively were blinded as to which suppository the patient received.
A suppository was placed rectally by a member of the surgical team at the conclusion of surgery, prior to departure from the OR and awakening from anesthesia. Post-operative placement was selected to minimize interaction with intraoperative anesthetic and analgesic medications, to maximize peak plasma concentrations and therapeutic efficacy of Belladonna alkaloids and Opium within the immediate postoperative period, and control for variation in procedure length between study participants. The nurses caring for the patient postoperatively were blinded to which suppository the patient did receive, but were made aware that the patient had received a suppository containing either glycerin or one containing belladonna 16.2mg and opium 60mg, equivalent to approximately 6mg of morphine. The nurses were be educated about potential side effects of Belladonna \& Opium suppositories, and of potential drug interactions; they were asked to document and to inform the covering provider of the occurrence of any such adverse effects. Patients remaining in the hospital overnight following their surgery underwent a postoperative exam by a resident physician familiar with the study protocol and familiar with potential side effects of the B\&O suppository. Standard of care at Mercy Medical Center is for nurses to assess patient's postoperative pain by visual analog scale at regular time intervals. Data regarding patients' visual analog pain scores for the first 12 hours following surgery were extracted from the electronic medical record and analyzed by the research team. PO and IV narcotic use in IV morphine equivalents, PO and IV NSAIDs, and PO and IV antiemetic use were also assessed over the first 12 following surgery, this data was extracted from the electronic medical record and analyzed by the research team. Study surveillance did not extend beyond the duration of the participant's postoperative hospitalization, usually less than 24 hours.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomization to one-time intervention A (medicated suppository) or intervention B (placebo), allocation was sealed in consecutively numbered opaque envelopes generated by biostatistician using blocked randomized technique.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| B&O | Active comparator | Drug: Belladonna Opium29 women randomized to Belladonna \& Opium suppository |
| Placebo | Sham comparator | Drug: Glycerin Suppository27 women randomized to Glycerin suppository |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- between ages 18 and 75,
- undergoing level I total laparoscopic or robot-assisted hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, cystoscopy, lysis of adhesions, or surgical treatment of endometriosis
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- contraindications to the use of B\&O (i.e. glaucoma, severe hepatic or renal disease, bronchial asthma, history of narcotic idiosyncracies, respiratory depression, convulsive disorders, acute alcoholism or delirium tremens, or regular use of an anticholinergic medication (twice per week or more frequently)
- additional surgical procedures being performed
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Belladonna OpiumBelladonna Opium 16.2-60mg rectal suppository | Drug | B&O |
| Glycerin SuppositoryGlycerine rectal suppository | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Post-operative Pain: VAS
Time frame: up to 4 hours
Visual analog pain scale (VAS) (0 to 10, 0 = no pain, 10 = maximum pain), averaged over duration of PACU stay until discharge criteria met
3 secondary outcomes
Narcotic Use
Time frame: up to 4 hours
Time Until Cleared for PACU Discharge
Time frame: up to 4 hours
Number of Participants for Which Anti-emetics Were Received in PACU
Time frame: up to 4 hours
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Apr 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hysterectomy
Recruiting
Implementation of a Pain Management Plan in Major Open Abdominal Surgeries.
Abdomen Cancer, Pancreas Adenocarcinoma (MSI-H)
Not yet recruiting
COMPARISON OF THE POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIC EFFECTS OF ULTRASOUND-GUIDED QUADRO-ILIAC PLANE AND TRANSVERSUS ABDOMINIS PLANE BLOCKS IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING TOTAL LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY
Postoperative Pain Following Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Intravenous Ibuprofen Postoperative Analgesia After Abdominal Hysterectomy
Post Operative Analgesia
RecruitingObservational study
Predictors of Success and Failure of v-NOTES Hysterectomy for Large and Very Large Uteri
Uterine Fibroids, Hysterectomy
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Assessment - HominisTM Surgical System
Hysterectomy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kevin Audlin, MD principal investigator
Surgeon
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Belladonna Opium and Glycerin Suppository in people with Hysterectomy and Pain, Postoperative, run by Anna Reinert at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Apr 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Post-operative Pain: VAS (time frame: up to 4 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2019.