AzTrials
AzTrials

Leishmaniasis, VisceralVL-DX-EAFRNCT03646981

Evaluation of Antibody Detection Tests for Visceral Leishmaniasis Diagnosis in Eastern Africa

An observational study of Leishmaniasis, Visceral, run by Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Switzerland at 2 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

According to recent estimates by the World Health Organization (WHO) on eastern Africa, not all visceral leishmaniasis (VL) cases reported are confirmed by a laboratory test, probably due to limited access to accurate diagnostic tests and poor reporting. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Leishmaniasis, Visceral
What is being tested?
Leishmania Ab Rapid Test (CTK, Biotech)
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
704 participants
Where
2 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
1 Sep 2019to 1 Dec 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Any patient reporting to the participating VL treatment centres in Ethiopia, Kenya, Sudan and Uganda and suspected with primary VL is eligible for inclusion in the study.

Who may be able to join

  • Patient with clinical signs compatible with VL.
  • Is a first VL episode suspected.
  • Patient ≥ 5 years old (≥ 4 years old in Kenya).
  • Patient from whom written informed consent can be obtained or signed by parent or legal guardian if patient is under 18 years of age. In the case of minors, assent from the children (12-17 years old in Ethiopia, Uganda and Sudan, and 13-17 years old in Kenya) will be obtained, as per country legal requirements.
  • Clinical samples required VL diagnosis (peripheral blood, lymph node or bone marrow or spleen aspirate) can be obtained from the patient and patient shows willingness.

Who cannot join

  • Patient already on treatment for VL.
  • Patient is a suspected VL relapse case.
  • Patient has had previous VL episodes.
  • Patients < 5 years old (< 4 years old in Kenya).
  • Pregnant woman.
  • Patient has post/para-kala-azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL).

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 2 countries.

2 sites in 2 countries

Ethiopia1 site
  • Leishmaniasis Research and Treatment Centre, Gondar University Hospital

    Gonder, PO BOX 196

Other trials in Ethiopia

Kenya1 site
  • Kacheliba District Hospital

    Kacheliba, West Pokot County, P.O Box 50 Kacheliba 30601

Other trials in Kenya

About this study

According to recent estimates by the World Health Organization (WHO) on eastern Africa, not all visceral leishmaniasis (VL) cases reported are confirmed by a laboratory test, probably due to limited access to accurate diagnostic tests and poor reporting. The main approach for VL diagnosis involves antibody detection using the rK39 rapid diagnostic test (RDT) and alternatively the direct agglutination test (DAT) to confirm clinically suspected cases. Suspected cases with negative rK39 RDT and/or DAT results are referred to facilities where examination of tissue aspirate (spleen, bone marrow, lymph node) by microscopy is available. Unfortunately, the diagnostic performance of rK39 in eastern Africa is suboptimal, particularly in settings with a high VL/HIV co-infection rate. A recently developed RDT, based on the recombinant antigen rK28, may overcome this problem, with studies reporting better performance than the rK39. However, data are not definitive, as studies comparing rK28 RDTs with rK39 RDT are limited. Another recently developed RDT detects immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) specific to Leishmania and has shown promising results in the Indian subcontinent. This study aims to undertake a multi-country assessment of the performance of rK28 and IgG1 RDTs, as compared to the currently used rK39 RDT.

Read the detailed description

Primary objective and endpoint: To evaluate the performance of different diagnostic tests in detecting anti-Leishmania antibodies to improve early diagnosis of VL in eastern Africa, in particular Ethiopia, and Kenya. Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of the RDTs for primary VL diagnosis based on estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, as well as the degree of agreement between tests.

Design: Prospective single arm diagnostic accuracy study. Multicountry. With participants being suspected cases of VL

Being tested
Leishmania Ab Rapid Test (CTK, Biotech)
Keywords
visceral leishmaniasis, diagnostics, RDT, Eastern Africa
Medical subject headings
Leishmaniasis, Visceral

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Leishmania Ab Rapid Test (CTK, Biotech)Device

    Also called IT Leish (Bio Rad), IgG1 RDT (Coris BioConcept)

    Rapid diagnostic tests to detect antibodies anti-Leishmania

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. RDT performance

    Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of the RDTs for primary VL diagnosis based on estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, as well as the degree of agreement between tests

    Measured: an average of 1.5 years

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Time to diagnosis

    Time taken to perform each diagnostic test, measured from the time the patient reports at the health facility to the time diagnosis is made is established.

    Measured: an average of 1.5 years

  2. New diagnostic algorithm

    The data generated will be analysed to assess whether the evaluated RDTs can be combined in a new algorithm to improve and accelerate VL diagnosis

    Measured: an average of 1.5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Aug 2018
  2. Study start1 Sep 2019
  3. Primary completion30 Oct 2021
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
704 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03646981
Sponsor's protocol ID
P08002-VL-DX-EAFR
Acronym
VL-DX-EAFR
Status last verified
Jun 2022
First submitted
7 Aug 2018
Last updated
6 Jun 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Data sharing procedures (including data confidentiality) will be carried out in accordance with the regulations defined by IDDO and H2020 Open Research Data Pilot

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Leishmaniasis, Visceral, run by Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Switzerland at 2 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Ethiopia, Kenya. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

RDT performance (time frame: an average of 1.5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in